The Swedish version of the Motivation and Pleasure Scale self-report (MAP-SR): psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia or depression.

PURPOSE: Negative symptoms are commonly regarded as a symptom dimension belonging to schizophrenia spectrum disorders but are also present in depression. The recently developed Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) has shown to be reliable and valid. A corresponding self-report questionnaire has also been developed, named the Motivation and Pleasure Scale - Self Report (MAP-SR). The purpose was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the MAP-SR in patients with either schizophrenia or depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MAP-SR was translated to Swedish. Participants were 33 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 52 patients with a depressive disorder and they completed the MAP-SR, the CAINS and other measures assessing adjacent psychopathology, functioning and cognition. RESULTS: The internal consistency for the MAP-SR was adequate in both groups (schizophrenia spectrum α = .93, depressive disorder α = .82). Furthermore, the MAP-SR had a large correlation to the motivation and pleasure subscale of the CAINS in patients with schizophrenia disorders (r = -0.75, p < .001), however among patients with depression this correlation was medium-to-large (r = -0.48, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MAP-SR shows promise as a useful measure of motivation and pleasure, especially in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Furthermore, results also suggest that the MAP-SR does not assess negative symptoms specifically, but that there is an overlap between depressive and negative symptoms.

Early symptom improvement and other clinical predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a rapidly emerging treatment for depression, but outcome prediction is still a challenge. This study aimed to identify predictors of response to rTMS among baseline clinical factors and early symptomatic improvements. METHODS: This cohort study comprised 136 patients with a unipolar or bipolar depressive episode referred for clinical intermittent theta-burst stimulation or right-sided 1 Hz rTMS at the Uppsala Brain Stimulation Unit. The co-primary outcomes used for logistic regression were response, defined as ≥50 % reduction of Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Self-assessment (MADRS-S) total score, and 1-2 points on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Early improvement was defined as ≥20 % reduction in the MADRS-S total score, or ≥ 1 point reduction in each MADRS-S item, after two weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The response rates were 21 % for MADRS-S and 45 % for CGI-I. A depressive episode >24 months had lower odds for MADRS-S response compared to ≤12 months. Early improvement of the MADRS-S total score predicted CGI-I response (95 % CI = 1.35-9.47, p = 0.011), Initiative6 predicted MADRS-S response (95 % CI = 1.08-9.05, p = 0.035), and Emotional involvement7 predicted CGI-I response (95 % CI = 1.03-8.66, p = 0.044). LIMITATIONS: No adjustment for concurrent medication. CONCLUSIONS: A depressive episode ≤12 months and early improvement in overall depressive symptoms, as well as the individual items, Initiative6 and Emotional involvement7, predicted subsequent rTMS response in a naturalistic sample of depressed patients. This could facilitate the early identification of patients who will benefit from further rTMS sessions.

Cognitive Function and Variability in Antipsychotic Drug-Naive Patients With First-Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Cognitive impairment contributes significantly to clinical outcome and level of function in individuals with psychotic disorders. These impairments are present already at psychosis onset at a group level; however, the question of heterogeneity in cognitive function among patients has not been systematically investigated. Objective: To provide an updated quantification of cognitive impairment at psychosis onset before patients receive potentially confounding antipsychotic treatment, and to investigate variability in cognitive function compared with healthy controls. Data Sources: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed articles were searched up to September 15, 2022. Study Selection: Original studies reporting data on cognitive function in antipsychotic drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were independently extracted by 2 researchers. Cognitive tasks were clustered according to 6 domains of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery and the domain of executive function. Random-effects model meta-analyses of mean differences and coefficient of variation ratios (CVRs) were performed, as well as meta-regressions, assessment of study quality, and publication bias. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measure was Hedges g for mean differences in cognition and CVR for within-group variability. Results: Fifty studies were included in the analysis with a total of 2625 individuals with FEP (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [3.6] years, 60% male; 40% female) and 2917 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 26.0 [4.6]; 55% male; 45% female). In all cognitive domains, the FEP group displayed significant impairment compared with controls (speed of processing: Hedges g = -1.16; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.98; verbal learning: Hedges g = -1.08; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.88; visual learning: Hedges g = -1.05; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.82; working memory: Hedges g = -1.04; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.73; attention: Hedges g = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.24 to -0.82; reasoning/problem solving: Hedges g = -0.90; 95% CI, -1.12 to -0.68; executive function: Hedges g = -0.88; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.69). Individuals with FEP also exhibited a larger variability across all domains (CVR range, 1.34-1.92). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis identified cognitive impairment in FEP before the initiation of antipsychotic treatment, with large effect sizes. The high variability within the FEP group suggests the need to identify those individuals with more severe cognitive problems who risk worse outcomes and could benefit the most from cognitive remediation.