Male Sex, Revision Surgery, Low Volume of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant, and Significant Instability Are Risk Factors for Posterior Root Tear of the Lateral Meniscus in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry. The study included all the patients in the registry who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between June 2020 and June 2023; we excluded incomplete data. We compared delay from injury to surgery between LMPRTs group and no-LMPRTs group. Variables investigated as potential risk factors for LMPRTs included age, sex, nature of surgery (primary or revision), pivot shift test result, side-to-side laxity under anesthesia, presence of ACL remnant, occurrence of medial meniscal tear, and presence of collateral ligament injury. Risk factors were analyzed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among the 5,359 patients analyzed, LMPRTs occurred in 7.0% (n = 375) of cases during ACL reconstruction. Mean age at surgery was 29.3 ± 10.3 years old [11-77]. Concerning delay to surgery, the mean time was 8.4 ± 23.1 weeks [0.0-347.2] in the no-LMPRTs group and 6.5 ± 10.2 weeks [0.2-61.6] in the LMPRTs group (P = .109). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex (P < .001), revision surgery (P < .001), medial meniscal injury (P = .007), ACL remnant (0% vs >70%, <10% vs >70%, 10%-30% vs >70%, >30%-50% vs >70%, >50%-70% vs >70%; P < .001), and greater pivot shift grade (P = .011) were significantly associated with a presence of LMPRTs. Age, side-to-side laxity, and collateral ligament injury were not found to be significant risk factors. In multivariate analysis, male sex, revision surgery, pivot shift test result, and a low volume of ACL remnant remained significant. Side-to-side laxity was also a significant factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified male sex, revision surgery, low volume of ACL remnant, side-to-side laxity, and greater grade of pivot shift as significant risk factors for LMPRTs during ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Risk factors and prevalence of ramp lesions in ACL ruptures: An analysis from the registry of the Francophone Arthroscopic Society.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify risk factors associated with these lesions. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry, including 5359 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2020 to June 2023. Potential risk factors for ramp lesion such as patient demographics, revision surgery, pivot shift, side-to-side anteroposterior laxity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, lateral meniscal tear and the volume of ligament remnant were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses. BMI and delay to surgery were also assessed. RESULTS: Ramp lesions were identified in 822 patients (15.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury, percentage of ACL remnant (all p < 0.0001) and pivot shift (p = 0.0103) as significant risk factors. MCL injury was associated with a lower risk (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and percentage of ACL remnants remained significant risk factors, while MCL injury remained a protective factor. The anteroposterior laxity wasn't a significant predictor in either analysis. In subgroup analysis, there were no differences concerning body mass index (n.s) and the delay to surgery (n.s). CONCLUSION: The study identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and pourcentage of ACL remnant as significant risk factors for ramp lesions, with MCL injury acting as a protective factor. This will help regarding the suspicion and identification of ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes of hamstring graft with preserved tibial insertion for ACL reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the outcomes of ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) reconstruction techniques that use a hamstring graft with a preserved tibial insertion and compare them to standard techniques. METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was done of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Ovid databases to identify published clinical studies on ACL reconstruction in which a non-detached hamstring tendon (NDHT) was used as a graft and to compare them to studies in which a detached hamstring tendon (DHT) or other techniques were used. The eligible studies were analyzed for the knee laxity, Lachman test, pivot shift test, joint range of motion, anterior drawer, pain, re-tear, revision surgery, Lysholm score, Tegner score, ACL-RSI scale, KOOS, IKDC, SNQ and Howell scale. RESULTS: Twelve articles in which NDHT was used for ACL reconstruction were analyzed. There was no significant difference between NDHT and DHT in the Lachman > 1 (p = .07), pivot shift test > 1 (p = .40), re-tears (p = .62), pain (p = .85) and the Tegner score (p = .95). However, the outcomes were somewhat better with the NDHT technique for the Lachman (RR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.08-1.12), pivot shift test (RR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.10-2.49) and re-tears (RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.13-3.42). The other criteria were not included in the meta-analysis because of lack of data or because specific outcome scores were used in each article. CONCLUSION: NDHT techniques provide similar results to DHT for ACL reconstruction and tend to produce better stability and a lower re-tear rate.

A quadruple peripheral nerve block outside the OR for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces the OR occupancy time.

