Comparison of ondansetron, tropisetron, and palonosetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after middle ear surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are 2 of the most frequent adverse effects of anesthesia. PONV prolongs hospital stays and also delays the recovery of patients. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the effects of ondansetron, tropisetron, and palonosetron on PONV in patients who had undergone middle ear surgeries such as mastoidectomy or tympanoplasty were compared. METHODS: The study included 165 American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 and 2 patients aged 18 to 65 years. Patients were randomized into 3 groups by a closed envelope method. Neither the patients nor the nurses administering the treatments knew which patient belonged to which group. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all groups. During skin closure, 0.075 mg palonosetron, 5 mg tropisetron, and 8 mg ondansetron were administered intravenously to the palonosetron, tropisetron, and ondansetron groups, respectively. After completion of the surgery, the patients were followed for 48 hours. Diclofenac sodium (100 mg IM) was administered to patients experiencing pain and metoclopramide chloride (10 mg IM) was administered to patients with nausea or vomiting. Potential side effects such as headache and constipation were recorded in the postanesthesia care unit and ear, nose, and throat clinic. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the effects of all 3 antiemetic agents on the severity of PONV (P = 0.081). At 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the palonosteron group (38.2%) than the ondansetron group (63.6%) and tropisetron group (61.8%) (P = 0.011). At 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly lower in the palonosetron group (32.7%) than in the ondansetron group (63.6%) and the tropisetron group (56.4%) (P = .003). The incidence of PONV between hours 12 and 24 postoperatively was significantly higher in the ondansetron group (27.3%) than in the palonosetron group (9.1%) (P = 0.013). The antiemetic requirement in the first hour after surgery was significantly higher in the tropisetron group (25.5%) than in the palonosetron group (7.3%) (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support those of earlier studies that suggest that palonosetron was statistically more effective than the other 2 formulations in the prevention of PONV in patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019; 80:XXXXXX).

The effects of dexmedetomidine on early stage renal functions in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac angiography using non-ionic contrast media: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine on early stage renal function in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac angiography. METHODS: 60 pediatric patients between 6 and 72 months of age undergoing cardiac angiography were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The patients in both groups were administered 1 mg · kg(-1) ketamine, 1 mg · kg(-1) propofol as bolus and followed by 1 mg · kg(-1) · h(-1) ketamine and 50 µg · kg(-1) · min(-1) propofol infusion. Additionally, a loading dose of 1 µg · kg(-1) dexmedetomidine given over 10 min followed by 0.5 µg · kg(-1) · h(-1) dexmedetomidine infusion to patients in group D. The patients were evaluated for NGAL, creatinine, renin, endothelin-1, TAS and TOS blood levels before the procedure and 6th and 24th h after the procedure. pRIFLE criteria were used to define CIN and its incidence in the study. RESULTS: According to pRIFLE criteria contrast-induced acute kidney injury developed in 3 (10%) of the patients in group D and 11 (36.7%) of the patients in group C (P = 0.029, risk ratio = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.084-0.88). In patients who developed CIN, Endothelin-1 levels in groups C and D were significantly higher than baseline levels at 6th, 24th and 6th h, respectively. Renin levels were significantly increased at 6th and 24 th( ) h in patients with CIN in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine may be beneficial in protecting against contrast-induced nephropathy during pediatric angiography by preventing the elevation of vasoconstrictor agents such as plasma endothelin-1 and renin.

