New European medical device regulation: How the French ecosystem should seize the opportunity of the EUDAMED and the UDI system, while overcoming the constraints thereof.

The European regulation governing the placing on the market of medical devices (MD) provides for the gradual and mandatory phasing-in, within the European Union, of a unique device identification (UDI) system and a European database (EUDAMED) aimed at improving traceability and transparency of the market. The deployment of these tools will have a significant impact on the stakeholders of the medical device world (companies, health institutions, healthcare professionals, competent authorities, etc.). A strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats (SWOT) analysis conducted among the think tank participants shows real support for the objectives but also distinguishes a great deal of issues relating to the implementation of these tools. An inventory of the current traceability tools and databases used in France was then carried out to measure the gaps between the requirements of the European regulation and the current situation revealing that EUDAMED and the UDI system will ultimately have to slot into a complex and poorly interoperable ecosystem. An essential first step to facilitate this integration will be to increase the number of educational, awareness-raising and information initiatives for the stakeholders concerned. Several other recommendations were put forward to support the implementation of EUDAMED and the UDI system in France and thus enable their promises to crystallise in the future.

Evaluation of digital medical devices: How to take into account the specificities of these solutions?

The beginning of the 21st century has seen an increasing number of digital medical devices (DMDs) arrive on the European market, bringing major benefits and changes for society. DMDs are unique in that they bring intelligence to the organisation of care, and generate and collect a wealth of real-life data with ultra-fast life cycles. They have specific requirements, particularly in terms of data security and interoperability. In France and Europe, the construction of evidence, the assessment process and evaluation methodologies with a view to purchase or reimbursement must adjust to these changes, given the specific features of these technologies. This digital leap has opened up new perspectives for healthcare, along with economic, ethical and regulatory issues. The challenge is to assess the clinical and organisational impact, reliability, safety, interoperability, efficiency and budgetary impact of DMDs in line with the requirements of new standards, guidelines and regulations. This should result in a coherent, pragmatic and proportionate evaluation, so that public decision-makers and buyers can take advantage of the potential opportunities that these digital devices offer to improve healthcare delivery. Thus, a fair and informed evaluation of DMDs would emerge, providing a solid basis to steer their inclusion into contemporary medical practices. This fundamental issue of evaluation, linked to the digital nature of these MDs, is what the round table, comprising experts from academia and/or hospitals, institutions and industry, sought to resolve. Discussions led to proposals on how DMDs should be evaluated, bearing in mind their complexity. The round table set out to identify the bottlenecks in the entire evaluation process, from the CE marking phase, compliance with French safety and interoperability requirements, through to national or local evaluation, in order to inform a purchasing policy and draw up proposals covering the entire spectrum. Ten concrete recommendations were put forward by the round table, aimed at improving the evaluation process by making it clearer and more adaptable, thus offering greater flexibility in the evaluation and decision-making stages. This well-thought-out approach is designed to facilitate a comprehensive and flexible evaluation of DMDs given the constantly evolving technological context.

Why and how can we improve patient and caregiver information for the proper use of their medical devices throughout the care pathway?

Information is generally a major pillar in the relationship of trust between the patient and their healthcare team. In the case of medical devices, which are operator-dependent and for which the proper "handling" of the device will directly affect its performance, information on the proper use becomes a major therapeutic issue. To do this, patients must have access to quality information about health products. Twenty years after the Kouchner Act introduced a right to information for patients, our panel questioned the quality of information provided to patients about the medical devices they use during their care pathway. We mapped off the information process throughout the life of the medical device (manufacturer, prescription, dispensing, use and monitoring) to identify deficiencies and potential corrective solutions. Thus, the device could respond to the 5B as for the drug (right device, right patient, right indication, right time, and right use). Seven recommendations have emerged and are proposed in this article.

What value do digital health solutions bring, what are the funding mechanisms and evaluations?

Digital health is currently booming, providing major innovations, particularly in terms of changing the practices of the stakeholders in the healthcare system as a whole. It allows our healthcare system to draw on new synergies between independent, hospital and medico-social professionals, as well as on high-performance digital tools for the benefit of all, users, patients and professionals. These tools, or digital solutions, have a strong potential to improve the healthcare system but also a strong potential for economic development. In this respect, the great diversity of existing and future digital solutions, as well as their vast fields of application, are prompting public and private stakeholders in the sector to question their integration into our healthcare system. The resulting challenges concern the identification of the targets they are intended for, the values they embody and, as a result, the methods of funding and evaluation. At a time when the first reimbursement terms for digital solutions are taking shape in the context of the Social Security Financing Bill for 2022, the roundtable wished to propose 8 recommendations to help structure exchanges between the various stakeholders and initiate avenues of work around the integration of digital solutions into the healthcare system. The main orientations are based on the proposal of a common and transparent reflection methodology around the technical scope of these solutions, the values they bring and the funding mechanisms. Other work will be necessary beyond the points addressed by the round table in order to go into greater depth on certain themes such as the adaptation of existing funding methods to the momentum and specificities of digital technology or the development of research work on the evaluation of the value claimed by these digital solutions.

Early patient access to health technologies: Is innovation needed for early management?

The question of early patient access to innovative health technologies arises from the assumption that, once a certain level of effectiveness or efficiency is achieved, waiting for mainstream coverage would represent a loss of opportunity for patients or for the community. This was the premise on which the round table based its dialogue. Early access is understood as the funding of a technology that comes within this field and is CE-marked but has not yet attained "mainstream" coverage. There are several early access schemes in France ("forfait innovation", early coverage, exceptional coverage, RIHN). This round table was an opportunity to establish mapping, extended to devices not dedicated to early access but which could nevertheless provide some patients with access to non-mainstreamed technologies (Article 51, ETAPES experiments, DGOS call for projects, local schemes). It is an initial step that would need to be further developed and complemented by the dissemination of common communication materials available to all, including patients. The existing schemes are in fact still poorly known. Consideration would also have to be given to the advisability of developing these schemes in order to adapt them to the new European requirements. More generally, early access schemes must be integrated into an ecosystem that is conducive for their relevance: consideration of procedures associated with medical devices benefiting from early access; short time frames of examination; patient information. Finally, the round table proposes the creation of a new early access scheme, complementary to those that exist and that would be positioned, after CE marking, between the "forfait innovation" and mainstreaming: PRESTO (Prise En charge Sécurisée et Temporaire de technologies innOvantes) (secure and temporary coverage for innovative technologies).