RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adverse primary care work conditions could lead to a reduction in the primary care workforce and lower-quality patient care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship among adverse primary care work conditions, adverse physician reactions (stress, burnout, and intent to leave), and patient care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: 119 ambulatory clinics in New York, New York, and in the upper Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: 422 family practitioners and general internists and 1795 of their adult patients with diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure. MEASUREMENTS: Physician perception of clinic workflow (time pressure and pace), work control, and organizational culture (assessed survey); physician satisfaction, stress, burnout, and intent to leave practice (assessed by survey); and health care quality and errors (assessed by chart audits). RESULTS: More than one half of the physicians (53.1%) reported time pressure during office visits, 48.1% said their work pace was chaotic, 78.4% noted low control over their work, and 26.5% reported burnout. Adverse workflow (time pressure and chaotic environments), low work control, and unfavorable organizational culture were strongly associated with low physician satisfaction, high stress, burnout, and intent to leave. Some work conditions were associated with lower quality and more errors, but findings were inconsistent across work conditions and diagnoses. No association was found between adverse physician reactions, such as stress and burnout, and care quality or errors. LIMITATION: The analyses were cross-sectional, the measures were self-reported, and the sample contained an average of 4 patients per physician. CONCLUSION: Adverse work conditions are associated with adverse physician reactions, but no consistent associations were found between adverse work conditions and the quality of patient care, and no associations were seen between adverse physician reactions and the quality of patient care.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Medicina Interna/normas , Satisfação no Emprego , Médicos de Família/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Esgotamento Profissional , Estudos Transversais , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Humanos , Medicina Interna/organização & administração , Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Estresse Psicológico , Gerenciamento do Tempo , Estados Unidos , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report on the proportion of individuals with alcohol-use disorders who take prescription medications that could interact with alcohol and on the proportion who recall advice to avoid alcohol with their medications. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of telephone counseling. SETTING: 18 primary care practices in south-central and southeastern Wisconsin. PATIENTS: 897 adults with alcohol-use disorders as identified by systematic survey. INTERVENTION: Telephone and mail survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported prescription medication use, potential for alcohol-drug interactions according to DrugDex, and patient-reported receipt of advice not to take alcohol with their medications. RESULTS: Of the 869 patients who provided usable information on prescription medication use, 348 (40.0%) were taking medications with alcohol interactions or proscriptions; the most frequently reported were bupropion, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and various acetaminophen-containing compounds. Slightly more than 20% of patients were taking medications with moderate to severe alcohol interactions; over one-third of these 184 patients did not recall advice to avoid alcohol. CONCLUSION: Practitioners who prescribe or dispense medications may need to enhance their efforts to advise patients about alcohol-drug interactions. Prescribing and dispensing medications that interact with alcohol present opportunities to administer alcohol screens and interventions.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/tratamento farmacológico , Interações Medicamentosas , Etanol , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/epidemiologia , Contraindicações , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Farmacoepidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Wisconsin/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Echinacea preparations are widely used to treat the common cold. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of dried, encapsulated, whole-plant echinacea as early treatment for the common cold. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled community-based trial. SETTING: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. PARTICIPANTS: 148 registered students with common colds of recent onset. INTERVENTION: An encapsulated mixture of unrefined Echinacea purpurea herb (25%) and root (25%) and E. angustifolia root (50%) taken in 1-g doses six times on the first day of illness and three times on each subsequent day of illness for a maximum of 10 days. MEASUREMENTS: Severity and duration of self-reported symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the echinacea and placebo groups for any of the measured outcomes. Trajectories of severity over time were nearly identical in the two groups. Mean cold duration was 6.01 days in both groups as a whole, 5.75 days in the placebo group, and 6.27 days in the echinacea group (between-group difference, -0.52 day [95% CI, -1.09 to 0.22 days]). After controlling for severity and duration of symptoms before study entry, sex, date of enrollment, and use of nonprotocol medications, researchers found no statistically significant treatment effect (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.24 [CI, 0.86 to 1.78]). Multivariable regression models assessing severity scores over time failed to detect statistically significant differences between the echinacea and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, unrefined echinacea provided no detectable benefit or harm in these college students who had the common cold.
