[Very preterm birth: should we be interested in maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index?]. / Grande prématurité : faut-il s'intéresser à la corpulence maternelle ?

UNLABELLED: Link between maternal body mass index (BMI) and pregnancy outcome is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To appreciate the impact of prepregnancy maternal BMI on very preterm birth (22-32 gestation's weeks). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To assess how maternal BMI does explain the mechanism of very preterm birth among live births. METHODS: Population-based study, including each mother with a live or stillborn baby was included in a geographically defined (Poitou-Charentes and Franche-comté, France) case-control study in 2004 to 2006. Leanness (BMI<18.5kg/m(2)) and overweight and obesity (BMI> or =25kg/m(2)) were defined according to World Health Organization's standards. Statistical analysis consisted in a polynomial regression on 832 mothers of very preterm babies and 431 mothers of full-term babies, taking account for confounders as maternal age, birth country, educational level, maternal work and smoking during the pregnancy. RESULTS: Leanness is a risk factor for very preterm live birth (aOR=1.73 [1.12-2.68]), overweight is a risk factor for stillbirth. (aOR=1.71 [1.03-2.84]). Among mothers of live born babies, leanness is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth (aOR=2.12 [1.20-3.74]), whereas overweight is a risk factor for very preterm birth on medical decision due to gestational hypertension (aOR=2.85 [1.80-4.52]). CONCLUSION: Morbid maternal stoutness before pregnancy is a complex risk factor for very preterm delivery. Women and couples should be informed and practitioners should be aware in order to prevent and manage this pathological status.

[Very preterm birth less than 33 weeks' gestation: how setting-up of a perinatal network does influence the activity of the neonatal tertiary care unit? The experience of the Poitou-Charentes region, France]. / Grande prématurité: impact de la mise en place d'un réseau périnatal sur l'activité du centre de néonatalogie de niveau 3 de la région Poitou-Charentes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of regional perinatal network setting on very preterm neonates (gestational age<33 weeks) referral and activity of regional level 3 NCIU, and short-term outcome of infants cared for. POPULATION AND METHODS: Comparison of data from medical records of hospital days and hospital outcome of very preterm neonates born before and after the setting-up of regional perinatal network (2002-2005). RESULTS: The setting-up of the Poitou-Charentes perinatal network has led to a 45% rise in number of very preterm neonates admitted to the level 3 neonatal care (114 in 2002, 166 in 2005), number of hospitalisation days has also increased by 31% in neonatology unit (2181 days in 2002, 2864 days in 2005) but remained stable in intensive care unit. A transient rise in neonatal mortality was observed, although the incidence of severe ultrasonographic cerebral abnormalities and that of bronchopulmonary dysplasia were lowered. CONCLUSION: Setting-up of perinatal network in Poitou-Charentes (France) has led to improved access to level 3 neonatal care, with rise in very preterm neonates survival and low incidence of short-term sequelae.

[Very preterm birth: is maternal anesthesia a risk factor for neonatal intubation in the delivery room?]. / Le risque d'intubation des grands prématurés en salle de naissance est-il lié au type d'anesthésie maternelle ? Expérience des réseaux périnatals Poitou-Charentes et Franche-Comté

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of tracheal intubation at birth in very premature neonates related to the type of maternal anesthesia in case of elective cesarean. POPULATION AND METHODS: All 219 live-born very premature neonates (28-32 weeks of gestation), delivered after an elective cesarean in the 27 maternity wards of 2 French semi-rural neonatal networks. Eighty-three percent (182/219) were delivered in level III maternity wards in university hospitals. RESULTS: Of the very preterm neonates, 33.3% (73/219) were intubated in the delivery room, either for respiratory distress syndrome or a low APGAR score. Very preterm neonates delivered after maternal general anesthesia were more often intubated than those delivered after spinal anesthesia (48.7% vs 25.2%; OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.8-5.1). The risk of intubation related to maternal general anesthesia remained statistically significant after an adjustment for gestational age, fetal growth retardation, respiratory distress syndrome, type of maternity ward, and a propensity score that took into account maternal sociodemographic characteristics and the causes of very preterm birth (aOR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.2). The risk of intubation related to general anesthesia was lower after adjusting for the 5-min APGAR score (aOR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.0-7.3). CONCLUSION: Very preterm neonates delivered after cesarean with general anesthesia require tracheal intubation in the delivery room more often than those delivered with spinal anesthesia. This study cannot assess a causal link between anesthesia and the need for neonatal intubation. However, neonatologists have to be aware of the type of maternal anesthesia because it may interfere with the non-invasive ventilation support policy of the very preterm neonate.