PURPOSE: The use of regional anesthesia (RA) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction reduces morphine consumption, the time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and the hospital readmission rate. However, RA failures due to delays in the induction of anesthesia and its unpredictable success rate (Cuvillon et al. Ann Fr Anesth 29:710-715, 2010; Jankowski et al. Anesth Analg 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081798.89853.E7) can lead to disorganization of the operating room (OR) schedule. The hypothesis is that performing RA outside the OR will significantly reduce the OR occupancy time relative to using general anesthesia (GA). The primary objective was to compare the OR occupancy time between RA and GA when performing ACL reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of data collected prospectively from consecutive patients operated by a single surgeon between January 2019 and December 2020. The patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia they received (GA, RA). RA consisted of a quadruple peripheral nerve block (femoral, sciatic, obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves). The durations of the perioperative stages of the patient's journey in the OR suite were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The analysis involved 469 ACL reconstructions: 356 GA and 113 RA. The two groups were comparable in age, gender and ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists). The OR occupancy time for ACL reconstruction with RA was reduced by a mean of 13 min (70 ± 12 SD vs. 83 ± 14 SD; P < 0.0001) and the PACU time by 41 min relative to GA (P < 0.0001). The entry-incision time was reduced by an average of 8 min and the end-exit time by 3 min (P < 0.0001). The care time in the PACU was reduced from 84 ± 35 to 46 ± 26 min (P < 0.0001). However, performing anesthesia outside the OR (i.e., in a RA block room) did not reduce the turnover time (n.s). CONCLUSION: Performing RA outside the OR reduced the OR occupancy time by nearly 20% relative to using GA for ACL reconstructions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

PURPOSE: The aim of the ESSKA 2022 consensus Part III was to develop patient-focused, contemporary, evidence-based, guidelines on the indications for revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery (ACLRev). METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was used to provide recommendations on the appropriateness of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment in different clinical scenarios based on current scientific evidence in conjunction with expert opinion. A core panel defined the clinical scenarios with a moderator and then guided a panel of 17 voting experts through the RAM tasks. Through a two-step voting process, the panel established a consensus as to the appropriateness of ACLRev for each scenario based on a nine-point Likert scale (in which a score in the range 1-3 was considered 'inappropriate', 4-6 'uncertain', and 7-9 'appropriate'). RESULTS: The criteria used to define the scenarios were: age (18-35 years vs 36-50 years vs 51-60 years), sports activity and expectation (Tegner 0-3 vs 4-6 vs 7-10), instability symptoms (yes vs no), meniscus status (functional vs repairable vs non-functional meniscus), and osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade 0-I-II vs grade III). Based on these variables, a set of 108 clinical scenarios was developed. ACLRev was considered appropriate in 58%, inappropriate in 12% (meaning conservative treatment is indicated), and uncertain in 30%. Experts considered ACLRev appropriate for patients with instability symptoms, aged ≤ 50 years, regardless of sports activity level, meniscus status, and OA grade. Results were much more controversial in patients without instability symptoms, while higher inappropriateness was related to scenarios with older age (51-60 years), low sporting expectation, non-functional meniscus, and knee OA (KL III). CONCLUSION: This expert consensus establishes guidelines as to the appropriateness of ACLRev based on defined criteria and provides a useful reference for clinical practice in determining treatment indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Simple foot an ankle value: a simple evaluation correlated to the existing PROMs.

PURPOSE: The SFAV (Simple Foot and Ankle Value) consists in asking patients how they rate their joint function on the day of the examination, as a percentage of that of a normal joint (0-100% scale with 100% being normal). The main objective was to validate the SFAV by determining its correlation with validated foot and ankle function scores. METHODS: This was a prospective study. 90 patients were included in three groups: patients 16 to 54 years old with an acute or subacute ankle pathology (foot/ankle trauma patient group), patients more than 55 years old with ankle or foot osteoarthritis (foot/ankle degeneration patient group), and adults of any age without foot or ankle pathology (control group). A self-administered questionnaire with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, The European Foot and Ankle Society, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, the Visual Analogic Scale, and the SFAV was given at three different timepoints (enrollment, preoperative visit, and 6-month postoperative visit) to the patients. The validity of the SFAV was investigated by determining its correlation with the existing foot and ankle PROMs using Spearman's correlation; test-retest reliability, the responsiveness to change, and the discriminative ability of the SFAV were also analyzed. The significance threshold was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The SFAV was significantly correlated with the AOFAS, EFAS, and FAOS at all tested time points, with all p values below 0.033. SFAV scoring was reliable over time, as p values resulting from the comparison between initial and preoperative SFAV were all above the significance threshold. SFAV scoring was responsive to change, based on the comparison between pre- and postoperative SFAV (p < 0.05). Like for the AOFAS, EFAS, and FAOS, SFAV provides good discrimination between a healthy subject and a patient. The control group scores and initial consultation scores of the pooled patient's groups were statistically correlated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SFAV is a valid outcome measure correlated with the AOFAS, EFAS, FAOS, and VAS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence III.

