Clinical actionability of BRCA2 alterations in uterine leiomyosarcoma: a molecular tumor board case report and a cBioPortal comprehensive analysis.

BACKGROUND: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) represents one of the most common sarcoma histotypes, demonstrating an overall dismal prognosis. Previous studies reported uLMS to carry recurrent somatic BRCA2 homozygous deletions, related to significant clinical benefits from the use of PARP inhibitors. METHODS: To investigate the prevalence in uLMS of genomic alterations (alt) in BRCA2 and other homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) genes, cBioPortal was accessed and data were retrieved from studies including pan-sarcoma histologies. HR-/DDR-genes included BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, FANCM, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD50, and ATR. Only oncogenic/likely oncogenic alterations were included according to OncoKB. CLINICAL REPORT AND RESULTS: We reported a clinical case of a patient affected by a highly pretreated uLMS discussed at the European Institute of Oncology Molecular Tumor Board. A targeted next-generation sequencing panel demonstrated a somatic BRCA2 homozygous deletion (homDel). Upon access to Niraparib, a remarkable response of 15 months was observed before experiencing disease progression. In the genomic query, among 2393 cases, uLMS (n = 193) displayed 9 of all 31 BRCA2alt observed, representing the only sarcoma histotype showing an enrichment in BRCA2alt (4.66%; q < 0.001). All of 9 BRCA2alt were represented by homDel, which related to a high fraction of genome altered. CONCLUSION: uLMS displays a significant frequency of somatic BRCA2alt homDel. Considering their dismal prognosis, further investigation is warranted to test the use of PARPi in uLMS, and particularly in the setting of BRCA1/2 alterations.

Deleterious alterations in homologous recombination repair genes and efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard first-line treatment for biliary tract cancers (BTC). Deficits in genes involved in the homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) may confer higher sensitivity to platinum agents. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients affected by BTC from 2 Italian institutions. Inclusion criteria consist of the receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and the availability of comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients were included in the HRD-like group if demonstrated oncogenic or likely oncogenic alterations in HR-/DDR-genes. Clinical endpoints were compared between the HRD-like group and the non-HRD-like group. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included, of whom 25 (33%) in the HRD-like group and 49 (66%) in the non-HRD group. With a median follow-up of 26.04 months (interquartile-range [IQR] 9.41-29.27) in the HRD-like group and of 22.48 months (IQR 16.86-40.53) in the non-HRD group, no PFS difference emerged, with a mPFS of 5.18 months in the HRD-like group compared to 6.04 months in the non-HRD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017, 95% CI 0.58-1.78; P = .95). No differences were observed in DCR (64% [95 CI 45%-83%] vs 73% [95 CI 61%-86%]; P = .4), and CBR (45% [95% CI 28%-73%] vs 50% [95% CI, 37%-68%]; P = .9) between the HRD-like group and non-HRD groups, respectively. Median OS did not statistically differ between the HRD-like group and non-HRD group (26.7 vs 18.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.670, 0.33 to 1.37, P = .27). CONCLUSION: HR-/DDR-genes, when assessed with regular tumor-only NGS panels, provide limited clinical validity to identify patients with BTC more likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy.

Cancers of Unknown Primary Origin: Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Genomic Analysis at the European Institute of Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP) poses a significant challenge due to poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment options. As such, further definition of clinicopathological factors and genomic profile to better adapt treatment strategies is required. METHODS: Medical records were interrogated to retrospectively include CUP with available clinical and genomics data at the European Institute of Oncology. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) included targeted panels. Statistical analyses were conducted with R Software 4.2.2. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 39.46 months (interquartile range [IQR] 35.98-47.41 months), median PFS (mPFS) to first-line regimen was 3.98 months (95% CI 3.22-5.98), with a clinical benefit rate of 26% (95% CI 14%-49%), and disease control rate (DCR) limited to 48.28%. Most patients (26 of 31, 83.87%) received platinum-doublet chemotherapy, with no statistically significant difference between first-line treatment regimens. Median OS (mOS) was 18.8 months (95% CI 12.3-39.9), with a 12-month OS rate of 66% (95% CI 50%-85%). All patients received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). For 11 patients, NGS was unsuccessful due to low sample quantity and/or quality. For the remaining, TP53 (n = 16, 48%) and KRAS (n = 10, 30%) represented the most altered (alt) genes. No microsatellite instability was observed (0 of 28), while 6 of 28 (21.43%) tumors carried high TMB (≥10 mutation per megabase). Eight of 33 tumors (24.2%) displayed at least one actionable alteration with potential clinical benefit according to ESCAT. Only 2 of them received targeted therapy matched to genomic alterations, with a combined mPFS of 2.63 months (95% CI 1.84-not evaluable) as third-line regimens. Six patients received anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy, showing a meaningful mPFS of 13 months (95% CI 2.04-not evaluable). CONCLUSION: CUP exhibits poor prognosis with limited benefits from standard treatment regimens. A significant proportion of CUPs carry actionable alterations, underscoring the importance of genomic profiling to gather additional treatment opportunities. In addition, immunotherapy might represent a valuable treatment option for a subset of CUP. Finally, accurate definition of sequencing methods and platforms is crucial to overcome NGS failures.

