Combined tetanus, diphtheria, and 5-component pertussis vaccine for use in adolescents and adults.

CONTEXT: Increasing reports of pertussis among US adolescents, adults, and their infant contacts have stimulated vaccine development for older age groups. OBJECTIVE: To assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a tetanus-diphtheria 5-component (pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and fimbriae types 2 and 3) acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in adolescents and adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, randomized, modified double-blind, comparative trial was conducted in healthy adolescents and adults aged 11 through 64 years from August 2001 to August 2002 at 39 US clinical centers. INTERVENTIONS: A single 0.5-mL intramuscular dose of either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria vaccine (Td). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antibody titers to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids for Tdap and Td were measured in sera collected from subsets of adolescents and adults, before and 28 days after vaccination. For pertussis antigens, titers in sera from Tdap vaccinees were assessed vs those from infants who received analogous pediatric diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) in a previous efficacy trial. Safety was assessed via solicited local and systemic reactions for 14 days and adverse events for 6 months following vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 4480 participants were enrolled. For both Tdap and Td, more than 94% and nearly 100% of vaccinees had protective antibody concentrations of at least 0.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and tetanus, respectively. Geometric mean antibody titers to pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and fimbriae types 2 and 3 exceeded (by 2.1 to 5.4 times) levels in infants following immunization at 2, 4, and 6 months with DTaP. The incidence of solicited local and systemic reactions and adverse events was generally similar between the Tdap and Td groups. CONCLUSIONS: This Tdap vaccine elicited robust immune responses in adolescents and adults to pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria antigens, while exhibiting an overall safety profile similar to that of a licensed Td vaccine. These data support the potential routine use of this Tdap vaccine in adolescents and adults.

Safety and immunogenicity of the pneumococcal pneumolysin derivative PlyD1 in a single-antigen protein vaccine candidate in adults.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal vaccines based on conserved protein antigens have the potential to offer expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the safety and immunogenicity in adults of three doses of a pneumococcal single-antigen protein vaccine candidate formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant and recombinantly derived, highly detoxified, genetically mutated pneumolysin protein (PlyD1). METHODS: This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalating study enrolled adults (18-50 years). In a pilot safety study, participants received a single injection of 10 µg PlyD1 and were observed for 24 h. Following review of the pilot safety data, participants were randomized (2:1) to receive two injections of PlyD1 at one of three doses or placebo 30 days apart. Assignment of second injection and successive dose cohorts was made after blinded safety reviews after each injection at each dose level. Safety endpoints included rates of solicited injection site reactions, solicited systemic reactions, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and safety laboratory tests. Immunogenicity endpoints included geometric mean concentrations of anti-PlyD1 IgG as determined by ELISA and functional assessment in an in vitro toxin neutralization assay. RESULTS: The study included a total of 100 participants, including 10 in the pilot study and 90 in the randomized study. None of the participants in the pilot study had SAEs, allergic reactions, or other safety concerns. Ninety participants received two doses of or placebo (n=30) or active vaccine candidate at 10 (n=20), 25 (n=20), or 50 µg (n=20). No vaccine-related SAE or discontinuation due to an AE occurred. Most solicited reactions were mild and transient. The most frequently reported solicited reactions were pain at the injection site and myalgia. Antigen-specific IgG levels and functional activity showed dose-related increases. When comparing the three dose levels, a plateau effect was observed at the 25 µg dose. CONCLUSIONS: All dose levels were safe and immunogenic. Repeat vaccination significantly increased the level of anti-PlyD1 antibodies. Functional antibody activity was demonstrated in sera from vaccinated individuals (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01444352).

Safety and immunogenicity of a pneumococcal histidine triad protein D vaccine candidate in adults.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal vaccines based on conserved protein antigens have the potential to offer expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae. OBJECTIVE: To explore safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant protein vaccine candidate against S. pneumoniae composed of adjuvanted pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD). METHODS: This phase I, exploratory, open-label, single-center clinical study enrolled adults (18-50 years). Participants in a pilot safety cohort received a single intramuscular injection of 6 µg. Following safety review, 3 dose cohorts were enrolled (6, 25, and 100 µg); participants received 2 injections administered approximately 30 days apart. Assignment of the second injection and successive dose cohorts were made after blinded safety reviews after each injection at each dose level. Safety endpoints included rates of solicited injection site and systemic reactions, unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events, and safety laboratory tests. Immunogenicity endpoints included levels of anti-PhtD antibodies as measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants were enrolled and received the pilot safety dose (n=3) or at least 1 dose of PhtD vaccine candidate at 6 µg (n=20), 25 µg (n=20), or 100 µg (n=20). No safety concerns were identified. No vaccine-related serious adverse event was reported. The most common solicited injection site reaction was pain and most common solicited systemic reactions were myalgia and headache; most reactions were mild and transient. Observed geometric mean concentrations (95% CI) were 200.99 ELISA units (148.46, 272.10), 352.07 (193.49, 640.63), and 699.15 (405.49, 1205.48) post-injection 1 in the 6, 25, and 100 µg dose cohorts, respectively, and 378.25 (275.56, 519.21), 837.32 (539.29, 1300.04), and 1568.62 (1082.92, 2272.16) post-injection 2. CONCLUSIONS: All dose levels were safe and immunogenic. The frequency of solicited reactions was highest at the 100 µg dose. Administration of a second injection significantly increased the levels of anti-PhtD antibodies (ClinicalTrials.gov registry no. NCT01444001).

Safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal protein vaccine candidates: monovalent choline-binding protein A (PcpA) vaccine and bivalent PcpA-pneumococcal histidine triad protein D vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal vaccines based on protein antigens may provide expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and immunogenicity in adults of pneumococcal vaccine candidates comprising S. pneumoniae pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD) and pneumococcal choline-binding protein A (PcpA) in monovalent and bivalent formulations. METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, step-wise dose-escalation study. Following a pilot safety study in which participants received one intramuscular injection of either aluminum hydroxide (AH)-adjuvanted PcpA (25 µg) or PhtD-PcpA (10 µg each), participants in the main study received AH-adjuvanted PcpA (25 µg), AH-adjuvanted PhtD-PcpA (10, 25, or 50 µg each), unadjuvanted PhtD-PcpA (25 µg each), or placebo as 2 injections 30 days apart. Assignment of successive dose cohorts was made after blinded safety reviews after each dose level. Safety endpoints included rates of solicited injection site and systemic reactions, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and safety laboratory tests. Immunogenicity endpoints included levels of anti-PhtD and anti-PcpA antibodies (ELISA). RESULTS: Six adults 18-50 years of age were included in the pilot study and 125 in the main study. No obvious increases in solicited reactions or unsolicited AEs were reported with escalating doses (adjuvanted vaccine) after either injection, or with repeated administration. Adjuvanted vaccine candidates were associated with a higher incidence of solicited reactions (particularly injection site reactions) than unadjuvanted vaccine candidates. However, no SAE or discontinuation due to an AE occurred. Geometric mean concentrations of anti-PhtD IgG and anti-PcpA IgG increased significantly after injection 2 compared with injection 1 at each dose level. No enhancement of immune responses was shown with adjuvanted vaccine candidates compared with the unadjuvanted vaccine candidate. In the dose-escalating comparison, a plateau effect at the 25 µg dose was observed as measured by geometric mean concentrations and by fold increases. CONCLUSIONS: Promising safety profiles and immunogenicity of these monovalent and bivalent protein vaccine candidates were demonstrated in an adult population (ClinicalTrials.gov registry no. NCT01444339).