Expanding Public Health Initiatives Through Community Pharmacies and Student Pharmacists: A Programmatic Case Study.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies are critical to the public health infrastructure in the United States and provide reliable information for public health concerns. Public health agencies curate educational materials that community pharmacy teams can disseminate. Student pharmacists participate in experiential learning at community pharmacies which could be utilized for dissemination of these resources. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project were to: (1) design a model for dissemination of public health information at community pharmacies; and (2) evaluate both the dissemination model's reach within communities and student pharmacist learnings from engagement in the model. METHODS: We engaged student pharmacists in a model to disseminate information at community pharmacies for two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiatives about Opioid Use Disorder Anti-Stigma and Antibiotic Stewardship Education. The number of pharmacies and student pharmacists who participated from 2021-2023 were retrospectively reviewed to demonstrate programmatic reach. A retrospective text mining of student assignments was conducted to evaluate student experiences. Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data. An inductive, rapid content analysis was completed for qualitative data. RESULTS: Across three years, 333 student pharmacists participated. Students reached 121 community pharmacies, 139 practicing pharmacist preceptors, and over 2000 patients with education and resources. Eleven student learning points emerged from the qualitative analysis. These included learnings around opioid use disorder and antibiotic stewardship. Students also acknowledged that there are public health needs present in communities and that community pharmacy teams are well-positioned to address these needs. CONCLUSION: Engaging student pharmacists to distribute curated information from public health authorities, to both pharmacist preceptors and patients at community pharmacies, is one way to educate future pharmacists, pharmacy teams, and communities on public health priorities. Pharmacies can serve as key venues in communities for dissemination of reliable public health information.

Complexity of Patient Encounters within a Clinically Integrated Community Pharmacy Network Medicaid Payer Program.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists frequently care for patients with complex medical and social needs; however, specific evidence on pharmacist perceptions of what makes a patient encounter complex has not been clearly characterized. There is a need to better understand specific factors that contribute to patient encounter complexity and demonstrate how pharmacists in community settings care for these individuals. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this programmatic case study were to: (1) elucidate factors that contributed to patient encounter complexity as a part of a Medicaid Managed Care Organization comprehensive medication management payer program in community pharmacies; and (2) curate a series of patient case vignettes that provide evidence of pharmacists care for patients with complex medical and social needs within community pharmacies. METHODS: This qualitative, programmatic case study utilized data from semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists who provided comprehensive medication management services to Medicaid patients in Pennsylvania. Pharmacists described their most complex patient encounter. Interviews were transcribed and independently coded by two investigators. The coded texts were grouped into categories, and a cross-case, inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify complexity factors. RESULTS: Thirty pharmacists provided 48 patient case vignettes and three complexity factors emerged: (1) care coordination, (2) behavioral health support, and (3) social determinants of health. Representative patient case vignettes were selected to illustrate these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists, who participated in a community pharmacy Medicaid MCO payer program, provided care to patients with complex health needs. In addition to medication-related problems, specific factors that increased pharmacist perception of encounter complexity were care coordination with other health care providers, behavioral health support, and addressing social determinants of health.

