Strengthening Nepal's Female Community Health Volunteer network: a qualitative study of experiences at two years.

BACKGROUND: Nepal's Female Community Health Volunteer (FCHV) program has been described as an exemplary public-sector community health worker program. However, despite its merits, the program still struggles to provide high-quality, accessible services nation-wide. Both in Nepal and globally, best practices for community health worker program implementation are not yet known: there is a dearth of empiric research, and the research that has been done has shown inconsistent results. METHODS: Here we evaluate a pilot program designed to strengthen the Nepali government's FCHV network. The program was structured with five core components: 1) improve local FCHV leadership; 2) facilitate structured weekly FCHV meetings and 3) weekly FCHV trainings at the village level; 4) implement a monitoring and evaluation system for FCHV patient encounters; and 5) provide financial compensation for FCHV work. Following twenty-four months of program implementation, a retrospective programmatic evaluation was conducted, including qualitative analysis of focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Qualitative data analysis demonstrated that the program was well-received by program participants and community members, and suggests that the five core components of this program were valuable additions to the pre-existing FCHV network. Analysis also revealed key challenges to program implementation including geographic limitations, literacy limitations, and limitations of professional respect from healthcare workers to FCHVs. Descriptive statistics are presented for programmatic process metrics and costs throughout the first twenty four months of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The five components of this pilot program were well-received as a mechanism for strengthening Nepal's FCHV program. To our knowledge, this is the first study to present such data, specifically informing programmatic design and management of the FCHV program. Despite limitations in its scope, this study offers tangible steps forward for further research and community health worker program improvement, both within Nepal and globally.

Prevalence and types of vaccination errors from 2009 to 2018: A systematic review of the medical literature.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination practices and the programmatic factors that influence them are essential for public health. Several barriers impact vaccination efforts, including vaccination errors, which pose the risk of reduced population-wide vaccination efficacy and individual adverse drug events. This study aimed to define the prevalence of vaccination errors documented in English language medical literature between 2009 and 2018 and to identify the common types of errors that occurred during this period. METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews prior to research activities. The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar, ProQuest Central, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using predetermined search terms. Included data were from primary studies or retrospective analyses that assessed the prevalence and/or type of vaccination errors and that were peer-reviewed, conducted between 2009 and 2018, and published in English. Data were extracted using the Cochrane Data Extraction and Assessment Template and assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Pooled vaccination error prevalence was then calculated. RESULTS: Of the 1310 independent records that were identified and screened, 17 studies from five countries met all inclusion criteria. Pooled vaccination error prevalence was calculated to be 1.15 per 10,000 vaccine doses (range, 0.005-141.69 per 10,000 doses). The most commonly reported vaccination errors were "wrong vaccine administered" and "off-schedule administration." CONCLUSIONS: International rates of vaccination error reporting remain low, with few reports of significant adverse reactions. Vaccination programs should consider the impact of vaccination errors on individual and population health, particularly focusing on the impact of "wrong vaccine" administration. Continued monitoring and promotion of error reporting will enable further understanding of this topic.

Implementing surgical services in a rural, resource-limited setting: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: There are well-established protocols and procedures for the majority of common surgical diseases, yet surgical services remain largely inaccessible for much of the world's rural poor. Data on the process and outcome of surgical care expansion, however, are very limited, and the roll-out process of rural surgical implementation in particular has never been studied. Here, we propose the first implementation research study to assess the surgical scale-up process in the rural district of Achham, Nepal. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based primarily on the protocols of the WHO's Integrated Management for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (IMEESC), this study's threefold implementation strategy will include: (1) the core IMEESC surgical care program, (2) community-based follow-up via health workers, and (3) hospital-based quality improvement programs. The implementation program will employ additional emergency and surgical care protocols developed collaboratively by physicians, nurses and the authors. This strategy will be referred to as IMEESC-Plus. This study will employ both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies to collect clinical data and information on the reception and utilisation of services. The first 18 months of the implementation process will be studied and divided into an initial phase (first 6 months) and a consolidation phase (subsequent 12 months). DISCUSSION: This study aims to describe the logistics of the implementation process of IMEESC-Plus, and assess the quality of the resulting IMEESC-Plus services during the course of the implementation process. Using data generated from this study, larger, multi-site implementation studies can be planned that assess the scale-up of surgical services worldwide in resource-limited areas.