Results from a first-in-human phase I safety trial to evaluate the use of a vascularized pericranial/temporoparietal fascial flap to line the resection cavity following resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of systemic therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) remains limited due to the constraints of systemic toxicity and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Temporoparietal fascial flaps (TPFFs) and vascularized peri cranial flaps (PCF) are not restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as they derive their vascular supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Transposition of a vascularized TPFF or PCF along a GBM resection cavity may bring autologous tissue not restricted by the BBB in close vicinity to the tumor bed microenvironment, permit ingrowth of vascular channels fed by the external circulation, and offer a mechanism of bypassing the BBB. In addition, circulating immune cells in the vascularized flap may have better access to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) within the tumor microenvironment. We conducted a first-in-human Phase I trial assessing the safety of lining the resection cavity with autologous TPFF/PCF of newly diagnosed patients with GBM. METHODS: 12 patients underwent safe, maximal surgical resection of newly diagnosed GBMs, followed by lining of the resection cavity with a pedicled, autologous TPFF or PCF. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Secondary analysis of efficacy was examined as the proportion of patients experiencing progression-free disease (PFS) as indicated by response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria and overall survival (OS). The study was powered to determine whether a Phase II study was warranted based on these early results. For this analysis, subjects who were alive and had not progressed as of the date of the last follow-up were considered censored and all living patients who were alive as of the date of last follow-up were considered censored for overall survival. For simplicity, we assumed that a 70% PFS rate at 6 months would be considered an encouraging response and would make an argument for further investigation of the procedure. RESULTS: Median age of included patients was 57 years (range 46-69 years). All patients were Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype. Average tumor volume was 56.6 cm3 (range 14-145 cm3). Resection was qualified as gross total resection (GTR) of all of the enhancing diseases in all patients. Grade III or above adverse events were encountered in 3 patients. No Grade IV or V serious adverse events occurred in the immediate post-operative period including seizure, infection, stroke, or tumor growing along the flap. Disease progression at the site of the original tumor was identified in only 4 (33%) patients (median 23 months, range 8-25 months), 3 of whom underwent re-operation. Histopathological analyses of those implanted flaps and tumor bed biopsy at repeat surgery demonstrated robust immune infiltrates within the transplanted flap. Importantly, no patient demonstrated evidence of tumor infiltration into the implanted flap. At the time of this manuscript preparation, only 4/12 (33%) of patients have died. Based on the statistical considerations above and including all 12 patients 10/12 (83.3%) had 6-month PFS. The median PFS was 9.10 months, and the OS was 17.6 months. 4/12 (33%) of patients have been alive for more than two years and our longest surviving patient currently is alive at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that insertion of pedicled autologous TPFF/PCF along a GBM resection cavity is safe and feasible. Based on the encouraging response rate in 6-month PFS and OS, larger phase II studies are warranted to assess and reproduce safety, feasibility, and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03630289, dated: 08/02/2018.

