Efficacy and safety of aciclovir mucoadhesive buccal tablet in immunocompetent patients with labial herpes (LIP Trial): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, self-initiated trial.

BACKGROUND: Single-day, high-dose systemic antiviral drugs are effective in the treatment of labial herpes (herpes labialis [HL]). Aciclovir Lauriad® mucoadhesive buccal tablet (ABT) is an innovative drug delivery system providing high and prolonged exposure to aciclovir in the oral cavity, supporting its evaluation as a single low dose in HL. METHODS: In this multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled patient-initiated trial, 775 patients with recurrent HL were randomly assigned to either a single application of ABT 50 mg or a matching placebo as soon as prodromal symptoms occurred. The primary endpoint was the time to healing (TTH) of primary vesicular lesion (modified intention-to-treat population). Other endpoints included incidence of blocked episodes, duration of herpes episodes, and incidence and time to next recurrence evaluated during a 9-month follow-up period (intention-to-treat population). RESULTS: With ABT 50 mg, median TTH of primary vesicular lesion was reduced (7 days vs 7.3 days, P=.015), the incidence of blocked herpes episodes was increased by 24.2% (34.9% vs 28.1%; P=.042), and the median duration of herpes episodes was reduced (5.6 days vs 6.4 days, P=.003). During the 9-month follow-up period, recurrence of herpes lesions was less frequent (64.2% vs 73.6%; P=.027) and delayed (205 days vs 165 days, P=.041) in the ABT 50 mg. Both treatments were safe. CONCLUSION: A single application of ABT improves all endpoints of HL and might modify its clinical course in decreasing the incidence and delaying the onset of the next recurrence.

Immunodominant epitopes in herpes simplex virus type 2 glycoprotein D are recognized by CD4 lymphocytes from both HSV-1 and HSV-2 seropositive subjects.

In human recurrent cutaneous herpes simplex, there is a sequential infiltrate of CD4 and then CD8 lymphocytes into lesions. CD4 lymphocytes are the major producers of the key cytokine IFN-gamma in lesions. They recognize mainly structural proteins and especially glycoproteins D and B (gD and gB) when restimulated in vitro. Recent human vaccine trials using recombinant gD showed partial protection of HSV seronegative women against genital herpes disease and also, in placebo recipients, showed protection by prior HSV1 infection. In this study, we have defined immunodominant peptide epitopes recognized by 8 HSV1(+) and/or 16 HSV2(+) patients using (51)Cr-release cytotoxicity and IFN-gamma ELISPOT assays. Using a set of 39 overlapping 20-mer peptides, more than six immunodominant epitopes were defined in gD2 (two to six peptide epitopes were recognized for each subject). Further fine mapping of these responses for 4 of the 20-mers, using a panel of 9 internal 12-mers for each 20-mers, combined with MHC II typing and also direct in vitro binding assay of these peptides to individual DR molecules, showed more than one epitope per 20-mers and promiscuous binding of individual 20-mers and 12-mers to multiple DR types. All four 20-mer peptides were cross-recognized by both HSV1(+)/HSV2(-) and HSV1(-)/HSV2(+) subjects, but the sites of recognition differed within the 20-mers where their sequences were divergent. This work provides a basis for CD4 lymphocyte cross-recognition of gD2 and possibly cross-protection observed in previous clinical studies and in vaccine trials.

Single-day, patient-initiated famciclovir therapy versus 3-day valacyclovir regimen for recurrent genital herpes: a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent genital herpes is a major problem for patients worldwide. Early episodic treatment with short-course therapy is effective, often stopping progression of outbreaks. This study is the first head-to-head comparison of single-day famciclovir (1000 mg administered twice daily) versus 3-day valacyclovir (500 mg administered twice daily) for episodic therapy in immunocompetent patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, multinational, double-blind, parallel-group study, 1179 adults with a history of recurrent genital herpes were randomized 1:1 to receive either famciclovir or valacyclovir. Patients initiated treatment within 6 h after a recurrence. The primary objective was to establish noninferiority of single-day famciclovir, compared with a 3-day course of valacyclovir, in time to healing of all nonaborted lesions in a modified intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: This study established that single-day famciclovir therapy was noninferior to 3-day valacyclovir therapy in reducing time to healing of all nonaborted genital herpes lesions (median time to healing, 4.25 days vs. 4.08 days). Approximately one-third of patients in each treatment group had aborted genital herpes episodes, suggesting that both treatments have similar efficacy in preventing outbreaks or progression of lesions beyond the papule stage. There was no significant difference in time to resolution of symptoms associated with recurrence. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar (23.2% for the famciclovir group vs. 22.3% for the valacyclovir group), with headache, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Single-day famciclovir (1000 mg administered twice daily) was similar to 3-day valacyclovir (500 mg administered twice daily) in both efficacy and safety, representing a more convenient treatment for immunocompetent adults with recurrent genital herpes.

Single-dose, patient-initiated famciclovir: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for episodic treatment of herpes labialis.

BACKGROUND: The brief period of viral replication in recurrent herpes labialis lesions suggests shorter therapeutic regimens are a logical episodic treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of single-dose and single-day famciclovir treatments. METHODS: In all, 701 randomly assigned patients self-initiated therapy with famciclovir (1500 mg once [single dose] or 750 mg twice a day for 1 day [single day]) or placebo within 1 hour of onset of the prodromal symptoms of an episode of herpes labialis. Lesion healing was monitored by diaries and frequent clinic visits. RESULTS: Median healing times of primary (first to appear) vesicular lesions in the famciclovir single-dose, famciclovir single-day, and placebo groups were 4.4, 4.0, and 6.2 days, respectively. There was no significant difference between the famciclovir regimens. Adverse events in the famciclovir groups were similar to placebo. LIMITATIONS: The active arms of this trial were not directly compared to other antiviral regimens. CONCLUSION: Single-dose famciclovir reduced time to healing of herpes labialis lesions by approximately 2 days compared with placebo.

Single-day famciclovir for the treatment of genital herpes: follow-up results of time to next recurrence and assessment of antiviral resistance.

BACKGROUND: Episodic therapy of genital herpes is usually recommended for patients with infrequent symptomatic recurrences and where transmission is not a concern. While shorter courses are as effective as standard 5-day regimens, it is unknown whether abbreviated therapy has detrimental effects on natural history and the development of antiviral resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess time to next recurrence and development of antiviral resistance in patients with recurrent genital herpes treated with either single-day famciclovir (1 g twice-daily) or 3-day valacyclovir (500 mg twice-daily). METHODS: Longer-term, follow-up data on the time to next recurrence and antiviral sensitivity were collected from a previously reported multicenter, multinational, double-blind, parallel group study in which 1179 immunocompetent adults were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either single-day famciclovir or 3-day valacyclovir. Treatment was self-initiated within 6 hours of a recurrence. Swabs for viral culture and sensitivity testing were collected for two sequential recurrences. RESULTS: The median time to next recurrence from treatment initiation was 33.5 days for famciclovir and 38.0 days for valacyclovir. No drug resistance to penciclovir, the active metabolite of famciclovir, was observed at baseline nor did any develop by the time of the next recurrence. LIMITATIONS: The study had no placebo arm, typing of viral isolates was not performed and viral resistance testing was restricted to penciclovir only. CONCLUSION: Treatment with single-day famciclovir for recurrent genital herpes did not shorten the time to the next recurrence. Drug resistance to penciclovir continues to be a rare event in immunocompetent patients.

2-day versus 5-day famciclovir as treatment of recurrences of genital herpes: results of the FaST study.

BACKGROUND: The brief period of viral replication in recurrent genital herpes lesions suggests shorter therapeutic regimens may be as effective as standard 5-day courses. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a 2-day course of famciclovir 500 mg statim, then 250 mg twice daily was non-inferior to the standard 5-day course of 125 mg twice daily. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned either the 2-day or 5-day famciclovir course and initiated therapy within 12 h of onset of prodromal symptoms. They were instructed to complete daily questionnaires on herpes-related symptoms and functioning and to attend the clinic for assessment of healing 5.5 days after initiating therapy. RESULTS: A total of 873 patients were randomised at least once and 1038 recurrences were treated. The proportion of evaluable recurrences with lesions present at 5.5 days was less in the 2-day arm (24%) than in the 5-day (28%) arm. The upper 97.5% confidence limit (CL) for this difference in favour of the 2-day arm was 2% in favour of the 5-day arm, well within the 10% predefined for non-inferiority. The upper 97.5% CL was similar in the intent-to-treat, evaluable and per-protocol recurrence populations and when adjusted for baseline differences (in gender, age, herpes history and HIV infection) or for clustering of recurrences within patients. Both treatments had similar side-effects; proportion of lesions aborted; time to next recurrence; patient-reported symptoms; and impact on daily functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-day course was as safe and effective as the standard 5-day course and can only enhance patient convenience and compliance.

An update on short-course episodic and prevention therapies for herpes genitalis.

The prevalence of herpes genitalis (genital herpes) has increased markedly over the past three decades. The most common cause is infection with the herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), but it can also occur as a result of HSV-1 infection. Herpes genitalis can cause substantial psychosexual as well as physical morbidity and, in immunocompromised individuals, such as those who are HIV-positive, HSV infection can result in severe disease with progressive and extensive lesions. The natural history of herpes genitalis and the pathways of infection are now well known; however, the factors associated with reactivation have yet to be fully defined. A number of management approaches with antiviral medications are commonly used, including episodic and suppressive treatments. For episodic therapy, the duration of both lesions and symptoms, as well as the proportion of aborted episodes, are the most important measures of efficacy. For suppressive therapy, the time to first recurrence and frequency of recurrences over time are the most important clinical measures of antiviral benefit. Regarding the duration of episodic regimens, comparisons of 1-, 2- and 3-day antiviral courses with standard 5-day regimens show similar benefits on healing and relief of symptoms, with the obvious improvement in convenience, economy and compliance. In HIV-positive patients, antiherpes therapy has proved effective in speeding healing of lesions and reducing subclinical shedding, and can be used to treat genital HSV-2 infections in this group. Suppressive antiviral therapy has been shown to decrease the risk of HSV transmission in heterosexual couples. New approaches to the prevention of HSV infection, including vaccines and topical microbicides, are under investigation.