RESUMO
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an extremely aggressive but curable subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. While younger patients have excellent outcomes in response to aggressive chemoimmunotherapy, the rarity of this disease in older patients and limitations caused by age, comorbidities, and performance status may negate survival advantages. This analysis assessed outcomes of older adults with BL through data provided by the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR). Patients ≥65 years with BL were assessed. Patients were dichotomized into 1997-2007 and 2008-2018. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and covariates including age, race, sex, stage, primary site, and poverty index were analyzed using Pearson Chi-squared analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to assess factors contributing to patients not offered systemic therapy. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Non-BL mortality events were also categorized. There were 325 adults, 167 in 1997-2007 and 158 in 2008-2018; 106 (63.5%) and 121 (76.6%) received systemic therapy, a trend that increased with time (p = 0.010). Median OS for 1997-2007 and 2008-2018 was 5 months (95% CI 2.469, 7.531) and 9 months (95% CI 0.000, 19.154) (p = 0.013), and DSS was 72 months (95% CI 56.397, 87.603) (p = 0.604) and not reached, respectively. For patients that received systemic therapy, median OS was 8 months (95% CI 1.278, 14.722) and 26 months (95% CI 5.824, 46.176) (p = 0.072), respectively, and DSS was 79 months (95% CI: 56.416, 101.584) and not reached, respectively (p = 0.607). Age ≥75 years (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.078, 1.791], p = 0.011) and non-Hispanic whites (HR 1.407 [95% CI 1.024, 1.935], p = 0.035) had poorer outcomes, and patients at the 20-100% poverty index (OR 0.387 [95% CI 0.163, 0.921], p = 0.032) and increasing age at diagnosis (OR 0.947 [95% CI 0.913, 0.983], p = 0.004) were less likely to receive systemic therapy. Of 259 (79.7%) deaths, 62 (23.9%) were non-BL deaths, and 6 (9.6%) of these were from a second cancer. This two-decade analysis of older Texas patients with BL indicates a significant improvement in OS over time. Although patients were more likely to receive systemic therapy over time, treatment disparities existed in patients residing in poverty-stricken regions of Texas and in advancing age. These statewide findings reflect an unmet national need to find a systemic therapeutic strategy that can be tolerated by and augment outcomes in the growing elderly population.
Assuntos
Linfoma de Burkitt , Humanos , Idoso , Linfoma de Burkitt/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Burkitt/epidemiologia , Texas/epidemiologia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that carries a poor prognosis in the elderly. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment patterns and survival trends in patients ≥ 65 years with PCNSL through data provided by the Texas Cancer Registry. Adults ≥ 65 years diagnosed with PCNSL and followed between 1995-2017 were identified and separated into three eras: 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017. Baseline covariates compared included patient demographics and treatments administered. Pearson's chi-squared test and Cox proportional hazard models compared covariates; overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 375 patients; 104 (27.7%) in 1995-2003, 146 (38.9%) in 2004-2012, and 125 (33.3%) in 2013-2017. There were 50 (48.1%), 55 (37.7%), and 31 (24.8%) in 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017, respectively, that did not receive treatment. At last follow up, 101 (97.1%), 130 (89.0%), and 94 (75.2%) in each era died, of which 89 (85.6%), 112 (76.7%), and 70 (56.0%) were attributed to PCNSL. Median OS per era was eight (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.06-10.93), six (95% CI, 2.30-9.69), and five months (95% CI, 2.26-7.73) (p = 0.638). DSS per era was nine (95% CI: 0.00, 26.53), 10 (95% CI: 5.14, 14.86), and 19 (95% CI, 0.00-45.49) (p = 0.931) months. Spinal cord as primary disease site (HR: 0.668 [95% CI, 0.45-0.99], p = 0.049), and chemotherapy (HR 0.532 [95% CI, 0.42-0.673], p = < 0.001) or chemotherapy + radiation (HR, 0.233 [95% CI, 0.11-0.48] p < 0.001) had better outcomes compared to no therapy or radiation therapy alone. Survival in older patients ≥ 65 with PCNSL has not improved per our analysis of the TCR from 1995-2017 despite increasing trends of treatment utilization. Strategies to augment recruitment of older individuals in trials are needed in order to determine who would derive treatment benefit and minimize treatment toxicities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Texas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/terapia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Sistema Nervoso CentralRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have changed the therapeutic landscape across a range of solid malignancies. However, there is little data regarding the cardiovascular (CV) impact of these agents. The purpose of this review is to discuss reported CV effects, pathophysiology, pre-treatment screening, diagnostic workup, and treatment recommendations in this patient population. RECENT FINDINGS: It is apparent that CV events are not class dependent, and while infrequently reported in clinical trials, unique CV toxicity may occur with EGFR inhibitors, including structural, electrical, and vascular events. There remains an unmet need to fully elucidate the spectrum of CV events associated with EGFR inhibitors. Early CV screening, close clinical monitoring, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach between medical and cardio-oncology is needed to minimize the potentially detrimental impact of cardiotoxicity in this patient population.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Mutação , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the proportion of premenopausal women who experience persistent ovarian escape (OE) while receiving ovarian suppression (OS) therapy for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer treatment. The study also examined clinical factors that may predispose to higher risk of persistent OE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, "real-world" study to evaluate premenopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine OS therapy. The primary objective was to measure the percentage of persistent OE within the first 3 months of OS injections (using either leuprolide or goserelin). The secondary objective was to associate baseline clinical data (age, body mass index [BMI], and previous chemotherapy) with the probability of OE. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients included in this analysis, 11 (23.9%) women did not achieve OS within 3 months. Three women (6.5%) remained in OE at 12 months. Older age (odds ratio, 0.86; confidence interval, 0.76-0.98, p = .024) was associated with lower chance of developing OE. BMI, previous chemotherapy, and drug used (tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitor) did not correlate with the likelihood of OE in this patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Among the premenopausal women who did not attain complete ovarian suppression, young age was a significant risk factor for likelihood of OE. Although the clinical relevance of this finding is not yet known, it should prompt further studies to determine whether inadequate OS is associated with higher recurrence risk for patients with ER+ breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Because up to a quarter of premenopausal women do not attain adequate ovarian suppression within the first 3 months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy, bloodwork should be checked to ascertain hormone levels prior to starting aromatase inhibitor therapy, and at regular intervals, for these women.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Receptores de Estrogênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and factors influencing systemic treatment decisions in adults 80 years and older with NSCLC. Methods: This was a retrospective National Cancer Database study evaluating outcomes in adults aged 80 years and older with advanced NSCLC. Patients were analyzed on the basis of systemic therapy, including none, chemotherapy or immunotherapy (IO) alone, and chemotherapy plus IO (chemotherapy + IO). Median overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess differences in outcomes, and OR with 95% CI was used to assess factors contributing to systemic therapy provision. Results: Patients 80 years and older (OR = 1.135 [95% CI: 1.127-1.142], p = 0.000), females (OR = 1.129 [95% CI: 1.085-1.175], p < 0.001), blacks (OR = 1.272 [95% CI: 1.179-1.372], p < 0.001), non-Hispanic whites (OR = 1.210 [95% CI: 1.075-1.362], p = 0.002), and those with increasing Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score (p < 0.001) were less likely to receive systemic therapy. Median OS for no therapy, IO alone, chemotherapy alone, and chemotherapy plus IO was 2.63 (95% CI: 2.57-2.69), 10.68 (95% CI: 9.96-11.39), 12.35 (95% CI: 11.98-12.72), and 14.03 (95% CI: 13.87-14.88) months, respectively. In chemotherapy alone, mean OS was 1.12 months (95% CI: 0.55-1.70) (p < 0.001) longer with multiagent versus single agent. There was no difference between IO plus single agent versus IO plus multiagent chemotherapy (0.67 mo [95% CI -1.18 to 2.54], p = 1.00). Conclusions: Age, comorbidities, patient race, and sex affected systemic therapy provision. Multiagent chemotherapy and chemotherapy plus IO significantly improved survival; with the latter, survival was similar with IO plus single or multiagent chemotherapy.
RESUMO
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant vascular disease characterized by the formation of cutaneous and visceral telangiectasias and arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Multiple organs may be affected, including the nasal mucosa, skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and brain. The following case highlights a unique manifestation of HHT in a patient with a gastrointestinal hemorrhage and epistaxis, resulting in hyperammonemia and diffuse cerebral edema and herniation. Clinicians should be aware of this potential complication in such patients and initiate ammonia-reducing agents early to avoid this devastating consequence.
RESUMO
Background: KRAS mutations are the most common oncogenic driver mutations of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Western world. Mutations of the KRAS gene are most prevalent in the patient population of current and former cigarette smokers. With the recent pivotal approval of a targeted inhibitor therapy for patients with KRAS p.G12C mutated and pretreated NSCLC, analysis of the heterogeneity of KRAS mutations and concomitant molecular alterations in patients with these tumors at all clinical stages is indicated. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, patient pathology records were reviewed for all cases receiving a pathologic diagnosis of NSCLC within our hospital system. All data were collected with IRB approval. Cases of indeterminate tumor type favoring a non-lung primary, as well as non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC (eg, squamous) were excluded from the cohort. In this hospital system, molecular testing for KRAS mutations is part of a molecular biomarker panel that is reflex ordered at initial diagnosis by the pathologist and may be performed as a single gene test or as a solid organ cancer hotspot panel by next generation sequencing. For each patient, KRAS mutational status and specific KRAS mutations, if present, were collated. Additional information assessed for this study included patient demographics (age, gender, and smoking history), tumor staging if available, PD-L1 expression levels by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the presence of other genetic alterations (EGFR, ALK, and STK11). Results: Between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2019, there were 276 patients diagnosed with NSCLC of all stages who had KRAS mutational analysis performed in our hospital system and who met the criteria for inclusion into the study cohort. A KRAS driver mutation was detected in 29% of these patients. The most frequently identified KRAS mutation was p.G12C (38%), followed by p.G12D (21%) and p.G12V (13%). KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with current or former patient smoking status in this cohort (29/202 (14%) smokers and 1/74 (1%) non-smokers; P = .0006). PD-L1 expression of at least 1% by IHC was present in 43% of KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinomas and 45% of non-KRAS-mutated adenocarcinomas. In this study, KRAS mutations were not found to co-occur with gene alterations in EGFR, ALK, or STK11. In 48% of cases, at least one genetic alteration (KRAS, ALK, EGFR, or STK11) was identified. Conclusions: In this study cohort, KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma demonstrated significant mutational heterogeneity, which is consistent with previously published studies. KRAS mutational status was also significantly associated with a current or former smoking history. Notably, p.G12C was the most frequently identified KRAS mutation in this cohort, with a frequency of 38%. This finding is particularly relevant given the recent approval of a KRAS p.G12C-specific targeted inhibitor therapy and the continued development of additional KRAS targeted therapies that may prove effective in treating NSCLC. These findings also highlight the necessity of considering molecular testing for KRAS mutations in patients with NSCLC and a smoking history, as this population most frequently harbors KRAS mutations and may benefit from these emerging targeted therapies.
RESUMO
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has significantly improved outcomes across a range of malignancies. While infections are a well-known contributor to morbidity and mortality amongst patients receiving systemic chemotherapy regimens, little is known about the impact of infections on patients receiving ICI therapy. This study aims to assess incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in patients who develop infections while on pembrolizumab-based therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients receiving pembrolizumab for stage III/IV NSCLC from 1/1/2017-8/1/2021 across seven hospitals were identified. Incidence and type of infection were characterized. Covariates including baseline demographics, treatment information, treatment toxicities, and immunosuppressive use were collected and compared between infected and non-infected patients. Outcomes included the rate of infections, all-cause hospital admissions, median number of treatment cycles, overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS). Univariable and multivariable analysis with reported odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized to evaluate infection risks. OS and PFS were analyzed by Kaplan−Meier analysis and tested by log-rank test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were 243 NSCLC patients that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 111 (45.7%) had one documented infection, and 36 (14.8%) had two or more. Compared to non-infected patients, infected patients had significantly more all-cause Emergency Department (ED) [37 (33.3%) vs. 26 (19.7%), p = 0.016], hospital [87 (78.4%) vs. 53 (40.1%), p < 0.001], and ICU visits [26 (23.4%) vs. 5 (3.8%), p < 0.001], and had poorer median OS (11.53 [95% CI 6.4−16.7] vs. 21.03 [95% CI: 14.7−24.2] months, p = 0.033). On multivariable analysis, anti-infective therapy (OR 3.32, [95% CI: 1.26−8.76], p = 0.015) and ECOG of >1 (OR 5.79, [95% CI 1.72−19.47], p = 0.005) at ICI initiation conferred an increased risk for infections. At last evaluation, 74 (66.7%) infected and 70 (53.0%) non-infected patients died (p = 0.041). Conclusion: Infections occurred in nearly half of patients receiving pembrolizumab-based therapies for NSCLC. Infected patients had frequent hospitalizations, treatment delays, and poorer survival. ECOG status and anti-infective use at ICI initiation conferred a higher infection risk. Infection prevention and control strategies are needed to ameliorate the risk for infections in patients receiving ICIs.
RESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) are improving outcomes in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and subtypes of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. As this treatment is being increasingly utilized, a better understanding of the unique toxicities associated with this therapy is warranted. While there is growing knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), relatively little is known about the associated cardiac events that occur with CRS that may result in prolonged length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit for pressor support, or cardiac death. This review focuses on the various manifestations of cardiotoxicity, potential risk factors, real world and clinical trial data on prevalence of reported cardiotoxicity events, and treatment recommendations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: KRAS is the most frequently encountered driver mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With targeted therapy for the most common KRAS mutation p.G12C on the horizon, the aim of this study is to retrospectively report outcomes in patients with KRAS mutated NSCLC. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 7 hospitals in Texas with reflex biomarker testing in all lung adenocarcinomas. Patients were included if they had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of any stage originating in the lung with molecularly confirmed KRAS driver mutation of any genotypic subtype. Twelve-month survival was assessed and compared between KRAS p.G12C and all other detected KRAS mutations. Other outcomes including impact of age, sex, smoking status, and pack years smoked were assessed to determine if they had prognostic significance on mortality in KRAS mutated patients. RESULTS: There were 58 patients diagnosed with KRAS mutated NSCLC, 63.8% were at an advanced stage at diagnosis, 55.8% of patients were female, and 82.8% were white. The median age was 72 [52-88] years, and 93.1% were either current or prior smokers. KRAS p.G12C was the most common KRAS mutation (44.8%). At diagnosis, patients with KRAS p.G12C had poorer performance statuses compared to other KRAS mutations. A total of 32 (55.2%) patients died, 26 with advanced disease. In this study, current smoking status (P=0.1652), pack years smoked (P=0.6597), age (P=0.5092), sex (P=0.4309), and underlying KRAS codon mutation controlling for stage (P=0.2287) did not impact survival. However, KRAS p.G12C had a numerically lower 12 months overall survival (OS) compared to all other KRAS mutations in both early stage (56.3% vs. 90.9%) and advanced stage (25.0% vs. 47.6%) disease. Of note, 16 (27.6%) patients had prior, concurrent, or second malignancies, but these did not significantly impact OS (P=0.7696). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find a prognostic difference with sex, smoking history, age, or p.G12C mutation. The patients in this cohort with KRAS p.G12C had a numerically lower 12-month overall survival in both early and advanced stage disease compared to other mutations, and over one-quarter had a notable history of previous and second primary malignancies.
