Usable donor lungs: exploring the hidden part of the iceberg.

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only effective treatment of selected patients suffering from end-stage respiratory disease. However, its main limitation is represented by the shortage of suitable organs. In the last years, LTx is progressively changing in the clinical arena and different strategies aiming to increase the number of usable donor lungs have been reported. Many efforts have been employed to improve management of donor during donation and to treat marginal or even initially rejected grafts ex-vivo. The evolving scenario is showing excellent clinical results of the employment of those strategies. Castleberry et al. analyzed outcomes of LTx using grafts coming from brain-dead donors experiencing cardiac arrest. They examined data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database and they showed comparable results with the use of such grafts suggesting a potential way to increase the number of lung transplant procedures. The article gives a strong message to all clinicians involved in the hard field of transplantation. For those taking care of donors, they should always consider donors suffering from cardiac arrest suitable for lung donation despite pulmonary function because gas exchange can be eventually optimized with ex-vivo perfusion techniques. On the other side, surgeons should feel more comfortable using such grafts. If these lungs have a normal function while in the donor, their use for clinical transplantation provides good results and if they are dysfunctional EVLP could allow a restoration of optimal oxygenation after retrieval.

Viral Infections in lung transplant recipients: devils or trolls?

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for end stage lung diseases. One of the most important topics in transplant management is the role of viral infections in chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and in particular in acute rejection (AR). This review arise from a recent study BY Brideaux et al. that offers the opportunity to investigate deeply the incidence, risk factors, symptomatology and clinical outcome of respiratory viral infections. Although most respiratory viral infections cause self-limited upper respiratory diseases, lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are particularly prone to develop complications. The absence of symptoms is a pivotal problem in managing these patients as it can depend on absence of active replication or on the effect of immunosuppressive regimen. In one word viruses can be just passengers or aggressive drivers in a facilitated environment, and the potential damage is completely different, as the management. PCR samplings give us an idea of the presence but not the certainty of the activity of viruses, and this is another common problem in reading data. In Herpes Virus infections this problem can be overtaken by studying biological samples and immune response, balancing the presence (PCR) and the activity (shell vial) of viruses with specific immune response (elispot). In fact viral presence doesn't mean activity and activity doesn't mean pathology in case of competent immune response. All these data can be matched in every single patient and managed by a tailored approach, either monitoring or treating.

Pulmonary hypertension in COPD and lung transplantation: timing and procedures.

The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the general chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) population is undefined because stable COPD patients do not routinely undergo screening echocardiogram and right heart catheterization. Most studies published on this topic are focused on a highly selected group of patients with moderate to severe disease awaiting lung transplantation, since hemodynamic data from cardiac catheterization are part of the standard transplant evaluation. In a very recent article, Hurdman et al. studied the characteristics and outcomes, with a particular focus on mortality, of extensively phenotyped, consecutive patients with PH-COPD over a 9-year period. This article offers the opportunity to update the role of PH in COPD as a timer to propose lung transplantation, based on solid literature data on survival, and to select the best procedure (single or double lung transplant), since the outcome indexes based on the old GOLD classification according to FEV1 (1-4) and the new GOLD classification (A-D) have failed in purpose to define the correct timing, due to the lack of functional (6 minutes walking test) and nutritional (Body Mass Index) data. After a revision of available literature including the recent paper of Hurdman et al. we conclude that the timing for lung transplantation is easy to manage in case of severe PH-COPD. On the other hand mild and moderate PH-COPD are still object of debate for therapy, procedure timing and choice and rehabilitation. In other words, we have some confirms for a little percentage of patients, whilst many doubts still exist for the rest.

New life for macrolides.

This article is an attempt to analyze and discuss the role and the purported mechanisms of azithromycin (AZM) in non-eosinophilic severe asthma, including antineutrophil activity, an effect on gastroesophageal reflux or antibacterial activity against an underlying chronic infection, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae. Macrolides have an expanding role in the therapy of chronic inflammatory diseases based on their additional anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. Many studies have been performed in lung transplantation field and maintenance treatment has been proved to be effective in cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, diffuse panbronchiolitis, and in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and in the prevention of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pathobiological studies of people with severe, refractory asthma focused on its heterogeneity encouraging more targeted and personalized approaches to asthma therapy. In neutrophilic asthma corticosteroids are not very effective, while the immunomodulatory action of macrolides is particularly relevant on neutrophils. Recently, The AZIthromycin in Severe ASThma (AZISAST) study, published on the April number of Thorax, provided evidences on the efficacy and safety of long-term add-on treatment with AZM in severe non-eosinophilic asthma. Despite concerns about an increased proportion of macrolide-resistant organism and about the effects of macrolides on cardiovascular events, there was no evidence of an increased risk of pneumonia or other adverse events. Because the AZISAST study was not able to demonstrate significant improvement in lung function and use of rescue medication, there is still a need for new data confirming the efficacy of AZM in severe non-eosinophilic asthma.

Single versus double lung transplantation in pulmonary fibrosis: a debated topic.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) represents the second most frequent indication for lung transplantation after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Survival rate after transplantation is poorer compared with other lung diseases for reasons that are not completely clear. Medical therapy with anti-inflammatory drugs may improve symptoms and quality of life, but it does not influence the survival rate. Lung transplantation is the best therapy for end-stage IPF. The debate regarding the superiority of double lung transplantation (DLT) compared with single lung transplantation (SLT) is still ongoing. Until some years ago, SLT was almost uniformly utilized for this indication. In the most recent years, a larger application of DLT has been observed worldwide, probably related to higher 1-year and 5-year survivals. The unanswered question is whether it is ethical to use two lungs for the same patient, considering the donor shortage, when a single lung would suffice. Many reports have demonstrated that SLT offers acceptable pulmonary function and satisfactory early and intermediate survival. Probably DLT should be reserved for younger recipients, for those with concomitant or possible chronic infection of the contralateral lung, or cases of marginal donors. Further studies will be needed to formulate recommendations regarding the preferred surgical approach in IPF.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Fibrosis: Prevalence and Hemodynamic Differences in Lung Transplant Recipients at Transplant Center's Referral Time.

INTRODUCTION: Single or bilateral lung transplantation is a therapeutic procedure for end-stage lung diseases. In particular, in cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary fibrosis, patients can be referred to the transplant center late and with important comorbilities. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with lung diseases not only is an index of poor outcome but also is an indication for bilateral procedure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study. We analyzed right heart catheterization in a consecutive series of patients who underwent lung transplantation from 2006 to 2014 for end-stage COPD and pulmonary fibrosis. RESULTS: We included in the study 73 patients (35 with fibrosis and 38 with COPD); prevalence of PH was higher in the COPD group (84.3% vs 31.4%), and with worse hemodynamic parameters (mean pulmonary artery pressure [30.3 mm Hg vs 24.1 mm Hg]). The majority of COPD patients presented mild or moderate PH, and fibrosis patients showed normal pulmonary arterial pressures. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients are referred to the Transplant Center with a higher prevalence of PH because of an echocardiographic screening or a late referral, but many patients survive on the waiting list and undergo the procedure. On the other hand, patients transplanted with interstitial diseases have a lower prevalence of PH; this can be explained by an earlier referral or a higher mortality on the waiting list and a more aggressive and rapidly progressing disease.

Heterotopic heart transplantation: a single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx) represents the therapy of choice for end-stage heart disease not treatable with medical or conservative surgical approach. Heterotopic heart transplantation (HHTx) is a surgical procedure in which the graft is connected to the native heart in a parallel fashion and it was especially employed in precyclosporine era. The aim of this paper is to present our experience with HHTx. METHODS: From November 1985 till May 2003, 713 heart transplanted patients included 12 (1.7%) received HHTx. Eleven were male, mean age was 50.7 +/- 5.8 years. Five patients suffered from dilated cardiomyopathy and seven from ischemic cardiomyopathy. Indication for HHTx was: a body size mismatch in 11 cases and availability of a marginal organ in one case. RESULTS: Mean ischemic time was 149 +/- 48 minutes and mean cross-clamp time was 82.3 +/- 19.1 minutes. In four cases left ventricle aneurysm resection was associated with HHTx. Hospital mortality was 8.3% (one patient due to multiorgan failure). The actuarial survival rates were 92% and 64% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The causes of death were: liver cancer, liver cirrosis, aortic dissection, cerebrovascular accident, and chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, HHTx survival rate is comparable to OHTx. Because of the scarcity of donors, use of an undersized or marginal graft is a valid option to increase the number of transplanted patients. The major disadvantages of HHTx are the need for anticoagulant therapy, the more difficult hemodynamic and immunologic follow-up, and the presence of the diseased native heart.