Assuntos
Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Echinacea , Fitoterapia , Preparações de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Placebos , Raízes de Plantas , Análise de Regressão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the current status of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in a community hospital as part of a 25-year longitudinal study. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive epidemiologic study. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All inpatients in 1998 with a positive blood culture who met the CDC NNIS System case definition of BSI. METHODS: Cases were stratified by underlying illness category using case mix adjustment categories (after McCabe) and reviewed for associations among mortality, underlying illness severity, and multiple clinical and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Of 19,289 patients discharged in 1998, 185 had an episode of infection documented by blood culture (96 cases per 10,000 inpatients). BSI was twice as frequent in patients 65 years and older compared with younger patients. BSIs caused or contributed to the deaths of 22 patients for an overall case-fatality rate of 11.9% compared with 20.7% in 1982 (P = .02). Striking decreases were noted for in-hospital patient mortality in 1998 for BSIs with ultimately and rapidly fatal underlying illnesses (P = .02 and P < .10, respectively). Primary bacteremia decreased compared with 1982. Antibiotic use was vigorous, but resistance was modest in both nosocomial and community-acquired organisms and had changed little from 1982 and 1987. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous studies, case-fatality rates in patients with BSI were substantially lower in rapidly fatal and ultimately fatal underlying illness categories. Antibiotic use was extensive but prompt and appropriate. Microorganism resistance to antibiotics changed little from the 1980s.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Hospitais Comunitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Sistemas de Informação em Laboratório Clínico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipotensão/complicações , Hipotensão/mortalidade , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Wisconsin/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the influence of physician workplace conditions on health care disparities. We compared 96 primary care clinics in New York, New York, and in the upper Midwest serving various proportions of minority patients to determine differences in workplace organizational characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional data are from surveys of 96 clinic managers, 388 primary care physicians, and 1701 of their adult patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or congestive heart failure participating in the Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome (MEMO) study. Data from 27 clinics with at least 30% minority patients were contrasted with data from 69 clinics with less than 30% minority patients. RESULTS: Compared with clinics serving less than 30% minority patients, clinics serving at least 30% minority patients have less access to medical supplies (2.7 vs 3.4, P < .001), referral specialists (3.0 vs 3.5, P < .005) on a scale of 1 (none) to 4 (great), and examination rooms per physician (2.2 vs 2.7, P =.002) . Their patients are more frequently depressed (22.8% vs 12.1%), are more often covered by Medicaid (30.2% vs 11.4%), and report lower health literacy (3.7 vs 4.4) on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) (P < .001 for all). Physicians from clinics serving higher proportions of minority populations perceive their patients as frequently speaking little or no English (27.1% vs 3.4%, P =.004), having more chronic pain (24.1% vs 12.9%, P < .001) and substance abuse problems (15.1% vs 10.1%, P =.005), and being more medically complex (53.1% vs 39.9%) and psychosocially complex (44.9% vs 28.2%) (P < .001 for both). In regression analyses, clinics with at least 30% minority patients are more likely to have chaotic work environments (odds ratio, 4.0; P =.003) and to have fewer physicians reporting high work control (0.2; P =.003) or high job satisfaction (0.4; P =.01). CONCLUSION: Clinics serving higher proportions of minority patients have more challenging workplace and organizational characteristics.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Barreiras de Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Escolaridade , Equipamentos e Provisões , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Estudos de Linguagem , Masculino , Medicaid , Dor/epidemiologia , Médicos , Autonomia Profissional , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Análise de Regressão , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to specialized treatment (ASBIR) reduce drinking and related harms. Unanswered questions are how to manage nondependent patients with poor response to brief interventions, how to manage dependent patients who do not obtain treatment, and how to ensure population-wide delivery of ASBIR. Telephone-administered counseling may provide answers. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a telephone and mail intervention for non-treatment-seeking primary care patients with alcohol use disorders. We enrolled 897 subjects after systematic screening in 18 primary care clinic waiting rooms in and around Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and subsequent telephone-administered diagnostic interviews. Experimental subjects received up to six sessions of protocol-driven telephone counseling based on principles of motivational interviewing and stages of readiness to change. Control subjects received a pamphlet on healthy lifestyles. The paper reports on 3-month drinking outcomes for men and women with alcohol abuse and dependence. RESULTS: Male experimental subjects (N=199) manifested a 30.6% decline in risky drinking days, compared with a 8.3% decline in controls (N=201, p<0.001). The total consumption declined by 17.3% compared with 12.9% by controls (p=0.001). Female experimental subjects (N=246) manifested a 17.2% decrease in risky drinking days compared with an 11.5% decrease by controls (N=251; p=NS) and a 13.9% decline in total consumption compared with 11.0% by controls (p=NS). Greater numbers of telephone counseling sessions were associated with greater declines in drinking. CONCLUSION: Following systematic screening, a six-session telephone and mail intervention is more effective than a pamphlet in reducing drinking at 3 months for non-treatment-seeking men with alcohol abuse and dependence. An intervention effect of the enrollment procedures may have obscured further intervention effectiveness. Telephone counseling shows promise for non-treatment-seeking primary care patients with alcohol use disorders.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo/reabilitação , Comunicação , Telefone , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Alcoolismo/psicologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Educação , Emprego , Etnicidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Casamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Tobacco use, alcohol and other drug use, early sexual behavior, dietary practices, physical inactivity, and activities that contribute to unintentional and intentional injuries are a significant threat to the health of young people. These behaviors have immediate and long-term consequences and contribute to diminished health, educational, and social outcomes. Research suggests that health risk behaviors exhibited during adolescence and adulthood have their origins earlier in childhood and preventive interventions are less successful after the risk behaviors have begun. Therefore, efforts to prevent health risk behaviors are best initiated in late childhood or early adolescence. However, to document the efficacy of these efforts, reliable, valid, and parent/child-friendly systems of data collection are required. Computerized data collection for research has been found to improve privacy, confidentiality, and portability over the paper-and-pencil method, which, in turn, enhances the reliability of sensitive data such as alcohol use or sexual activity. We developed programming tools for the personal computer and a handheld personal data assistant to offer a comprehensive set of user interface design elements, relational databases, and ample programming languages so that adults could answer 261 items and youth 346 items. The purpose of the article was to describe an innovative handheld computer-assisted survey interview method of collecting sensitive data with children aged 9 to 11. The method was developed as part of a large multisite, national study to prevent substance use.