Effects of inhibitors of DNA synthesis and protein synthesis on the rate of DNA synthesis after exposure of mammalian cells to ultraviolet light.

Chinese hamster V-79 cells were treated with metabolic inhibitors o DNA or protein synthesis for various intervals of time after exposure of 3.0 or 5.0 J m-2. After removal of the metabolic block(s) the rate of DNA synthesis was followed by measuring the incorporation of [14C]thymidine into acid-insoluble material. A 2.5 or 5.0 h incubation with cycloheximide or hydroxyurea was effective in delaying the onset of the recovery in the rate of DNA synthesis that normally becomes evident several hours after exposure to ultraviolet light. By using concentrations of cycloheximide or hydroxyurea that inhibit DNA synthesis by a similar amount (70%), but protein synthesis by vastly different amounts (95% for cycloheximide; 0% for hydroxyurea), it was apparent that the delay in recovery caused by the treatment of cells with cycloheximide could be accounted for entirely by its inhibitory effect on DNA synthesis. This suggests that the recovery in DNA synthetic rates following exposure of V-79 cells to ultraviolet light does not appear to require de novo protein synthesis, and therefore does not appear to require the involvement of an inducible DNA repair process.

Adenosine-mediated stimulation of bone cell adenylate cyclase activity.

Adenosine rapidly stimulated adenylate cyclase activity but did not modify cyclic AMP degradation when added to a particulate fraction prepared from isolated bone cells. The effect of adenosine was one-half maximal at 5-10 micronM, and was not mimicked by 5' AMP, inosine, guanosine, uridine, adenine, or ribose. Basal and adenosine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activites were directly proportional to the concentration of particulate protein in the assay system. Theophylline decreased the degree to which adenosine stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, whereas another phosphodiesterase inhibitor, RO-20-1724, failed to iiinfluence the effect of adenosine. Adenosine itself, and not a metabolite of adenosine is the stimulator of adenylate cyclase, since it was neither phosphorylated nor deaminated appreciably by the particulate fraction. The particulate fraction did not convert substrate ATP to adenosine in amounts sufficient to enhance adenylate cyclase. The stimulatory effect of adenosine was maximal at 1.2 mM Mg2+, declined with increases in the Mg2+ concentration, and was replaced by inhibition at 20 mM Mg2+. At 2.4 mM Mg2+, basal adenylate cyclase activity peaked at 1.1 mM ATP, and was inhibited by higher ATP concentrations. The magnitude of adenosine stimulation was greater at inhibitory concentrations of ATP than at concentrations which yielded maximum activity. The results suggest that the previously demonstrated ability of adenosine to increase cyclic 3'5' AMP levels in intact bone cells stems from its effect on adenylate cyclase. Adenosine may act by modifying the regulatory nfluence of free Mg2+, uncomplexed ATP, (or both), on adenylate cyclase. Theophylline appears to interfere with the action of adenosine by a mechanism which is distinct from its capacity to inhibit cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase activity. (Endocrinology 99:901,1976)

DNA chain growth as a function of age in intact and permeabilized WI-38 and MRC-5 cells.

The rate of incorporation of deoxythymidine triphosphate (dTTP) into acid-precipitable material of permeabilized MRC-5 and WI-38 cells as well as the rate of DNA chain growth in both intact and permeabilized cells was examined as a function of cell age. Although both the total rate of dTTP incorporation and the percentage of labeled cells decreased as cultures aged, we could detect no decrease in the rate of DNA chain growth from passages 29 to 53 for MRC-5 and from passages 34 to 50 for WI-38 cells. Since the older passages were in phase III growth and since, in our hands, the WI-38 cells used for this study senesced at passage 51, we conclude that a decrease in the rate of DNA chain growth is not related to in vitro aging.

Subchromosomal DNA synthesis in synchronous V-79 chinese hamster cells after X irradiation.

A substantial fraction of replicon initiation events in Chinese hamster V-79 cells have been shown to be refractory to the effects of X irradiation immediately after exposure. This study examines the possibility that the initiation radiorefractive portion is the result of changes in replicon radiosensitivity as a function of position in S phase. The data obtained from DNA fiber autoradiograms and kinetic incorporation of radiolabeled thymidine from cells irradiated at various positions in S phase showed only slight changes in the proportion of replicons refractive to X irradiation immediately after exposure. These results indicate that initiation radiorefractive replicons may be an intrinsic property of V-79 cells and that cell-cycle-specific heterogeneity in radiation response cannot fully account for this phenomenon. The results also indicate that delayed inhibition of initiation events may play a larger role in the observed radiorefractive fraction than previously thought.

DNA synthesis and cell survival after X-irradiation of mammalian cells treated with caffeine or adenine.

The expression of the transient depression in the rate of DNA synthesis normally observed after exposure of randomly-dividing Chinese hamster V-79 or Chinese hamster CHO cells to ionizing radiation can be postponed or diminished by a post-irradiation treatment with 1.0 to 1.0 mM adenine or 1.5 mM caffeine. Caffeine may exert its effect by creating additional sites for replication in irradiated cells. Cells treated with caffeine or adenine for 2 or 4 hours after exposure to 3000 rad of 300 kVp X-rays exhibit depressed synthesis only after the removal of caffeine or adenine. These alterations in the timing of the X-ray-induced depression of the rate of DNA synthesis have no effect on X-ray-induced cell killing. Although a 4 hour post-irradiation treatment of randomly-dividing Chinese hamster V-79 cells with 1.0 or 2.0 mM caffeine potentiates X-ray-induced cell killing, this reduction in survival is due primarily to effects on cells in S-phase.