Community Pharmacy Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Test-To-Treat Program: Development of an Implementation Toolkit.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) surveillance showed more than 2.5 million cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis nationally in the United States in 2022. Individuals often seek out non-emergency medical care at pharmacies. This makes community pharmacies well-positioned to address rising STI rates by offering services to screen and treat common STIs. A local health department, an independent pharmacy, and a school of pharmacy in Pennsylvania partnered to implement a test-to-treat service for chlamydia and gonorrhea within a pharmacy. This pilot program utilized: (1) patient self-collected test kits for chlamydia and gonorrhea screening and; (2) standing orders for treatment at the pharmacy. One goal of this pilot was to develop resources others can use to implement similar pharmacy-based chlamydia and gonorrhea testing and treatment services. OBJECTIVE: Develop an expert-informed implementation toolkit for a chlamydia and gonorrhea test-to-treat program at a community pharmacy. METHODS: The "How to Build an Implementation Toolkit from Start to Finish" framework from the University of California at Berkeley was used to design the initial toolkit outline. Toolkit content was triangulated from three sources: (1) comprehensive literature review; (2) pilot program implementation team meetings; and (3) feedback from public health and other experts. Pilot program partners met regularly to review and edit the toolkit. The draft toolkit was then reviewed by outside experts and potential end-users . RESULTS: An 11-item toolkit was developed. Toolkit contents were reviewed by 11 outside experts and potential end-users. Toolkit resources included STI training resources for pharmacy teams, testing and treatment standing orders, pharmacy treatment screening form, marketing strategies, patient education materials, sample workflow, essential supply list, and other key resources. CONCLUSION: Pharmacies may need additional resources for STI testing and treatment program implementation. Toolkit resources developed from this pilot program may help pharmacies overcome implementation barriers for similar programs.

Act for the Future of Community Pharmacy.

Community pharmacies serve as a vital gateway to primary care and public health, offering face-to-face pharmacist expert care to assure safe and effective medication use. However, they are disappearing at an alarming rate, with 20-30% of all community pharmacy locations projected to close within the next year. The objective of this commentary is to highlight the critical need for systemic reforms and collective action within our profession to address the unique challenges faced by community pharmacies, ensuring their sustainability and continued role in providing essential healthcare services for patients. Key issues and evidence are provided to help pharmacy professionals better articulate why pharmacy closures are happening now and how we can work towards a transformed future. Pharmacy closures stem from an unsustainable business model characterized by declining reimbursement for prescription medications, opaque and anti-competitive pricing practices of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and limited reimbursement for clinical services. Amongst these challenges, our profession has the opportunity to create a future for community pharmacy where every person has local access to pharmacist expert care and medications through sustainable, integrated community pharmacy practice. Our profession must embrace community pharmacy teams' role in patient care, champion opportunities to integrate community pharmacists and their support staff as members of the healthcare team, and advocate for payment transparency and transformation. Creating this future will take all pharmacists and all pharmacy professionals.

Development of a Pharmacy Point-of-Dispensing Toolkit for Anthrax Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for Allegheny County Postal Workers.

CONTEXT: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Postal Service (USPS) consider anthrax to be a potential threat to USPS workers. A county health department-owned pharmacy supports local USPS response in the event of an exposure. The pharmacy team identified the need to review and update the local anthrax response plan. PROGRAM/POLICY: A Pharmacy Point-of-Dispensing Toolkit and response plan for initial 10-day post-exposure antibiotic prophylaxis was developed for use by a local health department in the event of a mass anthrax exposure at a US Post Office sorting facility. The pharmacist's role in medical countermeasures planning for anthrax exposure is also discussed to illustrate how pharmacists' medication expertise can be utilized. EVALUATION: The CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning framework and inputs from an interprofessional stakeholder team were used to develop a Medical Countermeasures Response Plan and Implementation Toolkit for mass point-of-dispensing (POD) in the event of an anthrax exposure. IMPLEMENTATION AND DISSEMINATION: Stakeholders attended a USPS Community Partner Training event where additional revisions to the toolkit were made. The toolkit and standing order are now implemented at the local health department to be reviewed and updated on a yearly basis by health department leadership. DISCUSSION: Pharmacists can use their medication expertise and experience with patient education to design emergency response plans focused on increasing patient safety and medication adherence. Pharmacists should be involved in emergency response and medical countermeasures planning that involve medications.

