Pain Associated With Cervical Priming for First-Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of cervical priming with mifepristone with that of misoprostol on pain perception during surgical induced abortion under paracervical block. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-blind, two-center study of women undergoing surgical induced abortion at less than 14 weeks of gestation under paracervical block. Participants were randomized to receive cervical priming with 200 mg of oral mifepristone 36 hours or 400 micrograms buccal misoprostol 3 hours before surgery. The primary outcome was pain during mechanical cervical dilation evaluated by a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were pain during aspiration, preoperative and postoperative pain, participant satisfaction, duration of the procedure, occurrence of complications, and ease of performing the procedure (assessed by a 100-mm VAS). We estimated that 110 women would have to be included to have 90% power to detect a 13mm-difference of VAS for pain. RESULTS: Between June 2017 and May 2019, 314 women were eligible and 110 were randomized (55 in each group). Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. The mean VAS score during mechanical cervical dilation was lower in the mifepristone group (35.6±21 vs 43.5±21, P=.04) as was the mean VAS during aspiration (34±24 vs 47.8±23, P=.003). The preoperative and postoperative mean VAS, satisfaction and duration of procedures were similar between groups. The procedure was significantly easier to perform in the mifepristone group (88±16 vs 80±23, P=.004). CONCLUSION: Cervical priming with mifepristone for surgical induced abortion under paracervical block up to 14 weeks of gestation is more effective than misoprostol in reducing pain perception. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043014.

Clinical practice guidelines for contraception by the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

The French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF) has released its first comprehensive recommendations for clinical practices in contraception, to provide physicians with an updated synthesis of the available data as a basis for their practice. The organizing committee and the working group adopted the objective methodological principles defined by the French Authority for Health (HAS) and selected 12 themes relevant to medical professionals' clinical practices concerning contraception. The available literature was screened through December 2017 and served as the basis of 12 texts, reviewed by experts and physicians from public and private practices, with experience in this field. These texts enabled us to develop evidence based, graded recommendations. Male and female sterilization, as well as the use of hormonal treatments not authorized for contraception ("off-label") were excluded from the scope of our review. Specific practical recommendations are provided for the management of contraception prescription, patient information concerning effectiveness, risks, and benefits of the different methods, patient follow-up, intrauterine contraception, emergency contraception, local and natural methods, contraception in teenagers, in women after 40, for women at high thromboembolism or cardiovascular risk, and for those at of primary cancer or relapse. The short- and mid-term future of contraception depends mainly on improving the use of currently available methods. This includes reinforced information for users and increased access to contraception for women, regardless of their social and clinical contexts. The objective of these guidelines is to aid in enabling this improvement.