Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 25(6): 1292-6, 2015 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25677657

RESUMO

Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, presents a significant biological threat and is a Category A priority pathogen due to its potential for weaponization. The bacterial FASII pathway is a viable target for the development of novel antibacterial agents treating Gram-negative infections. Here we report the advancement of a promising series of benzimidazole FabI (enoyl-ACP reductase) inhibitors to a second-generation using a systematic, structure-guided lead optimization strategy, and the determination of several co-crystal structures that confirm the binding mode of designed inhibitors. These compounds display an improved low nanomolar enzymatic activity as well as promising low microgram/mL antibacterial activity against both F. tularensis and Staphylococcus aureus and its methicillin-resistant strain (MRSA). The improvements in activity accompanying structural modifications lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the chemical structure and biological activity that encompasses both enzymatic and whole-cell activity.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/química , Benzimidazóis/química , Enoil-(Proteína de Transporte de Acila) Redutase (NADH)/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores Enzimáticos/química , Francisella tularensis/enzimologia , Antibacterianos/síntese química , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/síntese química , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Sítios de Ligação , Domínio Catalítico , Cristalografia por Raios X , Enoil-(Proteína de Transporte de Acila) Redutase (NADH)/metabolismo , Inibidores Enzimáticos/síntese química , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Francisella tularensis/efeitos dos fármacos , Cinética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Simulação de Dinâmica Molecular , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Estrutura-Atividade
2.
Contraception ; 104(1): 92-97, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33910031

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Protocols including mifepristone are the most effective medication regimens for medication abortion and early pregnancy loss (EPL) management. Both can be safely and effectively offered in primary care settings. Despite mifepristone's excellent safety record, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) heavily regulates provision. This exploratory study examines US primary care clinicians' perspectives on the effects of mifepristone restrictions, including FDA regulations, on access to medication abortion and EPL management in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: In 2019, we conducted an online qualitative survey of US primary care clinicians recruited from six reproductive health-focused listservs. Open-ended questions queried about barriers to providing mifepristone and effects on patients when unable to access mifepristone in primary care. We iteratively coded and analyzed qualitative data using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of our analytic sample of 113 respondents, one-third had mifepristone available in their current primary practice setting. Key barriers to provision stemmed from the FDA rule to stock and dispense mifepristone onsite, including logistical difficulties and resistance from health center leadership. Clinicians believed that lack of mifepristone in primary care resulted in negative patient experiences, including disrupted continuity of care, medically-unnecessary appointments, and undesired aspiration procedures. CONCLUSIONS: FDA regulations that inhibit mifepristone provision in primary care create structural barriers to provision. This may result in physical, emotional, and financial burdens for patients. IMPLICATIONS: When mifepristone is unavailable in primary care, some patients in need of abortion or EPL care may experience physical, emotional, and financial harms. Removing FDA restrictions is a critical step in reducing primary care barriers to mifepristone provision and improving access to timely, patient-centered medication abortion and EPL care.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Espontâneo , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Mifepristona , Gravidez , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA