Human epigenetic and transcriptional T cell differentiation atlas for identifying functional T cell-specific enhancers.

The clinical benefit of T cell immunotherapies remains limited by incomplete understanding of T cell differentiation and dysfunction. We generated an epigenetic and transcriptional atlas of T cell differentiation from healthy humans that included exhausted CD8 T cells and applied this resource in three ways. First, we identified modules of gene expression and chromatin accessibility, revealing molecular coordination of differentiation after activation and between central memory and effector memory. Second, we applied this healthy molecular framework to three settings-a neoadjuvant anti-PD1 melanoma trial, a basal cell carcinoma scATAC-seq dataset, and autoimmune disease-associated SNPs-yielding insights into disease-specific biology. Third, we predicted genome-wide cis-regulatory elements and validated this approach for key effector genes using CRISPR interference, providing functional annotation and demonstrating the ability to identify targets for non-coding cellular engineering. These studies define epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of human T cells and illustrate the utility of interrogating disease in the context of a healthy T cell atlas.

BAMM (BRAF Autophagy and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma): A Phase I/II Trial of Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Hydroxychloroquine in Advanced BRAFV600-mutant Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Autophagy is a resistance mechanism to BRAF/MEK inhibition in BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. Here we used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to inhibit autophagy in combination with dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and trametinib 2 mg every day (D+T). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial in four centers of HCQ + D+T in patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. The primary objectives were the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and the one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of >53%. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were evaluable for one-year PFS rate. Patient demographics were as follows: elevated lactate dehydrogenase: 47%; stage IV M1c/M1d: 52%; prior immunotherapy: 50%. In phase I, there was no dose-limiting toxicity. HCQ 600 mg orally twice daily with D+T was the RP2D. The one-year PFS rate was 48.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.0%-65.5%], median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-16.9 months), and response rate (RR) was 85% (95% CI, 64%-95%). The complete RR was 41% and median overall survival (OS) was 26.5 months. In a patient with elevated LDH (n = 16), the RR was 88% and median PFS and OS were 7.3 and 22 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HCQ + D+T was well tolerated and produced a high RR but did not meet criteria for success for the one-year PFS rate. There was a high proportion of patients with pretreated and elevated LDH, an increasingly common demographic in patients receiving targeted therapy. In this difficult-to-treat population, the RR and PFS were encouraging. A randomized trial of D+T + HCQ or placebo in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma with elevated LDH and previous immunotherapy is being conducted.

A single dose of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade predicts clinical outcomes in resectable melanoma.

Immunologic responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients occur rapidly with pharmacodynamic T cell responses detectable in blood by 3 weeks. It is unclear, however, whether these early blood-based observations translate to the tumor microenvironment. We conducted a study of neoadjuvant/adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in stage III/IV melanoma. We hypothesized that immune reinvigoration in the tumor would be detectable at 3 weeks and that this response would correlate with disease-free survival. We identified a rapid and potent anti-tumor response, with 8 of 27 patients experiencing a complete or major pathological response after a single dose of anti-PD-1, all of whom remain disease free. These rapid pathologic and clinical responses were associated with accumulation of exhausted CD8 T cells in the tumor at 3 weeks, with reinvigoration in the blood observed as early as 1 week. Transcriptional analysis demonstrated a pretreatment immune signature (neoadjuvant response signature) that was associated with clinical benefit. In contrast, patients with disease recurrence displayed mechanisms of resistance including immune suppression, mutational escape, and/or tumor evolution. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment is effective in high-risk resectable stage III/IV melanoma. Pathological response and immunological analyses after a single neoadjuvant dose can be used to predict clinical outcome and to dissect underlying mechanisms in checkpoint blockade.

Phase II Trial of Temozolomide and Sorafenib in Advanced Melanoma Patients with or without Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE: The combination of the oral alkylating agent temozolomide and the oral multikinase inhibitor sorafenib was evaluated in advanced melanoma patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with metastatic melanoma (n = 167) were treated on four arms. All patients received sorafenib at 400 mg p.o. twice daily without interruption. Patients without brain metastases or prior temozolomide were randomized between arm A: extended dosing of temozolomide (75 mg/m(2) temozolomide daily for 6 of every 8 weeks) and arm B: standard dosing (150 mg/m(2) temozolomide daily for 5 of every 28 days). Patients previously treated with temozolomide were enrolled on arm C: extended dosing of temozolomide. Patients with brain metastases and no prior temozolomide were assigned to arm D: standard dosing. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included response rate, toxicity rates, and the rates of BRAF or NRAS mutations. RESULTS: The 6-month PFS rate for arms A, B, C, and D were 50%, 40%, 11%, and 23%. The median PFS for patients on arm A, B, C, and D was 5.9, 4.2, 2.2, and 3.5 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed between arms A and B in 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, or response rates. Treatment was well tolerated in all arms. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between arms A and B except for more grade 3 to 4 lymphopenia in arm A. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide plus sorafenib was well tolerated and showed activity in melanoma patients without prior history of temozolomide. The activity of this combination regimen warrants further investigation. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(24):7711-8).