"Twinning procedure" in lung transplantation: influence of graft ischemia on survival and incidence of complications.

The limited number of suitable lung donors is the major obstacle to clinical application of lung transplantation. The "twinning procedure" may represent one strategy to optimize the use of the small pool of available grafts. From November 1991 to May 2003, 99 single lung transplants (SLTx) were performed including 46 (46%) cases of the "twinning procedure." We divided the study population into two groups: group A (recipients of the "first" lung) and group B (recipients of the "second" lung). The ischemia time was significantly different (A: 216 +/- 48 minutes, B: 310 +/- 89 minutes, P <.001). Differences were not observed in the incidence of graft failure (A: 2, B: 0, P = NS), in the length of mechanical ventilation (A: 12.8 +/- 29.4 days, B: 7.8 +/- 15.2 days, P = NS), or ICU stay (A: 18.8 +/- 50.6 days, B: 15.2 +/- 17.1 days, P = NS), or of hospitalization (A: 37.8 +/- 56.8 days, B: 31.4 +/- 31.7 days, P = NS). Three bronchial anastomotic complications occurred in each group. The incidence of infections (A: 0.015 events/patient/month, B: 0.011 events/patient/month, P = NS) and of treated acute rejections (A: 0.011 events/patient/month, B: 0.011 events/patient/month, P = NS) was similar in the two groups. One-year survival rates were 86% +/- 7% and 72% +/- 10% in group A and B patients, respectively (P = NS). In our experience the different ischemia times related to the twinning procedure did not increase the mortality or morbidity in the early and midterm period.

Pulmonary endarterectomy: the lancet first, tears for pills.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a progressive disease due to the incomplete resolution of pulmonary emboli, leading to right heart failure, with a poor survival. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the operation of choice for CTEPH. As there are no well-defined criteria to discriminate surgically accessible from inaccessible obstructive lesions, the operability assessment relies on the surgeon's experience. The recommended algorithms to perform a correct diagnosis of CTEPH still suggest the lung ventilation/perfusion scan, despite advances in computed tomography with 3-D reconstruction and magnetic resonance imaging. Selective pulmonary angiography is the gold standard to assess operability in CTEPH. Medical therapy should not be considered an alternative to PEA, as it should be reserved to patients with either peripheral disease, deemed inoperable by an experienced PEA surgeon, or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Lung transplantation, when indicated, still represents a viable option for patients with either inoperable CTEPH or CTEPH with concomitant severe parenchymal lung disease that contraindicates PEA. The outcome of operable CTEPH is still best predicted after surgery. Remarkably, the recovery of exercise capacity is not as immediate as hemodynamic improvement, underlining the importance of early identification of surgical candidates before physical deconditioning.

Incidence and treatment of lymphedema in heart transplant patients treated with everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Proliferation signal inhibitors are increasingly used as immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation. Among their side effects peripheral lymphedema is rarely described in literature. METHODS: All heart transplant patients treated with everolimus (de novo or maintenance) at our center (135 patients: age 50.72±11.1 y, 115 male) were retrospectively analyzed. We considered the incidence of adverse events, particularly the appearance of peripheral edema (13 patients, 9.6%), and the correlation with preoperative characteristics, concomitant medications, other possible causes of edema, as well as all the measures developed for its therapeutic treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Edema appearance, especially in lower limbs, was considered to be one of the most frequent side effects in heart transplant patients treated with everolimus. In some cases its regression was possible with an adjustment of drug dosages associated with diuretics and lymphatic drainage, but more often a suspension of the drug itself was required for complete regression of the symptoms.