RESUMO
Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are an integral component of multiple myeloma therapies. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a well-knownconsequence of PIs, most frequently reported with earlier generations such as bortezomib (BTZ). There is a paucity of data highlighting the risk of developing PN with the new-generation PIs carfilzomib (CFZ) and ixazomib (IZB). This study evaluated reports of PN encountered with all three PIs using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (FAERS). Signal disproportionality analysis was reported using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). PN was reported in a total of 2.1%, 5.0%, and 10.9% of AEs with CFZ, IZB, and BTZ, respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for PN secondary to BTZ, CFZ, and IZB was 34.10 (32.76-35.49), 6.37 (5.50-7.37), and 14.97 (13.63-16.44), respectively. Compared to BTZ, CFZ and IZB have lower rates of reported PN, with RORs of 0.19 (0.16-0.22) and 0.48 (0.43-0.54), respectively.
Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Inibidores de Proteassoma , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Marketing , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Proteassoma/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
There have been unique adverse events reported with targeted blockade of programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA4), including immune mediated toxicities. Recently, there have been reports of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) occurring with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, which may result in treatment delays, interruptions, or discontinuation. This retrospective literature review and analysis of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) queried reported cases of "Hepatitis B reactivation" reported with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors "Pembrolizumab," "Atezolizumab," "Nivolumab," "Durvalumab," "Avelumab," and "Ipilimumab" from initial FDA approval to June 30, 2020. Disproportionality signal analysis was determined by calculating a reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The ROR was considered significant when the lower and upper limits of the 95% CI were >1 and confirmed by the Fisher exact test (P<0.05). Pembrolizumab had a strong signal associated with HBVr, with a ROR of 2.32 (95% CI: 1.11-4.28) (P=0.013) and was the only statistically significant finding. There were no reports of HBVr with Ipilimumab or Avelumab. Additional prospective studies should be conducted to validate the findings of this retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis to determine the risk of HBVr in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite B/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The NAPOLI-1 trial demonstrated that liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) prolonged survival with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Real-world data on clinical outcomes associated with liposomal irinotecan in NAPOLI-1-based regimens is needed to further substantiate this. METHODS: This real-world, retrospective chart review study included patients with mPDAC who received NAPOLI-1-based regimens from six academic centers in the United States. Liposomal irinotecan initiation defined the index date. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: There were 374 patients evaluated; median age was 68 years, and 51% were female. Among 326 patients with baseline ECOG information, approximately 74% had ECOG score <2. Liposomal irinotecan was administered as a doublet with 5-FU in a NAPOLI-1-based regimen in the first line (1L; 16%), 2L (42%), and 3L+ (42%) of the metastatic setting. For patients treated in 1L, 2L, and 3L+, median [95% confidence interval (CI)] OS was 8.0 [5.1, 11.2], 7.3 [5.3, 8.8], and 4.6 [4.0, 5.7] months, and median [95% CI] PFS was 4.2 [2.2, 6.6], 3.0 [2.6, 3.7], and 2.0 [1.7, 2.2] months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in a real-world setting treated with NAPOLI-1-based liposomal irinotecan doublet regimens at academic centers were older with poorer performance status compared to trial patients yet had similar outcomes and efficacy. Furthermore, liposomal irinotecan was frequently used in the 3L+ setting where no treatment has been approved and provided clinical benefit.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are transforming the modern era of cancer therapy. As new treatment options are becoming available, new patterns of disease behavior are manifesting. One such phenomenon, known as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), is a rare complication resulting in exponential disease progression on exposure to an ICI. Herein, we report an uncommon case of a patient who experienced HPD on 2 different occasions with 2 different immunotherapy agents. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old black man was diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. He was enrolled in a clinical trial that involved viral transduction and stereotactic body radiation followed by pembrolizumab administration. His disease progressed markedly after the first cycle of immunotherapy. He was switched to carboplatin and protein-bound paclitaxel. He continued to have steady disease progression. After the third cycle of chemotherapy, he was again given immunotherapy, this time with atezolizumab. Again, after a single infusion, he exhibited substantial disease progression and further clinical deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: HPD is a rare yet disturbing complication of immunotherapy with devastating effects on morbidity and mortality. Although there is accumulating literature supporting the phenomenon of HPD, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HPD occurring with 2 different ICIs in the same patient. This case suggests that the presence of HPD during treatment with 1 checkpoint inhibitor may preclude the use of another one. It also raises concerns about using other forms of immunomodulating agents. As immunotherapy becomes a major form of cancer therapy, more data are needed to better understand HPD and determine which patients are at risk.