Nosocomial COVID-19 Infection in a Long-Term Hospital in Spain: Retrospective Observational Study.

Background and Objectives. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and epidemiological characteristics and outcomes in patients with versus without nosocomial COVID-19 after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and to analyze the risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19 in a long-term hospital in Spain. Materials and methods. This retrospective, single-center observational study included all inpatients in a long-term hospital during a COVID-19 outbreak from 21 January to 15 March 2021. Results. Of 108 admitted patients, 65 (60.2%) were diagnosed with nosocomial COVID-19 disease (n = 34 women (52.3%), median age 77 years). In the univariable analysis, risk factors associated with nosocomial COVID-19 were dementia (OR 4.98 95% CI 1.58-15.75), dyspnea (OR 5.34 95% CI 1.69-16.82), asthenia (OR 5.10, 95% CI 1.40-18.60) and NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) (OR 1.28 95% CI 1.10-1.48). In the multivariable analysis, risk factors independently associated with nosocomial COVID-19 infection were dyspnea (aOR 7.39; 95% CI 1.27-43.11) and NECPAL (aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03-1.52). Of the 65 patients diagnosed with nosocomial COVID-19, 29 (44.6%) died, compared to 7/43 (16.2%) non-infected patients (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.61-10.67). Factors associated with mortality in nosocomial COVID-19 were confusion (aOR 3.83; 95% CI 1.03-14.27) and dyspnea (aOR 7.47; 95% CI 1.87-29.82). The NECPAL tool played an important predictive role in both nosocomial COVID-19 infection and mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.41). Conclusions. In a long-term hospital, nosocomial COVID-19 main clinical characteristics associated with infection were dyspnea and NECPAL. Mortality was higher in the group with nosocomial COVID-19; risk factors were confusion and dyspnea. The NECPAL tool may help to predict progression and death in COVID-19.

Prevalence of crystal deposits in asymptomatic hyperuricemia according to different scanning definitions: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The appropriate sonographic protocol for assessing urate crystal deposits in asymptomatic hyperuricemia (AH) is undefined, as well as how the choice would impact on deposit rates and accompanying sonographic, clinical and laboratory features. METHODS: Patients with AH (serum urate ≥7 mg/dL) underwent musculoskeletal ultrasound of 10 locations for OMERACT elementary gout lesions (double contour [DC] signs, tophi, aggregates). Different definitions for AH with deposits were applied, varying according to deposits (any deposits; only DC and/or tophi); gradation (any grade; only grade 2-3 deposits), location (10 locations; 4-joint scheme including knees and 1MTPs; >1 location with deposits), or pre-defined definitions (DC sign in femoral condyles/1MTP and/or tophi in 1MTP). We evaluated crystal deposits rates and compared between other sonographic features, clinical and laboratory variables. RESULTS: Seventy-seven participants with AH showed a median 1 location (IQR 0-2) with tophi, 1 (IQR 1-2) with aggregates, and 0 locations (IQR 0-1) with DC sign. The deposition rate ranged from 23.4% (in >1 location with grade 2-3 DC or tophi) to 87.0% (in any deposit in all 10 locations). Accompanying inflammation - assessed by a positive power-Doppler (PD) signal - and erosions were found in 19.5% and 28.4% of participants, respectively. Positive PD signal was better discriminated by criteria requiring grade 2-3 or >1 location with lesions. Erosions and the different clinical and laboratory variables were similar among protocols. CONCLUSION: Rates of sonographic deposition in AH varied dramatically among studied protocols, while some could discriminate accompanying inflammation, all highlighting the need for a validated, consensus-based definition.