Editor's Choice - Trends in Management and Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Report From the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. METHODS: From 1996 - 2022, 3 908 patients were divided into similar sized quartiles (T1, T2, T3, and T4). In hospital outcomes were analysed for each quartile. Survival rates following admission were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses with Mantel-Cox Log rank tests. RESULTS: Endovascular treatment increased from 19.1% in T1 to 37.2% in T4 (ptrend < .001). Correspondingly, medical therapy decreased from 65.7% in T1 to 54.0% in T4 (ptrend < .001), and open surgery from 14.8% in T1 to 7.0% in T4 (ptrend < .001). In hospital mortality decreased in the overall cohort from 10.7% in T1 to 6.1% in T4 (ptrend < .001), as well as in medically, endovascularly and surgically treated patients (ptrend = .017, .033, and .011, respectively). Overall post-admission survival at three years increased (T1: 74.8% vs. T4: 77.3%; p = .006). CONCLUSION: Considerable changes in the management of acute type B aortic dissection were observed over time, with a significant increase in the use of endovascular treatment and a corresponding reduction in open surgery and medical management. These changes were associated with a decreased overall in hospital and three year post-admission mortality rate among quartiles.

Factor eight inhibiting bypass activity for refractory bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative bleeding and transfusion have been associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. The use of factor eight inhibiting bypass activity (FEIBA) in managing bleeding after repair of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not previously been evaluated. We report our experience in utilizing FEIBA in ATAAD repair. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent repair of ATAAD between July 2014 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, dependent upon whether or not they received FEIBA intraoperatively: "FEIBA" (n = 112) versus "no FEIBA" (n = 119). From this, 53 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed with respect to transfusion requirements and short-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11.7% (27 deaths), not significantly different between patient groups. Those patients who received FEIBA demonstrated reduced transfusion requirements for all types of blood products in the first 48 h after surgery as compared with the "no FEIBA" cases, including red blood cells, platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in major postoperative morbidity between the two groups. The FEIBA cohort did not demonstrate an increased incidence of thrombotic complications (stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism). DISCUSSION: When used as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding following repair of ATAAD, FEIBA appears to be effective in decreasing postoperative transfusion requirements whilst not negatively impacting clinical outcomes. These findings should prompt further investigation and validation via larger, multi-center, randomized trials.

Deep Versus Moderate Hypothermia in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ideal temperature for hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) during acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair has yet to be determined. We examined the clinical impact of different degrees of hypothermia during dissection repair. METHODS: Out of 240 cases of ATAAD between June 2014 and December 2019, 228 patients were divided into two groups according to lowest intraoperative temperature: moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) (20-28°C) versus deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (<20°C). From this, 74 pairs of propensity-matched patients were analysed with respect to operative data and short-term clinical outcomes. Independent predictors of a composite outcome of 30-day mortality and stroke were identified. RESULTS: Mean lowest temperature was 25.5±3.9°C in the MHCA group versus 16.0±2.9°C in DHCA. Overall 30-day mortality of matched cohort was 11.5% (17 deaths), there were no significant different between matched groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times were longer in DHCA (221.0±69.9 vs 190.7±74.5 mins, p=0.01). Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) during HCA predicted a lower composite risk of 30-day mortality and stroke (OR 0.38). Female sex (OR 4.71), lower extremity ischaemia at presentation (OR 3.07), and CPB >235 minutes (OR 2.47), all portended worse postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical strategy of MHCA is at least as safe as DHCA during repair of acute type A aortic dissection. ACP during HCA is associated with reduced 30-day mortality and stroke, whereas female sex, lower extremity ischaemia, and longer CPB times are all predictive of poorer short-term outcomes.

Midterm outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers using the RelayPlus stent graft.

