Spectrum of genetic variants in 306 patients with non-syndromic hearing loss from Croatia.

AIM: To determine the spectrum and frequency of disease-causing variants in patients with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) and to investigate the diagnostic yield of the applied genetic methods. METHODS: The study enrolled 306 unrelated patients with childhood-onset, mild-to-profound NSHL referred to Children's Hospital Zagreb for genetic testing between March 2006 and October 2023. The GJB2 variants were analyzed with the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method and Sanger sequencing of the coding region of the GJB2 gene. In 21 patients negative for GJB2 biallelic variants, clinical exome sequencing (CES) was performed. RESULTS: Among 234 disease-associated GJB2 alleles detected, 19 were clinically relevant, of which 18 were reported as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. The c.35delG variant accounted for 73.5% of the mutated alleles. More than half of the patients with biallelic GJB2 variants (64/110, 58.2%) were 35delG homozygotes. Seventeen non-GJB2 variants were found in 10 genes (TECTA, NOG, SLC26A4, PCDH15, TMPRSS3, USH2A, GATA3, MYO15A, SOX10, COL2A1) in 11 participants, and 5 variants (in TECTA, NOG, PCDH15, and SOX10) were novel (29.4%). CONCLUSION: We were able to elucidate the genetic cause of hearing loss in 121 patients, with an overall diagnostic rate of 39.5%. The c.35delG was the most common variant. CES allowed us to diagnose almost half of the patients with HL; to distinguish NSHL from the syndromic form of HL in cases where the phenotype was unclear or where symptoms were absent from an early age; and to discover novel variants.

Chromosomal microarray in clinical diagnosis: a study of 337 patients with congenital anomalies and developmental delays or intellectual disability.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic yield and criteria that could help to classify and interpret the copy number variations (CNVs) detected by chromosomal microarray (CMA) technique in patients with congenital and developmental abnormalities including dysmorphia, developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and congenital anomalies (CA). METHOD: CMA analysis was performed in 337 patients with DD/ID with or without dysmorphism, ASD, and/or CA. In 30 of 337 patients, chromosomal imbalances had previously been detected by classical cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic methods. RESULTS: In 73 of 337 patients, clinically relevant variants were detected and better characterized. Most of them were >1 Mb. Variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were discovered in 35 patients. The most common VOUS size category was <300 kb (40.5%). Deletions and de novo imbalances were more frequent in pathogenic CNV than in VOUS category. CMA had a high diagnostic yield of 43/307, excluding patients previously detected by other methods. CONCLUSION: CMA was valuable in establishing the diagnosis in a high proportion of patients. Criteria for classification and interpretation of CNVs include CNV size and type, mode of inheritance, and genotype-phenotype correlation. Agilent ISCA v2 Human Genome 8x60 K oligonucleotide microarray format proved to be reasonable resolution for clinical use, particularly in the regions that are recommended by the International Standard Cytogenomic Array (ISCA) Consortium and associated with well-established syndromes.