RESUMO
Traf-2 and Nck interacting kinase (TNIK) is one of the STE20/MAP4K family members implicated in carcinogenesis and progression of several human malignancies. However, its expression pattern and biological behavior in pancreatic carcinoma remains completely unclear. The present study is designed to investigate the clinical and prognostic value of TNIK in pancreatic carcinoma. TNIK mRNA and protein level was respectively detected by real-time quantitative RCR (qPCR) and Western blot in ten paired samples of pancreatic cancer. Immunohistochemical staining was also conducted to examine TNIK in the tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of 91 archived specimens of pancreatic cancer. The correlation between TNIK and prognosis was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. The mRNA and protein levels of TNIK in pancreatic cancer were both significantly higher than those in matched paratumor tissues. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that TNIK was positively associated with pathologic T (P = 0.045) and TNM (P = 0.040) stage. In addition, The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that patients with high expression of TNIK had a shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low expression. Our results demonstrated that TNIK might play a crucial role in pancreatic carcinogenesis and serve as a novel therapeutic target of pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Quinases do Centro Germinativo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Prognóstico , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare short- and long-term outcome after 180-degree laparoscopic anterior fundoplication (180-degree LAF) with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LNF is currently the most frequently performed surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Alternatively, 180-degree LAF has been alleged to reduce troublesome dysphagia and gas-related symptoms, with similar reflux control. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and web of Knowledge CPCI-S were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing primary 180-degree LAF with LNF. The methodological quality was evaluated to assess bias risk. Primary outcomes were esophageal acid exposure, esophagitis, heartburn score, dilatation for dysphagia, modified Dakkak dysphagia score (0-45), and reoperation rate. Meta-analysis was conducted at 1 and 5 years. RESULTS: Five distinct randomized clinical trials comparing 180-degree LAF (n = 227) with LNF (n = 231) were identified. At 1 year, the Dakkak dysphagia score [2.8 vs 4.8; weighted mean difference: -2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.66 to -1.83; P < 0.001], gas bloating [11% vs 18%; relative risk (RR) 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.97; P = 0.04], flatulence (14% vs 25%; RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.35-0.91; P = 0.02), inability to belch (19% vs 31%; RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; P = 0.05), and inability to relieve bloating (34% vs 44%; RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55-0.99; P = 0.04) were lower after 180-degree LAF. Esophageal acid exposure (standardized mean difference: 0.19; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.46; P = 0.15), esophagitis (19% vs 13%; RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.69-2.91; P = 0.34), heartburn score (standardized mean difference: 1.27; 95% CI:-0.36 to 2.90; P = 0.13), dilatation rate (1.4% vs 2.8%; RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.19-1.91; P = 0.39), reoperation rate (5.7% vs 2.8%; RR: 2.08; 95% CI: 0.80-5.41; P = 0.13), perioperative outcome, regurgitation, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and patient satisfaction were similar after 180-degree LAF and LNF. At 5 years, the Dakkak dysphagia score, flatulence, inability to belch, and inability to relieve bloating remained lower after 180-degree LAF. The 5-year heartburn score, dilatation rate, reoperation rate, PPI use, and patient satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 and 5 years, dysphagia and gas-related symptoms are lower after 180-degree LAF than after LNF, and esophageal acid exposure and esophagitis are similar, with no differences in heartburn scores, patient satisfaction, dilatations, and reoperation rate. These results lend level 1a support for the use of 180-degree LAF for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In the title compound, {[Ag(C(14)H(10)N(4)O)(2)]CF(3)SO(3)}(n), the unique Ag(I) ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two pyridine rings of two independent N'-(4-cyano-benzyl-idene)nicotinohydrazide ligands and one N atom of a carbonitrile group of a symmetry-related N'-(4-cyano-benzyl-idene)nicotino-hydrazide ligand, forming a distorted T-shaped coordination environment. One of the independent ligands acts as a bridge connecting Ag(I) ions, forming chains along the a axis. In the crystal structure, two neighbouring anti-parallel chains are connected through N-Hâ¯O hydrogen bonds. In addition, there are relatively short Agâ¯O contacts of 2.723â (3)â Å, which connect the chains into a three-dimensional structure.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) on the survival of animals, by comparing the change of intraoperative and postoperative immunologic parameters of NOTES with laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty pigs were randomized to treatment with NOTES or standard laparoscopy. Each group underwent diagnostic peritoneoscopy by laparoscopy or NOTES in 90 minutes. Laboratory values, including interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), were obtained at baseline, at intraoperative minute (IOM) 30, 60, and 90, and on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 7. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed and all animals (except one in the NOTES group) survived to POD 14. The level of IL-1 and TNF-α was not significantly different compared with the preoperative level of IL-1 and TNF-α in both groups at IOM 30 and 60. It increased significantly at IOM 90 and POD 1 and 3 in both groups. Although levels of both IL-1 and TNF-α were higher in the NOTES group compared with the other group, there was no significant difference between the groups. At POD 7, the level of IL-1 and TNF-α decreased to near-normal levels in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, the findings in this study do not currently support the assumption that NOTES is less invasive than laparoscopy. Further research is required to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Interleucina-1/sangue , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/efeitos adversos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Animais , Modelos Animais , Período Pós-Operatório , Análise de Sobrevida , Suínos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are two most common weight loss procedures; our meta-analysis aims to compare these two in the treatment of morbid obesity and its related comorbidities. An electronic literature research of published studies concerning LRYGB and LSG was performed from inception to October 2013. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution or improvement rate of comorbidities, and adverse events were all pooled and compared by the software Review Manager 5.1. As a result, a total of 21 studies involving 18,766 morbidly obese patients were eventually selected according to the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in %EWL during 0.5- to 1.5-year follow-up (P > 0.05), but after that, LRYGB achieved higher %EWL than LSG (P < 0.05). Except for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (P < 0.001), the difference between these two procedures in the resolution or improvement rate of other comorbidities did not reach a statistical significance (P > 0.05). There were more adverse events in LRYGB compared with LSG (P < 0.01). In conclusion, LRYGB is superior to LSG in efficacy but inferior to LSG in safety.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: No randomized comparative trials have presented long-term outcomes for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two procedures. METHODS: From January 2007 to July 2008, 64 eligible patients were randomly assigned to LSG or LRYGB. During the 5-year follow-up, we compared morbidity rate, body mass index (BMI), percent of excess weight loss (%EWL), Moorehead-Ardelt (M-A) II quality of life, and resolution or improvement rate of obesity-related comorbidities between the groups. RESULTS: Both groups were matched with respect to age, gender, and BMI. Slightly more major complications were observed in patients undergoing LRYGB (P > 0.05). Weight loss was significantly better with LRYGB except during the first postoperative year. At 5 years, %EWL for LSG and LRYGB was 63.2 ± 24.5 % and 76.2 ± 21.7 % (P = 0.02), respectively. No statistical difference was observed in quality of life between the groups at all intervals (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, most comorbidities in both groups were resolved or improved, with no difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: LRYGB and LSG are equally safe and effective in quality of life and improvement or resolution of comorbidities, and LRYGB possesses the superiority in terms of weight loss. Further studies are needed to evaluate micronutrient deficiencies of these procedures.