Sedation for paediatric transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: comparison of two sedation protocols.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-propofol and ketamine-propofol sedation on haemodynamic stability, immobility, and recovery time in children who underwent transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. METHODS: In all, 46 children scheduled for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (n = 46) were included. The dexmedetomidine-propofol group (n = 23) received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) and propofol (1 mg/kg) for induction, followed by dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/hour) and propofol (100 µg/kg/minute) for maintenance. The ketamine-propofol group (n = 23) received ketamine (1 mg/kg) and propofol (1 mg/kg) for induction, followed by ketamine (1 mg/kg) and propofol (100 µg/kg/minute) for maintenance. RESULTS: In all, 11 patients in the dexmedetomidine group (47.8%) and one patient (4.3%) in the ketamine group demonstrated a decrease ≥20% from the baseline in mean arterial pressure (p = 0.01). Heart rates decreased ≥20% from the baseline value in 10 patients (43.4%) in the dexmedetomidine group and three patients (13%) in the ketamine group (p = 0.047). Heart rate values were observed to be lower in the dexmedetomidine group throughout the procedure after the first 10 minutes. The number of patients requiring additional propofol was higher in the dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.01). The recovery times were similar in the two groups--15.86 ± 6.50 minutes in the dexmedetomidine group and 19.65 ± 8.19 minutes in the ketamine group; p = 0.09. CONCLUSION: The ketamine-propofol combination was less likely to induce haemodynamic instability, with no significant change in recovery times, compared with the dexmedetomidine-propofol combination. The ketamine-propofol combination provided good conditions for the intervention.

Does dexmedetomidine provide cardioprotection in coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass? A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate whether dexmedetomidine has a cardioprotective effect during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into 2 groups: dexmedetomidine and placebo groups. In the dexmedetomidine group, dexmedetomidine infusion was started by a loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg/10 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h. The placebo group received the same volume of saline. Measurements of central venous pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) and cardiac index were performed before and after dexmedetomidine loading dose and 2, 24 and 48 hours after CPB. Simultaneously, arterial blood was sampled for CK-MB, cardiac troponin T, and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CK-MB, cardiac troponin T and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide values were elevated in the periods after CPB in both groups (p<0.05) and there were no statistically significant differences between groups. MPAP was decreased in the dexmedetomidine group at the 2nd, 24th and 48th hour after CPB (p<0.001, p<0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Higher cardiac index values were seen earlier in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial damage was not reduced by administration of 0.5 µg/kg loading dose and 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion of dexmedetomidine. However MPAP tended to be lower in the dexmedetomidine group. Large-scale clinical outcome studies are indicated to confirm the effect of dexmedetomidine.

Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, an α(2)-receptor agonist, provides sedation, analgesia, and anxiolytic effects, and these properties make it a potentially useful anesthetic premedication. In this study, we compared the effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam on mask induction and preoperative sedation in pediatric patients. METHODS: Ninety children classified as ASA physical status I, aged between 2 and 9, who were scheduled to undergo an elective adenotonsillectomy, were enrolled for a prospective, randomized, and double-blind controlled trial. All of the children received intranasal medication approximately 45-60 min before the induction of anesthesia. Group M (n = 45) received 0.2 mg·kg(-1) of intranasal midazolam, and Group D (n = 45) received 1 µg·kg(-1) of intranasal dexmedetomidine. All of the patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and sevoflurane, administered via a face mask. The primary end point was satisfactory mask induction, and the secondary end points included satisfactory sedation upon separation from parents, hemodynamic change, postoperative analgesia, and agitation score at emergence. RESULTS: Satisfactory mask induction was achieved by 82.2% of Group M and 60% of Group D (P = 0.01). There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in either sedation score (P = 0.36) or anxiety score (P = 0.56) upon separation from parents. The number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was higher in the midazolam group (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam are equally effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents; however, midazolam is superior in providing satisfactory conditions during mask induction.

Is the addition of dexmedetomidine to a ketamine-propofol combination in pediatric cardiac catheterization sedation useful?

Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization usually need deep sedation. In this study, 60 children were randomly allocated to receive sedation with either a ketamine-propofol combination (KP group, n = 30) or a ketamine-propofol-dexmedetomidine combination (KPD group, n = 30). Both groups received 1 mg/kg of ketamine and 1 mg/kg of propofol for induction of sedation, and the KPD group received an additional 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine infusion during 5 min for induction of sedation and a maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h. In both groups, 0.2 mg/kg of propofol was administered as a bolus to maintain a Ramsey sedation score (RSS) greater than 4 throughout the procedure. None of the patients in either group required intubation. In the KP group, one patient required mask ventilation. The chin-lift maneuver needed to be performed for eight patients in the KP group and one patient in the KPD group (p < 0.05). Adding dexmedetomidine to the ketamine-propofol combination decreased movement during the procedures. The heart rate in the KPD group was significantly lower after induction of sedation and throughout the procedure (p < 0.05). No significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or respiration rates were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean recovery time was longer in the KP group (5.86 vs 3.13 min; p < 0.05). Adding dexmedetomidine to a ketamine-propofol combination led to a reduced need for airway intervention and to decreased movement during local anesthetic infiltration and throughout the procedure. The recovery time was shorter and hemodynamic stability good in the KPD group.

The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam sedation on electroencephalography in pediatric patients with febrile convulsion.

BACKGROUND: When electroencephalogram (EEG) activity is recorded for diagnostic purposes, the effects of sedative drugs on EEG activity should be minimal. This study compares the sedative efficacy and EEG effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: EEG recordings of 60 pediatric subjects with a history of simple febrile convulsions were performed during physiologic sleep. All of these patients required sedation to obtain follow-up (control) EEGs. Subjects in Group D received 0.5 µg·kg(-1) of dexmedetomidine, and those in Group M received 0.1 mg·kg(-1) of midazolam. For rescue sedation, the same doses were repeated to maintain a Ramsey sedation score level of between 4 and 6. RESULTS: The mean doses that were required for sedation were 0.76 µg·kg(-1) of dexmedetomidine and 0.38 mg·kg(-1) of midazolam. Diastolic blood pressure and HR were lower in Group D than in Group M (P < 0.05). Hypoxia was observed in 11 (36.7%) subjects in Group M and none in Group D; this was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Frontal and parieto-occipital (PO) EEG frequencies were similar during physiologic sleep and dexmedetomidine sedation. However, EEG frequencies in these areas (P < 0.001) and PO EEG amplitude (P = 0.030) were greater during midazolam sedation than during physiologic sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine is a suitable agent to provide sedation for EEG recording in children. There is less change in EEG peak frequency and amplitude after dexmedetomidine than after midazolam sedation.

A comparison of 1 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane and 1 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.

BACKGROUND: A critical point in craniotomy is during opening of the dura and the subsequent potential for cerebral edema. Use of desflurane in neurosurgery may be beneficial because it facilitates early postoperative neurologic evaluation; however, data on the effect of desflurane on intracranial pressure in humans are limited. Isoflurane has been used extensively in neurosurgical patients. OBJECTIVE: This study compared 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane with 1 MAC isoflurane in facilitating hemodynamic stability, brain relaxation, and postoperative recovery characteristics in patients who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions. METHODS: A total of 70 patients (aged 18-65 years), with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 or 2 physical status, who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions, were enrolled in the study. For induction of anesthesia, fentanyl (2 µg/kg IV) and propofol (2 mg/kg IV) were administered. Endotracheal intubation was performed after administration of vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg IV) for total muscle relaxation. Before insertion of the skull pins, additional fentanyl (2 µg/kg IV) was administered. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 anesthetic regimens. For maintenance of anesthesia, 35 patients received 1 MAC of desflurane (group 1) and 35 patients received 1 MAC of isoflurane (group 2) within 50% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Intraoperatively, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured and recorded before induction and 1 minute after induction, after endotracheal intubation, before skull pin insertion and 1 minute after skull pin insertion, before incision and 1 minute after incision, and before extubation and 1 minute after extubation. Also, HR and MAP were recorded at 30-minute intervals. Postoperatively, extubation time, eye opening time to verbal stimuli, orientation time, and time to reach an Aldrete postanesthetic recovery score of ≥8 were recorded. In addition, opioid consumption was calculated and recorded. Brain relaxation was evaluated according to a 4-step brain relaxation scoring scale. All outcomes of the study were assessed and recorded by an anesthesiologist blinded to the volatile anesthetic gases studied. RESULTS: No significant difference in HR was observed between the 2 groups. Intraoperative MAP values in group 1 were higher than in group 2 (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between these groups in brain relaxation and opioid consumption. Extubation time, eye opening time to verbal stimuli, and time to reach an Aldrete score of ≥8 were found to be significantly shorter in patients in group 1 compared with patients in group 2 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions, patients who received 1 MAC desflurane-based anesthesia had earlier postoperative cognitive recovery and postoperative neurologic examination compared with patients who received 1 MAC isoflurane-based anesthesia. The observed benefits of early recovery from anesthesia, however, should be considered with risks such as higher MAP in patients administered 1 MAC desflurane.