Tailored cytomegalovirus management in lung transplant recipient: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Among solid organ recipients lung transplant recipients are at highest risk to be affected by cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) or to die from CMV disease. Two strategies are usually adopted in the clinical management of transplant recipients: antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. METHODS: In our center we adopted from 2007 a combined prophylaxis with anti-CMV immunoglobulins in the first post-transplant year and antiviral therapy (gancyclovir or valgancyclovir) from post-transplant day 15 for 3 weeks and in case of CMV bronchoalveolar lavage specimen positivity (polymerase chain reaction or shell vial). Moreover, we studied specific cellular immune response by an Elispot assay to define responder patients by the number of spot forming units (<5 nonresponders, 5-20 weeks, 20-100 good, >100 very good responders). RESULTS: We reduced acute rejections (from 17% to 6%, odds ratio 3.25), lymphocytic bronchitis bronchiolitis (from 11% to 2%), and first-year CMV pneumonia after the first post-transplant month (from 6.4% to 1%). We showed in nonresponders an earlier onset (68 vs 204 post-transplant days) and a longer duration (>14 days vs <14 days) of infection (P < .05 for all referred data). DISCUSSION: The morbility reduction has been obtained by antiviral therapy, increasing costs and risk of side effects. Our more recent studies show a population with a good immune response that probably doesn't need a pharmacological intervention but just a strict follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our proposed strategy is now tailoring the therapy on immune response clinical application, limiting to the specimen positivity in nonresponders.

Ex vivo lung perfusion increases the pool of lung grafts: analysis of its potential and real impact on a lung transplant program.

BACKGROUND: Among the strategies to increase the number of lung transplants, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) represents a novel technique to expand the donor pool. METHODS: Data from donors referred to our center were retrospectively analyzed to identify grafts that could potentially be potentially reconditioned by EVLP and for comparison with those obtained by clinical application of EVLP program in our center. RESULTS: Among 75 rejected lungs, 23 organs have been identified as potentially treatable with EVLP with a hypothetic increase of lung transplant activity of 53%. After the introduction of the EVLP program in our center, lung transplantation with reconditioned grafts was performed in 7 (23%) patients with a 30% increase in transplant procedures. CONCLUSION: Although less than expected, EVLP increased the number of lungs suitable for transplantation.

Inhaled nitric oxide versus sodium nitroprusside for preoperative evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates.

OBJECTIVE: The development of pulmonary hypertension before heart transplantation increases the risk for postoperative right ventricular failure. Reversibility of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), which indicates the feasibility of heart transplantation, can be tested with the use of intravenous vasodilators, such as sodium nitroprusside (NaNTP) or prostacyclin. However, the drawback of these drugs is the development of systemic hypotension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safely and feasibility of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) compared with sodium nitroprusside to test PVR reversibility, while avoiding systemic hypotension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients who were affected by end stage heart failure undergoing evaluation for heart transplantation if they showed elevated PVR > 2.5 Wood units and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >25 mm Hg. The hemodynamic parameters measured by right heart catheterization were: systolic blood pressure (SBP), mPAP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and cardiac index (CI). The following variables were derived: transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and PVR. All patients were tested by both iNO (20-40 ppm) and intravenous NaNTP, at increasing dosages which were titrated based on systemic pressure. We randomly assigned the order of administration of iNO and NaNTP. RESULTS: The 9 male candidates has an average age of 56 ± 4 years. Seven of the 9 (71%) had postischemic cardiomyopathy, and 2 had idiopathic cardiomyopathy. We observed a reduction of mPAP (32% and 14%), PVR (41% and 32%), TPG (20% and 26%), and SBP (17% and 5%) and an increase of CI with administration of NaNTP and iNO, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a reduction in PVR and mPAP with administration of either iNO and NaNTP. A better effect of NaNTP was attributed to reducted post-load of the left ventricle. However, the main advantage of iNO was the absence of systemic hypotension and its selectivity for pulmonary vascular system, as underscored by TPG reduction.

Evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus-specific immunologic response in solid organ transplant recipients with an enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot assay.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a γ-herpes virus, responsible for infectious mononucleosis in immunocompetent hosts. Cellular immunity appears rapidly during EBV primary infection, keeping it silent despite long-life persistence in B lymphocytes. Defects of the EBV-specific cellular immunity are supposed to be the basis of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders, promoted by high levels of immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed 197 solid organ transplant recipients to investigate EBV-specific lymphocyte responsiveness using Enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot assay (EliSpot), which assesses the EBV-specific interferon (IFN)-γ producing peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and kinetics of EBV infection/reactivation post-transplantation using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on whole blood. Overall, 102 of the 197 patients (51.8%) showed EBV responsiveness at the EBV-EliSpot assay: 68 (66.6%) showed a persistently positive EBV response in 3 or more determinations and 34 (33.3%) had transient episodes of nonresponsiveness. Ninety-five (48.2%) patients were persistently EBV nonresponders. EBV-DNAemia data were available for 58 patients: 27.6% presented at least one episode of EBV-DNA occurrence. No differences were found in EBV-EliSpot response stratification between the groups of patients who experienced episodes of EBV reactivation and those without EBV-DNAemia. However, EBV DNAemia peak values tended to be higher in the first year post-transplantation in the group of patients with a persistent positive EBV-specific immune response. EBV viral load quantitation in blood and EliSpot EBV-specific immune response determination may represent a powerful tool for monitoring solid organ transplant recipients, guiding immunosuppression modulation in patients with active EBV replication.

Bridging to lung transplantation by extracorporeal support.

Ideally, bridging patients with end stage severe respiratory failure to lung transplantation should significantly extend the pretransplant life expectancy to increase the chances to receive a suitable organ, as well as efficiently preserve the post-transplant long-term life expectancy by maintaining physiological homeostasis and avoiding multi-organ dysfunction. Various advanced strategies of extracorporeal circulation can replace at least in part the respiratory function of the lung and can potentially provide the appropriate mode and level of cardiopulmonary support for each patient's physiologic requirements. Therefore, patients on the lung transplant waiting list developing severe hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure can be supported for a prolonged period of time before the transplant, preserving a satisfactory post-transplant life expectancy. However, a more systematic clinical study on this issue is warranted in order to define the actual efficacy of these treatments in reducing the mortality rate on the waiting transplant list, and eventually improve the outcome of patients with end stage respiratory failure.

C4d analysis in endomyocardial biopsies of heart transplant patients: is there a correlation with hemodynamic data?

BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for immunologic follow-up to detect acute cellular rejection after cardiac transplantation. Conversely, protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are not well defined. Histologically, AMR is diagnosed by the presence of capillary damage associated with complement activation. The aim of this study was to correlate C4d expression of activated complement in EMB with hemodynamic compromise upon right heart catheterization. METHODS: Heart transplant patients underwent hemodynamic and histologic follow-up with EMB and right heart catheterization between January 2008 and December 2009 for a total of 491 procedures. The cardiac biopsy was evaluated for acute cellular and AMR by means of the presence of the C4d complement fraction. The histologic results were compared with hemodynamic data registered during right heart catheterization. RESULTS: Comparison of the hemodynamic data of subjects with versus without C4d positivity showed no significant difference. Furthermore, there was no significant difference comparing patients with versus without C4d positivity in the absence of significant acute cellular rejection episodes. (C4d-/ACR- vs C4d+/ACR-). The variation of each single hemodynamic parameter from its basal value (defined as the mean value in case of C4d-/ACR-) seemed to not be influenced by the presence of C4d+. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, C4d has been routinely evaluated in the majority of EMBs. We could not demonstrate a significant correlation of C4d positivity with hemodynamic compromise. These findings suggest that significant allograft dysfunction is not related to C4d positivity. Therefore, the diagnosis of AMR is difficult to establish, because allograft dysfunction is 1 of the 3 fundamental criteria.

Results with cyclosporine monotherapy in long-term cardiac transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy is the gold standard after heart transplantation while few reports have described experiences with cyclosporine monotherapy (CM). We have analyzed our experience with CM in long-term heart transplant recipients, surviving >5 years. METHODS: Of the 219 patients transplanted between January 1990 and December 1998, 143 survived >5 years (mean age, 49.6 +/- 10.4). There were 124 (86.7%) male subjects. Matching patients respect to follow-up length, we obtained 2 groups: group A of 41 patients on double therapy (DT; cyclosporine plus Azathioprine) and group B of 41 patients on CM. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 119.8 +/- 32.2 months, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of survival and major events: heart failure, malignancy, dialysis, infections, and CAV. CONCLUSION: We strongly support the use of triple therapy in cardiac transplant recipients because of its known safety and efficacy. However, our experience with CM suggests the utility of this approach.