Baseline Tumor Size as Prognostic Index in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Experimental Targeted Agents.

BACKGROUND: Baseline tumor size (BTS) has been associated with outcomes in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of BTS on patients receiving targeted therapies (TTs) remains undetermined. METHODS: We reviewed data of patients with advanced solid tumors consecutively treated within early-phase clinical trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as immunotherapy-based or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST1.1 baseline target lesions. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients were eligible; the median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). OS was significantly longer for patients with BTS lower versus higher than the median (16.6 vs. 8.2 months, P < .001), including among those receiving immunotherapy (12 vs. 7.5 months, P = .005). Among patients receiving TT, lower BTS was associated with longer PFS (4.7 vs. 3.1 months, P = .002) and OS (20.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < .001) as compared to high BTS. However, such association was only significant among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with longer PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months, P < .001) and OS (21.2 vs. 6.7 months, P < .001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs. 22%, P = .57). BTS was not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs. 4.4 months, P = .30), OS (19.3 vs. 11.8 months, P = .20), and ORR (33% vs. 28%, P = .78) in the 2 BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (P = .03) and OS (P < .001) but not with ORR (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BTS is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients receiving biomarker-matched, but not biomarker-unmatched TT.

Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming increasingly important in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Real-world clinical outcomes from applying molecular tumor boards (MTBs) recommendations in this context remain limited. Accordingly, we conducted a retrospective, single-institution analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of discussing patients affected by mBC at the MTB. METHODS: Clinicogenomic data of patients affected by mBCs referred to the European Institute of Oncology MTB between August 2019 and December 2023 were reviewed. Genomic alterations were classified by ESCAT framework. Clinical outcomes of patients showing actionable alterations and receiving molecular-matched therapy (MMT) were compared to those receiving standard therapy (ST). RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included. Following MTB discussion, genetic counseling was recommended in 27% (n = 26) of patients, while additional molecular analyses were requested in 25% (n = 24) cases. Fifty-six patients (58%) displayed at least one actionable alteration. For patients with available follow-up (n = 50), 32 (64%) received MMTs and 18 (36%) ST. No differences in real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (4.07 months [95% CI 2.14-8.28] vs. 3.12 months [95% CI 1.51-NE], P = 0.8) and 12-month overall survival (OS) (58% [95%CI 43-78] vs. 57% [95%CI 34-97), P = 0.9) were observed between the MMT- and ST-group. Level I ESCAT alterations yielded longer rwPFS (5.82 months [95% CI 3.12-8.41]) compared to ESCAT II (2.14 months [95%CI 1.61-NE]) and ESCAT III (2.10 months [95% CI 2.04-NE]; P = 0.03). Twenty-four percent of patients showed a PFS2/PFS1 ratio > 1.3 from MMT. CONCLUSION: Molecular tumor boards can provide additional treatment options for patients affected by mBC. Besides treatment recommendations, MTBs also have the utility to assess the validity of discussed genomic reports and to identify alterations worthy of genetic counseling.

HER2-positive breast cancer: cotargeting to overcome treatment resistance.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The introduction in clinical practice of anti-HER2 agents changed the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer in both metastatic and early setting. Although the incomparable results obtained in the last years with the approval of new drugs targeting HER2, not all patients derive benefit from these treatments, experiencing primary or secondary resistance. The aim of this article is to review the data about cotargeting HER2 with different pathways (or epitopes of receptors) involved in its oncogenic signaling, as a mechanism to overcome resistance to anti-HER2 agents. RECENT FINDINGS: Concordantly to the knowledge of the HER2+ breast cancer heterogeneity as well as new drugs, novel predictive biomarkers of response to anti-HER2 treatments are always raised helping to define target to overcome resistance. Cotargeting HER2 and hormone receptors is the most well known mechanism to improve benefit in HER2+/HR+ breast cancer. Additional HER2-cotargeting, such as, with PI3K pathway, as well as different HERs receptors or immune-checkpoints revealed promising results. SUMMARY: HER2+ breast cancer is an heterogenous disease. Cotargeting HER2 with other signaling pathways involved in its mechanism of resistance may improve patient outcomes. Research efforts will continue to investigate novel targets and combinations to create more effective treatment regimes.

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, has been described in about 15-20% of breast cancer (BC) and is associated with poor outcomes. Trastuzumab is the first anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAB) that blocks receptor activity but it also activates immune response against cancer cells, thus, revolutionizing the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive BC. Over the years, new therapies have been developed, including other mAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that required multimodal approaches with chemotherapy to optimize their anticancer activity. This chapter gives a comprehensive overview of the last advancements including new approaches and future combinations, which seem to be very promising in overcoming resistance to the traditional anti-HER2 treatments. A modern therapeutic algorithm should include treatment options based on tumour patterns and a patient-centred approach. A proper patient's selection is crucial to derive maximal benefits from a treatment strategy and emerging biomarkers should be integrated along with the HER2 status, which is currently the only validated biomarker in the context of HER2-positive disease. These biomarkers might include molecular features with reported prognostic/predictive significance, such as phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which all affect prognosis and response to treatments.

Postneoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been conventionally associated with poor prognosis, as a result of limited therapeutic options. In the early setting, prognosis is informed by clinical-pathological factors; for patients receiving neoadjuvant treatments, pathological complete response (pCR) is the strongest factor. In this review, we mapped the landscape of clinical trials in the postneoadjuvant space, and identified three patterns of clinical trial design. RECENT FINDINGS: For patients at higher risk, effective postneoadjuvant treatments are of paramount importance to address a high clinical need. Postneoadjuvant risk-adapted treatments have demonstrated to improve survival in patients at high of recurrence. SUMMARY: Patients at high risk have indication for adjuvant treatment intensification, informed by baseline clinical, pathological or molecular factors (type 1 approach), on the presence, extent and molecular characteristics of the residual disease at the time of surgery (type 2) or on risk factors assessed in the postsurgical setting (type 3), for example, circulating tumour DNA. Most of the past trials were based on type 2 approaches, for example, with capecitabine and Olaparib. Few trials were based on a type 1 approach, notably pembrolizumab for early TNBC. The clinical validity of type 3 approaches is under investigation in several ongoing trials.

The return of RET GateKeeper mutations? an in-silico exploratory analysis of potential resistance mechanisms to novel RET macrocyclic inhibitor TPX-0046.

TPX-0046 is designed to overcome resistance to FDA approved RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. Early prediction of resistance mechanisms to investigational drugs may facilitate subsequent drug and trial designs. This study aims to predict potential mutations inducing resistance to TPX-0046. We conducted an in-silico analysis of TPX-0046 macrocyclic structure and predicted the binding mode on RET. We used as reference literary examples of resistance mechanisms to other macrocyclic inhibitors (Lorlatinib on ALK/ROS1) to construct RET secondary resistance mutations. We conducted docking simulations to evaluate impact of mutations on TPX-0046 binding. TPX-0046 binding mode on RET appears to not be influenced by Solventfront G810X mutation presence. Bulky Gatekeeper V804X mutations affect predicted TPX-0046 binding mode. Mutations in Beta 7 strand region L881F and xDFG S891L impair TPX-0046 docking. Our findings suggest that development of second generation RET inhibitors focused mainly on Solventfront G810X mutations granting resistance to selective RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. If these findings are confirmed by identification of Gatekeeper V804X mutations in patients progressing to TPX-0046, explanation of acquired resistance and loss of benefit will be easier These findings might accelerate development of third generation RET inhibitors, as well as clinical trial design in precision oncology settings.

Radiation therapy, tissue radiosensitization, and potential synergism in the era of novel antibody-drug conjugates.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a therapeutic class of agents designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells. With the increasingly positioning of ADCs in the clinical practice, combinations with other treatment modalities, including radiation therapy (RT), will open new opportunities but also challenges. This review evaluates ADC-RT interactions, examining therapeutic synergies and potential caveats. ADC payloads can be radiosensitizing, enhancing cytotoxicity when used in combination with RT. Antigens targeted by ADCs can have various tissue expressions, resulting in possible off-target toxicities by tissue radiosensitization. Notably, the HER-2-directed ADC trastuzumab emtansine has appeared to increase the risk of radionecrosis when used concomitantly with brain RT, as glial cells can express HER2, too. Other possible organ-specific effects are discussed, such as pulmonary and cardiac toxicities. The lack of robust clinical data on the ADC-RT combination raises concerns regarding specific side effects and the ultimate trade-off of toxicity and safety of some combined approaches. Clinical studies are needed to assess ADC-RT combination safety and efficacy.

Beyond PD(L)-1 Blockade in Microsatellite-Instable Cancers: Current Landscape of Immune Co-Inhibitory Receptor Targeting.

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) derives from genomic hypermutability due to deficient mismatch repair function. Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancers (EC) are the tumor types that more often present MSI-H. Anti-PD(L)-1 antibodies have been demonstrated to be agnostically effective in patients with MSI-H cancer, but 50-60% of them do not respond to single-agent treatment, highlighting the necessity of expanding their treatment opportunities. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) non-targeting PD(L)-1 that has been approved so far by the FDA for MSI-H cancer, namely, CRC in combination with nivolumab. Anti-TIM3 antibody LY3321367 showed interesting clinical activity in combination with anti-PDL-1 antibody in patients with MSI-H cancer not previously treated with anti-PD(L)-1. In contrast, no clinical evidence is available for anti-LAG3, anti-TIGIT, anti-BTLA, anti-ICOS and anti-IDO1 antibodies in MSI-H cancers, but clinical trials are ongoing. Other immunotherapeutic strategies under study for MSI-H cancers include vaccines, systemic immunomodulators, STING agonists, PKM2 activators, T-cell immunotherapy, LAIR-1 immunosuppression reversal, IL5 superagonists, oncolytic viruses and IL12 partial agonists. In conclusion, several combination therapies of ICIs and novel strategies are emerging and may revolutionize the treatment paradigm of MSI-H patients in the future. A huge effort will be necessary to find reliable immune biomarkers to personalize therapeutical decisions.

Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.

The evolving landscape of metastatic HER2-positive, hormone receptor-positive Breast Cancer.

Therapeutic agents targeting Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) demonstrated to positively impact the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2-positive breast cancer can present either as hormone receptor-negative or positive, defining Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). TPBC demonstrate unique gene expression profiles, showing reduced HER2-driven gene expression, as recapitulated by a higher proportion of Luminal-type intrinsic subtypes. The different molecular landscape of TPBC dictates distinctive clinical features, including reduced chemotherapy sensitivity, different patterns of recurrence, and better overall prognosis. Cross-talk between HER2 and hormone receptor signaling seems to be critical to determine resistance to HER2-directed agents. Accordingly, superior outcomes have been achieved with the use of endocrine therapy, representing the first subtype-specific pharmacological intervention unique to this subgroup. Additional targeted agents capable to tackle resistance mechanisms to anti-HER2, hormone agents, or both might further improve the efficacy of treatments, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, particularly in a biomarker-enriched setting, and CDK4/6-inhibitors, with preliminary data suggesting a role of PAM50 subtyping to predict higher benefits in luminal tumors. Finally, the distinct biology of triple-positive tumors may yield the rationale for considering combinations within antibody-drug conjugate regimens. Accordingly, in this review, we summarized the current evidence and rationale for considering TPBC as a different entity, in which distinct therapeutical approaches leveraging on the different biological profile of TPBC may result in superior anticancer regimens and improved patient-centric outcomes.

The HER2-low revolution in breast oncology: steps forward and emerging challenges.