The effects of caudal or intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine in children.

BACKGROUND: Clonidine is used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia practice to prolong the duration of action of caudal block with a local anesthetic agent. Which route of administration of clonidine is the most beneficial remains unknown. We compared the effects of caudal and intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine. METHODS: Sixty ASA I and II children, aged 2-8 undergoing inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy surgery received standardized premedication with midazolam and general anesthesia. The children were randomized in a double-blind fashion to three groups. Group L (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml x kg(-1) of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine and i.v. 5 ml saline, Group L-Ccau (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml x kg(-1) of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine + 2 microg x kg(-1) clonidine and i.v. 5 ml saline, Group L-Civ (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml x kg(-1) of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine and i.v. 2 microg x kg(-1) clonidine in 5 ml of saline. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and end-tidal carbon dioxide values were recorded. Postoperative pain [Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) score], sedation (Ramsay Sedation Scale) and motor blockade (Modified Bromage Scale) were assessed at predetermined time points during the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Caudal clonidine significantly delayed the time to first rescue analgesic and fewer patients required rescue analgesia in the 24 h after surgery. No motor block was observed in any of the three groups on awakening or during the study period. In Group L-Ccau, the CHIPPS score was lower than in Group L at all times through 240 min (P < 0.05), while the pain scores were lower in Group L-Civ only at extubation and at 240 min (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal clonidine prolongs the duration of analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine without causing significant side effects and this is because of a spinal mode of action.

Comparison of the effects of ketamine or lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough in patients undergoing surgery: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl-induced cough is common but has not been viewed as a serious anesthetic problem. However, the cough may be explosive at times, may require immediate intervention, and may be associated with undesirable increases in intracranial, intraocular, and intra-abdominal pressures. Prevention of fentanylinduced cough in such situations is of paramount importance. Ketamine, at concentrations achieved with standard clinical doses, has a direct relaxant effect on airway smooth muscle. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the effects of ketamine or lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted at the Erciyes University Medical School, Kayseri, Turkey. Consecutive adult patients aged 18 to 65 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated equally into 3 groups to receive lidocaine 1 mg/kg, ketamine 0.5 µg/kg, or placebo intravenously 1 minute before fentanyl administration. Following intravenous fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg over 2 seconds) injection, an observer, unaware of the type of medication given to the patients, recorded the number of episodes of coughing, if any. Any episode of cough was classified as coughing and graded by investigators blinded to treatment as mild (1-2 coughs), moderate (3-4), or severe (≥5). Blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (SpO2), and adverse effects (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were approached for inclusion; 300 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. No patients in the ketamine group had cough. The frequency of cough was significantly lower in the lidocaine (11/100 [11%]; P = 0.024) and ketamine (0/100; P = 0.001) groups compared with the placebo group (23/100 [23%]). The intensity of cough was significantly lower in the lidocaine (mild, 7/100 [7%]; moderate, 4/100 [4%]; P = 0.037) and ketamine (0/100; P < 0.001) groups compared with the placebo group (mild, 10/100 [10%]; moderate, 12/100 [12%]; severe, 1/100 [1%]). Severe cough (≥5) was observed in 1 patient in the placebo group. Incidence and intensity of cough were significantly decreased in the ketamine group compared with the lidocaine group (incidence, P = 0.001; intensity, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, and AEs. CONCLUSION: Intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) significantly reduced the reflex cough induced by fentanyl compared with lidocaine and placebo, and was well tolerated.

Effects of naloxone and flumazenil on antinociceptive action of acetaminophen in rats.

BACKGROUND: Studies of acetaminophen suggest that multiple nociceptive pathways are involved in the drug's analgesic action. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether naloxone and flumazenil were able to modify or antagonize the antinociceptive effect of acetaminophen in rats. METHODS: Adult albino Wistar rats were used in the study and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups. The acetaminophen group (A group) was administered IP saline and then 300 mg/kg IP acetaminophen 5 minutes thereafter. The acetaminophen + naloxone group (AN group) was pretreated with 1 mg/kg IP naloxone, followed by 300 mg/kg IP acetaminophen 5 minutes later. The acetaminophen + flumazenil group (AF group) was pretreated with 1 mg/kg IP flumazenil, followed by 300 mg/kg IP acetaminophen 5 minutes later. The control group received 2.5 mL IP saline, followed by an additional 2.5 mL IP injection of saline 5 minutes later. The paw-withdrawal latency period of the rats was assessed by an investigator blinded to treatment using the hot-plate test at 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after administration of acetaminophen. RESULTS: Thirty-two rats were evenly randomized by envelope method into 4 groups of 8 rats each. Baseline values for the A, AN, AF, and control groups were not significantly different (9.1 [2.3], 10.5 [2.7], 9.8 [3.0], and 8.9 [1.4] sec, respectively). In the AF group, flumazenil appeared to antagonize the analgesic effect exerted by the acetaminophen in the hot-plate test (30 min, 10.3 [3.7] sec; 45 min, 11.7 [5.1] sec; 60 min, 12.1 [5.1] sec; and 90 min, 12.2 [4.9] sec) and values were not significantly different from those obtained in the control group (30 min, 9.8 [2.2] sec; 45 min, 9.0 [1.6] sec; 60 min, 9.2 [1.6] sec; and 90 min, 8.5 [2.0] sec). In the AN group, naloxone did not significantly affect the values observed in the hot-plate test (30 min, 18.0 [4.5] sec; 45 min, 21.5 [7.8] sec; 60 min, 20.5 [5.9] sec; and 90 min, 22.3 [7.4] sec) and values at all time points were not significantly different from those obtained in the A group (30 min, 17.8 [7.6] sec; 45 min, 20.9 [6.9] sec; 60 min, 21.5 [7.3] sec; and 90 min, 23.8 [8.6] sec). All postbaseline values in the A and AN groups were significantly increased versus baseline and versus the control group values (all, P < 0.05). All postbaseline values in the A group were significantly greater than those in the AF group (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flumazenil antagonized the analgesic effect exerted by acetaminophen, while naloxone had no significant effect on acetaminophen's antinociceptive action in this pain model in rats.

Oral ketamine for pain relief in a child with abdominal malignancy.

Oral ketamine has been found to be effective during invasive procedures in children with malignancy. To the best of our knowledge, analgesic effects of oral ketamine have not been reported in pediatric cancer pain management. We described a patient with end-stage cancer pain that was resistant to opioids and was relieved by oral ketamine.

Comparison of 0.5% levobupivacaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, and 2% lidocaine for retrobulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery.

PURPOSE: The authors compared the efficacy of local anesthetics levobupivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine for retrobulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 135 patients presenting for vitreoretinal surgery under local anesthesia were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Group LB patients received 5 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine, Group L patients received 5 mL of 2% lidocaine, and Group B patients received 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine for retrobulbar anesthesia via inferotemporal injection. Sensory and motor block durations were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed by using verbal pain scala. Anesthesia efficiency, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and akinesia were assessed by using point scales. Hemodynamic data and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of patients, duration of surgery, and hemodynamic data in both groups were similar. The duration of motor and sensory block was longer in levobupivacaine and bupivacaine groups than lidocaine group. Pain on injection was found more frequent in Group L and Group B than Group LB and the difference between the Groups LB and B was significant (p<0.05). Surgeon and patient satisfaction were also higher and intraoperative pain was less in levobupivacaine group than lidocaine and bupivacaine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine provides longer motor and sensory block duration and higher surgeon and patient satisfaction than lidocaine and bupivacaine when used for retrobulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery.

Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Stimulation of various sites, from the nasal mucosa to the diaphragm, can evoke laryngospasm. To reduce airway reflexes, tracheal extubation should be performed while the patient is deeply anesthetized or with drugs that do not depress ventilation. However, tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty may be difficult because of the aspiration of blood and the possibility of laryngospasm. Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl both have sedative and analgesic effects, but dexmedetomidine has been reported to induce sedation without affecting respiratory status. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, controlled study was conducted at the Erciyes University Medical Center, Kayseri, Turkey. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were undergoing elective rhinoplasty between January 2007 and June 2007 with general anesthesia were eligible for study entry. Using a sealed-envelope method, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (20 patients per group). Five minutes before extubation, patients received either dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg in 100 mL of isotonic saline or fentanyl 1 µg/kg in 100 mL of isotonic saline intravenously. All patients were extubated by anesthesiologists who were blinded to the study drugs, and all were continuously monitored for 15 minutes after extubation. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and oxygen saturation using pulse oximetry (SpO2) were recorded before anesthesia, after drug administration, after skin incision, at the completion of surgery, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes before and after tracheal extubation. Any prevalence of laryngospasm, bronchospasm, or desaturation was recorded. RESULTS: Forty patients (25 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 24.86 [7.43] years) were included in the study. Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant increase in extubation quality compared with fentanyl, reflected in the prevalence of cough after extubation (85% [17/20] vs 30% [6/20] of patients, respectively; P = 0.001). There were no clinically significant decreases in HR, SBP, DBP, or SpO2 after extubation with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl. In the dexmedetomidine group, HR was not significantly increased after extubation; however, in the fentanyl group, HR was significantly increased compared with the preextubation values (all, P = 0.007). HR was significantly higher in the fentanyl group compared with the dexmedetomidine group at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after extubation (all, P = 0.003). Compared with preextubation values, SBP was significantly increased at 1 and 5 minutes after extubation in the dexmedetomidine group (both, P = 0.033) and at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after extubation in the fentanyl group (all, P = 0.033). The postoperative sedation scores and the extubation, awakening, and orientation times were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the dexmedetomidine group, bradycardia (HR <45 beats/min) was observed in 2 patients and emesis was observed in 2 patients. In the fentanyl group, emesis was observed in 3 patients, bradycardia in 2 patients, vomiting in 1 patient, and shivering in 1 patient; vertigo was reported in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of adverse events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The findings in the present study suggest that dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg IV, administered before extubation, was more effective in attenuating airway reflex responses to tracheal extubation and maintaining hemodynamic stability without prolonging recovery compared with fentanyl 1 µg/kg IV in these patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

Celiac plexus block with the long stylet needle technique.

