Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: the Mayo clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical and histopathologic features of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland, specifically, the relation of tumor stage and grade and treatment type with clinical outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical and histopathologic review. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: From 1940 to 1994, 128 patients were treated at our institution for parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Eighty-nine of these patients had their first treatment at our institution; these cases were chosen for retrospective clinical and histopathologic review. INTERVENTION: A head and neck pathologist independently reviewed the pathology specimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, symptoms, stage, treatment type, tumor grade, pathological features, disease progression, and survival. RESULTS: Results of clinical staging were: T1 in 56 patients, T2 in 13, T3 in 1, T4 in 15, N0 in 85, N1 in 2, and N2 in 2. No patient had N3 or M1 disease. All patients underwent parotidectomy with or without neck dissection. Seven patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Tumor grade was low in 43 patients (48%), intermediate in 40 (45%), and high in 6 (7%). Only 5 patients had disease progression (local recurrence in 4, regional recurrence in 4, and distant recurrence in 2). At latest follow-up (mean follow-up, 14.7 years), 64 patients were alive without disease, 1 was alive with disease, 2 had died of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and 22 had died of other causes. The Kaplan-Meier estimated cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 15, and 25 years were 98.8%, 97.4%, and 97.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, tumor grade and stage appeared to be less important than previously described. With adequate parotidectomy and appropriate neck dissection, patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland appear to do well, with few recurrences.

Heminasal proboscis with associated microphthalmos and encephalocele.

Heminasal proboscis is a rare congenital malformation that presents complex management issues when associated with other craniofacial abnormalities. A newborn male, known to have a facial mass on prenatal ultrasonography, was delivered by planned induction at 37 weeks' gestation. He was intubated immediately because of anticipated respiratory difficulty. He had a right-sided proboscis, pedicled on the right medial canthal region. Additional airway evaluation identified a piriform aperture and choanal stenosis. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a hypoplastic orbit with aplastic optic nerve and a naso-orbito-ethmoidal encephalocele. Right upper and lower eyelid colobomas were present. The airway was initially stabilized with a tracheostomy. Beginning at the age of 10 weeks, he underwent several staged procedures to excise the encephalocele and to reconstruct the nose, orbit, eyelid, and lacrimal drainage system. The encephalocele was exposed via a bicoronal approach and frontal craniotomy. The dural defect was repaired with a pericranial flap. Nasal reconstruction provided an adequate nasal passage and tip after three staged procedures. Creation of a conjunctival flap prepared the right eye for later insertion of a prosthetic shell. The patient remained successfully decannulated 3 years after his last reconstructive procedure. Identification of all associated anomalies is important before initiating surgical repair. The presence of coexisting craniofacial abnormalities requires a multispecialty approach and coordination of surgical procedures.