Iliotibial band autograft is a suitable alternative graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

PURPOSE: Despite encouraging clinical, biomechanical and histological results, ACL reconstruction using the ITB was slowly abandoned. The hypothesis was that the current literature supports the use of ITB as the graft of choice for ACL reconstruction because of its good outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases to identify published clinical studies relevant to ACL reconstruction with ITB autograft and studies comparing ITB autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring (HT) autografts (none were found). The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of graft failure, instrumented knee laxity measurements, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity score, return to sports rate, return to sports at pre-injury level and complications. RESULTS: Nineteen clinical studies including 1,210 patients with ACL reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Graft failure occurred after ITB autograft in 4.2% of patients. Postoperative mean side-to-side laxity was 1.41 mm with 21% of patients having greater than 3 mm side-to-side difference. Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative (grade 0) in 57% and 85%, respectively, and were grade 0 or 1 in 95% and 97%, respectively. Functional outcomes were satisfactory in 84% of patients with good to excellent results (Lysholm score > 84). Mean postoperative Lysholm score was 93.3 and 84% of patients had an objective IKDC grade of A or B. Mean postoperative Tegner score was 6.8. The return to sports rate was 89% and 61% of patients returned to their pre-injury level. A comparison of 89 ITB versus 80 BPTB autografts revealed no significant differences in graft failure (n.s.), instrumented mean side-to-side knee laxity difference (n.s.) or Tegner score (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The graft survival rate and clinical and functional outcomes for ITB autograft are satisfactory. By allowing ACL reconstruction and lateral tenodesis to be done with a single, continuous, pedicled graft through an outside-in femoral tunnel, this technique may become the preferred alternative for primary or secondary ACL surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Femoral and tibial bone bruise volume is not correlated with ALL injury or rotational instability in patients with ACL-deficient knee.

PURPOSE: Some researchers have suggested that bone bruises are evidence of rotational instability. The hypothesis was that the extent of lateral bone edema is correlated with the presence of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. The main objective was to determine whether there was a correlation between the presence of an ALL injury the extent of bone bruises. METHODS: A prospective diagnostic study enrolled all the patients who suffered an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) who were operated on within 8 weeks. The extent of bone bruising according to the ICRS classification was measured on preoperative MRIs by two independent blinded raters twice with an interval of 4 weeks. Dynamic ultrasonography (US) to look for ALL injury and the pivot shift test were performed before the ACL surgery. The correlation between ALL injury and bone bruises, and the correlation between an ALL injury and a high-grade pivot shift test were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included; 52% of patients had an ALL injury on US. The extent of lateral bone bruise was not related to the presence of an ALL injury, nor related to the presence of a high-grade pivot shift. A grade 2 or 3 pivot shift was significantly correlated with an ALL injury (p < 0.0001). Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the bone bruise rating was excellent. CONCLUSION: The extent of lateral bone bruise is not correlated with ALL injury or a high-grade pivot shift; thus, it is not correlated with rotational instability of the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Simple Knee Value: a simple evaluation correlated to existing knee PROMs.