Patients' opinions on participation in patient-centered outcomes research in community pharmacies: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) often brings patient voices, thoughts, and opinions into the research process, allowing patients to have a say in the research process from project inception to dissemination of results. Community pharmacy teams are well-situated to engage patients in their own health and in research, given their trusting relationships with patients and access in communities. OBJECTIVE: To gather patients' opinions on participation in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. METHODS: Four regional focus groups representing western, central, northeastern, and southeastern Pennsylvania were conducted. A single community pharmacy in each region recruited patients to participate in each focus group. A focus group discussion guide was developed and reviewed by a Stakeholder Advisory Board that consisted patients, pharmacists, and researchers. Questions focused on patients' relationships with their pharmacy and pharmacist, perceptions of research occurring at their local pharmacy, and patient engagement methods. Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by 2 investigators. Coding discrepancies were reconciled through discussion, and a qualitative inductive thematic analysis was conducted by the research team. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients participated in one of 4 focus groups. Patients provided insights into what would make them more likely to participate in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Four themes emerged from the discussions: (1) Understanding the impact to one's health or community affects participation; (2) Patients prefer to schedule research activities at times outside of prescription pick-up or drop-off; (3) Trusted relationships can be leveraged for recruitment; and (4) Face-to-face engagement is preferred for participant recruitment. CONCLUSION: Patients want to engage in research in a way that is respectful of their time and matters to them. Strong patient-pharmacist relationships are essential for patient engagement in and acceptance of PCOR opportunities in community pharmacies. Community pharmacies may be rich locations to engage patients in PCOR.

Coaching strategies for the Flip the Pharmacy practice transformation initiative in Pennsylvania independent community pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: Flip the Pharmacy (FtP) is a nationwide initiative to scale practice transformation in community pharmacies. Participating pharmacies are coached through monthly practice transformation initiatives and document their patient-care activities through Pharmacist electronic Care (eCare) Plans. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify peer coaching strategies to facilitate practice transformation in Pennsylvania community pharmacies. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with practice transformation coaches and pharmacy champions participating in Pennsylvania's FtP program. The interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and elicited information using the intervention characteristics, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process domains. Interviews were conducted in person or via telephone over a 3-month period. An inductive qualitative thematic analysis was performed to identify coaching strategies. RESULTS: A total of 18 key informants were interviewed: 6 pharmacy champions and 12 practice transformation coaches. The following 5 coaching strategies emerged: (1) learn to use the pharmacy's specific Pharmacist eCare Plan software, (2) build a trusting relationship with the pharmacy, (3) engage all pharmacy team members in practice transformation, (4) adapt communication strategies to the pharmacy's preference, and (5) tailor goals to the pharmacy's stage of practice transformation. CONCLUSION: This study elicited 5 peer coaching strategies to support community pharmacy practice transformation initiatives. These findings can be used to further practice transformation efforts in community pharmacies through FtP and other initiatives aimed at expansion of community pharmacy patient care services.

COVID-19 pandemic vaccination preparedness strategies for independent community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine independent community pharmacist preparedness for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and to identify strategies for COVID-19 pandemic vaccination implementation in Pennsylvania. METHODS: This study used a complementary mixed-methods approach to recruit independent community pharmacists to participate in an electronic survey and 2 virtually conducted focus groups before the availability of the first COVID-19 vaccine. Information was gathered and compiled into 5 topic areas: (1) workflow, (2) resources, (3) staff and patient safety, (4) communication, and (5) documentation and training. Data collection occurred between October and December 2020. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Focus group discussions were audiorecorded and transcribed. A directed, content analysis was conducted to identify strategies for each topic area, and supporting quotes were selected. RESULTS: A total of 88 and 11 independent community pharmacists participated in the survey and focus groups, respectively. Because of the small size of most independent pharmacies, participants recommended working with community partners to support off-site mass vaccination clinics. Leveraging partnerships with community organizations and universities could be used to support staffing for vaccination efforts. Using an appointment-based immunization model was identified as one tool to optimize patient and staff safety during the pandemic. Pharmacists suggested using existing scheduling tools and text messaging and automated phone calls for second-dose reminders. Finally, independent pharmacists recommended further training and process improvements to support vaccine documentation and transmission to the Pennsylvania Statewide Immunization Information System. CONCLUSION: Recommendations from this study were used to support planning and preparation for COVID-19 vaccinations across Pennsylvania. Incorporation of pharmacists' ideas and recommendations on pandemic vaccination implementation is an important strategy to efficiently expand vaccination administration during pandemics.

Strategies for implementing the Appointment-Based Model at a rural independent chain of community pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: The Appointment-Based Model (ABM) is a care model that helps community pharmacists streamline their medication dispensing workflow while simultaneously integrating patient care into the medication preparation process through medication synchronization. Implementation of the ABM has varied across community pharmacies. Further studies that identify tailored implementation approaches are needed to support broad adoption of the ABM in practice. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine facilitators and barriers to ongoing adoption and implementation of the ABM at a small chain of rural independent pharmacies where adoption has stalled and (2) to identify implementation strategies to support further adoption of the ABM at these pharmacies METHODS: This project was an exploratory, mid-implementation study. Semistructured interviews were conducted with pharmacy staff who participated in the ongoing implementation and use of the ABM at the pharmacies. Interviews elicited stakeholder-centered perspectives on (1) experiences with the ABM to date, (2) processes and roles for the ABM, and (3) opinions on how implementation of the ABM could be improved at the pharmacies. Rapid qualitative assessment methodology was used for analysis to identify facilitators and barriers and to select implementation strategies. RESULTS: Thirty-one pharmacy personnel were interviewed: pharmacists (n = 10), pharmacy technicians (n = 7), and fill clerks (n = 14). The research team identified 6 facilitators and 4 barriers to the implementation of the ABM at the pharmacies. Five implementation strategies were selected based on the facilitators and barriers: (1) capture and share local knowledge across pharmacy sites, (2) conduct educational outreach visits, (3) conduct ongoing training, (4) prepare patients to be active participants in the ABM, and (5) organize clinician implementation team meetings. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a stakeholder-driven implementation approach may support further implementation and adoption of the ABM in practice.

Pharmacist peer coaching in a traditional community chain pharmacy: Implementation and perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacists' perceptions of peer coaching techniques designed to enhance pharmacists' provision of targeted medication reviews for adherence in traditional chain community pharmacies. METHODS: A peer coaching method was designed and implemented by a community-based pharmacy resident. Pharmacies within a traditional community chain were selected from a region that spans parts of western Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio. Individualized peer coaching was provided face-to-face with pharmacists within pharmacy workflow. After the full coaching intervention was complete, semi-structured interviews with coached pharmacists were conducted to qualitatively assess their perceived impact of the coaching. Interviews were conducted by a member of the investigative team to limit bias. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and then they underwent full thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five major themes were elicited from the coached pharmacists' interviews: (1) tailor coaching to pharmacist skill level, (2) empower pharmacists with strategies to conduct clinical interventions and self-assess, (3) teach patient engagement strategies, (4) include all team members to promote engagement, and (5) utilize peer coach's experience with the intervention. CONCLUSION: Themes from this project can help guide the implementation of peer coaching programs in community pharmacies. Effective peer coaching is an important approach to increase the uptake and effectiveness of a variety of community pharmacist-led enhanced patient care services.

Informing the development of a transitions of care program between an emergency department and regional supermarket chain pharmacies.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacist collaboration in transitions of care (TOC) programs is integral to increase patient education and adherence after discharge. This study aimed to conduct a qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perspectives to inform the design and implementation of a TOC program between an emergency department (ED) and regional supermarket chain pharmacies. METHODS: Pharmacies from a regional supermarket chain were identified for inclusion on the basis of geographic proximity to a local community hospital ED. Semistructured, one-on-one interviews with the primary investigator were conducted. Interview questions were based on the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The following 5 CFIR domains were used: (1) intervention characteristics, (2) outer setting, (3) inner setting, (4) characteristics of individuals, and (5) process. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two investigators coded each transcript independently. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 interviews were conducted, and the following 7 major themes emerged on analysis: (1) enhance real-time interprofessional communication, (2) establish data sharing between the ED and the community pharmacy, (3) provide timely resolution of prescription insurance issues for new therapies post-ED discharge, (4) use off-site pharmacy resources to support community pharmacy workflow, (5) increase patient education to prevent primary medication nonadherence, (6) reinforce discharge care plans, and (7) focus on community-dwelling older adult patients in an ED care transition program. CONCLUSION: Health care providers including pharmacists, physicians, nurses, and care managers, view an ED-to-community pharmacy TOC program as a valuable service to increase patient education on new medications and discharge planning. Establishment of data sharing and reimbursement is integral to the development, implementation, and sustainability of such programs. There is an untapped opportunity for community pharmacists to bridge the gap in care after ED discharge.

