RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT; sleeping sickness) caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense is a fatal disease. Current treatment options for patients with second-stage disease are toxic, ineffective, or impractical. We assessed the efficacy and safety of nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy (NECT) for second-stage disease compared with the standard eflornithine regimen. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, open-label, active control, phase III, non-inferiority trial was done at four HAT treatment centres in the Republic of the Congo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Patients aged 15 years or older with confirmed second-stage T b gambiense infection were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive intravenous eflornithine (400 mg/kg per day, every 6 h; n=144) for 14 days or intravenous eflornithine (400 mg/kg per day, every 12 h) for 7 days with oral nifurtimox (15 mg/kg per day, every 8 h) for 10 days (NECT; n=143). The primary endpoint was cure (defined as absence of trypanosomes in body fluids and a leucocyte count =20 cells per muL) 18 months after treatment. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT, and per-protocol (PP) populations. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in cure rates was defined as 10%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00146627. FINDINGS: One patient from the eflornithine group absconded after receiving the first dose, without any type of assessment done, and was excluded from all analyses. In the ITT population, 131 (91.6%) of 143 patients assigned to eflornithine and 138 (96.5%) of 143 patients assigned to NECT were cured at 18 months (difference -4.9%, one-sided 95% CI -0.3; p<0.0001). In the PP population, 122 (91.7%) of 133 patients in the eflornithine group and 129 (97.7%) of 132 in the NECT group were cured at 18 months (difference -6.0%, one-sided 95% CI -1.5; p<0.0001). Drug-related adverse events were frequent in both groups; 41 (28.7%) patients in the eflornithine group and 20 (14.0%) in the NECT group had major (grade 3 or 4) reactions, which resulted in temporary treatment interruption in nine and one patients, respectively. The most common major adverse events were fever (n=18), seizures (n=6), and infections (n=5) in the eflornithine group, and fever (n=7), seizures (n=6), and confusion (n=2) in the NECT group. There were four deaths, which were regarded as related to study drug (eflornithine, n=3; NECT, n=1). INTERPRETATION: The efficacy of NECT is non-inferior to that of eflornithine monotherapy. Since this combination treatment also presents safety advantages, is easier to administer (ie, infusion every 12 h for 7 days vs every 6 h for 14 days), and potentially protective against the emergence of resistant parasites, it is suitable for first-line use in HAT control programmes. FUNDING: Médecins Sans Frontières (Dutch section), Médecins Sans Frontières International, and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative.
Assuntos
Eflornitina/uso terapêutico , Nifurtimox/uso terapêutico , Tripanossomicidas/uso terapêutico , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Animais , Congo/epidemiologia , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eflornitina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infecções/induzido quimicamente , Infusões Intravenosas , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Nifurtimox/efeitos adversos , Segurança , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Tripanossomicidas/efeitos adversos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The lack of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) viral load (VL) monitoring in resource-limited settings might favour the accumulation of resistance mutations and thus hamper second-line treatment efficacy. We investigated the factors associated with resistance after the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the absence of virological monitoring. METHODS: Cross-sectional VL sampling of HIV-1-infected patients receiving first-line ART (nevirapine or efavirenz plus stavudine or zidovudine plus lamivudine) was carried out; those with a detectable VL were genotyped. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients undergoing VL sampling, 84 were genotyped. The mean number of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations increased with the duration of ART exposure (P=0.02). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with a CD4+ T-cell count < or =50 cells/mm(3) at ART initiation (baseline) had a higher mean number of both NRTI and non-NRTI (NNRTI) mutations than those with a baseline CD4+ T-cell count >50 cells/mm(3) (2.10 versus 0.56; P<0.0001; and 1.65 versus 0.76; P=0.005, respectively). A baseline CD4+ T-cell count < or =50 cells/mm(3) predicted > or =1 NRTI mutation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 7.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.20-32.14), > or =1 NNRTI mutation (AOR 4.25, 95% CI 1.36-15.48), > or =1 thymidine analogue mutation (AOR 8.45, 95% CI 2.16-40.16) and resistance to didanosine (AOR 6.36, 95% CI 1.49-32.29) and etravirine (AOR 4.72, 95% CI 1.53-15.70). CONCLUSIONS: Without VL monitoring, the risk of drug resistance increases with the duration of ART and is associated with lower CD4+ T-cell counts at ART initiation. These data might help define strategies to preserve second-line treatment options in resource-limited settings.