Intermuscular technique for implantation of the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: a propensity-matched case-control study.

AIMS: A previous randomized study demonstrated that the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was noninferior to transvenous ICD with respect to device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. However, that was performed prior to the widespread adoption of pulse generator implantation in the intermuscular (IM) space instead of the traditional subcutaneous (SC) pocket. The aim of this analysis was to compare survival from device-related complications and inappropriate shocks between patients who underwent S-ICD implantation with the generator positioned in an IM position in comparison with an SC pocket. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 1577 consecutive patients who had undergone S-ICD implantation from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up until December 2021. Subcutaneous patients (n = 290) were propensity matched with patients of the IM group (n = 290), and their outcomes were compared. : During a median follow-up of 28 months, device-related complications were reported in 28 (4.8%) patients and inappropriate shocks were reported in 37 (6.4%) patients. The risk of complication was lower in the matched IM group than in the SC group [hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.99, P = 0.041], as well as the composite of complications and inappropriate shocks (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.86, P = 0.013). The risk of appropriate shocks was similar between groups (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.50-1.61, P = 0.721). There was no significant interaction between generator positioning and variables such as gender, age, body mass index, and ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: Our data showed the superiority of the IM S-ICD generator positioning in reducing device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02275637.

Physical Activity in Patients With Heart Failure During and After COVID-19 Lockdown: Single-Center Observational Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced several European governments to impose severe lockdown measures. The reduction of physical activity during the lockdown could have been deleterious. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to investigate the effect of the lockdown strategy on the physical activity burden and subsequent reassessment in a group of patients with heart failure who were followed by means of remote monitoring. METHODS: We analyzed remote monitoring transmissions during the 3-month period immediately preceding the lockdown, 69 days of lockdown, and 3-month period after the first lockdown in a cohort of patients with heart failure from a general hospital in Lombardy, Italy. We compared variation of daily physical activity measured by cardiac implantable electrical devices with clinical variables collected in a hospital database. RESULTS: We enrolled 41 patients with heart failure that sent 176 transmissions. Physical activity decreased during the lockdown period (mean 3.4, SD 1.9 vs mean 2.9, SD 1.8 hours/day; P<.001) but no significant difference was found when comparing the period preceding and following the lockdown (-0.0007 hours/day; P=.99). We found a significant correlation between physical activity reduction during and after the lockdown (R2=0.45, P<.001). The only significant predictor of exercise variation in the postlockdown period was the lockdown to prelockdown physical activity ratio. CONCLUSIONS: An excessive reduction of exercise in patients with heart failure decreased the tolerance to exercise, especially in patients with more comorbidities. Remote monitoring demonstrated exercise reduction, suggesting its potential utility to encourage patients to maintain their usual physical activity levels.

Delayed ICD lead cardiac perforation: comparison of small versus standard-diameter leads implanted in a single center.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of delayed cardiac perforation (DCP) with active-fixation small-diameter ICD leads has recently been reported, especially with regard to the St. Jude Riata lead (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA). Few data on the risk of DCP in small versus standard-diameter leads implanted in a single high-volume center are available. Moreover, no data on the performances of St. Jude's new small-diameter Durata lead are as yet available. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of DCP in small versus standard-diameter leads implanted in our center. METHODS: Between January 2003 and October 2009, 437 small-diameter leads (190 Medtronic Sprint Fidelis [Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA], 196 Riata, 51 Durata) and 421 standard-diameter (>8 Fr) leads were implanted. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 421 days seven of 858 (0.8%) patients experienced DCP. The incidence of DCP was higher in patients with small-diameter leads than in those with standard-diameter leads (1.6% vs 0%, P = 0.01). No cases of DCP occurred among 371 passive-fixation leads versus 1.4% of events among active-fixation leads (P = 0.02). The incidence of DCP was 2.5% in Riata, 1% in Sprint Fidelis, 0% in Durata, and 0% in standard-diameter leads (P < 0.01 for Riata vs standard-diameter leads). CONCLUSIONS: Small-diameter active-fixation ICD leads are at increased risk of DCP, a finding mostly due to the higher incidence of events in the Riata family. By contrast, passive-fixation small-diameter leads and standard-diameter leads appear to be safe enough regarding the risk of DCP. Our preliminary data suggest that the new Durata lead is not associated with an increased risk of DCP.

Impact of the Pattern of Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Risk and Mortality.

Thromboembolism is the most serious complication of AF, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy. Current guidelines place all AF types together in terms of anticoagulation with the major determinants being associated comorbidities translated into risk marker. Among patients in large clinical trials, those with non-paroxysmal AF appear to be at higher risk of stroke than those with paroxysmal AF. Higher complexity of the AF pattern is also associated with higher risk of mortality. Moreover, continuous monitoring of AF through cardiac implantable devices provided us with the concept of 'AF burden'. Usually, the larger the AF burden, the higher the risk of stroke; however, the relationship is not well characterised with respect to the threshold value above which the risk increases. The picture is more complex than it appears: AF and underlying disorders must act synergically respecting the magnitude of its own characteristics, which are the amount of time a patient stays in AF and the severity of associated comorbidities.