The use of CO2 removal devices in patients awaiting lung transplantation: an initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung failure. Limitations are presented by the shortage of donors and the long waiting list periods. New techniques, such as extracorporeal membrane ventilator devices with or without pump support, have been developed as bridges to transplantation for patients with severe, unresponsive respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: Between November 2005 and September 2009, 12 patients (7 males and 5 females), of overall mean age of 43.3 +/- 15.5 years underwent decapneization with extracorporeal devices. In 6 cases, a NovaLung system was used; in the remaining 6 patients, it was a Decap device. Causes of respiratory failure that led to implantation of such devices were cystic fibrosis (n = 6), pulmonary emphysema (n = 5), and chronic rejection of a previous double lung transplant (n = 1). RESULTS: Mean time on extracorporeal decapneization was 13.5 +/- 14.2 days. Eight patients died on the device. Three patients were bridged to lung transplantation; 1 recovered and was weaned from the device after 11 days. Mean PaCO(2) on the extracorporeal gas exchanger was significantly lower for both the devices at 24, 48, and 72 hours after implantation (P < .05). No significant difference was observed for the 2 systems. CONCLUSION: In our initial experience, decapneization devices have been simple, efficient methods to support patients with mild hypoxia and severe hypercapnia that is refractory to mechanical ventilation. This could represent a valid bridge to lung transplantation in these patients.

Does everolimus associated with a low dose of cyclosporine in long-term cardiac transplant recipients improve renal function? Initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) renal toxicity is a well-known side effect. Various immunosuppressive strategies have been developed to minimize renal insufficiency. The use of everolimus associated with low levels of CsA can be an alternative strategy. METHODS: From October 2007 to April 2008, everolimus was started with a lower dose of cyclosporine (trough levels from 109.3 +/- 27.5 to 93.7 +/- 30.1 ng/mL after 45 days) in 21 cardiac transplant recipients (18 male and 3 female patients, mean age 56.4 +/- 10.7 years). Pre-everolimus therapy creatinine levels, creatinine clearances, and glomerular filtration rates were 1.9 +/- 0.9 mg/dL, 54.2 +/- 18.1 mL/mins and 44.3 +/- 16.5 mL/min/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in creatinine levels (from 1.9 +/- 0.9 to 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, P = .022) as well as a significant improvement in creatinine clearances (from 54.2 +/- 18.1 to 69.0 +/- 19.0 mL/min, P = .020) and glomerular filtration rates (from 44.3 +/- 16.5 to 57.1 +/- 16.3 mL/min/m(2), P = .010) after 7 days of everolimus therapy. Upon univariate analysis patient age, pretransplantation creatinine clearance, creatinine clearance after everolimus introduction, glomerular filtration rate at 45 days, and time from transplantation were associated with renal improvement. Upon multivariate analysis, only creatinine clearance at 7 days was related to the renal improvement. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggested that everolimus with a low dose of CsA may be safe and effective to reduce CsA-related renal insufficiency among selected, heart transplant patients.

Role of oral sildenafil in the treatment of right ventricular dysfunction after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) after heart transplantation is a major complication, especially in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Herein we have presented our initial experience with oral sildenafil for RVD following heart transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2006 to February 2008, 10 patients (7 males and 3 females) of overall mean age of 56.7 +/- 9.5 years suffered from acute RVD immediately after heart transplantation. Preoperative hemodynamic data before and after a vasodilatation test (sodium nitroprusside; NTP) showed: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) 59.5 +/- 12.9 and 44.2 +/- 12.4 mm Hg; cardiac output (CO) 3.3 +/- 0.9 and 3.7 +/- 0.8 L/min; transpulmonary gradient (TPG) 11.7 +/- 3.9 and 8.7 +/- 3.6 mm Hg; and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 3.9 +/- 2.1 and 2.4 +/- 1.3 wood units (WU), respectively. All patients required inotropes and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) to be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). RESULTS: Intravenous (IV) or inhaled vasodilators could be weaned using oral sildenafil in all patients. The hemodynamic data obtained during IV or inhaled drugs (between postoperative days 5 and 10) compared with those obtained on sildenafil therapy alone (about 1 month after transplantation) showed a significant decrease in SPAP (39.0 +/- 8.2 vs 32.0 +/- 6.5 mm Hg; P = .049). CONCLUSION: These data suggested that oral sildenafil may have a role in the treatment of RVD after heart transplantation.