Autologous cell immunotherapy (IGV-001) with IGF-1R antisense oligonucleotide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Standard-of-care first-line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) is maximal safe surgical resection, then concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, followed by maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001, the first product of the Goldspire™ platform, is a first-in-class autologous immunotherapeutic product that combines personalized whole tumor-derived cells with an antisense oligonucleotide (IMV-001) in implantable biodiffusion chambers, with the intent to induce a tumor-specific immune response in patients with ndGBM. Here, we describe the design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial evaluating IGV-001 compared with placebo, both followed by standard-of-care treatment in patients with ndGBM. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and key secondary end points include overall survival and safety.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fast-growing brain tumor that happens in about half of all gliomas. Surgery is the first treatment for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, followed by the usual radiation and chemotherapy pills named temozolomide. Temozolomide pills are then given as a long-term treatment. The outcome for the patient with newly diagnosed GBM remains poor. IGV-001 is specially made for each patient. The tumor cells are removed during surgery and mixed in the laboratory with a small DNA, IMV-001. This mix is the IGV-001 therapy that is designed to give antitumor immunity against GBM. IGV-001 is put into small biodiffusion chambers that are irradiated to stop the growth of any tumor cells in the chambers. In the phase IIb study, patients with newly diagnosed GBM are chosen and assigned to either the IGV-001 or the placebo group. A placebo does not contain any active ingredients. The small biodiffusion chambers containing either IGV-001 or placebo are surgically placed into the belly for 48 to 52 h and then removed. Patients then receive the usual radiation and chemotherapy treatment. Patients must be adults aged between 18 and 70 years. Patients also should be able to care for themselves overall, but may be unable to work or have lower ability to function. Patients with tumors on both sides of the brain are not eligible. The main point of this study is to see if IGV-001 helps patients live longer without making the illness worse compared with placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04485949 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Optimization of novel exoscopic blue light filter during fluorescence-guided resection of Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Operative guidelines and use optimization for new surgical exoscopes are not well described in the literature. In this study, we evaluated use of the ORBEYE (Olympus) surgical exoscope system during 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection of GBMs to optimize workflow and exoscope settings. METHODS: The ORBEYE exoscope system was fitted with a blue light filter for 5-ALA mediated fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). Intraoperative images were obtained during 5-ALA FGS in 9 patients with primary or recurrent GBM. The exoscope was set up at constant, increasing focal distances from the target tissue, and light source intensity varied. High-resolution 4 K images were captured and analyzed. Comparisons of fluorescence to background were then generated for use optimization. RESULTS: Light intensity did not significantly influence tumor fluorescence (P = 0.878). However, focal distance significantly impacted relative fluorescent intensity (P = 0.007). Maximum average fluorescence was seen consistently at a focal length of 220 mm and a light intensity of approximately 75% maximum. Decreasing focal distance from 400 mm to 220 mm significantly increased visualized fluorescence (P = 0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: The ORBEYE surgical exoscope system with blue light filter is a powerful imaging tool for 5-ALA FGS in GBM. The ORBEYE blue filter performs optimally at shorter focal distance with moderate light intensity. Similar to microscope systems, decreasing focal distance significantly influences visualized fluorescence.

Hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in neurocognitive function. METHODS: PubMed was queried for studies involving hippocampal-avoidance radiation therapy and results were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed for median overall survival, progression-free survival, hippocampal relapse rates, and neurocognitive function testing. RESULTS: Of 3709 search results, 19 articles were included and a total of 1611 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 8 retrospective cohort studies. All studies evaluated hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with brain metastases. Hippocampal relapse rates were low (overall effect size = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.05]) and there was no significant difference in risk of relapse between the five studies that compared HA-WBRT/HA-PCI and WBRT/PCI groups (risk difference = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [- 0.02, 0.03]; p = 0.63). 11 out of 19 studies included neurocognitive function testing. Significant differences were reported in overall cognitive function and memory and verbal learning 3-24 months post-RT. Differences in executive function were reported by one study, Brown et al., at 4 months. No studies reported differences in verbal fluency, visual learning, concentration, processing speed, and psychomotor speed at any timepoint. CONCLUSION: Current studies in HA-WBRT/HA-PCI showed low hippocampal relapse or metastasis rates. Significant differences in neurocognitive testing were most prominent in overall cognitive function, memory, and verbal learning. Studies were hampered by loss to follow-up.

First in-human intrathecal delivery of bevacizumab for leptomeningeal spread from recurrent glioblastoma: rationale for a dose escalation trial.

PURPOSE: To outline the dose rationale for the first in-human intrathecal delivery of bevacizumab for LMS of GBM. METHODS: A 19-year-old female patient presented to Lenox Hill Hospital following thalamic GBM recurrence. She subsequently underwent two infusions of intra-arterial BEV (NCT01269853) and experienced a period of relative disease stability until progression in 2022. One month later, MRI disclosed diffuse enhancement representative of LMS of GBM. The patient subsequently underwent five cycles of IT BEV in mid-2022 (IND 162119). Doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg, 50 mg, and 37.8 mg were delivered at two-week intervals between doses 1-4. The final 37.8 mg dose was given one day following her fourth dose, given that the patient was to be discharged, traveled several hours to our center, and was tolerating therapy well. Dosage was decreased due to the short interval between the final two treatments. Shortly after IT BEV completion, she received a third dose of IA BEV. RESULTS: Our patient did not show any signs of serious adverse effects or dose limiting toxicities following any of the treatments. It is difficult to determine PFS due to the rapid progression associated with LMS of GBM and rapid timeframe of treatment. CONCLUSION: LMS continues to be a devastating progression in many types of cancer, including GBM, and novel ways to deliver therapeutics may offer patients symptomatic and therapeutic benefits.