Neurolytic celiac plexus block has been used successfully in the treatment of patients with intractable intra-abdominal pain due to malignancy or to benign pain syndromes. A new technique is described here for blocking the celiac plexus through the retrocrural approach with a special long stylet needle inserted under fluoroscopic guidance. Celiac blocks were performed in 2 groups of patients. In the first group (n=7), the classic technique was performed with the use of 2 needles; in the second group (n=5), 1 needle and 2 stylets were used to complete the block through the long guided needle approach. Parameters evaluated in each group consisted of the number of attempts, defined as the number of skin punctures, and fluoroscopy injection time, defined as time from the beginning of fluoroscopy to completion of successful needle insertion into the celiac area. Patients who had abdominal pain resulting from pancreatic cancer underwent celiac plexus block performed by the long guided needle technique. In the classic technique group, fluoroscopy injection time was 13+/-3 min and the number of attempts was 5.3+/-3; values in the long guided needle group were 8.9+/-3 min and 4.9+/-2, respectively. The difference in fluoroscopy injection times was significant (P<.05). The long guided needle technique for celiac plexus block may be an effective and appropriate method for beginners or for practitioners who are not knowledgeable about imaging techniques used in various medical specialties.

The effectiveness of intramuscular dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses during tracheal intubation and anesthesia induction of hypertensive patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients are at risk for increased hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Sympatholytic drugs administered during the preinduction period may prevent adverse events. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness of a single preinduction IM bolus dose of dexmedetomidine (DMED) 2.5 µg/kg in attenuating hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation and rapid-sequence anesthesia induction in hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. METHODS: Adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II and III) with essential hypertension, scheduled for elective abdominal or gynecologic surgery, were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were assigned to i of 2 groups: the DMED group received IM DMED 2.5 µg/kg and the placebo group received IM saline 0.9% 45 to 60 minutes before induction of anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with thiopental, fentanyl, and vecuronium and maintained with a sevoflurane-nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture. Hemodynamic values were recorded before (baseline) and after anesthesia induction, before endotracheal intubation, and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation. The patients were monitored for hypotension (systolic arterial pressure [SAP] decreased ≥25% from baseline or to <90 mm Hg) or bradycardia (heart rate [HR] decreased ≥25% from baseline or to <50 beats/min). RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty patients were assessed for enrollment during a 6-month period. Sixty patients (49 women, 11 men; mean [SD] age, 59.16 [8.39] years) were eligible for the study. There were no significant differences in baseline hemodynamic values between the groups. SAP and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) before anesthesia induction, 1 and 3 minutes after intubation, and DAP 1 minute after intubation were significantly lower in the DMED group than in the placebo group (all, P < 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in SAP or DAP 5 minutes after intubation. HR before anesthesia induction, before intubation, and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation were lower in the DMED group than in the control group (all, P < 0.05). In the DMED group, SAP after intubation, DAP before intubation, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation, HR before induction, before intubation, and 3 and 5 minutes after intubation were significantly decreased compared with baseline values (all, P < 0.05). In the control group, SAP at all times, DAP before intubation, 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation, HR before intubation, and 3 and 5 minutes after intubation were significantly decreased compared with baseline values (all, P < 0.05). Hypotension and bradycardia were observed together in 3 patients, and hypotension alone was observed in 1 patient 3 minutes after intubation in the DMED group; hypotension was observed in 1 patient at 3 minutes after intubation in the control group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that IM DMED 2.5 µg/kg administered 45 to 60 minutes before anesthesia induction attenuated, but did not completely prevent, hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation in these patients with essential hypertension.

[Comparison of phantom limb pain or phantom extremity sensation of upper and lower extremity amputations]. / Alt ve üst ekstremite amputasyonlarinin fantom agrisi ve fantom ekstremite hissi yönünden karsilastirilmasi.

