The effect of growth differentiation factor-5-coated sutures on tendon repair in a rat model.

Tendon ruptures are common injuries that are often treated surgically. Growth Differentiation Factor-5 (GDF-5) has been shown to accelerate tendon healing with varying degrees of success. We used a novel technique to apply recombinant human GDF-5 (rhGDF-5) to suture and hypothesized that controlled, local delivery of rhGDF-5 can be used to enhance tendon repair. Tendons of 92 rats were transected and repaired with sutures. All researchers were blinded to the following treatment groups (24 rats in each group): 0 rhGDF (control), 24 ng/cm rhGDF, 55 ng/cm rhGDF, and 556 ng/cm rhGDF. Rats were euthanized at 3 weeks (n = 48) and at 6 weeks (n = 48). Sutures were coated with rhGDF-5 using a novel dip-coat technique. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay confirmed consistent and reproducible delivery of rhGDF-5. Within each group, 8 were tested biomechanically, and 4 were assessed histologically. Histologic grading at 3 weeks showed improved healing in tendons repaired with coated suture versus controls. By 6 weeks, there were no significant differences. At 3 weeks, minimal isolated cartilage formation was observed; 6-week samples showed more extensive presence, typically surrounding suture fibers. At 3 weeks, tendons repaired with rhGDF-5-coated sutures resulted in significantly higher ultimate tensile load and stiffness compared with control sutures (P < .05) At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in the mechanical properties of repaired tendons. At 3 weeks, rhGDF-5 induced significant tendon hypertrophy that was more pronounced than at 6 weeks. In addition, tendons repaired with rhGDF-5 showed an increased rate of healing versus control repairs at 3 weeks. This study showed that a novel dip-coating technique can be used to deliver growth factors in varying concentrations to local repair sites to accelerate tendon healing.

Histologic stages of healing correlate with restoration of tensile strength in a model of experimental tendon repair.

Much current research is focused on biologic enhancement of the tendon repair process. To evaluate the different methods, which include a variety of gene therapy and tissue engineering techniques, histological and biomechanical testing is often employed. Both modalities offer information on the progress and quality of repair; however, they have been historically considered as two separate entities. Histological evaluation is a less costly undertaking; however, there is no validated scoring scale to compare the results of different studies or even the results within a given study. Biomechanical testing can provide validated outcome measures; however, it is associated with increased cost and is more labor intensive. We hypothesized that a properly developed, objective histological scoring system would provide a validated outcome measure to compare histological results and correlate with biomechanics. In an Achilles tendon model, we have developed a histological scoring scale to assess tendon repair. The system grades collagen orientation, angiogenesis, and cartilage induction. In this study, histology scores were plotted against biomechanical testing results of healing tendons which indicated that a strong linear correlation exists between the histological properties of repaired tendons and their biomechanical characteristics. Concordantly, this study provides a pragmatic and financially feasible means of evaluating repair while accounting for both the histology and biomechanical properties observed in surgically repaired, healing tendon.