RESUMO
CONTEXT: During the past two decades, bedside ultrasound has revolutionized the practice of emergency medicine. Physicians are now expected to be competent in utilizing ultrasound skills, for patients presenting with conditions ranging from trauma to skin evaluations. The overall purpose of this quality improvement/patient safety (QIPS) project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pair of five-hour, hands-on didactic/training sessions, aimed at preparing a sample of emergency medicine physicians, residents and medical students to perform peripheral ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. METHODS: The study location was set in a community-based emergency medicine program in Pontiac, Michigan. Data was collected from N = 54 emergency medicine residents, physicians and medical students. Data was collected from two training sessions in November 2017 and January 2018. The training consisted of a 12-question pre-test, followed by five hours of hands on & didactic training, with a subsequent post-test containing the same questions. RESULTS: The authors compiled the data from both training sessions and found that the participants had an average correct percentage of 5.52 of 12 (46%) on the pre-test. After attending the training session, participants had an overall correct percentage of 9.24 of 12 (77%) on the post-test. This pre-to post-training increase of the mean scores was statistically significant, t (53) = -10.76 (p < 0.01), with an effect size (Cohen's d) of 1.82. Post hoc power calculations utilizing the d = 1.82 effect size revealed statistical power (1- ß) of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this QIPS evaluation project suggest that emergency physicians, residents and medical students may achieve an improved understanding of key ultrasound-guided nerve block material after a single five-hour session of hands-on training and didactics. Going forward, additional studies employing larger sample sizes that allow for outcome stratification by group (emergency physicians, residents, or medical students) along with relevant demographic variables (age, years in practice, etc.) in similar settings are needed to further verify these findings.