Long-Term Clinical Course after Successful Initial Treatment in Patients with Mild Erosive Esophagitis: A Prospective Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the clinical course of patients with healed mild erosive esophagitis and clarify the predictive factors for continuous treatment. METHOD: Fifty-one patients with mild erosive esophagitis who confirmed mucosal healing by endoscopy after initial treatment with vonoprazan (VPZ) were enrolled. The patients continued subsequent treatment of their choice: maintenance therapy with VPZ 10 mg (n = 15), on-demand therapy with VPZ 20 mg (n = 19), or no medication (n = 17). Each patient was prospectively followed up for over 2 years, and the treatment was switched to other options appropriately according to their symptoms. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 3.1 years (range: 2.0-3.9 years), 2 patients who chose maintenance therapy switched to on-demand therapy. One patient who chose on-demand therapy switched to maintenance therapy, while 3 patients switched to no medication. Recurrence of symptoms occurred in 9 patients who chose no medication. They were administered maintenance therapy and five of them were subsequently switched to on-demand therapy. Ultimately, the proportion of patients receiving each treatment was 35.3% (18/51) for maintenance therapy, 43.1% (22/51) for on-demand therapy, and 21.6% (11/51) for no medication. A predictive factor for the need for continuous treatment was the presence of esophageal hiatal hernia (odds ratio: 6.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-25.3, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Among patients with healed mild erosive esophagitis, 78.4% required continuous treatment with VPZ, while 21.6% remained symptom free with no medication. On-demand therapy was the most common treatment, and continuous treatment may be recommended for patients with esophageal hiatal hernia.

[A case of retrograde intussusception due to transverse colon cancer detected by abdominal ultrasonography].

A 78-year-old female patient presented to our hospital with abdominal pain and melena. Abdominal ultrasonography detected a multiple concentric ring sign and retrograde invagination mass near the hepatic flexure. Colonoscopy revealed a 40-mm diameter type 1 tumor in the transverse colon near the splenic flexure, and the biopsy specimen demonstrated a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Retrograde intussusception due to transverse colon cancer was diagnosed, and laparoscopic transverse colon resection with lymph node dissection was performed. The resected specimen revealed a 48×40mm diameter type 1 tumor in the transverse colon and was diagnosed as pT2N0M0 pStage I. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was unavailable, but real-time assessment of the invaginated mass and bowel blood flow was possible by abdominal ultrasonography, which was useful in determining the diagnosis and treatment strategy.

Long-Term Outcomes after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Dysplasia.

INTRODUCTION: The Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy instead of colectomy after the complete removal of "endoscopically resectable" dysplastic lesions in ulcerative colitis (UC). There are no studies on long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ESD for UC-associated dysplasia (UCAD) during long-term follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 17 consecutive UC patients with 22 UCADs, who underwent initial ESD or total proctocolectomy at the Hiroshima University Hospital. The clinicopathological features of the patients and neoplasias and clinical outcomes of ESD were evaluated and compared with those of total proctocolectomy. RESULTS: UCAD in the ESD and total proctocolectomy groups was mostly noted on the left side of the colon, and most lesions were superficial macroscopic lesions. In the ESD group, en bloc resection and histological complete resection rates were 83 and 67%, respectively. One patient died of malignant melanoma; however, none of the patients died of UC-associated carcinoma in both groups. Metachronous neoplasias developed in 5 of the 7 patients in the ESD group. Among the 5 patients with metachronous UCAN, 4 finally underwent total proctocolectomy and 1 underwent additional ESD. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for UCAD is a useful method for total excisional biopsy. UC patients with UCAD resected by ESD have a high risk of developing metachronous UCAN during the follow-up period.

Real-world learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The current status of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed by endoscopists without colorectal ESD experience is unknown. This study evaluated the quality of colorectal ESD performed by endoscopists without colorectal ESD experience. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 420 consecutive patients with 427 superficial colorectal tumors (male/female, 251/169; mean age, 69 years) who underwent ESD. The procedures were performed by 31 endoscopists without colorectal ESD experience using needle knife-type devices at 13 hospitals from October 2008 to June 2017. Cases were divided into the first and second phases according to the experience of the endoscopist: the first phase included the first 20 cases and the second phase included case 21 and beyond. We also identified factors associated with en bloc resection failure. RESULTS: Rates of colonic tumors, laterally spreading tumors of the non-granular type, poor scope operability, and severe submucosal fibrosis for the first phase were significantly lower than those for the second phase. The en bloc resection rates for the first and second phases were 93% and 96%, respectively. The factors associated with en bloc resection failure were poor scope operability (odds ratio [OR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-6.5), severe submucosal fibrosis (OR 6.5; 95% CI 2.6-15.9), and the first 20 cases (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-10.1). CONCLUSION: Inexperienced endoscopists should initially perform colorectal ESD for tumors without severe submucosal fibrosis under good scope operability for at least 20 cases.

Dual Red Imaging Maintains Clear Visibility During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic lens becomes clouded and its visibility reduces during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), especially in cases with submucosal fatty tissue. Dual red imaging (DRI) is a novel image-enhanced endoscopic technique that improves endoscopic visibility. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of submucosal fatty tissue and the clinical usefulness of DRI in maintaining clear visibility during colorectal ESD. METHODS: The study participants included 586 consecutive patients with 645 colorectal tumors who underwent ESD between January 2014 and July 2017. First, the degree of submucosal fatty tissue was evaluated by reviewing recorded images, and the clinical characteristics of the patients and tumors related to severe submucosal fatty tissue were evaluated. Second, 34 tumors resected using DRI were propensity score-matched in a 1:1 ratio to other resected tumors using white light imaging (WLI), and the degree of endoscope lens cloudiness and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of tumors located in the right side of the colon, body mass index (≥ 25, BMI), and hemoglobin A1c (≥ 6.5%, HbA1c) were significantly higher in patients with severe submucosal fatty tissue. The visibility in the DRI group was significantly better than in the WLI group. Treatment outcomes in the DRI group were as good as those in the WLI group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location in the right side of the colon, BMI (≥ 25), and HbA1c (≥ 6.5%) are the predictive factors of severe submucosal fatty tissue. DRI is useful in maintaining clear visibility during colorectal ESD, especially with submucosal fatty tissue.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective study from the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although advanced high-volume centers have reported good outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a limited number of highly skilled experts in specialized institutions performed these procedures. We undertook a retrospective multicenter survey, which included nonspecialized hospitals, to investigate the clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD. METHODS: We recruited 1233 consecutive patients with 1259 colorectal tumors resected by ESD at 12 institutions. We evaluated the en bloc resection rate, histologic complete resection rate, curative (R0) resection rate, adverse events, and the long-term prognoses, including local recurrence, metachronous tumor development, and survival rate. RESULTS: The en bloc, histologic complete, and R0 resection rates were 92.6%, 87.4%, and 83.7%, respectively. The delayed bleeding, intraoperative perforation, and delayed perforation rates were 3.7%, 3.4%, and .4%, respectively. The long-term outcomes analysis included 1091 patients (88.4%). Local recurrences occurred in 1.7%, and metachronous tumors (>5 mm) developed in 11.0% of the patients. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.1% and 92.3%, respectively. The number of colonic tumors, severe submucosal fibrosis, and en bloc resection rates were significantly higher in the high-volume centers (Group H) than those in the low-volume centers (Group L). The average tumor size in Group H was significantly larger than that in Group L. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal ESDs are feasible, have acceptable adverse event risks, and favorable long-term prognoses. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000016197.).

Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Western countries, endoscopic removal of all adenomas during colonoscopy is recommended. The present study evaluates the usefulness of magnifying colonoscopy without removal of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps. METHODS: Patients with diminutive polyps who were observed for over 5 years using magnification at Hiroshima University Hospital were selected retrospectively. Lesions ≥6 mm in size, depressed lesions, and lesions with type V pit pattern were indications for endoscopic resection. We investigated the characteristics of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection detected on surveillance colonoscopy and the risk factors for the incidence of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection. RESULTS: A total of 706 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-eight lesions indicated for endoscopic resection were detected, averaging 9.0 ± 4.8 mm, and 33 (49%) lesions were located in the right colon. Pathological diagnoses were adenoma, Tis carcinoma, and T1 carcinoma in 58 (85%), eight (12%), and two (3%) lesions, respectively. Five lesions were considered to grow from previously detected diminutive polyps. Relative risks for the incidence of a lesion indicated for endoscopic resection were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-3.23) for males compared with females, 3.76 (95% CI, 2.03-7.50) for more than three polyps at initial colonoscopy compared with one polyp, and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.43-5.24) for patients with carcinoma at initial colonoscopy compared with patients with no lesion indicated for endoscopic resection. Nine carcinomas were resected endoscopically. CONCLUSION: Diminutive low-grade adenomas detected by using magnifying colonoscopy may not necessarily require removal.

Predictive factors for the progression of primary localized stage small-bowel follicular lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary small-bowel follicular lymphoma (FL) is mainly diagnosed as a duodenal lesion during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Recently, with the widespread use of small-bowel endoscopy, FL in the jejunum and ileum has been detected. Most patients with small-bowel FL are diagnosed at the localized stage, and a watch-and-wait policy is used. However, the predictive factors for the progression of small-bowel FL have not been clarified. This study retrospectively examined the predictive factors for the progression of primary localized stage small-bowel FL based on clinicopathological and endoscopic findings. METHODS: We enrolled 60 consecutive patients with primary small-bowel FL diagnosed at two tertiary hospitals between January 2005 and December 2020, with localized stage, low grade, and low tumor burden with the watch-and-wait policy. We examined the predictive factors for progression according to the clinicopathological and endoscopic findings. Endoscopic findings were focused on the color tone, circumferential location of follicular lesions (circumference ≥ 1/2 or < 1/2), fusion of follicular lesions (fusion [ +] or [ -]), and protruded lesions (≥ 6 mm or < 6 mm). RESULTS: Progressive disease was observed in 12 (20%) patients (mean observation period, 76.4 ± 55.4 months). In the multivariate analysis, "circumference ≥ 1/2" and "fusion (+)" were significant predictive factors for progression. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, progression-free survival was significantly shorter in the "circumference ≥ 1/2" and/or "fusion (+)" group than in the "circumference < 1/2" and "fusion ( -)" group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic findings of "circumference ≥ 1/2" and "fusion (+)" were significant predictive factors for the progression of primary localized stage small-bowel FL.

Successful closure with covered self-expandable metal stent for severe anastomotic leakage in the cervical esophagus.

Anastomotic leakage is one of the major complications of esophageal surgery with a high mortality rate and significant morbidity. We describe a case of severe anastomotic leakage close to the hypopharynx after esophageal cancer resection. Despite the conservative management with external drainage, the severe leak did not improve. A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) with short flares, which was designed for the cervical esophagus, was subsequently placed bridging the anastomosis to seal the fistula. The post-procedural course was uneventful, and the stent was endoscopically removed after three weeks without any complications. The patient was discharged home three weeks after the stent removal. Our results suggest that placement of fully covered SEMS with short flares may be a safe and effective treatment in this condition of patients.

Clinical usefulness of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in difficult-to-access submucosal layer.

Background and study aims In colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the S-O clip improves the accessibility to the submucosal layer of the colon. However, its safety and usefulness in difficult colorectal ESDs are unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of the S-O clip in colorectal ESD in the difficult-to-access submucosal layer. Patients and methods From January 2016 to December 2016, 189 consecutive cases of colorectal ESD were performed at Hiroshima University Hospital before the S-O clip was introduced. Between January 2017 and June 2018, among 271 consecutive colorectal ESD cases, 41 cases were performed colorectal ESD using the S-O clip. We compared outcomes between the two groups (41 cases with S-O clip [use group] and 189 cases without S-O clip [non-use group]) using propensity score matching. Results Prior to propensity score matching, 41 cases with the S-O clip (use group) and 189 cases without the S-O clip (non-use group) were extracted. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was more severe and the procedure time was longer in the use group than in the non-use group. In the use and non-use groups, en bloc resection (100 % vs. 94.7 %) and complete en bloc resection (100 % vs. 92.6 %) rates were satisfactory. After propensity score matching, 33 cases in each group were extracted. As a result, complete en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the use group than in the non-use group (100 % vs. 84.9 %). Conclusion The S-O clip is effective and can be used safely in colorectal ESD in the difficult-to-access submucosal layer.

Can surveillance colonoscopy be discontinued in an elderly population with diminutive polyps?

OBJECTIVES: Surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection (ER) for adenomatous polyps reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its significance in the elderly population is uncertain. The study aimed to determine whether surveillance colonoscopy should be discontinued in the elderly population. METHODS: We enrolled 105 patients who underwent baseline colonoscopy between January 2004 and December 2009 and were subsequently followed-up over 5 years in our institution. All had diminutive colorectal polyps and were aged <80 years at baseline colonoscopy and ≥80 years at follow-up in May 2018. Patients who had undergone colectomy or who had inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, and no diminutive polyps were excluded. The cumulative incidence of the target lesion was evaluated. Histopathological diagnoses included low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and carcinoma. RESULTS: The target lesion was detected in 15% (16/105) of the patients. There was no invasive carcinoma; however, two HGDs were detected. There were three lesions that had increased from previously detected diminutive lesions, all of which were LGDs. There were no target lesions detected after 84 years of age, and the cumulative incidence was 0.20. The cumulative incidence was significantly higher in the group with HGD than in the group with no target lesions at baseline colonoscopy. There was no HGD after age 79 years, and the cumulative incidence was 0.019. CONCLUSION: Surveillance colonoscopy for patients with diminutive polyps may be discontinued after age 79 years.

The utility of a novel colonoscope with retroflexion for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Background and study aims The PCF-H290TI/L produced by Olympus is a novel colonoscope equipped with some advantageous features for endoscopic treatment. It is expected to improve the potential for retroflexion and overall endoscope operability, which can reduce the difficulty of performing colorectal ESD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the novel colonoscope in colorectal ESD. Methods Three hundred and forty-eight consecutive colorectal lesions resected via ESD between June 2014 and January 2017 at Hiroshima University Hospital were included in the retroflexion ability analysis. We compared the retroflexion potential of PCF-H290TI to that of a conventional endoscope. Two hundred and twenty-seven colorectal lesions located in the left-sided colon and resected with ESD between April 2009 and February 2018 were enrolled in the treatment outcome analysis. Treatment outcomes using PCF-H290TI compared to those of the conventional colonoscope, and outcomes of the PCF-H290TI with retroflexion compared to those of the conventional colonoscope without retroflexion were evaluated by propensity score matching. Results The retroflexion rate with the PCF-H290TI was 76 %, which was significantly higher than the 44 % rate with the conventional scope. Endoscope operability was better and dissection speed was faster when using the PCF-H290TI with retroflexion compared to the conventional colonoscope without retroflexion. There were no significant differences between the groups in en bloc resection rate and adverse events. Conclusion Compared to the conventional colonoscope, the PCF-H290TI/L made it easier to perform ESD via a retrograde approach regardless of tumor location, and thus may be useful for performing colorectal ESD.

Use of anticoagulants increases risk of bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Japanese guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy have recommended temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], or heparin) to prevent hemorrhagic complications during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasias (CRNs). However, serious thrombosis might occur during temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants. The current study aimed to evaluate outcomes with anticoagulants in patients undergoing ESD for CRNs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a single-institution retrospective cohort study based on clinical records. We assessed 650 consecutive patients with 698 CRNs who underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between December 2010 and June 2016. The patients were divided into three groups: the warfarin group (19 patients with 19 CRNs), DOAC group (7 patients with 9 CRNs), and no-antithrombotics group (624 patients with 670 CRNs). We replaced warfarin with heparin 3 to 5 days before endoscopy. Although DOAC was suspended on the morning of endoscopy, we did not replace heparin. RESULTS: Bleeding after the procedure occurred in 26.3 % (5/19), 22.0 % (2/9), and 2.7 % (18/670) of patients in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. In the warfarin group, four patients who bled after the procedure took not only warfarin but also other antiplatelets. En bloc resection rates were 94.7 % (18/19), 100 % (9/9), and 96.6 % (647/670) in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. No patients experienced ischemic events in the perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing ESD for CRNs, risk of bleeding was higher among patients who took anticoagulants than among those who did not. In particular, careful attention to patients who took antiplatelets in addition to warfarin before ESD for CRNs is warranted.

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial cecal tumors: a comparison between extension and nonextension into the appendiceal orifice.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. Herein, we assessed the feasibility and safety of ESD for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of ESD for 78 patients with 78 cecal tumors (male/female ratio, 40/38; mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 67 [9] years; mean [SD] tumor size, 32 [15] mm), who underwent ESD at the Hiroshima University Hospital between October 2008 and March 2016. The indication for ESD in cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice was recognition of the distal edge of the lesion in the appendix. They were classified into two groups: patients with cecal tumors extending (Group A: 29 patients, 29 tumors) and not extending (Group B: 49 patients, 49 tumors) into the appendiceal orifice. We compared the outcomes of ESD between both groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed between both groups. The rate of severe submucosal fibrosis in Group A (48%) was significantly higher than that in Group B (24%) (p < 0.05). The mean (SD) procedure speed in Group A (14 [10] mm2/min) was significantly slower than that in Group B (23 [16] mm2/min) (p < 0.01). The en bloc resection rates in Groups A and B were 90% and 96%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events reported between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for cecal tumors with extension into the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe.