Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(10): 937-946, 2024 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Blood level of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) is a promising biomarker of sepsis both in adults and children. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PSP in children with suspected sepsis and to compare diagnostic performance with other sepsis biomarkers approved for clinical use, that is, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: PICU and pediatric emergency department. INTERVENTION: Blood levels of PSP were measured using a nanofluidic point-of-care immunoassay (abioSCOPE, Abionic SA, Switzerland) within 24 hours of admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 99 children aged between older than 1 month and younger than 18 years with signs and symptoms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (irrespective of associated organ dysfunction). The prevalence of sepsis was 35 of 99 (35.4%). Patients with sepsis had higher PSP levels ( p < 0.001) than patients with systemic inflammation of noninfectious cause. In this analysis, the optimal cutoff for the diagnosis of sepsis using PSP was 123 ng/mL, which resulted in a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.43-0.80), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.77-0.95). The PSP test area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.91) and, by comparison, procalcitonin and CRP AUROC were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.84), respectively. Overall, the pretest to posttest probability of sepsis with a positive test changed from 0.35 to 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center prospective pediatric cohort, admitted to the high intensive care and to the PICU, our findings suggested the potential use of PSP as a sepsis biomarker. However, because of the clinical diagnostic uncertainty with a positive result, further investigation is needed particularly in combination with other biomarkers.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa , Litostatina , Pró-Calcitonina , Sepse , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Litostatina/sangue , Masculino , Criança , Feminino , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pré-Escolar , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/sangue , Lactente , Adolescente , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Recém-Nascido , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
2.
Perfusion ; 39(1_suppl): 95S-106S, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651583

RESUMO

Background: Cardiogenic shock in children still carries a high mortality risk despite advances in medical therapy. The use of temporary mechanical circulatory supports is an accepted strategy to bridge patients with acute heart failure to recovery, decision, transplantation or destination therapy. These devices are however limited in children and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains the most commonly used device. Veno-arterial ECMO may provide adequate oxygen delivery, but it does not significantly unload the left ventricle, and this may prevent recovery. To improve the likelihood of left ventricular recovery and minimize the invasiveness of mechanical support, the Impella axial pump has been increasingly used in children with acute heart failure in the last decade. Purpose: There are still limited data describing the Impella indications, management and outcomes in children, therefore, we aimed to provide a comprehensive narrative review useful for the pediatric nurses to be adequately trained and acquire specific competencies in Impella management.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Choque Cardiogênico , Criança , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Enfermagem Pediátrica/métodos , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia
3.
Helicobacter ; 15(2): 79-87, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20402810

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines suggest the use of triple therapy as first choice treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, although the eradication failure rate is more than 30%. Current interest in probiotics as therapeutic agents against H. pylori is stimulated not only by the clinical data showing efficacy of some probiotics in different gastrointestinal diseases but also by the increasing resistance of pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics, thus the interest for alternative therapies is a real actual topic. AIM: To review in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of probiotics in H. pylori infection focusing on the paediatric literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-clinical and clinical paediatric studies in English assessing the role of probiotics in H. pylori infection identified by MEDLINE search (1950-2009) were reviewed. RESULTS: In vitro studies demonstrated an inhibitory activity of probiotics on H. pylori growth and that this effect is extremely strain specific. Available data in children indicate that probiotics seems to be efficacious for the prevention of antibiotic associated side-effects, and might be of help for the prevention of H. pylori complications by decreasing H. pylori density and gastritis, and for the prevention of H. pylori colonization or re-infection by inhibiting adhesion to gastric epithelial cells. There is no clear evidence that probiotics may increase the H. pylori eradication rate. CONCLUSION: Both in vitro and in vivo studies provide evidence that probiotics may represent a novel approach to the management of H. pylori infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter/terapia , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Antibiose , Aderência Bacteriana , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Helicobacter pylori/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Front Pediatr ; 6: 234, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30191146

RESUMO

Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disorder of the lower respiratory airways in childhood. The management of asthma exacerbations and the disease control are major concerns for clinical practice. The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, published by GINA, updated in 2017, the British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network, revised in 2016, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence asthma guideline consultation, available in 2017, are widely accepted documents, frequently implemented, with conflicting advices, and different conclusion on asthma definition and treatment. An International Consensus on Pediatric Asthma was carried out in 2012 by a Committee with expertise in the field, to critically review differences on current guidelines. In addition, the specific issue of treating severe and difficult asthma has been recently highlighted throughout the International European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guidelines on severe asthma. The aim of this paper is to describe conventional treatments and some new therapeutic approaches to pediatric asthma according to guidelines, highlighting key aspects, and differences on proposed clinical recommendations for asthma management. Age specific therapy are proposed in steps, according to clinical severity and the level of disease control. If control is not achieved within 3 months, stepping-up should be considered; otherwise, if control is achieved after 3 months, stepping down may be considered. The most used drug classes of asthma medications are beta-2 adrenergic agonists, corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifiers. Intramuscolar triamcinolone has been used for severe asthma treatment. Chromones and xanthines have been extensively used in the past, but they have shown limits related to their efficacy and safety profile. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody against IgE, is an immunomodulatory biological agent, used as new drug in patients with confirmed IgE-mediated allergic asthma, only for patient's specific range of total IgE level. There are low evidences in the efficacy of metotrexate, as well as macrolide antibiotics in children with asthma. Antifungal agents are also not recommended in asthmatic patients. Non-pharmacological measures that may improve patient's quality of life should also be attempted. We conclude that treatment decisions on childhood asthma management should be critically made, pondering the differences suggested by agreed international consensus documents.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA