The clinical and fiscal impact of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed cost, reimbursement, application, and outcome differences between endovascular (ER) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in a community hospital. METHOD: A total of 187 consecutive elective AAA repairs by both methods (69 ER, 118 OR) performed at a single center between July 2001 and March 2003 were analyzed. Average values in postoperative clinical and fiscal demographics were calculated for this period. RESULTS: The average length of stay was higher for OR than ER (9.38 days versus 1.94 days, P < .001). Significant reductions in operative time (4 hours versus 2.67 hours) and intensive care unit use (100% versus 4.05%) were seen in the ER population. Total hospital costs were slightly higher for OR than ER (21,989 dollars versus 19,668 dollars) despite a considerable difference in cost of the grafts (>11,000 dollars for ER versus <500 dollars for OR). However, hospital charges were much lower for ER than OR (32,660 dollars versus 48,877 dollars), and there was an average loss of 4986 dollars on ER cases versus a profit of 2064 dollars on OR procedures. Thirty-day mortality was not significantly improved in the ER population (1.45% versus 2.54%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescence and operating room times but no improvements in fiscal impact or overall morbidity/ mortality rates when similar preoperative medical risks exist.

Challenges associated with the integration of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a community hospital.

PURPOSE: There has been considerable debate regarding the proper place for endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) versus traditional open repair (OR). Our study compared preoperative patient demographics and outcomes for elective, asymptomatic AAA repairs performed at our center over a 33-month period. METHODS: For this study, we selected 342 consecutive elective infrarenal AAA repairs performed between July 1, 2000, and March 31, 2003, at Riverside Methodist Hospital. The patients underwent either ER or OR, depending on patient and surgeon collaborative determinations. Ruptured and symptomatic AAAs were excluded from our study. Preoperative demographics, anesthesia, complications, and discharge status for the 2 groups were analyzed, and statistical analysis was done to determine statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The preoperative status of the ER and OR patient groups were essentially similar. There were only 3 significant differences between the 2 groups: alcohol use was higher for the OR group than for the ER group (12.0% versus 5.2%; P = .04), and the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease were lower for the OR group compared with the ER group (6.7% versus 13.4% [P = .04] and 18.3% versus 30.6% [P = .008], respectively). The OR group used more general anesthesia than the ER group (99% versus 86%; P < .001) and had more complications, including dysrhythmia (8.65% versus 1.59%; P = .005), ileus (13.94% versus 0.79%; P < .0001), infection (8.17% versus 0.0%; P = .0007), respiratory complications (12.50% versus 1.59%; P = .0003), and renal complications (5.29% versus 0.79%; P = .032). The ER group had a higher rate of wound hematoma (4.76% versus 0.48%; P = .007). ER patients also had significantly less blood loss (379 mL versus 1930 mL; P < .001), a better independent discharge status (P < .0001), a shorter length of stay (1.8 days versus 8.2 days; P < .001), and a lower mortality rate (0.75% versus 3.85%; P = .0954). CONCLUSIONS: From our study we cautiously continue to encourage the consideration of the ER of AAAs in our patient population while being mindful of its limitations.

Oblique groin incision for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Groin incision for access to the femoral artery is necessary for stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, lymphatic and infectious complications can occur during wound healing after surgery. A vertical incision traditionally is used, but a new oblique incision technique has the potential to reduce complications. We report our results from AAA stent repairs performed via oblique incisions at our center for a 33-month period. METHODS: Data for 134 consecutive patients undergoing elective stent repair of asymptomatic infrarenal AAA performed by 2 cardiovascular surgeons at a single center from July 1, 2000, to March 31, 2003, were gathered for analysis. Wound complication percentages for infections, paresthesias, sepsis, and seroma were calculated. RESULTS: In 134 patients, a total of 278 incisions were made. Reasons for extra incisions included improving catheter entry angle (5 cases), tunneling for vascular tapes (3 cases), and initial approach too low (2 cases). The percentages were, however, calculated on a per-patient basis. Thirty day analysis revealed a 0% infection rate, 4.7% incidence of paresthesias, 2.38% rate of wound seroma, and 0% wound sepsis rate. CONCLUSION: Because of the nonexistent infection rate and low wound complication rate, our data supports the use of oblique groin incisions for stent repair of asymptomatic infrarenal AAA.