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the upper and the lower extremity amputations with regard to phantom pain, phantom sensation and stump pain. A questionnaire consisting of 23 questions was send to the patients who underwent upper or lower extremity amputation surgery between 1996- 2005. The patients were questioned for the presence of phantom pain and sensations and if they existed for the frequency, intensity, cause of amputation, pre-amputation pain, stump pain, usage of artificial limb. Totally 147 patients were included and the response rate was 70 %. The incidence of phantom pain in Upper Extremity Group was 60 % and 65.8% in Lower Extremity Group. The incidence of phantom sensations was 70.7% in Upper Extremity Group and 75.6% in Lower Extremity Group. There was no significant difference between two groups considering in phantom pain and phantom sensations. The phantom pain was significantly higher in patients who lost dominant hand, experienced pre amputation pain and suffered stump pain. There were no significant differences in regard to phantom pain and sensation between upper and lower extremity amputations. However the presence of preamputation pain, stump pain and amputation of dominant hand were found as risk factors for the development of phantom pain.

The effects of the prophylactic tropisetron-propofol combination on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroidectomy under desflurane anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacies of tropisetron and tropisetron-propofol combination in the prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroidectomy under desflurane anesthesia. (This combination has apparently not been previously investigated for this particular surgery and anesthesia.) METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. One hundred five patients aged between 19 and 68 years were included in the study. Group T received 5 mg of tropisetron (tropisetron group. n=35), group TP (tropisetron-propofol group, n=35) received 5 mg of tropisetron and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol and group P (placebo group, n=35) received saline, immediately after anesthesia induction. The anesthesia induction regimen was applied to all patients, and anesthesia was maintained with 5-7% desflurane and 66% N 2 O in O 2 . RESULTS: Group TP reported a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (17%) than those in groups T and P (42.8% and 77%, respectively). The postoperative antiemetic requirements were significantly higher in the placebo group compared to the other two groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The tropisetron-propofol combination is more effective than tropisetron alone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a single dose of tropisetron for the prevention of vomiting after strabismus surgery in children.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the effect of different doses of tropisetron to prevent postoperative vomiting, which frequently occurs in children following strabismus surgery. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists' classification (ASA) I-II group patients 2-12 years of age were randomized to this prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Patients were placed in groups of 5 and did not receive any premedication. The first group received placebo, and the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th groups received 0.5 mg/m(2), 1 mg/m(2), 1.5 mg/m(2), and 2 mg/m(2) of tropisetron, respectively, following anesthesia induction. The same anesthetic technique and analgesia were used for all groups. The patients were examined for the presence of vomiting and for any complaints and side effects at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV) was statistically more significant in the placebo group at 2, 6 and 24 hours, when compared to the study groups (p< 0.001), but there was no significant difference among tropisetron groups at 6-24 hours (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of the incidence of POV among the study groups (16%, 16%, 24%, 20% respectively) at all periods (p>0.05). The number of patients with POV score of 3 was 10 in the placebo group, while it was 1, 2, 0 and 1 in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th groups, respectively (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Tropisetron (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m(2)) decreased the incidence and severity of POV following strabismus surgery in children. All of the doses seemed to be equally effective. There was no difference in POV control between placebo and any of the doses of the tropisetron after six hours. So we suggest that 0.5 mg/m(2) single-dose tropisetron is enough for preventing POV following strabismus surgery in children.

Addition of cisatracurium to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the onset and regression time of motor and sensory block, and the quality of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia by the addition of cisatracurium to local anesthetic solution in small doses in intravenous regional anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective hand surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous regional anesthesia was achieved using 3 mg/kg lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the control group or 0.01 mg/kg of cisatracurium plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the cisatracurium group. MEASUREMENTS: The onset and the regression time for sensory and motor block were recorded. Quality of anesthesia, intraoperative, and postoperative analgesic requirements were noted. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded every 5 minutes. MAIN RESULTS: The onset time of sensory and motor block in the cisatracurium group was shorter than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The quality of anesthesia was better in the cisatracurium group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to sensory block regression time. Motor block regression time was statistically longer in the cisatracurium group than in the control group. Analgesic requirement was greater in the control group than in the cisatracurium group. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisatracurium to lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia shortened the sensory and motor block onset times, improved the quality of anesthesia, and decreased analgesic requirements without causing clinical side effects.