PURPOSE: The Simple Knee Value (SKV) is an outcome score in which patients are asked to grade their knee function as a percentage of that of a normal knee. The primary aim of this study was to validate the SKV by measuring its correlation with existing knee-related PROMs. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at a teaching hospital to assess the SKV's validity. The study enrolled 47 young patients (16-54 years old), 49 older patients (≥ 55 years) and 30 healthy controls. A paper questionnaire consisting of the Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC and SKV was given to subjects three times (enrolment, 1-month preoperative visit and 6 months postoperative visit). The criterion validity of the SKV was determined by correlating it to existing knee PROMs using the Spearman correlation coefficient (S). SKV test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between two time points (initial consultation at enrolment and preoperative visit, reflecting the same clinical condition). Responsiveness to change was determined by comparing the SKV scores before and after surgery (enrolment consultation and 6 months postoperative). Discriminative ability was determined by comparing the SKV distribution in patients and controls. RESULTS: There was a strong and significant correlation between the SKV and the gold standard Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS and WOMAC in the younger patients and the older patients (p < 0.0001). The reliability between the SKV at the initial consultation and before surgery was excellent (ICC 0.862, 95% CI 0.765; 0.921) in the younger patients, and moderate (ICC 0.506, 95% CI 0.265; 0.688) in the older patients. The SKV was responsive to change in both patient groups (p < 0.0001 for the SKV before versus 6 months after surgery). Like the other knee-specific PROMs (p < 0.0001), the SKV was able to distinguish between patients and controls (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SKV is valid as it is significantly correlated to existing knee PROMs. It is also reliable, responsive to change and discriminating. Its simplicity gives it many advantages and it can be used by physicians in their daily practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Increased lateral femoral condyle ratio is associated with greater risk of ALC injury in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: To examine whether increased lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) correlates with increased risk of Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (1) and to evaluate the relationship between the LFCR and anterolateral complex (ALC) injury in non-contact ACL torn knees (2). METHODS: Six hundred and seventy-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and 120 patients were finally included in the study. Forty patients (ACL + ALC injury) were included in the study group, while forty patients with isolated ACL injury (isolated ACL injury group) and 40 patients who suffered from meniscal tear without ACL or ALC injury were matched in a 1:1 fashion by age, sex, and BMI to the study group (ACL + ALC injury). The LFCR was measured on standard lateral radiographs in a blinded fashion. The differences between the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA. A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve was produced to determine risk of ACL injury and risk of concomitant ALC injury in non-contact ACL injury. RESULTS: The mean LFCR was 71.9% ± 3.1% in the ACL + ALC injury group, 68.4% ± 3.2% in the isolated ACL injury group, and 66.8% ± 2.6% in the control group (patients who suffered from meniscal tear without ACL or ALC injury). Significantly greater LFCR was found in the ACL + ALC injury group than that in the isolated ACL injury group (p < 0.017). Greater LFCR was additionally confirmed in the ACL injury group as compared to the control group (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that LFCR > 68.3% was predictive for an increased risk of ACL injury in the entire cohort. LFCR > 69.4% was predictive for an increased risk of ALC injury in non-contact ACL ruptured patients. CONCLUSION: Increased LFCR was found to be associated with greater risk of ALC injury in non-contact ACL ruptured patients. Additionally, increased LFCR was further confirmed to be correlated with increased risk of ACL injury in an Asian population. The data from this study may help recognize patients undergoing ACL reconstruction that could benefit from additional extra-articular tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Perineural dexamethasone attenuates liposomal bupivacaine-induced delayed neural inflammation in mice in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel®) is a sustained-release formulation of bupivacaine for use in surgical infiltration anaesthesia. We analysed the histological nerve toxicity and clinical effectiveness of perineural Exparel® alone or with added dexamethasone in a mouse model. METHODS: We assigned 98 mice receiving a perineural sciatic nerve injection into seven groups: sham (n=14, perineural saline), B (n=14, perineural bupivacaine), BDIP (n=14, perineural bupivacaine + intraperitoneal dexamethasone), BDPN (n=14, perineural bupivacaine + perineural dexamethasone), E (n=14, perineural Exparel®), EDIP (n=14, perineural Exparel® + intraperitoneal dexamethasone), and EDPN (n=14, perineural Exparel® + perineural dexamethasone). The duration of thermoalgesic and motor block was evaluated in 49 mice (seven mice randomly selected by group) every 30 min until recovery. Mice were killed for sciatic nerve histological assessment at 14 or 28 days. RESULTS: The median duration of motor block was 90, 120, 120, 120, 180, and 180 min and the duration of thermoalgesic block was 240, 300, 360, 360, 360, and 420 min for groups B, BDIP, BDPN, E, EDIP, and EDPN, respectively. The B group mice showed mild neural inflammation at 14 days and the E group mice showed mild neural inflammation at 28 days. Addition (intraperitoneal or perineural) of dexamethasone reduced neural inflammation induced by bupivacaine, whereas only perineural dexamethasone reduced neural inflammation induced by Exparel®. CONCLUSIONS: Perineural or systemic dexamethasone had a protective effect against the neural inflammation induced by bupivacaine, and perineural dexamethasone attenuated delayed inflammation induced by perineural Exparel®.