Short and long-term prognostic value of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in brain tumor patients: a case series of 121 brain tumor patients.

PURPOSE: Iatrogenic neurologic deficits adversely affect patient outcomes following brain tumor resection. Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring allows surgeons to assess the integrity of motor-eloquent areas in real-time during tumor resection to lessen the risk of iatrogenic insult. We retrospectively associate intraoperative transcranial and direct cortical MEPs (TC-MEPs, DC-MEPs) to early and late post-operative motor function to prognosticate short- and long-term motor recovery in brain tumor patients undergoing surgical resection in peri-eloquent regions. METHODS: We reviewed 121 brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomies with DC-MEP and/or TC-MEP monitoring. Motor function scores were recorded at multiple time-points up to 1 year postoperatively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated at each time point. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TC-MEP in the immediate postoperative period was 17.5%, 100%, 100%, and 69.4%, respectively. For DC-MEP monitoring, the respective values were 25.0%, 100%, 100%, and 68.8%. By discharge, sensitivity had increased for both TC-MEP and DC MEPs to 43.8%, and 50.0% respectively. Subset analysis on patients without tumor recurrence/progression at long term follow-up (n = 62 pts, 51.2%) found that all patients with stable monitoring maintained or improved from preoperative status. One patient with transient intraoperative TC-MEP loss and permanent DC-MEP loss suffered a permanent deficit. CONCLUSION: Brain tumor patients who undergo surgery with intact MEP monitoring and experience new postoperative deficits likely suffer transient deficits that will improve over the postoperative course in the absence of disease progression.

Improvement in visual outcomes of patients with base of skull meningioma as a result of evolution in the treatment techniques in the last three decades: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed visual outcomes over the last three decades in patients undergoing treatment for base of skull (BOS) meningiomas and provide recommendations to preserve vision. METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search was conducted from 6/1/2022-9/1/2022 using PubMed and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included (1) patients treated for BOS meningiomas (2) treatment modality specified (3) specifics of surgical techniques and/or dose/fractions of radiotherapy (4) individual patient outcomes of treatment. Each study was assessed for bias based on study design and heterogeneity of results. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were included (N = 2911). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating surgery alone published from 2006 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2006 studies (p = 0.02). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating combined therapy with surgery and radiation published from 2008 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2008 studies (p < 0.01). Combined modality therapy was less likely to worsen vision compared to either surgery or radiation monotherapy (p < 0.01). However, surgery and radiation monotherapy were more likely to actually improve outcomes compared to combination therapy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: For over a decade we have observed improvement in visual outcomes in patients managed for meningioma of BOS, likely attributing the innovation in microsurgical and more targeted and conformal radiation techniques. Combination therapy may be the safest option for preventing worsening of vision, but the highest rates of improving visual function are achieved through monotherapy when indicated.

Evolution of flash visual evoked potentials to monitor visual pathway integrity during tumor resection: illustrative cases and literature review.

Flash visual evoked potentials (fVEPs) provide a means to interrogate visual system functioning intraoperatively during tumor resection in which the optic pathway is at risk for injury. Due to technical limitations, fVEPs have remained underutilized in the armamentarium of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) techniques. Here we review the evolution of fVEPs as an IONM technique with emphasis on the enabling technological and intraoperative improvements. A combined approach with electroretinography (ERG) has enhanced feasibility of fVEP neuromonitoring as a practical application to increase safety and reduce error during tumor resection near the prechiasmal optic pathway. The major advance has been towards differentiating true cases of damage from false findings. We use two illustrative neurosurgical cases in which fVEPs were monitored with and without ERG to discuss limitations and demonstrate how ERG data can clarify false-positive findings in the operating room. Standardization measures have focused on uniformity of photostimulation parameters for fVEP recordings between neurosurgical groups.

Stimulated Raman histology facilitates accurate diagnosis in neurosurgical patients: a one-to-one noninferiority study.

OBJECTIVE: Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) offers efficient and accurate intraoperative neuropathological tissue analysis without procedural alteration to the diagnostic specimen. However, there are limited data demonstrating one-to-one tissue comparisons between SRH and traditional frozen sectioning. This study explores the non-inferiority of SRH as compared to frozen section on the same piece of tissue in neurosurgical patients. METHODS: Tissue was collected over a 1-month period from 18 patients who underwent resection of central nervous system lesions. SRH and frozen section analyses were compared for diagnostic capabilities as well as assessed for quality and condition of tissue via a survey completed by pathologists. RESULTS: SRH was sufficient for diagnosis in 78% of specimens as compared to 94% of specimens by frozen section of the same specimen. A Fisher's exact test determined there was no significant difference in diagnostic capability between the two groups. Additionally, both quality of SRH and condition of tissue after SRH were deemed to be non-inferior to frozen section. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence for the non-inferiority of SRH techniques. It is also the first study to demonstrate SRH accuracy using one-to-one tissue analysis in neuropathological specimens.

Repeated superselective intraarterial bevacizumab after blood brain barrier disruption for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase I/II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Pre-clinical evidence suggests bevacizumab (BV) depletes the GBM peri-vascular cancer-stem cell niche. This phase I/II study assesses the safety and efficacy of repeated doses of superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) of BV after blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). METHODS: Date of surgery was day 0. Evaluated patients received repeated SIACI bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) with BBBD at days 30 ± 7, 120 ± 7, and 210 ± 7 along with 6 weeks of standard chemoradiation. Response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria and the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to evaluate progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a median age of 60.5 years (SD = 12.6; 24.7-78.3) were included. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation was found in 1/23 (4%) patients. MGMT status was available for 11/23 patients (7 unmethylated; 3 methylated; 1 inconclusive). Median tumor volume was 24.0 cm3 (SD = 31.1, 1.7-48.3 cm3). Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.7-25.9) with 6, 12, 24 and 60 month PFS estimated to be 91.3% (95% CI 69.5-97.8), 47.4% (26.3-65.9), 32.5% (14.4-52.2) and 5.4% (0.4-21.8), respectively. Median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI 12.2-36.9) with 12, 24, and 36 month OS as 77.3% (95% CI 53.6-89.9), 45.0% (22.3-65.3) and 32.1% (12.5-53.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated dosing of IA BV after BBBD offers an encouraging outcome in terms of PFS and OS. Phase III trials are warranted to determine whether repeated IA BV combined with Stupp protocol is superior to Stupp protocol alone for newly diagnosed GBM.

Correction to: Super selective intra­arterial cerebral infusion of modern chemotherapeutics after blood-brain barrier disruption: where are we now, and where we are going.

The name of author Jason A. Ellis was missing in the intial online publication, and there was a typo in the sixth author's first name. The original article has been corrected.

Super selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of modern chemotherapeutics after blood-brain barrier disruption: where are we now, and where we are going.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-arterial (IA) delivery of therapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an evolving strategy which enables the distribution of high concentration therapeutics through a targeted vascular territory, while potentially limiting systemic toxicity. Studies have demonstrated IA methods to be safe and efficacious for a variety of therapeutics. However, further characterization of the clinical efficacy of IA therapy for the treatment of brain tumors and refinement of its potential applications are necessary. METHODS: We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion (SSIACI) with BBB disruption for the treatment of brain tumors. In addition, we review ongoing clinical trials expanding the applicability and investigating the efficacy of IA therapy for the treatment of brain tumors. RESULTS: Trends in recent studies have embraced the use of SSIACI and less neurotoxic chemotherapies. The majority of trials continue to use mannitol as the preferred method of hyperosmolar BBB disruption. Recent preclinical and preliminary human investigations into the IA delivery of Bevacizumab have demonstrated its safety and efficacy as an anti-tumor agent both alone and in combination with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: IA drug delivery may significantly affect the way treatments are delivered to patients with brain tumors, and in particular GBM. With refinement and standardization of the techniques of IA drug delivery, improved drug selection and formulations, and the development of methods to minimize treatment-related neurological injury, IA therapy may offer significant benefits for the treatment of brain tumors.

