Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Transplant ; 20(9): 2602-2605, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277581

RESUMO

Both congenital and acquired recipient anatomy can present a significant challenge to renal transplantation. A patient with congenital aortic atresia and limited dialysis access options presented to our institution for consideration of transplant. Through multidisciplinary planning, a strategy to accommodate the patient's variant anatomy was devised and successfully performed. A deceased donor vessel graft was used as conduit in combination with the recipient hepatic artery for renal graft inflow.


Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta , Transplante de Rim , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Artéria Hepática/cirurgia , Humanos , Doadores de Tecidos
2.
Am J Surg ; 222(1): 241-244, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33223073

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical decisions regarding the utility of carotid revascularization are informed by randomized controlled trial (RCT) results. However, RCTs generally require participating surgeons to meet strict inclusion criteria with respect to procedure volume. The purpose of this study was to compare annual surgeon volume for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in contemporary practice to RCT inclusion thresholds. METHODS: Surgeon volume thresholds were identified in 17 RCTs evaluating the efficacy of CEA (1986-present, n = 17). Contemporary annual surgeon volumes (2012-2017) were identified by aggregating data from the Medicare Provider Utilization Database and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Network (HCUP), and compared to RCT inclusion thresholds. Further comparisons were performed over time, and across specialties (i.e., vascular surgeon vs. other, based on board certification associated with provider NPI). RESULTS: Minimal surgeon volume in 17 RCTs ranged from 10 to 25 CEA annually when specific case volumes were required. From 2012 to 2017, CEA incidence in Medicare beneficiaries declined from 68,608 to 56,004 and became increasingly consolidated in fewer providers (7,331 vs. 6,626). However, in 2016 only 26.2% of surgeons performing CEA in Medicare beneficiaries would have met the least stringent volume requirement (10 CEA/year). Only 6.5% of surgeons performing CEA met the most stringent RCT volume threshold (25 cases/year) during the same time period. In 2017, 819 vascular surgeons (25.5% of those certified in the specialty) performed >10 CEA in Medicare beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgeons performing CEA do not meet the annual volume thresholds required for participation in the RCTs that have evaluated the efficacy of carotid revascularization. Given the established volume-outcome relationship in CEA, the disparity between surgeon experience in the context of RCTs versus contemporary practice is concerning. These findings have potential implications for informed decision-making, hospital privileging, and regionalization of care.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/normas , Humanos , Seleção de Pessoal/organização & administração , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Cirurgiões/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA