Using an expanded algorithm to estimate prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in U.S. and UK.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing need to better understand the burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) using real-world data (RWD). However, identifying ALS cases using RWD presents several challenges due to the rarity of ALS and the differences in database coding systems. METHODS: MarketScan claims, and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases were searched for diagnosis codes of ALS or MND, the only drugs approved for treating ALS (riluzole and edaravone) and clinical visits with 12-month enrolment prior to 1 January 2011. The main algorithm required ≥ 1 ALS diagnosis code together with prescriptions or clinical visits. We expanded the existing algorithm to identify unspecific (possible) ALS group that had codes for motor neuron disease (MND) and the ALS drugs. The study period was from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2020. RESULTS: We identified 16,246 patients with ≥ 1 ALS code in Marketscan (denominator n = 85,279,619), yet only 184 were found in the UK CPRD (denominator n = 21,318,589). Using the main algorithm 9,433 ALS patients were included in MarketScan, with a prevalence ranged between 4.5 per 100,000 in 2019 and 6.2 in 2015. In MarketScan, 3,658 (4.3 per 100,000) had ≥ 1 MND code and the ALS drug codes (possible cases). In CPRD, 47.9% of 2,785 patients with ≥ 1 MND code had a prescription for riluzole (6.3 per 100,000), regarded as possible ALS cases. CONCLUSIONS: The expanded algorithm enabled the identification of a large population with ALS, or possible ALS, and the estimation of ALS prevalence in MarketScan and CPRD.

Increasing tramadol utilisation under strict regulatory control of opioid prescribing - A cross-sectional study in Taiwan from 2002 through 2016.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prescribing of opioids to patients with non-cancer pain is strictly regulated in Taiwan, but tramadol is not included in the regulation on chronic opioid prescribing. This study aims to identify the utilization trend of prescribing tramadol and other opioid analgesics and investigate the influence of government regulation on opioid prescribing in Taiwan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database and the cancer registry from 2001 through 2016. The annual number of adult opioid users, opioid utilization (Defined Daily Doses [DDDs]/1000 registrants) and the number of supply days were enumerated for each calendar year and stratified by cancer or non-cancer patients. Descriptive statistics were used to report the trends in utilization for each calendar year. RESULTS: The regulation strictly limited persistent use of opioids for patients with non-cancer pain, of which only a small proportion of fentanyl (20%) and morphine (<2%) users were prescribed with an annual number of supply days greater than 28 days. The annual utilization of morphine (6.4-53.5 vs. 1.1 to 9.6 DDD/1000 registrants) and fentanyl (8.3-37.0 vs. 0.16 to 1.8 DDD/1000 registrants) to patients with cancer was consistently higher than patients without cancer. In contrast to morphine and fentanyl, the utilization of tramadol prescribed to patients without cancer increased 92.2-fold (3.7-341.2 DDD/1000 registrants) from 2002 to 2016. CONCLUSION: The regulation in Taiwan limited the prescribing of selective opioids for patients with non-cancer pain and the substitution of tramadol for other opioids may have safety implications.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of COPD Patients at Different Blood Eosinophil Levels in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Blood eosinophil count may be a useful biomarker for predicting response to inhaled corticosteroids and exacerbation risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The optimal cut point for categorizing blood eosinophil counts in these contexts remains unclear. We aimed to determine the distribution of blood eosinophil count in COPD patients and matched non-COPD controls, and to describe demographic and clinical characteristics at different cut points. We identified COPD patients within the UK Clinical Practice Research Database aged ≥40 years with a FEV1/FVC <0.7, and ≥1 blood eosinophil count recorded during stable disease between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. COPD patients were matched on age, sex, and smoking status to non-COPD controls. Using all blood eosinophil counts recorded during a 12-month period, COPD patients were categorized as "always above," "fluctuating above and below," and "never above" cut points of 100, 150, and 300 cells/µL. The geometric mean blood eosinophil count was statistically significantly higher in COPD patients versus matched controls (196.6 cells/µL vs. 182.1 cells/µL; mean difference 8%, 95% CI: 6.8, 9.2), and in COPD patients with versus without a history of asthma (205.0 cells/µL vs. 192.2 cells/µL; mean difference 6.7%, 95%, CI: 4.9, 8.5). About half of COPD patients had all blood eosinophil counts above 150 cells/µL; this persistent higher eosinophil phenotype was associated with being male, higher body mass index, and history of asthma. In conclusion, COPD patients demonstrated higher blood eosinophil count than non-COPD controls, although there was substantial overlap in the distributions. COPD patients with a history of asthma had significantly higher blood eosinophil count versus those without.