BACKGROUND: The Relay Thoracic Stent-Graft with Plus Delivery System (RelayPlus; Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, Fla) was designed to handle the curvature and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012; the postapproval study was stopped early because of adequate safety and efficacy data, and no difference was identified in experienced vs first-time users of RelayPlus. The purpose of this study was to report real-world outcomes of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with RelayPlus. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized postapproval study that required the use of novice implanters in the United States. Primary and secondary end points included device-related adverse events (deployment failure, conversion to open repair, endoleaks, migration, rupture, and mortality) and major adverse events (stroke, paraplegia/paraparesis, renal failure, respiratory failure, and myocardial infarction), respectively. Continuous and categorical covariates were reported in means or medians and percentages, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to report long-term TEVAR-related mortality, all-cause mortality, and reinterventions at 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients with mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 73.5 (±7.20) years were treated for descending thoracic fusiform aneurysm (56%) or saccular aneurysm/PAU (44%). The patients were predominantly white (80.0%) and male (68.9%). Mean (SD) proximal neck, distal neck, and lesion lengths were 38.2 (±37) mm, 42.1 (±28) mm, and 103.8 (±74) mm, respectively. Mean (SD) aneurysm, proximal neck, and distal neck diameters were 53.9 (±13) mm, 31.3 (±4) mm, and 31.7 (±6) mm, respectively. Technical success was 100%. TEVAR-related mortality at 30 days was 4.4%; two patients died postoperatively, one of shock and the second of bilateral hemispheric stroke. No patient in the study had any conversion to open repair or post-TEVAR rupture. Two patients experienced three major adverse events, which included stroke (2.2%), paraplegia (2.2%), and respiratory failure (2.2%) at 30 days. Three-year freedom from TEVAR-related mortality, all-cause mortality, and reinterventions was 95.6%, 84.0%, and 97.2%, respectively. There were two type I endoleaks at 3 years: one type IB associated with no migration or aneurysm sac increase and one type IA associated with caudal migration of proximal neck and expansion of the proximal aorta. CONCLUSIONS: The RelayPlus postapproval study reported low operative mortality and morbidity and supported use of the device as a safe and effective thoracic aortic aneurysm and PAU endovascular treatment. Early midterm follow-up showed sustained freedom from TEVAR-related mortality in real-world practice. Follow-up continues to evaluate the durability of this endograft.

Laser-assisted "Scissor" Technique to Facilitate Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in utilization of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat aneurysms with chronic dissection. Despite significant progress, TEVAR is hindered by persistent perfusion of the false lumen and aneurysm growth. Various techniques to address false lumen perfusion exist. We preset our experience of laser fenestration with disruption of the dissection flap to facilitate TEVAR and avoid persistent retrograde false lumen perfusion. METHODS: Review a technique to treat patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm complicated by chronic dissection. This is an adjunct to a TEVAR procedure with final goal to treat the aneurysm and avoid retrograde false lumen perfusion. Under IVUS guidance, we performed a Phillips/Spectranetics laser fenestration of the intimal flap followed by a scissoring technique to obliterate the dissection flap and create a distal seal zone. Stent-grafts placed following flap obliteration allow graft expansion and apposition to the entire outer aortic and avoid retrograde perfusion of the false lumen. RESULTS: Two patients underwent TEVAR in conjunction with laser obliteration of the dissection flap, including 1 undergoing primary repair of a chronic Type B dissection with aneurysm, and 1 as a completion second stage elephant trunk procedure. Technical success was achieved in both cases, with successful implantation of the endograft, and freedom from type I and III endoleaks. Absence of false lumen flow, and patency of the visceral vessels was confirmed on completion angiography. True lumen patency and obliteration of the intimal flap were confirmed by IVUS. Early follow up confirms exclusion of the aneurysm, with no evidence of retrograde perfusion of the false lumen. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic aneurysms in the context of chronic dissections can be successfully treated with TEVAR and laser obliteration of the chronic dissection flap to fully exclude the aneurysm and avoid retrograde false lumen perfusion.

Marijuana: An Underappreciated Risk Factor for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

BACKGROUND: Stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamines are well-established risk factors for acute aortic dissection. Despite the fact that marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States, its relationship to acute aortic syndromes has not been well studied. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who presented with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection from January 2017 to December 2019. Of 152 patients identified, 51 (33.6%) underwent comprehensive urine toxicology screening at clinical presentation. The characteristics and outcomes of the patients with urine results positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (n = 9, 17.6%) were compared with the 42 patients who had no evidence of recent marijuana consumption. RESULTS: Of the 51 dissection patients who underwent broad-spectrum urine toxicology screening upon presentation, 9 (17.6%) returned positive results for THC, a proportion higher than would be expected for the general population. All THC patients were male; 3 concurrently tested positive for cocaine, and 3 others had evidence of recent amphetamine use. The THC patients were significantly younger than the non-THC patients (mean ± standard deviation age 48 ± 11.3 versus 61.4 ± 12.3 years, respectively, P = .004). A greater proportion of the THC cohort had a known diagnosis of aortic aneurysm before the dissection (44.4% versus 4.8%, P = .006). All patients underwent expeditious surgical repair. Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort of 51 patients was 19.6% (10 deaths); for the THC group, it was 11.1% (1 death). There was no difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Marijuana is the third most commonly used substance in the United States, after alcohol and tobacco. Although marijuana use is understudied, our results suggest that marijuana may be a contributing risk factor for acute type A aortic dissection, particularly in patients with other predisposing risk factors. Given the recent national trend to legalize marijuana, with the concomitant potential for exponential increases in its consumption, we suggest that the diagnosis of aortic dissection be considered earlier in any younger patient who presents with suggestive symptoms, especially if there is a history of recent marijuana use.

Preoperative multidetector computed tomography for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement: Planning for future transcatheter options.

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a valuable option in patients with bioprosthetic failure. However, potential issues with ViV TAVR may occur in patients with high-risk anatomy for coronary obstruction and patients with baseline smaller bioprosthetic valves at risk for patient prosthesis mismatch. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to use preoperative electrocardiography-gated, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to (1) identify which would be high risk for coronary occlusion with ViV TAVR, and (2) predict intraoperative SAVR sizing. METHODS: Among 223 patients from our institutions' database that underwent SAVR for aortic insufficiency (AI) or aortic stenosis (AS) between January 2012 and January 2020, 48 patients had MDCT imaging before surgery (AI; n = 31, AS; n = 17). Of all patients, 67% (n = 32) were bicuspid morphology. RESULTS: With the use of virtual valve implantation, all patients with AI and bicuspid AS had feasible anatomy for ViV TAVR, while 38% of patients with tricuspid AS were high risk for coronary obstruction. There was a strong correlation between actual valve size implanted and preoperative MDCT measurements using annulus average diameter, area, and/or perimeter. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MDCT in patients undergoing SAVR is a useful tool for lifetime management, particularly in patients with tricuspid AS. Decisions for surgical management may change based on MDCT's ability to predict intraoperative SAVR size and determine which patients may be high-risk candidates for future ViV TAVR due to coronary artery obstruction.

Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: Hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary revascularization methods.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) constitutes a left internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, coupled with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-LAD lesions. This management strategy is not commonly offered to patients with complex multivessel disease. Our objective was to evaluate 8-year survival in patients with triple-vessel disease (TVD) treated by HCR, compared with that of concurrent matched patients managed by traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or multivessel PCI. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 4805 patients with TVD who presented between January 2009 and December 2016. A cohort of 100 patients who underwent HCR were propensity-matched with patients treated by CABG or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 8 years. RESULTS: Patients with TVD who underwent HCR had similar 8-year mortality (5.0%) as did those with CABG (4.0%) or multivessel PCI (9.0%). A composite endpoint of death, repeat revascularization, and new myocardial infarction, was not significantly different between patient groups (HCR 21.0% vs CABG 15.0%, P = .36; HCR 21.0% vs PCI 25.0%, P = .60). Despite a higher baseline synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery(SYNTAX) score, HCR was able to achieve a lower residual SYNTAX score than multivessel PCI (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In select patients with TVD, long-term survival and FREEDOM from major adverse cardiovascular events after HCR are similar to that seen after traditional CABG or multivessel PCI. HCR should be considered for patients with multivessel disease, presuming a low residual SYNTAX score can be achieved.

Time of day does not influence outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: Results from the IRAD.

BACKGROUND: Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) represents a surgical emergency requiring intervention regardless of time of day. Whether such a "evening effect" exists regarding outcomes for TAAAD has not been previously studied using a large registry data. METHODS: Patients with TAAAD were identified from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissections (1996-2019). Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing operative repair during the daytime (D), defined as 8 am-5 pm, versus the evening (N), defined as 5 pm-8 am. RESULTS: Four thousand one-hundrd and ninety-seven surgically treated patients with TAAAD were identified, with 1824 patients undergoing daytime surgery (43.5%) and 2373 patients undergoing evening surgery (56.5%). Daytime patients were more likely to have undergone prior cardiac surgery (13.2% vs. 9.5%; p < .001) and have had a prior aortic dissection (4.8% vs. 3.4%; p = .04). Evening patients were more likely to have been transferred from a referring hospital (70.8% vs. 75.0%; p = .003). Daytime patients were more likely to undergo aortic valve sparing root procedures (23.3% vs. 19.2%; p = .035); however, total arch replacement was performed with equal frequency (19.4% vs. 18.8%; p = .751). In-hospital mortality (D: 17.3% vs. N. 16.2%; p = .325) was similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis examining the effect of weekend presentation revealed no significant mortality difference. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of TAAAD patients underwent surgical repair at night. There were higher rates of postoperative tamponade in evening patients; however, mortality was similar. The expertise of cardiac-dedicated operative and critical care teams regardless of time of day as well as training paradigms may explain similar mortality outcomes in this high risk population.

Reoperative mitral valve surgery via sternotomy or right thoracotomy: A propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is, as yet, no broad consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach for patients requiring reoperative mitral valve surgery. Consequently, we sought to evaluate the perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing redo mitral surgery via right mini thoracotomy as compared with traditional resternotomy. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective review of our prospectively collected database was undertaken from January 2011 to December 2017. We propensity matched 90 patients who underwent reoperative mitral valve surgery via right mini thoracotomy with a concurrent cohort of patients who had redo median sternotomy. Intraoperative data and short-term clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 3.3% (six deaths) in the entire cohort, not significantly different between redo sternotomy and mini thoracotomy groups. Patients who had their procedure via right mini thoracotomy had reduced intensive care unit (P = .029) and overall hospital (P < .0001) lengths of stay, a diminished requirement for perioperative transfusion (P = .023), and a trend towards faster postoperative extubation. Right thoracotomy patients experienced shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (P = .012) and cardiac arrest (P < .0001) times than did the sternotomy cases. Peripheral cannulation was utilized more frequently in the mini thoracotomy group, as were fibrillatory arrest techniques. CONCLUSION: Reoperative mitral valve surgery via right mini thoracotomy is safe, and is associated with shorter extracorporeal circulation times, reduced transfusion, and faster postoperative recovery.

Aortic Cannulation in DeBakey Type I Aortic Dissection Facilitates Subsequent Deployment of a Frozen Elephant Trunk.

Arterial cannulation in acute DeBakey type I dissection can be difficult. Moreover, the residual dissected aorta is susceptible to further adverse events in the future. Implanting a stent-graft into the descending aorta during the initial dissection repair ('frozen elephant trunk') has been demonstrated to promote favourable aortic remodelling, mitigating some of these longer-term complications. We describe a technique for cannulation of the ascending aorta in acute dissection that facilitates expeditious antegrade deployment of a frozen elephant trunk.

Rethinking the Paradigm: Modern Approach to Proximal Aortic Reconstruction Demonstrates Excellent Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Techniques for aortic surgery continue to evolve. A real-world snapshot of patients undergoing elective surgery for aneurysm in the modern era is helpful to assist in deciding the appropriate timing for intervention. We herein describe our experience with 100 consecutive patients who underwent primary elective surgery for aneurysm of the proximal thoracic aorta over a two-year period at a single institution. METHODS: The majority of our patients were male, mean age 61.19 ± 13.33 years. Two patients had Marfan syndrome. Twenty-eight patients had bicuspid aortic valve. Thirty-four patients underwent aortic root replacement utilizing a composite valve/graft conduit; 23 had valve-sparing root replacements. The ascending aorta was replaced in 89 patients; 80 (89.9%) of these included a period of circulatory arrest at moderate hypothermia utilizing unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was zero. Perioperative stroke occurred in 2 patients, both of whom completely recovered prior to discharge. No patients required re-exploration for bleeding. One patient developed a sternal wound infection. Fifteen patients required readmission to hospital within thirty days of discharge. CONCLUSION: Elective surgery for aneurysm of the proximal aorta is safe, reproducible, and is associated with outcomes that are superior to those seen in an acute aortic syndrome. It may be appropriate to offer surgery to younger patients with proximal aortic aneurysms at smaller diameters, even if their aortic dimensions do not yet meet traditional guidelines for surgical intervention.

Prestenting for prevention of melody valve stent fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The role of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) prestenting in the prevention of Melody valve stent fractures (SFs) is not well defined. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the incidence of SF in Melody valve transcatheter pulmonary implants with and without prestenting. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies that reported the incidence of SF in Melody valve transcatheter pulmonary implants stratified by the presence or absence of RVOT prestenting. Subgroup analyses were performed for (1) SF associated with a loss of stent integrity and (2) SF requiring reintervention. RESULTS: Five studies and 360 patients were included, of whom 207 (57.5%) received prestenting. Follow-up ranged from 15 to 30 months. SF were significantly reduced in the prestenting group (16.7%) when compared to no prestenting (33.5%) (odds-ratio [OR] 0.39; 95%CI 0.22-0.69). Patients who received prestenting also had a lower incidence of (1) SF associated with loss of stent integrity (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.05-0.48) and (2) SF requiring reintervention (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.02-0.91). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that stenting of the RVOT prior to Melody valve implantation is associated with a reduction in the incidence of SF and fracture-related reinterventions.

Use of del Nido Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

UNLABELLED: Background: del Nido cardioplegia was developed to protect pediatric hearts, and similar to pediatric hearts, older adult hearts tolerate ischemia-reperfusion poorly. This study investigates the feasibility of del Nido cardioplegia as an alternative to conventional Buckberg cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 142 adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with del Nido cardioplegia and conventional Buckberg cardioplegia were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Fewer doses of cardioplegia and fewer defibrillations were noted with del Nido cardioplegia, and there were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative events. CONCLUSION: del Nido cardioplegia may be a feasible alternative to conventional Buckberg cardioplegia.

Central aortic cannulation for Stanford type a aortic dissection with the use of three-dimensional and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: There is still significant disagreement among surgeons about the best method for arterial cannulation to institute cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (STAADs). This study aimed to provide support for central aortic cannulation as a viable and preferable option, as it reduces time to institute CPB, operative times, and decreases the complexity of the procedure. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 34 patients who underwent STAAD repairs consecutively between October 2006 and January 2014. The sample was analyzed for method of cannulation, CPB time, cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time, mortality, and complication rate. Statistical analysis was performed to compare a control group of patients who underwent nonaortic cannulation. RESULTS: The most common method of cannulation was the distal aortic arch, which also produced the lowest relative mortality. The 30-day mortality was found to be 17.6%. Arrhythmia, acute renal injury, and failure to extubate within 48 hours were the most frequent complications, and cerebrovascular accidents occurred in three patients (8.8%). Statistically significant differences in bypass and cardiac arrest times favored aortic cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the notion that central aortic cannulation is a viable option for CPB in STAAD repair, but further prospective, randomized trials are necessary for the procedure to replace peripheral cannulation techniques.

Staged cerebral and brachiocephalic bypass in a patient with MCA and brachiocephalic steno-occlusion.

Background: Brachiocephalic steal is a rare phenomenon that may lead to hemodynamic abnormalities in the ipsilateral vertebral and carotid arteries. Current treatment includes management of vascular risk factors, endovascular stenting, and surgical management depending on the severity of symptoms. Case Information: We describe a patient with multiple vascular risk factors who presented with mild neurological symptoms and chronic right arm weakness associated with concurrent brachiocephalic steal and right MCA M1 stenosis on neuroimaging. Use of right superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass and aorta-right subclavian bypass resulted in improved flow to the right hemisphere on quantitative magnetic resonance angiography and single-photon emission computed tomography, significantly lowering the risk of catastrophic ischemic stroke. Conclusion: Complex steal phenomena increase stroke risk. In cases of high-grade occlusion or advanced symptoms, endovascular or surgical management should be considered for optimal stroke prevention.

Axillary vs Femoral Arterial Cannulation in Acute Type A Dissection: International Multicenter Data.

BACKGROUND: Cannulation strategy in acute type A dissection (ATAD) varies widely without known gold standards. This study compared ATAD outcomes of axillary vs femoral artery cannulation in a large cohort from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 2145 patients from the IRAD Interventional Cohort (1996-2021) who underwent ATAD repair with axillary or femoral cannulation (axillary group: n = 1106 [52%]; femoral group: n = 1039 [48%]). End points included the following: early mortality; neurologic, respiratory, and renal complications; malperfusion; and tamponade. All outcomes are presented as axillary with respect to femoral. RESULTS: The proportion of patients younger than 70 years in both groups was similar (n = 1577 [74%]), as were bicuspid aortic valve, Marfan syndrome, and previous dissection. Patients with femoral cannulation had slightly more aortic insufficiency (408 [55%] vs 429 [60%]; P = .058) and coronary involvement (48 [8%] vs 70 [13%]; P = .022]. Patients with axillary cannulation underwent more total aortic arch (156 [15%] vs 106 [11%]; P = .02) and valve-sparing root replacements (220 [22%] vs 112 [12%]; P < .001). More patients with femoral cannulation underwent commissural resuspension (269 [30.9%] vs 324 [35.3%]; P = .05). Valve replacement rates were not different. The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the femoral group (190 [149-237] minutes vs 196 [159-247] minutes; P = .037). In-hospital mortality was similar between the axillary (n = 165 [15%]) and femoral (n = 149 [14%]) groups (P = .7). Furthermore, there were no differences in stroke, visceral ischemia, tamponade, respiratory insufficiency, coma, or spinal cord ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary cannulation is associated with a more stable ATAD presentation, but it is a more extensive intervention compared with femoral cannulation. Both procedures have equivalent early mortality, stroke, tamponade, and malperfusion outcomes after statistical adjustment.

Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options.

OBJECTIVES: The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. METHODS: In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. RESULTS: Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.

A novel hybrid prosthesis for open repair of acute DeBakey type I dissection with malperfusion: Early results from the PERSEVERE trial.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after hemiarch repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (ADTI) remain unfavorable, with high rates of major adverse events and negative aortic remodeling. The PERSEVERE study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the AMDS Hybrid prosthesis, a novel bare metal stent, in patients presenting with preoperative malperfusion. METHODS: PERSEVERE is a prospective single-arm investigational study conducted at 26 sites in the United States. Ninety-three patients underwent ADTI aortic dissection repair with AMDS implantation. The 30-day primary endpoints are a composite rate of 4 major adverse events and the rate of distal anastomotic new entry tears. The secondary endpoints include aortic remodeling. RESULTS: Clinical malperfusion was documented in 76 patients (82%); only radiographic malperfusion, in 17 (18%). The median follow-up in the 93 patients was 5.6 months. Within 30 days, 9 patients died (9.7%), 10 patients (10.8%) experienced new disabling stroke, and 18 patients (19.4%) had new-onset renal failure requiring ≥1 dialysis treatment. There were no cases of myocardial infarction. The composite rate of major adverse events (27%) was lower than that reported in the reference cohort (58%). There were no distal anastomotic new entry tears. Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients. Early remodeling indicated total aortic diameter stability, true lumen expansion, and false lumen reduction in the treated aortic segment. CONCLUSIONS: Early results show significant reductions in major adverse events and distal anastomotic new entry tears, successfully meeting both primary endpoints. The technical success rate was high. AMDS can be used safely in patients with ADTI dissection with malperfusion.

Acute Aortic Dissection: Observational Lessons Learned From 11 000 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 25 years, diagnosis and therapy for acute aortic dissection (AAD) have evolved. We aimed to study the effects of these iterative changes in care. METHODS: Patients with nontraumatic AAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (61 centers; 15 countries) were divided into time-based tertiles (groups) from 1996 to 2022. The impact of changes in diagnostics, therapeutic care, and in-hospital and 3-year mortality was assessed. Cochran-Armitage trend and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests were conducted to test for any temporal trend. RESULTS: Each group consisted of 3785 patients (mean age, ≈62 years old; ≈65.5% males); nearly two-thirds had type A AAD. Over time, the rates of hypertension increased from 77.8% to 80.4% (P=0.002), while smoking (34.1% to 30.6%, P=0.033) and atherosclerosis decreased (25.6%-16.6%; P<0.001). Across groups, the percentage of surgical repair of type A AAD increased from 89.1% to 92.5% (P<0.001) and was associated with decreased hospital mortality (from 24.1% in group 1 to 16.7% in group 3; P<0.001). There was no difference in 3-year survival (P=0.296). For type B AAD, stent graft therapy (thoracic endovascular aortic repair) was used more frequently (22.3%-35.9%; P<0.001), with a corresponding decrease in open surgery. Endovascular in-hospital mortality decreased from 9.9% to 6.2% (P=0.003). As seen with the type A AAD cohort, overall 3-year mortality for patients with type B AAD was consistent over time (P=0.084). CONCLUSIONS: Over 25 years, substantial improvements in-hospital survival were associated with a more aggressive surgical approach for patients with type A AAD. Open surgery has been partially supplanted by thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated type B AAD, and in-hospital mortality has decreased over the time period studied. Postdischarge survival for up to 3 years was similar over time.