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in males and females in the United States. Approximately, 20%-22% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of presentation, and 50%-60% will develop metastasis over the course of their disease. Despite advances in systemic therapies, there remains a paucity of effective third- and later-line therapies for patients with ongoing disease progression. However, rechallenging chemo-resistant CRC tumors with previously administered therapies is an emerging concept that may be a life-prolonging option for heavily treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). CASE SUMMARY: A 41-year-old man with no previous medical history initially presented with worsening diffuse abdominal tenderness. Computed tomography was significant for a splenic flexure mass and hepatic lesions concerning for metastatic disease. He underwent a colectomy with anastomosis. Postoperative pathology was diagnostic for moderately to well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (T4bN1bM1a). He received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), but therapy was discontinued due to the development of atrial fibrillation. Additional workup indicated a carcinoembryonic antigen level of 508.2 ng/mL, and mutational analysis found that the tumor was microsatellite instability-high and KRAS/BRAF wild-type. He was started on irinotecan with oxaliplatin (IROX), and bevacizumab (14 cycles), developed disease progression, was transitioned to FOLFOX and cetuximab, and then eventually three cycles of pembrolizumab. Following disease progression, he was rechallenged with IROX therapy, as he previously responded well to oxaliplatin-based therapy. The IROX rechallenge provided this patient with a ten-month survival benefit, decreased metastatic burden, and marked improvement in his clinical condition. CONCLUSION: Rechallenge of previous lines of well-tolerated systemic chemotherapy regimens may be a valuable therapeutic strategy in patients with heavily-treated mCRC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high propensity to metastasize. Esophageal metastasis manifesting as dysphagia is rarely reported in the literature and has not to our knowledge been reported prior to the appearance of the primary disease. CASE SUMMARY: A patient presented with progressive dysphagia to solids and a persistent earache. Computed tomography of the neck and chest revealed a 3.0 cm × 1.8 cm heterogeneous mass originating from the upper third of the esophagus, necrotic cervical and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy, and bilateral pulmonary nodules. She underwent a core needle biopsy of a right cervical node, which suggested a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. She had an upper endoscopy with biopsy of the esophageal mass suggestive of a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Positron emission tomography imaging revealed increased uptake in the esophageal mass, cervical, and mediastinal lymph nodes. She was started on folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. Prior to initiation of cycle 8, the patient was found to have a pancreatic body mass that was not present on prior radiographic imaging, confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy to be pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CA19-9 was > 10000 U/mL, suggesting a primary pancreaticobiliary origin. CONCLUSION: Esophageal metastasis diagnosed before primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma is rare. This case highlights the profound metastatic potential of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute small bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency usually caused by abdominal adhesions, followed by intraluminal tumors from metastatic disease. Although lymphomas have been known to cause bowel obstruction, Burkitt lymphoma is seldom reported to induce an obstruction in the adult population. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old Hispanic man with a history of abdominal interventions presented to our hospital with abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a partial small bowel obstruction attributed to local inflammation or adhesions. Medical management with bowel rest and nasogastric decompression resulted in resolution of symptoms and quick discharge. He returned 2 days later with worsening abdominal pain. Repeat imaging showed progression of the partial small bowel obstruction, but with an additional 1.6-cm nodular density abutting the anterior aspect of the gastric antrum and lobulated anterior gastric antral wall thickening. He was taken to the operating room, where several masses were found. Intraoperative frozen sections were consistent with lymphoma, and pathology later revealed Burkitt lymphoma. Disease was found on both sides of the diaphragm by positron emission tomography. After the initial resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient is alive and well about 14 months after resection. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel obstruction is uncommonly due to Burkitt lymphoma in the geriatric population and is more frequently seen in the pediatric and young adult populations. Burkitt lymphoma is very aggressive with rapid cell turnover leading to significant morbidity. The rapid recurrence of an acute abdominal process should prompt an investigation for a more sinister cause such as malignancy.
Assuntos
Linfoma de Burkitt , Obstrução Intestinal , Dor Abdominal , Idoso , Linfoma de Burkitt/complicações , Linfoma de Burkitt/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/complicações , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKI) 1/2 approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV). These patients may be at risk for developing opportunistic infections. We assessed the number of patients that developed typical (Mycobacterium tuberculosis [MTB]) and atypical mycobacterial infections (AMI) while on treatment with ruxolitinib by utilizing the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse events reporting system (FAERS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study utilizing FAERS, a pharmacovigilance database. We queried FAERS for cases of MTB and AMI secondary to ruxolitinib between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. Disproportionality signal analysis was done by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR). ROR was considered significant when the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was > 1. RESULTS: There were 91 reported cases of MTB associated with ruxolitinib compared with 4575 cases from all other drugs. The ROR was significant at 9.2 (95% CI, 7.5-11.4). There were 23 reports of AMI with ruxolitinib compared with 1287 reported with all other drugs. The ROR was significant at 8.3 (95% CI, 5.5-12.6). Twelve (13.2%) patients with MTB and 8 (34.8%) with AMI died. CONCLUSION: Patients on ruxolitinib are at increased risk of developing MTB and AMI. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and consider screening patients for latent MTB prior to initiating ruxolitinib.
Assuntos
Janus Quinases/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/induzido quimicamente , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Janus Quinases/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Farmacovigilância , Pirazóis/farmacologia , Pirimidinas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a rare cause of hepatitis in pregnancy and the chronically immunosuppressed, with a high propensity to progress to acute liver failure (ALF) and death. Patients typically present with a nonspecific clinical picture that often delays diagnosis and treatment, contributing to the high mortality rate. We present a case of a young female on chronic prednisone and hydroxychloroquine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who was diagnosed with HSV-2 hepatitis after presenting with right-sided chest and abdominal discomfort. Despite early clinical deterioration, prompt initiation of therapy with intravenous acyclovir and methylprednisolone led to rapid improvement.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors that block programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have improved outcomes for many cancer subtypes but do exhibit toxicity, in the form of immune-related adverse events. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the emerging toxicities of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors including acute or reactivation of tuberculosis (TB) and atypical mycobacterial infection (AMI). METHODS: This study was completed as a retrospective review using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) for incidence of TB and AMI due to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors compared with other FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved drugs. The statistical methods included disproportionality signal analysis using the reporting OR (ROR) to compare cases. The 95% Wald CI was reported to assess the precision of the ROR. RESULTS: Out of the 10 146 481 adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS for all drugs between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2020, 73 886 AEs were due to the five FDA approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Seventy-two cases of TB were due to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Specifically, 45 cases (62.5%) due to nivolumab, 18 (25%) due to pembrolizumab, 5 (7%) due to atezolizumab and 4 (5.5%) due to durvalumab. There were 13 cases of AMI: 9 (69.3%) due to nivolumab, 2 (15.3%) due to pembrolizumab and 1 (7.7%) each due to durvalumab and atezolizumab. Avelumab was not attributed to any AE of TB or AMI. From analysis of the FAERS database, the calculated ROR for TB due to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was 1.79 (95% CI, 1.42 to 2.26) (p<0.0001) and for AMI was 5.49 (95% CI, 3.15 to 9.55) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors used in the treatment of cancer subtypes is associated with increased TB and AMI risk. Although this complication is rare, clinicians using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be aware of the risks.