Increased lateral meniscal slope is associated with greater incidence of lateral bone contusions in noncontact ACL injury.

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate whether an increased lateral meniscal slope measured on magnetic resonance image (MRI) would be associated with greater risk of bone contusions in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury, and (2) to measure the relationship between the occurrence of bone contusions and associated findings observed in ACL deficient knees such as cartilage damage, anterolateral complex injury and concomitant meniscal tears. METHOD: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-three patients were included in the study group (ACL + bone contusions group), 56 participants were in the control group (isolated ACL group). The presence and severity of bone contusions were determined from preoperative MRIs. The lateral meniscal slope and lateral posterior tibial slope were measured on the MRIs in a blinded fashion. The predictors of lateral bone contusions including age, sex, body mass index, lateral meniscal slope and lateral posterior tibial slope were examined by multivariable logistic regression. Associated findings including concomitant meniscal lesions, intra-articular cartilage damage and anterolateral complex injury, which were also calculated by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean lateral meniscal slope in the study group was 6.5° ± 3.5°, which was significantly larger than that in the control group (3.8° ± 2.7°; P < 0.01). In addition, increased lateral meniscal slope was significantly associated with lateral bone contusions in noncontact ACL injury (Lateral femoral condyle (LFC): AOR 16.5; 95% CI 5.40-50.20; P < 0.01; Lateral tibial plateau (LTP): AOR 31.8; 95% CI 8.68-116.7; P < 0.01). However, lateral posterior tibial slope was not significantly associated with bone contusions. Moreover, the presence of lateral bone contusions was associated with concomitant lateral meniscal tears (OR 12.4; 95% CI 3.30-46.30) and cartilage damage (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.04-8.18). CONCLUSION: An increased lateral meniscal slope was associated with increased risk of lateral bone contusions in noncontact ACL injury. In addition, the presence of lateral bone contusions was associated with intra-articular cartilage damage, anterolateral complex injury and concomitant meniscal tears. Hence, additional information was provided for counseling patients who have increased LMS on the greater risk of knee rotational instability and identify patients undergoing ACL reconstruction who may benefit from extra-articular tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Comparing scar cosmesis and regional hypoesthesia at the incision site between quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with QT, HT or BPTB were evaluated at 1-year post-op. Scar cosmesis was assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and length of the incision. Sensory outcome was analyzed by calculating the area of hypoesthesia around the scar. The classical ACL reconstruction functional follow-up was measured using the Lysholm score and KOOS. RESULTS: Concerning QT versus BPTB group, QT patients have a significantly lower mean POSAS (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 39.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.0001), shorter mean incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 6.4 ± 1.3 cm; p < 0.0001), lower extent of hypoesthesia (8.7 ± 5.1 cm2 vs. 88.2 ± 57 cm2; p < 0.0001), and better Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 82.6 ± 13.5; n.s.). No significant difference was seen in KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 88.4 ± 7.0; n.s.). Concerning QT versus HT group, no significant difference was found regarding mean POSAS score (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 31.8 ± 6.2; n.s.), mean length of the incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 cm; n.s.), KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 89.8 ± 8.2; n.s.) and mean Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 87.8 ± 0.6; n.s.). The mean measured area of hypoesthesia was significantly higher in the HT group (70.3 ± 77.1 cm2 vs. 8.7 ± 5.1 cm2; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Quadriceps tendon harvesting technique has the safest incision by causing less sensory loss compared to BPTB and HT. It also has the advantage of a short incision with more cosmetic scar compared to BPTB, with no difference compared to HT. However, no significant difference in terms of functional outcome was shown between the three autografts. These findings provide surgeons evidence about their clinical practice and help with graft choice decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Sexual and ethnic polymorphism result in considerable mismatch between native trochlear geometry and off-the-shelf TKA prostheses.

