Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 127(6): 871-878, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503827

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Haemodynamically unstable patients often require arterial and venous catheter insertion urgently. We hypothesised that ultrasound-guided arterial and venous catheterisation would reduce mechanical complications. METHODS: We performed a prospective RCT, where patients requiring both urgent arterial and venous femoral catheterisation were randomised to either ultrasound-guided or landmark-guided catheterisation. Complications and characteristics of catheter insertion (procedure duration, number of punctures, and procedure success) were recorded at the time of insertion (immediate complications). Late complications were investigated by ultrasound examination performed between the third and seventh days after randomisation. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least one mechanical complication (immediate or late), by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included success rate, procedure time, and number of punctures. RESULTS: We analysed 136 subjects (102 [75%] male; age range: 27-62 yr) by intention to treat. The proportion of subjects with one or more complications was lower in 22/67 (33%) subjects undergoing ultrasound-guided catheterisation compared with landmark-guided catheterisation (40/69 [58%]; odds ratio: 0.35 [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.71]; P=0.003). Ultrasound-guided catheterisation reduced both immediate (27%, compared with 51% in the landmark approach group; P=0.004) and late (10%, compared with 23% in the landmark approach group; P=0.047) complications. Ultrasound guidance also reduced the proportion of patients who developed deep vein thrombosis (4%, compared with 22% following landmark approach; P=0.012), and achieved a higher procedural success rate (96% vs 78%; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound-guided approach reduced mechanical complications after urgent femoral arterial and venous catheterisation, while increasing procedural success. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02820909.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Artérias/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Veias/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 60: 478.e15-478.e18, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31200046

RESUMO

Rupture of a chronic thrombosed or excluded popliteal arterial aneurysm is rare, but has been previously reported in the literature. The management of a ruptured thrombosed popliteal aneurysm, in a context of chronic limb ischemia, raises the problem of latent ischemia and its outcome. In this case report, we present the first case of a ruptured thrombosed popliteal aneurysm in a patient presenting chronic ischemia.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto , Isquemia , Artéria Poplítea , Trombose , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Roto/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Circulação Colateral , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Ligadura , Masculino , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Trombose/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA