Benefit of continuous positive airway pressure on work quality in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective study was to assess the effect of CPAP therapy on job productivity and work quality for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: A convenience sample of patients diagnosed with severe OSA using polysomnography or polygraphy and with a therapeutic indication for CPAP was enrolled in our study. Patients completed two self-administered questionnaires: the first before CPAP therapy and the second during the first 6 months after CPAP treatment. OSA symptoms were evaluated through self-administered questionnaires assessing potential effects on occupational activity: excessive daytime sleepiness was rated by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), emotional status was rated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, work quality was rated by the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ). RESULTS: Forty patients (30 men, mean age 47.3 ± 8.3, mean BMI 31.6 ± 7.4, mean apnea-hypopnea index 51.8 ± 16.3) showed a beneficial effect of CPAP therapy on ESS score (mean 11.6 to 8.2, p < 0.0001), the anxiety dimension (mean 57.5% to 20%, p = 0.0002), and the overall anxiety-depressive score (mean 50% to 22.5%, p = 0.0006). Mean WRFQ scores were significantly improved in the second questionnaire for the dimensions of timetable requirements (69.3% to 83.5%, p < 0.0001), productivity requirements (71.4% to 82.2%, p < 0.0001), mental requirements (72.0% to 84.3%, p < 0.0001), and social requirements (82.6% to 91.4%, p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that adherence to CPAP therapy for patients with severe OSA mitigates the impact of symptoms on work including excessive daytime sleepiness, impairment of work ability, and anxiety and depressive disorders.

Underreporting of occupational blood and body fluid exposure in French university hospitals in 2017.

BACKGROUND: Occupational blood and body fluid exposures (OBBFEs) are one of the biological risks run by health professionals, especially in hospitals. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the occurrence and reporting of occupational blood and body fluid exposures (OBBFEs) in university hospital medical staff and to investigate factors associated to declared OBBFE and factors associated to reported OBBFE. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire has been e-mailed to all junior and senior medical staff in four university hospital centers in one administrative region of France in 2017. RESULTS: 292 of the 1,228 respondents declared at least one OBBFE. More than two-thirds (70.2%) were under-reporters and more than half (53.8%) non-reporters. Younger subjects, surgical specialties and other associated work accidents were risk factors for OBBFE. Considering the reporting procedure too complex was a risk factor for underreporting. CONCLUSIONS: Underreporting by hospital medical staff was a persistent phenomenon, with a high rate. The OBBFE reporting procedure needs rethinking.