Approximately half of breast cancers (BCs), historically categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, have low expression of HER2 defined as an immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization. Retrospective evidence suggest that HER2-low BC does not represent a distinct subtype from a biological and prognostic perspective. Nonetheless, it currently constitutes an essential biomarker to guide treatment selection and its introduction has led to reconsidering the binary classification of HER2 status according to which only patients with HER2-positive BC were thought to derive benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with HER2-low metastatic BC based on the results of the DESTINY-Breast04 phase III trial, and other antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2 are showing promising results. Treatment paradigms for both triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive BCs exhibiting HER2-low expression are thus rapidly evolving. Given its therapeutic implications, it is essential to accurately recognize the level of HER2 expression, and the development of more sensitive and reliable methods for HER2 testing and scoring is warranted, especially since the minimum threshold of HER2 expression required for T-DXd efficacy is currently under investigation. Given the signs of activity of T-DXd even in patients with HER2-0 (IHC 0) disease, an evolution in the way we define HER2-low is anticipated. Considering the expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium for BC patients, with several ADCs approaching the clinic, research efforts are needed to clarify whether the expression level of targets can enrich for responders to a given ADC as well as to understand mechanisms of resistance with the goal of optimizing the sequencing of ADCs.

Pharmacoeconomics of novel pharmacotherapies in triple-negative breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the most aggressive breast cancer subtype carrying unfavorable clinical outcomes. Although traditionally chemotherapy has represented the only systemic treatment option available, novel drugs have changed the treatment landscape, granting approval by regulatory agencies worldwide, while determining new economic struggles on health systems for their high prices. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provided a comprehensive analysis of pharmacoeconomic studies of drugs recently approved in the early and advanced settings of TNBC. EXPERT OPINION: Novel systemic treatment options redefined the therapeutic algorithms for TNBC by establishing new paradigms, based on substantial clinical benefits. Pembrolizumab and olaparib in the curative setting portend high value, as shown with the use of value frameworks, resulting in cost-effective interventions. In the metastatic setting, new drugs have demonstrated mixed improvements in patient-centric end-points, resulting often in interventions unlikely to have good value for money. We believe that cost-effectiveness alone is not a metric to inform the opportunity to invest on new interventions, while the intrinsic value of medicines should be the driver of the decisions. We endorse a patient-centric priority setting that can ensure health system sustainability, to timely deliver innovative cancer care to all in need and positively impact on population health.

A comprehensive update of hormone-related pharmacokinetic variations associated with breast cancer drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Drugs available for the treatment of breast cancer are increasing, yielding improved oncological outcomes. The efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs significantly depend on pharmacokinetic profiles, which could be influenced by several factors, such as sex hormones. AREAS COVERED: This article discusses the potential hormone-related pharmacokinetic influences on novel breast cancer pharmacotherapies. EXPERT OPINION: Recently approved drugs for the treatment of breast cancer belong to different classes, each with unique pharmacokinetic profile. The impact of hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone, may occur at different steps of drug metabolism. Key effects of sex hormones ha ve been reported on multidrug-resistant transporters and enzymes involved in the liver metabolism of drugs, such as cytochromes. Nevertheless, no data is currently available to establish hormone-related metabolic interactions that may account for variability in drug scheduling and selection. Whereas we recognize influences may occur, we do not assume hormones alone can yield clinically significant metabolic changes. Rather, we believe that hormonal influences should be considered along with other elements that may affect drugs metabolism, such as concomitant medications, age-related pharmacokinetic changes, and genetic polymorphisms, in order to deliver treatment personalization and ensure better tolerability and safety of anticancer treatments.

Future potential targets of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer (BC) remains an incurable disease. Besides endocrine and targeted agents, chemotherapy is still a relevant therapeutic option for this disease. Recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown to overcome the lack of tumor specificity and systemic toxicity typically associated with traditional chemotherapies, thus improving the therapeutic index. To effectively exploit this technological breakthrough, identification of optimal target antigens (Ags) is of utmost importance. To make the ideal target, differential expression of target Ags between healthy and cancer tissues, as well as specific mechanisms of ADC internalization after Ag-antibody interaction are required. Therefore, several in silico strategies to identify and characterize new promising candidate Ags have been developed. If initial in vitro and in vivo positive data are documented, thus providing a biological rationale for further Ag investigation, early phase clinical trials are designed. In BC, these strategies have already led to the development of effective ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), primarily targeting HER2 and TROP-2. However, promising new Ags are currently under investigation, with encouraging results especially coming from targeting HER3, FRα, Tissue Factor, LIV-1, ROR1-2, and B7-H4. In this review, we describe the landscape of emergent and future potential targets (i.e., other than HER2 and TROP-2) investigated in BC for ADC development. Predominant target expression, function, preclinical rationale, potential clinical implication, as well as preliminary clinical trial results are provided.

A demand-offer critical analysis of current drug development. Phase I drugs versus TCGA sequencing data.

BACKGROUND: Phase I clinical trials have become increasingly critical to regulatory approvals of novel agents. In phase I drug development, a global problem of unknown magnitude is the multiplicity of similar drugs being investigated against the same target, colloquially known as the 'me too' phenomenon. METHODS: Ranging from December 2020 to December 2022 we annotated phase I clinical trials present on clinicaltrials.gov. Public databases were queried for annotation of investigational agents (IAs). Extensive literature research and data mining were performed to annotate agents not present in public databases. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pan-cancer sequencing cohort was used to perform second-level analyses to evaluate tumour types with a higher number of IA matches. RESULTS: A total of 1054 unique drug targets were identified. The most frequent IA classes were: cell products (1223), small-molecule inhibitors (1110), antibodies (733), and vaccines (346). Only a minority (8.9%) of phase I IAs were explored against a target without a competitive agent; 7% of agents shared targets with 2-3 other agents. Unfortunately, the majority (84%) shared targets with at least four other agents. Using data from the TCGA pan-cancer sequencing potentially underserved histologies were identified. Analysis of alteration-IA matches revealed potentially frequent and unexplored alterations in many tumour types. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of IAs (86%) shared targets with at least three other agents. We argue that these duplicative efforts could be redirected toward unmet needs instead.

Variant allele frequency: a decision-making tool in precision oncology?

Precision oncology requires additional predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy selection. Variant allele frequency (VAF), measuring the proportion of variant alleles within a genomic locus, provides insights into tumor clonality in somatic genomic testing, yielding a strong rationale for targeting dominant cancer cell populations. The prognostic and predictive roles of VAF have been evaluated across different studies. Yet, the absence of validated VAF thresholds and a lack of standardization between sequencing assays currently hampers its clinical utility. Therefore, analytical and clinical validation must be further examined. This Review summarizes the evidence regarding the use of VAF as a predictive biomarker and discusses challenges and opportunities for its clinical implementation as a decision-making tool for targeted therapy selection.

Molecular tumour board at European Institute of Oncology: Report of the first three year activity of an Italian precision oncology experience.

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcomes by personalising treatment options for patients with cancer. Exploiting vulnerabilities identified in a patient's cancer genome requires reliable interpretation of a huge mole of alterations and heterogeneous biomarkers. ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) allows evidence-based evaluation of genomic findings. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) convey the required multi-disciplinary expertise to enable ESCAT evaluation and strategical treatment choice. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 251 consecutive patients discussed by European Institute of Oncology MTB between June 2019 and June 2022. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty-eight (74.6%) patients had at least one actionable alteration. After MTB discussion, 76 patients received molecularly matched therapies (MMTs) while 76 patients received standard of care. Patients receiving MMT displayed higher overall response rate (37.3% versus 12.9%), median progression-free survival (mPFS 5.8 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-7.5 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.5-4.8, p = 0.041; hazard ratio 0.679, 95% CI 0.467-0.987) and median overall survival (mOS 35.1 months, 95% CI not evaluable versus 8.5 months, 95% CI 3.8-13.2; hazard ratio 0.431, 95% CI 0.250-0.744, p = 0.002). Superiority in OS and PFS persisted in multivariable models. Among 61 pretreated patients receiving MMT, 37.5% of patients had PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥1.3. Patients with higher actionable targets (ESCAT tier I) had better OS (p = 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.049), while no difference was observed in lower evidence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that MTBs can yield valuable clinical benefit. Higher actionability ESCAT level appears to be associated with better outcomes for patients receiving MMT.