Intradural spinal tumors in adults-update on management and outcome.

Among spinal tumors that occur intradurally, meningiomas, nerve sheath tumors, ependymomas, and astrocytomas are the most common. While a spinal MRI is the state of the art to diagnose intradural spinal tumors, in some cases CT scans, angiography, CSF analyses, and neurophysiological examination can be valuable. The management of these lesions depends not only on the histopathological diagnosis but also on the clinical presentation and the anatomical location, allowing either radical resection as with most extramedullary lesions or less invasive strategies as with intramedullary lesions. Although intramedullary lesions are rare and sometimes difficult to manage, well-planned treatment can achieve excellent outcome without treatment-related deficits. Technical advances in imaging, neuromonitoring, minimally invasive approaches, and radiotherapy have improved the outcome of intradural spinal tumors. However, the outcome in malignant intramedullary tumors remains poor. While surgery is the mainstay treatment for many of these lesions, radiation and chemotherapy are of growing importance in recurrent and multilocular disease. We reviewed the literature on this topic to provide an overview of spinal cord tumors, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Typical cases of extra- and intramedullary tumors are presented to illustrate management options and outcomes.

Superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion of cetuximab with blood brain barrier disruption combined with Stupp Protocol for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the first case of a novel treatment for a newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) using superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) of cetuximab after osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) with mannitol. A 51year-old female underwent craniotomy for removal of a right frontal GBM. Pathology confirmed EGFR amplification, and she underwent three treatments of SIACI of cetuximab to the tumor site. The first treatment was given within a week of starting standard of care chemoradiation (Stupp protocol), which is a combination of radiation treatment (2 Gy per/ day x 30 days, total of 60 Gy) and oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2). The second and third SIACI of cetuximab were administered 3 and 6 months later, while the patient continued on maintenance temozolomide. Post-radiation changes on MRI were stable, and there were no signs of recurrence at 4 and 6 months post-resection. Herein, we detail the technical aspects of this novel treatment paradigm and suggest that SIACI of cetuximab after BBB disruption using mannitol, combined with the standard of care chemoradiation therapy, may be an effective treatment method for newly diagnosed EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Long-term benefit of intra-arterial bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Standard treatment for recurrent GBM is not yet established. We present a case demonstrating the benefit of intra-arterial (IA) bevacizumab with blood brain barrier disruption (BBBD) for the treatment of recurrent GBM. A 31 year-old man diagnosed with GBM, following primary resection, received temozolomide. After a second resection, he received one dose of IA bevacizumab with BBBD using mannitol, preventing regrowth for 2.5 years. Following tumor regrowth, the patient received another dose of IA bevacizumab with BBBD, which has prevented regrowth for another year.

Glioblastoma spheroids produce infiltrative gliomas in the rat brainstem.

PURPOSE: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is universally fatal without proven therapy other than radiation therapy for palliation. Representative animal models will play an essential role in the preclinical stage of future therapy development. To address the shortage of representative models, we created a novel infiltrative brainstem glioma model in rats based on glioblastoma spheroids. METHODS: Cells dissociated from glioblastoma spheroids grown from surgical specimens were implanted into the brainstem of NIH nude rats. Animals were serially assessed clinically and radiographically with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumors were further characterized using histology, immunohistochemistry, and cytogenetics. RESULTS: Tumor generation was successful in all animals receiving glioblastoma spheroid cells. The rats survived 17-25 weeks before severe symptoms developed. The tumors showed as diffuse hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted images. Histologically, they demonstrated cellular heterogeneity, and infiltrative and invasive features, with cells engorging vascular structures. The tumors were shown to comprise immature human origin glial tumor cells, with human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification and gain. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that cells from glioblastoma spheroids produced infiltrative gliomas in rat brainstem. The rat brainstem gliomas are radiographically and histologically accurate compared to DIPG. These tumors develop over several months that would allow sequential clinical and radiographic assessments of therapeutic interventions. This study demonstrated in principle the feasibility of developing patient-specific animal models based on putative cancer stem cells from biopsy or resection samples.

Durability of single dose intra-arterial bevacizumab after blood/brain barrier disruption for recurrent glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (BV) has been used to treat recurrent glioblastoma with a progression free survival of approximately 3-3.5 months. Typically, it is administered intravenously every 2-3 weeks at dosages ranging from 5-15 mg/kg. Serious side effects include GI tract perforations, hematologic disorders, intracranial hemorrhage, and malignant hypertension. We hypothesized that selective intracranial intra-arterial infusion (SIACI) of BV following blood/brain barrier disruption (BBBD) with mannitol may allow for reduced dosage, lower toxicity, and equivalent or superior progression free survival (PFS). METHODS: Sixteen patients (8 males & 8 females) with a mean age of 55 years (range 27-68), KPS>70, and recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled. All patients underwent super-selective catheterization and were given a single intra-arterial dose of 15 mg/kg BV following osmotic blood/brain barrier disruption with mannitol to the arteries supplying the tumor. The patients had no additional treatment following that initial SIACI mannitol and BV until they met criteria for progression. PFS was assessed using modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. RESULTS: Median progression free survival from only one dose of SIACI mannitol and BV was 3.9 months. Side effects included seizure in 2 patients, and headache in 1 patient. Seizures were well controlled with medications, and there were no serious toxicities. There were no endovascular-related complications. CONCLUSION: SIACI of mannitol and BV at 15mg/kg allows for similar or better PFS compared to biweekly treatments of IV BV at 10mg/kg. The dosage required is lower and side effects were minimal and well tolerated. Future larger trials are warranted to assess whether repeated less frequent IA mannitol and BV may be superior to biweekly IV administration as a monotherapy.

Intra-arterial cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma†.

IMPORTANCE: Management of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a common and challenging clinical problem in head and neck oncology. OBJECTIVE: Here we present the first reported case of super-selective intra-arterial (SSIA) microcatheter based local delivery of cetuximab for head and neck cancer. This technical report describes the techniques used to deliver the SSIA dose of cetuximab, as well as the patient outcome. DESIGN: This technical report is part of an ongoing Phase I Clinical Trial. SETTING: The New York Head and Neck Institute (NYHNI) is a full-service otolaryngology and neurosurgery department at Lenox Hill Hospital, part of the Northwell Health System. The NYHNI serves a diverse patient population with a wide range of head and neck diseases in a tertiary hospital setting. INTERVENTION: SSIA Cetuximab. PARTICIPANT: A patient presents to our clinic with recurrent unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx. He is recruited into the first cohort of a phase I clinical trial to assess the safety of SSIA cetuximab, dose starting at 100mg/m2. Adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy is also given. MEASURES: Safety, as measured by toxicity of SSIA cetuximab. RESULTS: SSIA Cetuximab has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible procedure in this technical report. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates technical feasibility and a very preliminary assessment of the safety of a novel delivery of a biologic agent for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, which is part of an ongoing phase I clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02438995.

Neuro-oncology biotech industry progress report.

The Brain Tumor Biotech Center at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, in collaboration with Voices Against Brain Cancer hosted The Brain Tumor Biotech Summit at in New York City in June 2015. The focus was once again on fostering collaboration between neuro-oncologist, neurosurgeons, scientists, leaders from biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and members of the financial community. The summit highlighted the recent advances in the treatment of brain tumor, and specifically focused on targeting of stem cells and EGFR, use of prophage and immunostimulatory vaccines, retroviral vectors for drug delivery, biologic prodrug, Cesium brachytherapy, and use of electric field to disrupt tumor cell proliferation. This article summarizes the current progress in brain tumor research as presented at 2015 The Brain Tumor Biotech Summit.