Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients. METHODS: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

Phase II evaluation of doxorubicin/vinblastine combined with inhibitors trifluoperazine/verapamil of P-glycoprotein in patients with advanced renal carcinoma.

Doxorubicin/vinblastine combined with the P-glycoprotein inhibitors trifluoperazine and verapamil was evaluated in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. Patients were treated with starting doses of doxorubicin/vinblastine of 30 mg/m(2) (doxorubicin) and 3 mg/m(2) (vinblastine) intravenously every 2 weeks, combined with 4 days of oral trifluoperazine/verapamil at 2 mg tid (trifluoperazine) and 160 mg tid (verapamil) administered I day before the chemotherapy was initiated. Response was assessed every three cycles of treatment. Of 26 evaluable patients, there were no responders. Six patients had stable disease for greater than 6 months on treatment. Therapy was generally well tolerated but 7 of 26 patients developed grade 4 granulocytopenia, including one patient who died due to sepsis. The possible reasons for the failure of P-glycoprotein inhibitors to enhance the effect of chemotherapy are discussed.

Solitary brain metastasis: results of an RTOG/SWOG protocol evaluation surgery + RT versus RT alone.

From 1983 through 1986, the Southwest Oncology Group and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted an intergroup study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical resection in those patients with solitary central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The study was initially designed as a prospective randomized trial. Because of difficulty accruing patients, the registration format was altered and the patients were placed on study according to physician preference. Ninety-seven patients were registered on study and 80 patients were eventually analyzed. Fifty-five patients underwent radiation therapy alone and 25 patients received surgery and radiation. Fifty-nine percent of those patients undergoing radiation therapy alone improved or stabilized while 79% of those patients undergoing surgery and radiation therapy improved or stabilized. Eventually, 22% of the surgically treated patients failed in the brain while 45% of the patients undergoing radiation therapy exhibited a CNS relapse. Survival was improved when corrected for other prognostic factors in those patients undergoing surgical resection. Although not a prospective randomized trial, this study does suggest an improvement in the survival of a select group of patients able to tolerate neurosurgical resection.