Hazelnut allergy differs between children and adults in frequency of severity, aetiology and relevance of diagnostic parameters.

BACKGROUND: Hazelnut allergy in adults is often birch pollen related, whereas in children, non-pollen-related hazelnut allergy is more frequent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in hazelnut allergy between children and adults with regard to severity, aetiology and diagnostic value of routinely available data. METHODS: Adults (n = 120) who underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) for hazelnut were selected and compared to 151 hazelnut-challenged children from a previous study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to build a prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was determined for level of hazelnut-specific IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and the prediction model. RESULTS: Hazelnut allergy was confirmed by DBPCFC in 95/120 (79%) adults, 77% had only subjective and 23% objective symptoms, whereas in children, 63% had objective symptoms to hazelnut. Within the group of children, the frequency of severe hazelnut allergy was higher in younger than in older children. A concomitant birch pollen allergy was more common in adults (82%) than in children (39%) with a hazelnut allergy. A detailed history with allergic symptoms to previous ingestion of hazelnut had the highest diagnostic value in adults, while in children, SPT to hazelnut extract showed the highest level of discrimination between clinical reactivity and tolerance to hazelnut. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hazelnut allergy differs between children and adults with respect to frequency of severity, aetiology and relevance of diagnostic parameters. Therefore, age has to be taken into account in the diagnostic work-up of a hazelnut allergy.

Effectiveness of adenoidectomy in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections: open randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of adenoidectomy in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections. DESIGN: Open randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 11 general hospitals and two academic centres. PARTICIPANTS: 111 children aged 1-6 with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections selected for adenoidectomy. INTERVENTION: A strategy of immediate adenoidectomy with or without myringotomy or a strategy of initial watchful waiting. Main outcome measure Primary outcome measure: number of upper respiratory tract infections per person year calculated from data obtained during the total follow-up (maximum 24 months). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: days with upper respiratory tract infection per person year, middle ear complaints with fever in episodes and days, days with fever, prevalence of upper respiratory tract infections, and health related quality of life. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 24 months, there were 7.91 episodes of upper respiratory tract infections per person year in the adenoidectomy group and 7.84 in the watchful waiting group (difference in incidence rate 0.07, 95% confidence interval -0.70 to 0.85). No relevant differences were found for days of upper respiratory tract infections and middle ear complaints with fever in episodes and days, nor for health related quality of life. The prevalence of upper respiratory tract infections decreased over time in both groups. Children in the adenoidectomy group had significantly more days with fever than the children in the watchful waiting group. Two children had complications related to surgery. CONCLUSION: In children selected for adenoidectomy for recurrent upper respiratory tract infections, a strategy of immediate surgery confers no clinical benefits over a strategy of initial watchful waiting. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR968: ISRCTN03720485.