PURPOSE: To determine if trochlear morphology in healthy knees depends on sex and ethnicity, and to compare it to off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. METHODS: Three retrospective series of CT angiograms from France (female, 124; male, 135), China (female, 122; male, 137) and South Africa (female, 21; male, 62) were used to digitize osseous landmarks at the level of the femoral epicondyles. Sulcus angle, trochlear rotation, lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear asymmetry ratio, and trochlear depth index were quantified for each knee and for 10 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) models. Univariable regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the five trochlear parameters with sex and ethnicity. Interquartile ranges (IQR) of native trochlear parameters were compared to the trochlear parameters of 10 off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. RESULTS: Compared to French knees, Chinese knees had greater sulcus angle (ß = 6.3°, p < 0.001), trochlear rotation (ß = 0.8°, p = 0.004) and trochlear depth index (ß = 1.60, p < 0.001). Conversely, South African knees had greater trochlear rotation (ß = 1.9°, p < 0.001) and lateral trochlear inclination (ß = 3.7°, p < 0.001). Female knees had smaller trochlear asymmetry ratios (ß = - 0.03, p = 0.05) but greater trochlear rotation angles (ß = 0.7, p = 0.005). Considerable mismatches in trochlear morphology were revealed between native knees and off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that thresholds used in the diagnosis of patellofemoral instability should be adapted to patient sex and ethnicity, and that standard off-the-shelf TKA may not restore native trochlear parameters in all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative.

Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus regarding systematic screening for infection in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The rationale for systematic intra-operative samples is to increase the sensitivity of latent infections detection, which may require specific treatment. However, the incidence of occult infection in revision THAs is not precisely known. As such, the aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of occult infection in presumed aseptic revision THAs and identify associated risk factors. METHOD: Bacteriological samples from 523 aseptic THA revisions performed for five years were analyzed. Revisions performed for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or clinical suspicion of PJI were excluded. Microbiological cultures were performed using tissue samples in 505 cases (97%), synovial fluid in blood culture vials in 158 (30%), and in dry tubes in 263 (50%). Implants were sent for sonication in 12 cases (2.6%). The mean number of microbiological samples per patient was 3.6 (range, 1-15). Histology samples were collected for 300 patients (57%). RESULTS: The incidence of occult infection was 7% (36 cases) and contamination 8% (42 cases). Among occult infections, the primary reasons for revision were dislocation (42%), aseptic loosening (25%), fracture (19%), and others (14%). The infection rate in the dislocation group was significantly higher than that of other reasons for revision (p < 0.001). Among the patients determined with PJI, the revision THA was performed less than a year after primary in 19 (53%). CONCLUSION: The incidence of occult PJI justifies systematic intraoperative sampling. A short time between primary arthroplasty and revision or an early postoperative dislocation is a factor to suspect infections.

The Origin of the Knee Anterolateral Ligament Discovery: A Translation of Segond's Original Work With Commentary.

Paul Segond was a French surgeon who was in practice at the end of the 19th century. A prodigious anatomist, scientist, and surgeon in his day, he is best known for his treatise on the origin of traumatic hemarthrosis of the knee following injury. In this detailed description of the anatomy of the anterolateral aspect of the knee, he describes "a pearly, resistant, fibrous band that is placed under extreme tension when the knee is forcefully rotated internally," which has more recently been described as the anterolateral ligament or a capsular thickening contributing to the anterolateral complex of the knee. His work goes on to speculate about the role of this structure in controlling internal rotation of the knee. The original study was published in French in 1879. Although this work is widely cited, one must question whether many of the citing authors have actually had the opportunity to read it. As such, we sought to unlock this treasure by translating the original study into English and exposing this illuminating, forward-thinking and historical tour de force to the broader orthopaedic community.

Sexual and ethnic polymorphism render prosthetic overhang and under-coverage inevitable using off-the shelf TKA implants.

PURPOSE: Unexplained pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often result from mismatch between implant geometry and knee morphology, which depends on patient size, sex, and ethnicity. This study aimed to determine whether size, sex, or ethnicity are independently associated with distal femoral morphology in healthy Caucasian and Asian knees, and to compare anatomic ratios to those of commercially available TKA implants. METHODS: Two series of computed tomography (CT) angiograms from France (264 knees) and China (259 knees) were used to digitize osteometric landmarks at the level of the femoral epicondyles, to measure anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions at the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral zones. The aspect (ML/AP), trapezoidicity (MLp/MLa), and asymmetry (APl/APm) ratios, as well as the sulcus angle were calculated and compared to those of 9 TKA models. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether anatomic ratios were independently associated with sex, origin, or size. RESULTS: Multivariable analyses revealed that, independently from size, female knees were narrower (ß = - 0.03; p < 0.001) and more asymmetric (ß = 0.02; p < 0.001), while Chinese knees were more trapezoidal (ß = 0.04; p = 0.002) and asymmetric (ß = 0.02; p < 0.001) with shallower trochleae (ß = 6.4°; p < 0.001). Compared to native knees, most implants were too wide, and many of the recent models too 'trapezoidal'. Most prosthetic trochleae were too shallow compared to French knees, but within the third quartile of Chinese knees. CONCLUSIONS: The morphology of the distal femur depends on sex and ethnicity independently from size. The wide spectrum of morphotypes observed cannot be covered by 'off-the-shelf' TKA models, and until customized implants become more accessible, prosthetic overhang, and under-coverage remain inevitable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective comparative study.

Determination of normal KOOS and WOMAC values in a healthy population.

PURPOSE: The KOOS questionnaire is used to assess the symptoms and function of patients with traumatic or degenerative knee pathology. The WOMAC score has been validated mainly in the context of knee osteoarthritis. The distribution of these scores in a non-diseased population is not known. The hypothesis was that KOOS and WOMAC scores were influenced by patients' age, sex, and BMI. The primary objective of this study was to describe, for the first time, the distribution of KOOS and WOMAC scores in a healthy population based on age, sex, and BMI. METHODS: This was a pilot (innovative), cross-sectional, international, multicenter, descriptive study. Persons accompanying patients to our clinic were invited to participate in this study by filling out the KOOS questionnaire. These data were also used to calculate the WOMAC score. The study was designed according to guidelines on pilot studies and planned to enroll a minimum of 30 subjects in each age, gender, and BMI group. Expected KOOS and WOMAC scores by age, gender, and BMI were determined using a linear regression model. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fourteen subjects were included: 305 men (42.7%) and 409 women (57.3%). For the KOOS score, as age increases, there was a decrease in the "ADL" (p = 0.0001) and "sport" (p = 0.0001) items and an increase in the "symptoms" (p = 0.0025) and "QOL" items (p = 0.0001). Women had lower scores (p < 0.05) than men on all the KOOS items, except "QOL". For the WOMAC, the "pain", "stiffness", and "function" items varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0203) and sex (p = 0.0121). The "stiffness" item varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0005) and sex (p = 0.0477). The "function" item varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0001) and sex (p = 0.0256). The expected value for the KOOS and WOMAC scores in a healthy population without any knee ailments were determined. CONCLUSIONS: The KOOS and WOMAC scores vary significantly based on age, sex, and BMI in a healthy population. This study also provides KOOS and WOMAC values in a population without any knee issue. These scores can be used, in a daily practice, as a reference to assess functional outcomes after a surgical procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Anterolateral ligament injuries in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament tear: Contribution of ultrasonography and MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pathological appearance of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) on US and MRI in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 patients who had a suspected acute ACL tear. Their injured and contralateral knees were evaluated with radiography, US and MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the ALL on the MRI and US examinations. Agreement between these examiners' findings was evaluated with Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: On US examination, the ALL was found to be injured in 63% of cases (19/30; k = 0.93). The enthesis was found to be torn in 50% of cases (15/30; k = 1), with the tear located at the tibial attachment in all instances. On the MRI exam, the ALL was found to be injured in 53% of cases (16/30; k = 0.93). The enthesis was found to be torn in 13% of cases (4/30; k = 0.76), with the tear located at the tibial attachment in all instances (k = 0.93). CONCLUSION: ALL injuries that occur with ACL tears are located at the tibial enthesis. They are often associated with bone avulsion at the enthesis and are better viewed on US. KEY POINTS: • ALL injuries often occur in combination with ACL tears. • ALL injuries can be assessed with ultrasonography and MRI. • ALL injuries associated with ACL tears are located at the tibial enthesis.

Editorial Commentary: Looking Outside the Box With Ultrasound in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee: Welcome to Surgery 2.0.

Perspectives on the anterolateral ligament have changed greatly since the first articles were published that cast doubt on the existence of this structure. The current debate is centered on how to best analyze it. Surgeons are increasingly focusing on the knee's secondary restraints. It is important to understand that magnetic resonance imaging is not the only imaging modality available to us.