Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer in the Asia Pacific region: 'real-world' consideration of results from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017.

OBJECTIVE: The Asia Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2018) brought together 20 experts from 15 APAC countries to discuss the real-world application of consensus statements from the second APCCC held in St Gallen in 2017 (APCCC 2017). FINDINGS: Differences in genetics, environment, lifestyle, diet and culture are all likely to influence the management of advanced prostate cancer in the APAC region when compared with the rest of the world. When considering the strong APCCC 2017 recommendation for the use of upfront docetaxel in metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer, the panel noted possible increased toxicity in Asian men receiving docetaxel, which would affect this recommendation in the APAC region. Although androgen receptor-targeting agents appear to be well tolerated in Asian men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, access to these drugs is very limited for financial reasons across the region. The meeting highlighted that cost and access to contemporary treatments and technologies are key factors influencing therapeutic decision-making in the APAC region. Whilst lower cost/older treatments and technologies may be an option, issues of culture and patient or physician preference mean, these may not always be acceptable. Although generic products can reduce cost in some countries, costs may still be prohibitive for lower-income patients or communities. The panellists noted the opportunity for a coordinated approach across the APAC region to address issues of access and cost. Developments in technologies and treatments are presenting new opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Differences in genetics and epidemiology affect the side-effect profiles of some drugs and influence prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: As the field continues to evolve, collaboration across the APAC region will be important to facilitate relevant research and collection and appraisal of data relevant to APAC populations. In the meantime, the APAC APCCC 2018 meeting highlighted the critical importance of a multidisciplinary team-based approach to treatment planning and care, delivery of best-practice care by clinicians with appropriate expertise, and the importance of patient information and support for informed patient choice.

Managing advanced prostate cancer in the Asia Pacific region: "Real-world" application of Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 statements.

AIM: The second Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2020) gathered insights into the real-world application in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region of consensus statements from the 3rd Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2019). METHODS: The 4-h our virtual meeting in October 2020 brought together 26 experts from 14 APAC countries to discuss APCCC 2019 recommendations. Presentations were prerecorded and viewed prior to the meeting. A postmeeting survey gathered views on current practice. RESULTS: The meeting and survey highlighted several developments since APAC APCCC 2018. Increased access and use in the region of PSMA PET/CT imaging is providing additional diagnostic and staging information for advanced prostate cancer and influencing local and systemic therapy choices. Awareness of oligometastatic disease, although not clearly defined, is increasing. Novel androgen receptor pathway antagonists are expanding treatment options. Cost and access to contemporary treatments and technologies continue to be a significant factor influencing therapeutic decisions in the region. With treatment options increasing, multidisciplinary treatment planning, shared decision making, and informed choice remain critical. A discussion on the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted challenges for diagnosis, treatment, and clinical trials and new service delivery models that will continue beyond the pandemic. CONCLUSION: APAC-specific prostate cancer research and data are important to ensure that treatment guidelines and recommendations reflect local populations and resources. Facilitated approaches to collaboration across the region such as that achieved through APAC APCCC meetings continue to be a valuable mechanism to ensure the relevance of consensus guidelines within the region.

Measurement of serum PSA as a predictor of symptoms scored on the IPSS for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if serum PSA levels would correlate with patients' symptoms. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels correlate to size of the prostate gland. Prostate gland size has a direct correlation to the symptoms experienced by patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data collected on levels of serum PSA and symptom scores using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) collected from males who attended the prostate clinic in Christchurch Public Hospital with a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the period of January 2007 to January 2012. A total of 833 subjects were found and a Pearson product moment correlation analysis (r value) and a coefficient of determination (R2 value) was calculated to compare PSA levels versus symptom scores. RESULTS: PSA compared to IPSS showed a mild trend with a r-value of 0.1375 (p=0.00003): showing a mild statistically significant correlation between these two parameters. However R2 value was only 0.0189 meaning each unit increase of serum PSA only influences 1.89% of the change in the symptom score. PSA vs QoL scores, there was a mild correlation found with the r-value of 0.207 (p=0.00001). However the R2 value was only 0.043, showing only a mild 4.3% influence by PSA on quality of life. CONCLUSION: PSA would not be a good predictor for symptom scores and hence it is unable to accurately gauge the symptomatic severity in BPH patients.

Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer.

Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a cornerstone of the management of prostate cancer for more than 50 years, controversy remains regarding its optimum application. Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) has been researched since the mid-1980s as a way of reducing the adverse effects and cost of continuous androgen suppression. With preclinical evidence suggesting a potential benefit in terms of time to androgen independence, IAS has been the focus of a number of clinical phase II and III trials. Overall, these trials suggest that IAS is neither inferior nor superior to continuous androgen suppression, with respect to time to castration resistance and cancer-specific survival, but has significant advantages in terms of adverse effects, quality of life and cost. A number of unresolved questions remain, however, including how to select patients for therapy, the optimum duration of therapy, when to restart therapy after the off cycle, and how to define progression to castration-resistant disease. Landmark randomized clinical trials comparing IAS to continuous androgen suppression are in progress and will hopefully answer many of these questions. In future, the use of second-line drugs in the off-treatment phase holds potential for delaying disease progression in men on IAS. At present, men with advanced disease who are deemed candidates for ADT should be informed of IAS as a treatment option, considered experimental from an informed consent point of view, but promising based on current evidence.