Recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation is associated with low contact force.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent arrhythmia after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFIB) remains a significant challenge. Using contact force (CF) sensing ablation catheters, we aimed to identify procedure related parameters associated with recurrence after de-novo PVI in patients with AFIB. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a de-novo PVI procedure (n = 120, 63% paroxysmal and 37% persistent AFIB) employing a force-sensing ablation catheter were included. A clinical control including electrocardiogram and 120 hour of Holter-recording at 12-months was performed in all patients. Recurrence was defined as any documented AFIB or atrial flutter more than 30 seconds on Holter-recording after an initial blanking period of three months. RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 44 patients (37%). Mean CF was lower in patients with recurrent arrhythmia (22.2 ± 9.5 vs. 28.8 ± 9.3 g, p < .001). In multi-variable analyses lower mean CF (OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.8-1.0), p = .03), and higher percentage of ablation time with a CF <10 grams (OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.1), p = .004) were both associated with recurrence in two distinct models. Dragging during ablation compared with point-by-point ablation technique was associated with recurrence in both models (OR 19.2 (95% CI 2.9-130.0), p = .002, and OR 21.7 (95% CI 2.7-176.2), p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Low CF and dragging during ablation as compared with point-by-point ablation technique were associated with recurrent arrhythmia in patients with AFIB undergoing de-novo PVI by RF ablation.

Is the knowledge of contact force beneficial in pulmonary vein antrum isolation?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the operator knowing the real-time contact force (CF) on the efficacy of pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI). METHODS: Fifty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) or short lasting persistent AF were randomized to CF guided PVAI (n = 25) or conventional PVAI (n = 25). In the CF guided group, CF between 10 and 40 g was aimed at. Efficacy of PVAI was measured as reduction in AF burden (AFB) and time to AF recurrence detected by implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), inserted three months before PVAI. Blanking period was three months and follow-up 12 months. RESULTS: All pulmonary veins were isolated in the CF guided group and all but one in the conventional group. Mean CF was 25 g in the CF guided group and 24 g in the conventional group (p = 0.75). Compared to pre-ablation, median [IQR] relative reduction in AFB 3-12 months after ablation was 100 [99-100]% in the CF guided group (p < 0.001) and 99.4 [25-100]% in the conventional group (p < 0.001), not different between groups (p = 0.09). Nine patients (36%) had AF recurrence in the CF guided group and 13 (52%) in the conventional group (p = 0.21, log-rank test). CF differed between operators. When adjusted for operator by regression analysis, patients without recurrent AF had lower proportion of ablation time with CF <10 g than recurrent patients (p = 0.034). No complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Operator knowledge of real-time CF had no significant effect on AFB reduction or time to AF recurrence. Larger trials should be done to study benefit of real-time CF.

Radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: the long-term mortality and risk of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To assess the long-term mortality and occurrence of post-ablation atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing a radiofrequency ablation for the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 362) subjected to radiofrequency ablation of the WPW syndrome at Aarhus University Hospital from 1990 to 2011. A comparison cohort (N = 3619) was generated from the Danish National Board of Health Central Population Registry. We found no significant difference in all-cause mortality when comparing the WPW group with the control group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.77 and confidence interval (CI): 0.47-1.25]. After radiofrequency ablation, the WPW group had a significantly higher risk of atrial fibrillation than the control group (HR: 4.77 and CI: 3.05-7.43). Atrial fibrillation prior to ablation (HR: 4.66 and CI: 2.09-10.41) and age over 50 years (HR: 9.79 and CI: 4.29-22.36) at the time of ablation were independent risk factors for post-ablation atrial fibrillation in the WPW group. CONCLUSION: Patients with radiofrequency ablation-treated WPW syndrome have a post-ablation mortality that is similar to the background population. The risk of atrial fibrillation remains high after radiofrequency ablation of the WPW syndrome.