Formation of a statewide community pharmacy practice-based research network: Pharmacist opinions on research participation and engagement.

OBJECTIVE: To gather the insights and opinions of pharmacist stakeholders to inform the creation of a community pharmacy practice-based research network (PBRN) in Pennsylvania. DESIGN: A stakeholder advisory board of pharmacists, patients, and researchers was established to guide this research. This was a qualitative study using a semistructured interview guide. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community pharmacists from the Pennsylvania Pharmacist Care Network. OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes were identified that describe pharmacist insights and opinions on research participation and preferences for engagement in the PBRN. RESULTS: A total of 16 pharmacists participated in the study. The pharmacists believed that participating in research would help demonstrate their value and commitment to improving patients' health. Enhancing patient-pharmacist relationships and driving innovation were additional benefits that were reported. The pharmacists believed that they could effectively leverage their relationships with patients to engage them in research opportunities. The pharmacists reported that they would like to share research ideas and successful research practices with other members of the PBRN. CONCLUSION: Gathering pharmacists' opinions on participating in research was an important step in developing a community pharmacy PBRN that meets stakeholder needs. The results of this study can help others who seek to form community pharmacy PBRNs that facilitate stakeholder-driven research.

Implementation strategies from deployment of the National Diabetes Prevention Program in Pennsylvania community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE: To identify implementation strategies used by community pharmacists when initiating the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP). DESIGN: This study was a qualitative, mid-implementation study using a semi-structured interview guide. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community pharmacies in Pennsylvania that received grant funding from the Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association to begin the NDPP. OUTCOME MEASURES: A final list of implementation strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change and corresponding action items for pharmacists to begin the NDPP in their community pharmacies. RESULTS: Twenty strategies were used by community pharmacists when implementing the NDPP. These strategies were grouped into 3 implementation phases: (1) designing the program; (2) enrolling patients; and (3) keeping patients engaged. Strategies were further organized into 8 clusters based on strategy characteristics. Pharmacists commonly noted that making classes dynamic, keeping patients engaged through interactive activities, and encouraging patients to join classes with a companion were important when implementing the NDPP. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists used an array of strategies to implement the NDPP. This comprehensive list of strategies and accompanying action items can be used by community pharmacists nationwide to facilitate the implementation of the NDPP.

Implementation of comprehensive medication management at supermarket pharmacies in a pharmacy network.

OBJECTIVE: To garner experience with the early implementation of pharmacist-provided comprehensive medication management at a regional supermarket pharmacy during the initial launch of a statewide community pharmacy enhanced services network payer contract. METHODS: A series of key informant interviews were conducted with pharmacists at Giant Eagle Pharmacy locations in Pennsylvania. To be eligible to participate, pharmacists must have been trained by the Pennsylvania Pharmacists Care Network to deliver contracted comprehensive medication management services and willing to participate in audio recorded, telephonic interviews every 2 weeks. Interviews concluded when each pharmacist completed a total of 6 interviews or when the project period ended. A semistructured interview guide was developed by the investigators to elicit the pharmacists' experience providing contracted services. Interviews were transcribed and coded by 2 independent investigators. Coding discrepancies were resolved. The final coded transcripts were presented back to the project team to identify and finalize major themes. Illustrative quotes were selected to represent each theme. RESULTS: Interviews from 10 pharmacists were included in the analysis. Five themes emerged as keys of successful early implementation: (1) promote commitment of the pharmacy team, (2) use effective whole-team patient engagement strategies, (3) personalize patient encounters by providing patient-centered care and practicing interpersonal skills, (4) make workflow and staffing resources easily accessible, and (5) make clinical patient care tools readily available. CONCLUSION: These results highlight thematic trends for how pharmacists can successfully engage their patients in contracted comprehensive medication management services. Understanding the success of early implementation at a regional supermarket pharmacy can serve as a framework for other participants in community pharmacy enhanced services networks to replicate and scale contracted patient care services.