Can Assessment of Disease Burden Prior to Changes in Initial COPD Maintenance Treatment Provide Insight into Remaining Unmet Needs? A Retrospective Database Study in UK Primary Care.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess treatment patterns over 24 months amongst patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), initiating a new COPD maintenance treatment, and to understand clinical indicators of treatment change. Patients included in the study initiated a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), or a combination of LABA and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS/LABA) between January 1, 2009, and November 30, 2013, as recorded in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK CPRD). Treatment modifications (switching or adding maintenance treatments) over 24 months were assessed, and patient characteristics, disease burden, medication and healthcare resource use during the 30 days before treatment modification were evaluated. The cohort comprised 17,258 patients [LABA (8%), LAMA (39%) and ICS/LABA (54%)] with similar age, body mass index and dyspnoea distribution. LABA users were more likely than LAMA users to add a maintenance therapy. Distinct patterns of treatment augmentations were noted, whereby LABA users typically received dual therapy before moving to triple therapy, while LAMA users moved to triple therapy by directly adding an ICS/LABA. Exacerbation events immediately prior to treatment change were not frequently recorded; however, the need for rescue short-acting medication and assessment of dyspnoea in the 30 days prior to the treatment change suggest that dyspnoea is a remaining unmet need driving therapy change.

Misdiagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in clinical practice in Europe and the USA: a patient chart review and physician survey.

OBJECTIVE: Delays in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnosis can result in compromised disease management and unnecessary costs. We examined the extent of ALS misdiagnosis in the US and Europe. METHODS: Data were collected via the Adelphi ALS Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and a medical chart review of their consulting patients with ALS in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK (EU5), and the US. Between July 2020 and March 2021, eligible physicians (primary speciality neurology, active involvement in managing patients with ALS) abstracted data from patients (≥18 years old) with confirmed ALS. RESULTS: Overall, 138 physicians completed the survey (EU5 107, US 31), with data reviewed from 795 patient medical charts (EU5 568, US 227); 278 (35.0%) patients (EU5 183 [32.2%], US 95 [41.9%]) had received ≥1 initial misdiagnosis based on symptoms later attributed to ALS. Mean (SD) time from symptom onset to first healthcare professional consultation was 3.8 (5.2) months (EU5 4.3 [4.8] months, US 2.6 [5.8] months). Mean (SD) time from symptom onset to ALS diagnosis was 8.2 (12.5) months (EU5 9.6 [14.0] months, US 5.0 [6.8] months) and increased to 10.4 (17.9) for patients with a misdiagnosis (compared with 6.9 [7.2] for patients with no misdiagnosis). Physician-identified barriers to timely ALS diagnosis included the similarity of symptoms to other conditions and delayed referral to neurologists. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis of ALS is frequent, with a protracted diagnostic pathway. Targeted education of patients and physicians about signs and symptoms and benefits of prompt referral to multidisciplinary care are needed.

Epidemiology and economic burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the United States: a literature review.

Objective: This review sought to gain a comprehensive, up-to-date understanding of the epidemiology and cost and healthcare resource use (HCRU) burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the US, at a patient and national level. Methods: A targeted literature review (TLR) to identify epidemiological evidence (prevalence, incidence, mortality, survival), and systematic literature review (SLR) to identify cost and HCRU data published since January 2016, were performed. MEDLINE databases and Embase searches were conducted in January 2021. Key congresses (2019-2020) and bibliographies of relevant SLRs were hand-searched. Two high-quality SLRs were reviewed for additional cost data published between January 2001-2015. Registry and database studies were prioritized for epidemiological evidence. To allow comparison between studies in this publication, only evidence from the US was considered, with costs inflated to the 2020/2021 cost-year and converted to US dollars. Results: Eight studies from the epidemiology TLR, and eighteen from the cost and HCRU SLR, were extracted. Reported ALS incidence in the US was ∼1.5 per 100,000 person-years, and point prevalence ranged from 3.84-5.56 per 100,000 population. Total US national costs spanned ∼$212 million-∼$1.4 billion USD/year, and variably consisted of direct costs associated with HCRU and indirect costs. Conclusions: The national cost of ∼$1.02 billion USD/year (estimated using a prevalence of 16,055 cases) best aligns with prevalence estimates found in the TLR (equating to ∼13,000-18,000 cases). However, large-scale, population-based studies are necessary to precisely assess US epidemiology of ALS and capture all costs needed to inform cost-effectiveness models and resource planning.