Co-surgery in head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Co-surgery with two attending reconstructive surgeons is becoming increasingly common in breast microvascular reconstruction due to case complexity and the potential for improved outcomes and operative efficiency. The impact of co-surgery on outcomes in head and neck microvascular reconstruction has not been studied. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary head and neck reconstruction team (Otolaryngology, Plastic Surgery) at the University of Pittsburgh transitioned to a practice of co-surgery on head and neck free flaps. In this study, we compare outcomes of two surgeon head and neck reconstruction to single surgeon reconstruction in a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: 384 patients met our inclusion criteria from 2020 to 2022. Cases were performed by a single surgeon in 77.8 % of cases (299/384) and two surgeons in 22.1 % (85/384). The mean age was 62.5 years. There was no difference between the single surgeon cohort and the co-surgery cohort in terms of flap survival, procedure time, ischemia time, hospital length of stay, recipient site complications, or rates of return to the operating room. Donor site complications were less common in the co-surgery cohort (0 % vs 4.7 %, p = 0.021). For our reconstructive team, the transition to co-surgery has increased total surgeon fee collection per free flap by 28 % and increased surgeon flap related RVU production by 35 %. CONCLUSION: Co-surgery is feasible and safe in head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Benefits may include reduced complications, increased reimbursement, and improved interdisciplinary collaboration.

Venous Thromboembolism Rates After Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Region.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern for the postoperative hospitalized patient, especially after long and complex procedures. Cancer itself also contributes to the hypercoagulable state, further complicating the management of patients. Despite prophylaxis, breakthrough events can occur. We aimed to assess our institutional VTE and bleeding rates after free flap reconstruction of the head and neck (H&N) region and the factors associated with VTE events. METHODS: A retrospective review of the patients who underwent H&N free flap reconstruction at an academic center from 2012 to 2021 was performed from a prospectively maintained database. Data regarding patient demographics, medical history, surgical details, and overall outcomes were collected. Outcomes studied included postoperative 30-day VTE rates and major bleeding events. Patients who had a VTE event were compared with the rest of the cohort to identify factors associated with VTE. RESULTS: Free flap reconstruction of the H&N region was performed in 949 patients. Reconstruction after cancer extirpation for squamous cell carcinoma was the most common etiology (79%). The most common flap was thigh based (50%), followed by the fibula (29%). The most common postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis regimen was enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily (83%). The VTE and bleeding rates over the 10-year period were 4.6% (n = 44) and 8.7% (n = 83), respectively. Body mass index (28.7 ± 5.8 vs 26.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.013) and pulmonary comorbidities were found to be significantly higher in patients who had a VTE event (43% vs 27%, P = 0.017). Patients with a VTE event had a prolonged hospital stay of 8 more days (19.2 ± 17.4 vs 11 ± 7, P = 0.003) and a higher incidence of bleeding events (27% vs 8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative VTE is a significant complication associated with increased length of hospitalization in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the H&N region. Institutional measures should be implemented on an individualized basis based on patient comorbidities to improve the postoperative VTE rates, while balancing the bleeding events.

General health and knee function outcomes from 7 days to 12 weeks after spinal anesthesia and multimodal analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that continuous perineural femoral analgesia reduces pain with movement during the first 2 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR, n = 270), when compared with multimodal analgesia and placebo perineural femoral infusion. We now report the prospectively collected general health and knee function outcomes in the 7 days to 12 wk after surgery in these same patients. METHODS: At three points during 12 wk after ACLR surgery, patients completed the SF-36 General Health Survey, and the Knee Outcome Survey (KOS). Generalized Estimating Equations were implemented to evaluate the association between patient-reported survey outcomes and (1) preoperative baseline survey scores, (2) time after surgery, and (3) three nerve block treatment groups. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen patients' data were complete for analysis. In univariate and multiple regression Generalized Estimating Equations models, nerve block treatment group was not associated with SF-36 and KOS scores after surgery (all with P > or = 0.05). The models showed that the physical component summary of the SF-36 (P < 0.0001) and the KOS total score (P < 0.0001) increased (improved) over time after surgery and were also influenced by baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: After spinal anesthesia and multimodal analgesia for ACLR, the nerve block treatment group did not predict SF-36 or knee function outcomes from 7 days to 12 wk after surgery. Further research is needed to determine whether these conclusions also apply to a nonstandardized anesthetic, or one that includes general anesthesia and/or high-dose opioid analgesia.

The 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the validity and responsiveness of three instruments: the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8), and the 40-item Quality of Recovery from Anesthesia (QoR) Survey in 154 outpatients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The objective was to provide a robust psychometric basis for outcome survey selection for surgical outpatients undergoing regional anesthesia without general anesthesia. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACLR with a standardized spinal anesthesia plan were randomized to receive a perineural catheter with either placebo injection-infusion, or injection-infusion with levobupivacaine. Patients completed the NRS, SF-8, and QoR instruments for four postoperative days to evaluate pain, physical function, and mental function. RESULTS: Regarding pain, neither the NRS nor the QoR offered advantages over the SF-8. Regarding physical function, the QoR physical independence composite offered no advantage over the SF-8 physical component summary. The QoR physical comfort composite assessed short-term changes in treatment-related side effects, and thus provided information not covered by the SF-8. Regarding mental function, the SF-8 mental component summary and QoR emotional state composite showed little change over the four days, although the latter measure showed higher responsiveness to change. CONCLUSIONS: For ACLR outpatients receiving regional anesthesia, the SF-8 is sufficient to assess postoperative pain and physical function. Adding the QoR physical comfort composite will help assess short-term side effects.

Rebound pain scores as a function of femoral nerve block duration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous perineural femoral analgesia has been reported to reduce numeric rating pain scores (NRS, scale 0-10) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In the current study, we determined rebound pain scores in autograft ACLR outpatients after nerve block analgesia resolved. METHODS: After standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative multimodal analgesia, patients received a femoral perineural catheter and 50 hours of saline or levobupivacaine. All patients received levobupivacaine (30 mL of 0.25% as a bolus) before the infusion. Patients completed a pain diary for 6 days, indicating serial NRS scores and perceptions of when nerve block analgesia resolved. Block duration and rebound pain scores were computed. RESULTS: Data from 84 participants' pain diaries were analyzed. Patients receiving saline infusion reported mean nerve block duration of 37 hours versus 59 hours for patients receiving the levobupivacaine infusion (P < .001). Mean rebound pain scores increased by 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.4). Based on the computations used to derive block duration and rebound pain scores, each hour of additional block duration was predictive of a 0.03-unit reduction in rebound pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: In an anesthesia care protocol consisting of spinal anesthesia and multimodal analgesia during and after autograft ACL reconstruction, approximately 33 hours of additional nerve block duration were required to reduce rebound pain scores by one unit. Further study is required to determine rebound pain score differences when other local anesthetics and anesthetic/analgesic plans are being used and when other surgeries are being performed.

Nausea, vomiting, sleep, and restfulness upon discharge home after outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with regional anesthesia and multimodal analgesia/antiemesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We analyzed discharge outcome data after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under spinal anesthesia including a perineural femoral catheter and multimodal analgesia/antiemesis. The outcomes specifically addressed in this report are nausea, vomiting, and retching (NVR) and quality of sleep/difficulty falling asleep/daytime restfulness. METHODS: ACLR patients were randomized to saline or 0.25% levobupivacaine as a bolus and/or 50-hour infusion. Patients completed the Quality of Recovery 40-item (QoR-40) survey on postoperative days 1 to 4. We analyzed predictors of perfect responses (i.e., no NVR and perfect sleep-restfulness) by pooling these specific QoR-40 items. Prospectively collected QoR-40 data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Data from 233 participants were analyzed. The addition of the femoral nerve block or perineural catheter did not predict associated improvements in NVR or sleep-restfulness. Previous days' NVR was the most consistent predictor of subsequent NVR, whereas gender and opioid consumption were less consistent predictors. Smoking status was not predictive of NVR. Previous days' sleep-restfulness was a consistent predictor of subsequent sleep-restfulness, whereas the presence of any moderate pain was a less consistent predictor of sleep-restfulness. CONCLUSIONS: NVR and quality of sleep-restfulness after the described regional anesthetic with multimodal analgesia and antiemesis is reported. Smoking status was not a predictor of NVR, and gender and opioid consumption were not consistently predictive of NVR. The addition of a femoral nerve block to the described multimodal technique was not associated with NVR or quality of sleep-restfulness.

Reduction of verbal pain scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-day continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Single-injection femoral nerve block analgesia and spinal anesthesia have been associated with fewer postoperative nursing interventions and successful same-day discharge after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the current study, the authors prospectively determined the effect of continuous femoral nerve block on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity with movement for 7 postoperative days. METHODS: Patients undergoing this surgery with no history of previous invasive surgery on the same knee were recruited for this study. After standardized spinal anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and perioperative multimodal analgesia, patients received a femoral nerve catheter with (1) saline bolus (30 ml) plus saline infusion (270 ml at 5 ml/h, placebo group); (2) levobupivacaine (0.25%) bolus with saline infusion (group I), or (3) levobupivacaine (0.25%) bolus and infusion (group II). Patients were surveyed preoperatively and on postoperative days 1-4 and 7 to determine NRS scores (scale 0-10). RESULTS: Data from 233 participants were analyzed. On days 1-2, 50% of placebo patients had NRS scores of 5 or above, whereas among group II patients, only 25% had scores of 5 or above (P < 0.001). In regression models for NRS scores during days 1-4, group II was the only factor predicting lower pain scores (odds ratios, 0.3-0.5; P = 0.001-0.03). Overall, patients with preoperative NRS scores greater than 2 were likely to report higher NRS scores during days 1-7 (odds ratios, 3.3-5.2; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral nerve block catheters reliably keep NRS scores below the moderate-to-severe pain threshold for the first 4 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.