Using prescription dispensing data infographics to facilitate collaborative pharmacist-prescriber discussions on mutual patients.

OBJECTIVE: To develop prescriber-specific infographics containing community pharmacy prescription dispensing data and share them with targeted prescribers to determine their utility in facilitating initial collaborative conversations regarding the care of mutual patients. METHODS: Prescription dispensing data from an independent community pharmacy in western Pennsylvania was collected to generate highly visual infographics for the most frequent prescribers to the pharmacy. Infographics were individualized for prescribers, and they included information on mutual patients between the pharmacy and the prescriber. Infographics were then shared with prescribers during semistructured, audio-recorded interviews. Interview questions elicited feedback on prescriber medication-related needs, quality and performance measures, infographic format and utility, and prescriber-pharmacist collaboration. Interviews were transcribed and coded by 2 independent investigators using qualitative analysis software. Coding discrepancies were resolved. A thematic analysis of the interview data was conducted. RESULTS: Eight interviews were conducted with prescribers. The following themes emerged: (1) the infographic prompted prescribers to recognize potential collaborative opportunities with community pharmacists; (2) the infographic stimulated discussion on prescribing patterns and mutual patient populations; (3) prescribers value discussing the infographic data in a face-to-face meeting; (4) prescribers want to hear from pharmacists when mutual patients have medication-related problems; and (5) the infographic helped prescribers identify quality measures that they were not currently meeting. CONCLUSION: Infographics containing prescription dispensing data for mutual patients may be a useful tool when shared by community pharmacists to facilitate collaborative discussions with prescribers.

Vaccination equity and the role of community pharmacy in the United States: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify strategies community pharmacists utilized to support equitable vaccination in their communities. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive design. METHODS: Key informant interviews were conducted virtually via teleconference using a mix of purposeful and snowball sampling of Pennsylvania community pharmacy personnel who participated in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Interviews were conducted from March until August 2022 when thematic saturation was reached. A qualitative, inductive thematic data analysis was utilized to identify major themes and strategies that emerged from the data. RESULTS: Pharmacists utilized three philosophies: (1) prioritizing trust, (2) meeting people where they are at, and (3) building capacity within their teams and communities to create "safe spaces" for people to receive vaccinations. Nine discrete strategies used in practice exemplify how respondents implemented these philosophies: (1) Build Community Partnerships; (2) Establish Trust to Build Credibility; (3) Address Transportation Issues; (4) Provide Patient Education and Address Health Literacy Barriers; (5) Address Language Barriers; (6) Create a Safe and Accessible Space for Those with Individualized Needs; (7) Provide Patient-Centered and Culturally-Sensitive Care; (8) Train Staff on Health Equity and Patient Engagement; and (9) Advocate for Community Pharmacy Policy and Payment Reform. Definitions for these philosophies and key examples that illustrate how each strategy was employed in practice are provided. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight unique strategies respondent community-based pharmacy teams use to contribute to equitable vaccination efforts in communities and further emphasizes the importance of their role in public health initiatives.

Implementation of a Health Risk Assessment into Workflow of the Appointment-Based Model at an Independent Community Pharmacy.

Health risk assessments (HRAs) are tools used to collect information on patients' current health conditions, personal and family medical history, and lifestyle factors that can impact their overall health. The objectives of this pilot project were to implement an HRA as part of the appointment-based model workflow and to assess the resulting pharmacy-patient-care service opportunities. Sixteen HRA questions from a single health plan were incorporated into the appointment-based model workflow at an independent community pharmacy. Questions were administered either telephonically or in person over two patient encounters. Pharmacy staff were trained on how to administer the HRA, what to do if patients needed immediate assistance, how to provide referrals, and how to document of responses. Forty-nine patients were contacted and 38 (77.6%) completed the HRA. The median time for HRA completion was 19 min and the identified opportunities were vaccination (49), smoking cessation (15), diabetes prevention program (14), asthma control assessments (8), and substance use disorder screening and referral (3). This pilot project demonstrates that community pharmacies can implement HRAs and utilize the results to identify new pharmacy-patient-care service opportunities that can contribute to improved patient care and practice sustainability.

Podcasts as a Method to Deliver Education on Stigma Surrounding Opioid Use Disorder.

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a podcast miniseries to reduce stigma surrounding opioid use disorder (OUD) among student pharmacists. Students in their second and third professional years from two schools of pharmacy listened to five, 10-23 min podcasts incorporated into their coursework. The podcasts highlighted: (1) interviews with OUD professionals and those with lived experiences; (2) types of stigma and how it affects health outcomes; (3) OUD disease state processes, and (4) harm reduction strategies. Surveys assessed changes in perception of OUD and its associated stigma and included free-response and Likert scale questions. Subjects (n = 121) who completed a pre- and post-podcast survey were included. Paired t-tests assessed changes in survey responses from baseline and a content analysis was performed on all free-responses. There was a statistically significant change from baseline for each survey question, demonstrating a decrease in stigma towards OUD. Free-responses were categorized into four learning domains: (1) Impact of stigma on access to care; (2) Compassion and empathy; (3) Resources and support; and (4) Call to action. Podcasts can be an effective tool to reduce student pharmacist stigma associated with OUD.

Impact of a Medication Adherence Packaging Service on Patient-Centered Outcomes at an Independent Community Pharmacy.

The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive medication adherence packaging (RxMAP) service on patient medication-taking behaviors and patient-centered outcomes. Adult patients who utilized a single independent community pharmacy, enrolled in the RxMAP service for at least two consecutive cycles, and managed their own medications were eligible. The RxMAP service consists of multi-dose blister packaging in 28-day cycles, medication synchronization, monthly touchpoint calls, and delivery/mailing. A 13-item telephonic survey was administered, and patients' verbal responses were captured by audio-recording and detailed note taking. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the results and illustrative quotes representing the interview domains were selected. There were 42 patients who completed the survey: 88% reported they missed fewer doses compared to before using RxMAP; 71% were more likely to take their medications on time each day; 86% were more confident with managing their medications; and 74% were more independent. Finally, 64% of patients stated their overall quality of life was better now compared to before using the packaging service. These results demonstrate that medication adherence packaging services can positively impact patients' medication-taking behaviors, increase their confidence in medication management, and improve perceived quality of life.

A Student Pharmacist Quality Engagement Team to Support Initial Implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management within Independent Community Pharmacies.

In 2017, the Pennsylvania Pharmacists Care Network (PPCN), an enhanced pharmacy services network, and STRAND Clinical Technologies partnered to launch a payor contract with a Pennsylvania Medicaid Managed Care Organization for the provision of comprehensive medication management (CMM) at PPCN pharmacies. PPCN and the Community Leadership and Innovation in Practice Center at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy partnered to create the Quality Engagement Team (QET), a group of student pharmacists formed with the intent to support the initial implementation of this contract. The QET supported the pharmacies through biweekly phone calls, which led to increased pharmacist engagement and produced impactful patient encounter stories that were then reported back to the payor. We utilized Active Implementation Frameworks and select implementation strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project throughout the implementation period. The QET supported the successful implementation of this payor contract, which saw an increase in CMM encounters completed by the pharmacists during each month of the four-month contract period. Students, pharmacists and the payor each derived meaningful benefits from this initiative. Student pharmacists can be a powerful asset in the implementation of payor programs within an enhanced pharmacy services network, resulting in the mutually beneficial and sustainable support of the network.