MicroRNA-based signatures impacting clinical course and biology of ovarian cancer: a miRNOmics study.

BACKGROUND: In Western countries, ovarian cancer (OC) still represents the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths, despite the remarkable gains in therapeutical options. Novel biomarkers of early diagnosis, prognosis definition and prediction of treatment outcomes are of pivotal importance. Prior studies have shown the potentials of micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) as biomarkers for OC and other cancers. METHODS: We focused on the prognostic and/or predictive potential of miRNAs in OC by conducting a comprehensive array profiling of miRNA expression levels in ovarian tissue samples from 17 non-neoplastic controls, and 60 tumor samples from OC patients treated at the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRE). A set of 54 miRNAs with differential expression in tumor versus normal samples (T/N-deregulated) was identified in the IRE cohort and validated against data from the Cancer Genoma Atlas (TCGA) related to 563 OC patients and 8 non-neoplastic controls. The prognostic/predictive role of the selected 54 biomarkers was tested in reference to survival endpoints and platinum resistance (P-res). RESULTS: In the IRE cohort, downregulation of the 2 miRNA-signature including miR-99a-5p and miR-320a held a negative prognostic relevance, while upregulation of miR-224-5p was predictive of less favorable event free survival (EFS) and P-res. Data from the TCGA showed that downregulation of 5 miRNAs, i.e., miR-150, miR-30d, miR-342, miR-424, and miR-502, was associated with more favorable EFS and overall survival outcomes, while miR-200a upregulation was predictive of P-res. The 9 miRNAs globally identified were all included into a single biologic signature, which was tested in enrichment analysis using predicted/validated miRNA target genes, followed by network representation of the miRNA-mRNA interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Specific dysregulated microRNA sets in tumor tissue showed predictive/prognostic value in OC, and resulted in a promising biological signature for this disease.

High activity of salvage treatment with biweekly paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients.

The treatment of refractory metastatic breast cancer is primarily palliative, without a significant impact on overall survival. Among the innovative combinations in this unfavourable setting, paclitaxel and gemcitabine showed a possible synergistic action and an encouraging activity in some clinical trials. This phase II study was carried out to evaluate paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination in very heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer on a bi-weekly schedule.Thirty-nine women with advanced breast cancer were treated with paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 as 3 hrs infusion, and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 as 30 mins infusion, both drugs administered on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 28 days. All but two patients received granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on days 7 to 9 and 20 to 22 of every cycle. More than two third (71%) of the patients had previously received two or more chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease, including almost all active agents in this disease. Objective responses were observed in 18 out of 34 evaluable patients (53%; 95% CI, 36% to 70%). Disease remained stable in 7 patients (21%). Responses by sites were 67% in soft tissue and in bone, and 48% in visceral disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 9 and 20 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with G3-4 neutropenia in 8%, and G 1-2 thrombocytopenia in 13% of the patients; non-hematological toxicities were mild, with G3 hepatotoxicity in 5% of the patients, and G3 peripheral neurotoxicity in 10% of the patients. Biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine combination with G-CSF support appears to be very active as salvage therapy in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients, with a very favourable safety profile.

A partial response in anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid with liposomal doxorubicin.

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Surgery represents the curative treatment for limiting the disease. In the presence of locoregional disease, not suitable for surgery, and for metastastic disease, chemotherapy represents the treatment option. Single agents chemotherapy can produce some responses; doxorubicin is an active drug with a rate of partial response lower than 20%. Association with cisplatin seems to be more active producing a higher rate of complete responses. Liposomal doxorubicin is a new class of anthracyclines, derived from a structural modification of doxorubicin, representing a new form of an old drug with pharmacological characteristics that facilitate a more easy elusion from immune system, a longer half-life, an increased tumor cell uptake and a reduced toxicity if compared with parental drug. Herein we report the first case of an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma treated with the use of liposomal doxorubicin. The encouraging response observed with single agent liposomal doxorubicin (70% according to RECIST criteria) deserves further investigations.

Sequential chemoimmunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer using cisplatin, etoposide, thymosin-alpha 1 and interferon-alpha 2a.

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the clinical and immunological effects of a regimen of cisplatin (DDP) and etoposide (VP-16) combined with thymosin-alpha 1 (TA1) and low-dose interferon-alpha 2a (IFN) in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemoimmunotherapy cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. There were 24 responses (two complete, 22 partial) among 56 assessable patients. Median survival was 12.6 months. Overall, treatment was well tolerated. Natural killer cell activity and lymphocyte subtypes were depressed by chemotherapy, but this effect was less prominent in patients receiving TA1 and IFN in comparison with a concomitant group of patients treated with DDP and VP-16 only. The combination of DDP and VP-16 and TA1 and IFN is effective in advanced NSCLC with acceptable toxicity. However, the results of this study need to be confirmed in a randomised trial.

Paclitaxel activity in anthracycline refractory breast cancer patients.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 and 135 mg/m2, over a 3-hr infusion, without prophylactic G-CSF, in heavily pretreated patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Although paclitaxel may share with anthracyclines a common mechanism of drug resistance, there is evidence that the two drugs are not completely cross resistant. METHODS: From July 1994 to January 1996, 42 patients were treated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles; paclitaxel dose was established according to pretreatment extension. RESULTS: In 41 assessable patients we observed 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% CI, 10-34%). There was no difference in response rate between the two dose levels. Median duration of response was 9 months, median time to progression 5 months, and median survival 9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 3-4 in 40% (135 mg/m2) and 62% (175 mg/m2) of the patients (P = 0.28); neutropenic fever occurred in 24% of the patients, without significant differences between the two dose levels. Other toxicity was mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at doses of 175 mg/m2 or 135 mg/m2 is active and well tolerated in advanced breast cancer patients resistant to anthracyclines. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors seems appropriate in heavily pretreated patients given the higher dose level.

Ifosfamide, cisplatin, and 13-Cis retinoic acid for patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide (IFO) and cisplatin (CDDP) are active drugs in the treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. 13-Cis retinoic acid (RA), along with its antiproliferative and differentiating activity on SCC cell lines, has immunomodulatory and chemopreventive effects. The objective of the current Phase I-II study was to evaluate the combination of CDDP, IFO, and RA in patients with advanced or recurrent SCC of the head and neck. METHODS: Patients with measurable recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced SCC of the head and neck were eligible. Patients received a fixed dose of 20 mg/m(2) CDDP, and IFO was administered with sodium mercaptoethanesolfonate in three-dose increments (1000 mg/m(2), 1200 mg/m(2), and 1500 mg/m(2)) up to dose limiting toxicity. Both drugs were given for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. RA (0.5 mg/kg) was given orally for 5 days per week. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients either with locoregional recurrence or distant metastases (50%) or with locally advanced SCC of the head and neck beyond surgery or radiation therapy (50%) were entered into the trial. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the Phase I study, during which the maximum tolerated dose of IFO was 1500 mg/m(2). In the Phase II study (CDDP 20 mg/m(2) and IFO 1200 mg/m(2)), the response rate was 72% (95% confidence interval, 57-83%). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median time to disease progression was 10.4 months (range, 2.9-47.2+ months), and the median overall survival was 12.95 months (range, 1.7-47.2+ months). Two patients were converted from a partial response to a complete response with RA. Toxicity was relatively well tolerated and caused no deaths. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 16 patients, and Grade 2-3 diarrhea toxicity occurred in 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The dose and schedule for the combination of CDDP, IFO, and RA that were used in this study are feasible and active in the treatment of patients with SCC of the head and neck, with durable responses and a relatively well tolerated toxicity.