Quality of life improvement in patients with hard-to-heal leg wounds treated with Prontosan wound irrigation solution and wound gel.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of four weeks of treatment with Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan Wound Gel (B. Braun Medical Inc., US) on adults with hard-to-heal leg wounds. Overall change (weeks 1-5) in the Global Quality of Life scale (GQOL), changes in body, psyche and everyday life (EDL) quality of life (QoL) subscores, and changes in wound appearance and size after treatment were assessed. METHOD: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, five-centre study, non-hospitalised patients with no more than two wounds below the knee were recruited into the study; wounds were ≥5cm2 and ≤50cm2 and present for ≥4 weeks. The investigator or a designee applied the wound solution and gel to the wounds at clinic visits, and patients/caregivers applied the wound solution and gel at home. Wound-QoL questionnaires were completed at the initial screening and at each week of treatment. Wound size and photographs were obtained at pre- and post-treatment during clinic visits. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean GQOL scores decreased by 1.11 (46.1%). Body, psyche and EDL decreased by 1.17 (60.0%), 1.26 (41.8%) and 1.00 (42.2%), respectively. Wounds also showed improvement in odour, appearance and size. Adverse events were mild in intensity and transient in nature. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvement in the QoL of patients with hard-to-heal leg wounds below the knee during four weeks of treatment with the wound solution and gel. Wounds also showed improvement in odour, appearance and size, and the treatment solution and gel were well tolerated. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: B. Braun Medical Inc. funded the research and preparation of this article. AK, DV, CRC and WC are employees of B. Braun Medical Inc. AO and RS declare no conflict of interest.

0.1% Polyhexanide-Betaine Solution as an Adjuvant in a Case-Series of Chronic Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: The application of 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine gel and irrigating solution was used in place of saline during standard of care wound treatment for 70 chronic wounds of various etiologies. Our goal in this study sample was to investigate the number of days to wound closure, change in absolute wound size, and antimicrobial initiation from baseline visit, following application of polyhexanide-betaine in standard of care wound treatment. Results suggested a benefit of Prontosan® (Polyhexanide-betaine, B. Braun Medical Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania), with very few patients being administered supplemental antibiotic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis evaluated 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine as an adjuvant in the management of chronic non-healing wounds. Over a two-year period at a single wound center, 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine gel and irrigating solution were applied in place of saline during standard of care wound treatment for 70 chronic wounds of various etiologies. Standard weekly wound protocols and debridement were performed. All wounds were evaluated for days to closure, change in wound dimensions, and number of patients requiring antibiotic therapy after initial consultation at the study site. RESULTS: A case series of 49 patients presented 70 wounds for analysis. Antimicrobial therapy was initiated in five of 49 patients. Days to wound closure revealed that venous wounds showed the shortest number of days to closure (29 days) with diabetic ulcers the longest (92 days). Significant comorbid conditions and concomitant medications were present in all groups and did not appear associated with closure rates. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine gel and solution in treating chronic non-healing wounds provided a moist wound healing environment facilitating closure. Of particular note was the fact that with polyhexanide-betaine, antimicrobial therapy was not initiated in nearly 90% of patients. It is theorized that the antimicrobial effect of 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine gel and solution inhibited bacterial colonization and reduced the need for antimicrobial usage. A prospective controlled and randomized study is warranted to further explore this theory.

Determination of appropriate weight-based cutoffs for empiric cefazolin dosing using data from a phase 1 pharmacokinetics and safety study of cefazolin administered for surgical prophylaxis in pediatric patients aged 10 to 12 years.

Despite over 40 years of worldwide usage, relatively few data have been published on the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in pediatric surgical patients. The primary objectives of this study were to examine the pharmacokinetics and safety of cefazolin in children 10 to 12 years of age (inclusive) receiving 1 or 2 g of cefazolin, based on body weight. This multiple-center, open-label study enrolled pediatric patients electively scheduled for surgical procedures who required cefazolin as part of their routine clinical management. Patients weighing ≥25 to <50 kg received a 1-g dose, and patients weighing ≥50 to ≤85 kg received a 2-g dose. Postdose pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were conducted following drug administration. Cefazolin concentration-time data were analyzed by using both noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetics methods. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify appropriate weight-based cutoffs for the dosing of children aged 10 to 17 years of age. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study and provided the requisite pharmacokinetic data. In general, cefazolin was well tolerated. The mean cefazolin terminal elimination half-life, clearance, and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity in this population were 1.95 h, 0.804 ml/min/kg, and 607 mg · h/liter, respectively. Patients weighing 50 to 60 kg exhibited elevated cefazolin exposures. Observed pharmacokinetic parameters and simulation results indicated that a weight-based cutoff of 60 kg is predicted to provide cefazolin exposure consistent with that observed in normal, healthy adults at recommended doses for surgical prophylaxis. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01904357.).

Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dose Selection of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis of Pediatric Patients.

Cefazolin is an antibiotic frequently used for perioperative prophylaxis. Data from healthy adults and pediatric surgery patients were pooled to refine a previously developed population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and to determine the optimal body weight cutoff for selecting fixed doses of either 1 or 2 g cefazolin to produce exposures in pediatric surgery patients similar to a single 2-g dose in adults. Regardless of dose used, cefazolin was well tolerated in pediatric patients. A total of 1102 plasma samples from 62 patients from 3 studies were available to assess the previous model. The pooled data set allowed for simplification of the model such that allometrically scaled clearance and volume parameters were found to provide a robust fit while removing unnecessary covariate relationships. Monte Carlo simulations using the final cefazolin population PK model suggested an optimal weight cutoff of 50 kg, in contrast to the previously suggested 60 kg for a single 2-g dose. Patients at or above this 50-kg cutoff would receive a 2-g dose of cefazolin, and those below 50 kg but ≥25 kg would receive a 1-g dose of cefazolin.

Importance of public-private partnerships for nutrition support research: An ASPEN Position Paper.

Parenteral and enteral nutrition support are key components of care for various medical and physiological conditions in infants, children, and adults. Nutrition support practices have advanced over time, driven by the goals of safe and sufficient delivery of needed nutrients and improved patient outcomes. These advances have been, and continue to be, dependent on research and development studies. Such studies address aspects of enteral and parenteral nutrition support: formulations, delivery devices, health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and related metabolism. The studies are supported by public funding from the government and by private funding from foundations and from the nutrition support industry. To build public trust in nutrition support research findings, it is important to underscore ethical research conduct and reporting of results for all studies, including those with industry sponsors. In 2019, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition's (ASPEN's) Board of Directors established a task force to ensure integrity in nutrition support research that is done as collaborative partnerships between the public (government and individuals) and private groups (foundations, academia, and industry). In this ASPEN Position Paper, the Task Force presents principles of ethical research to guide administrators, researchers, and funders. The Task Force identifies ways to curtail bias and to minimize actual or perceived conflict of interests, as related to funding sources and research conduct. Notably, this paper includes a Position Statement to describe the Task Force's guidance on Public-Private Partnerships for research and funding. This paper has been approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.