The experience and professional development of medical appraisers.

This article explores the experiences of General Practitioner (GP) appraisers working in a unfamiliar setting (Jersey) with appraisees new to the process. Findings were interpreted using the learning theory, 'situated cognition', to shed light on the experience of appraisers working with new appraisees more generally and contribute to new understandings of workplace learning. Rich qualitative data derived from transcripts of nine in-depth interviews with GP appraisers were analysed thematically in a rigorous and iterative manner process. GP appraisers working in an unfamiliar environment shared a common sense of culture shock and discomfort. Initially, they needed to work much harder than usual to establish rapport and credibility, but by the second round of appraisals, appraisers were reminded of the power of appraisal. The innovative application of 'situated cognition' helps to explain why appraisers felt like 'novices' in Jersey and how they were required to reconstruct their professional knowledge. This is the first time appraiser development has been considered in this way and appraisers can be helped to develop professionally if they are offered a mix of appraisal-related activities in new places and with new people. Such implications for educational support apply internationally where doctors are involved in a process of peer review as part of on-going professional development.

The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.

It has been acknowledged that little is known about the impact of general practice (GP) appraisal on clinical and professional practice, as may be demonstrated by identifiable or 'hard' outcomes, and further, that the way in which appraisal informs professional development is unclear. In spite of this acknowledgement and the existence of a substantial number of studies about GP appraisal, to date an overview of the field of enquiry which maps what is known, has been lacking. In this leading article we present the first extensive thematic narrative synthesis of the literature on appraisal. In it we highlight the issues and tensions around research into appraisal, based on what we found (or didn't find) in our review. Key conclusions concern the focus of existing research - which has tended to report the perceptions of change from individual appraisees, rather than specific examples of change captured from other sources and perspectives - and the scope of research - which has been limited to certain data collection methods. Based upon our review, we draw out implications for research and researchers in the future.