Cutaneous amitriptyline in human volunteers: differential effects on the components of sensory information.

BACKGROUND: Amitriptyline is effective in relieving neuropathic pain. Its site of action is thought to be supraspinal and spinal, but a peripheral effect on fibers is also suggested. METHODS: This double-blind study examined the effects of transcutaneous amitriptyline diluted in hydroalcoholic solution in healthy young male volunteers. Six treatments were randomly applied on different areas of the skin of the back: amitriptyline at 0 (vehicle), 25, 50, and 100 mm; saline (control); and lidocaine-prilocaine cream as a positive control. Up to 24 h after application, mechanical thresholds for touch and nociception, and thermal thresholds for cold, warm, and heat sensation were recorded for each area. Blood samples were collected to assess plasma levels of amitriptyline. A late recording of the tactile thresholds was performed 1 and 3 weeks after the treatment session. RESULTS: The thresholds for all sensations did not differ between the vehicle and saline. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream displayed a short-lasting anesthetic effect for all sensations, although this was not significant for warm sensation. Amitriptyline, at the three concentrations studied, induced a mild and short-lasting increase of the tactile and mechanical nociceptive thresholds. It significantly decreased cold thresholds (down to 21.8 degrees C, P = 0.01 vs. 27.5 degrees C for control) and heat thresholds (down to 40.1 degrees C, P = 0.004 vs. 43.4 degrees C for control). These two effects were no longer significant after the fourth hour of observation. Amitriptyline did not change warm thresholds. There was no apparent systemic absorption effect of the drug. CONCLUSION: It is hypothesized that amitriptyline has a differential effect on different fiber structures.

Influence of unclogging agents on the surface state of enteral feeding tubes.

BACKGROUND: Despite standardized prevention procedures, recalcitrant clogging of enteral feeding tubes is observed, which requires recourse to varied unclogging agents. Some of these agents have proved effective in routine use, but their impact on the surface state of the tube materials has never been studied. In this work, the authors tested the impact of different unclogging agents on the materials used for these tubes (polyurethane and silicone). METHODS: Enteral feeding tubes were placed in contact with different agents in vitro, and the surface state of the material was analyzed using 2 different methods: infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. To assess the surface state of the silicone and polyurethane tubes, negative controls (undamaged tubes) and positive controls (deliberately damaged tubes) were used for each type. RESULTS: The infrared spectroscopy method did not reveal any damage to the surface of either the silicone or the polyurethane tubes with either treatment. The test results by scanning electron microscopy showed that orange juice, pineapple juice, and cola had no detrimental action on the tube biomaterials under current conditions of clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although some studies have advocated using polyurethane tubes to administer medication, silicone appears to be less vulnerable to damage by the agents tested.