Contemporary Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A U.S. Perspective.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a complex fatal condition that requires aggressive treatment with close monitoring. Significant progress has been made over the last three decades in the treatment of PAH, but, despite this progress, survival has remained unacceptably low. In the quest to improve survival, therapeutic interventions play a central role. In the last few years, there have been remarkable attempts to identify novel treatments. Finally, we have had a breakthrough with the discovery of the fourth treatment pathway in PAH. Activin signaling inhibition distinguishes itself as a potential antiproliferative intervention as opposed to the traditional therapies, which mediate their effect primarily by vasodilatation. With this novel treatment pathway, we stand at an important milestone with an exciting future ahead and the natural question of when to use an activin signaling inhibitor for the treatment of PAH. In this state-of-the-art review, we focus on the placement of this novel agent in the PAH treatment paradigm, based on the available evidence, with special focus on the U.S. patient population. This review also provides an expert opinion of the current treatment algorithm in important subgroups of patients with comorbidities from the U.S. perspective.

An expert panel delphi consensus statement on patient selection and management for transitioning between oral and inhaled treprostinil.

Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), is available for administration by parenteral, oral, or inhaled routes. Transitioning between routes may be beneficial for appropriate patients; however, there is little published data on transitions between oral and inhaled treprostinil. We used a modified Delphi process to develop expert consensus recommendations on transitions between these formulations. Three questionnaires were used to develop statements about relevant aspects of transition management, which the panelists rated, using a Likert scale, from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). Eleven physicians with expertise in PAH treatment modalities, participated in the panel. Of the 492 statements evaluated, consensus was reached on 215 (43.7%). Key consensus recommendations included (1) accurately defining successful transition, as stable or improved PAH with good tolerability and adherence, and (2) patients with stable, low-risk PAH showing insufficient response or tolerability to their existing treprostinil therapy (and due to restrictions in up titration of dosing), as appropriate candidates for transitions between treprostinil formulations. Panelists did not reach consensus for an overall strategy for performing these transitions, mainly because of variability in their practice parameters. Consensus was also achieved on recommendations for adverse event management, including reassurance, administration of oral treprostinil 3 times daily with food, and dosing inhaled treprostinil at intervals ≥3 hours apart. The Delphi process aided in developing expert consensus recommendations that may provide clinically useful guidance for transitioning between treprostinil formulations. However, additional data from centers with high volumes of PAH patients undergoing treprostinil transitions would be optimal for defining more complete and robust strategies to facilitate successful transition.

Riociguat: Clinical research and evolving role in therapy.

Riociguat is a first-in-class soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, approved for the treatment of adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), or persistent or recurrent CTEPH after pulmonary endarterectomy. Approval was based on the results of the phase III PATENT-1 (PAH) and CHEST-1 (CTEPH) studies, with significant improvements in the primary endpoint of 6-minute walk distance vs placebo of +36 m and +46 m, respectively, as well as improvements in secondary endpoints such as pulmonary vascular resistance and World Health Organization functional class. Riociguat acts as a stimulator of cyclic guanosine monophosphate synthesis rather than as an inhibitor of cGMP metabolism. As with other approved therapies for PAH, riociguat has antifibrotic, antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects, in addition to vasodilatory properties. This has led to further clinical studies in patients who do not achieve a satisfactory clinical response with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors. Riociguat has also been evaluated in patients with World Health Organization group 2 and 3 pulmonary hypertension, and other conditions including diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, Raynaud's phenomenon and cystic fibrosis. This review evaluates the results of the original clinical trials of riociguat for the treatment of PAH and CTEPH, and summarises the body of work that has examined the safety and efficacy of riociguat for the treatment of other types of pulmonary hypertension.

Pazopanib may reduce bleeding in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Pazopanib (Votrient) is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks VEGF receptors potentially serving as anti-angiogenic treatment for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). We report a prospective, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalating study [50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg], designed as a proof-of-concept study to demonstrate efficacy of pazopanib on HHT-related bleeding, and to measure safety. Patients, recruited at 5 HHT Centers, required ≥ 2 Curacao criteria AND [anemia OR severe epistaxis with iron deficiency]. Co-primary outcomes, hemoglobin (Hgb) and epistaxis severity, were measured during and after treatment, and compared to baseline. Safety monitoring occurred every 1.5 weeks. Seven patients were treated with 50 mg pazopanib daily. Six/seven showed at least 50% decrease in epistaxis duration relative to baseline at some point during study; 3 showed at least 50% decrease in duration during Weeks 11 and 12. Six patients showed a decrease in ESS of > 0.71 (MID) relative to baseline at some point during study; 3/6 showed a sustained improvement. Four patients showed > 2 gm improvement in Hgb relative to baseline at one or more points during study. Health-related QOL scores improved on all SF-36 domains at Week 6 and/or Week 12, except general health (unchanged). There were 19 adverse events (AE) including one severe AE (elevated LFTs, withdrawn from dosing at 43 days); with no serious AE. In conclusion, we observed an improvement in Hgb and/or epistaxis in all treated patients. This occurred at a dose much lower than typically used for oncologic indications, with no serious AE. Further studies of pazopanib efficacy are warranted.

Clinical outcomes stratified by baseline functional class after initial combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil reduced the risk of clinical failure events for treatment-naïve participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as compared to monotherapy. Previous studies in PAH have demonstrated greater treatment benefits in more symptomatic participants. METHODS: AMBITION was an event-driven, double-blind study in which participants were randomized 2:1:1 to once-daily initial combination therapy with ambrisentan 10 mg plus tadalafil 40 mg, ambrisentan 10 mg plus placebo, or tadalafil 40 mg plus placebo. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, we compared the efficacy data between those with functional class (FC) II vs. FC III symptoms at baseline. RESULTS: This analysis included 500 participants in the previously defined primary analysis set (n = 155 FC II, n = 345 FC III). Comparing combination therapy to pooled monotherapy, the risk of clinical failure events was reduced by 79% (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% confidence interval: 0.071, 0.63]) for FC II patients and 42% (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.86]) for FC III patients. In a post-hoc analysis, the risk of first hospitalization for worsening PAH was also reduced by combination therapy, particularly for FC II patients (0 combination vs. 11 [14%] pooled monotherapy). Adverse events were frequent but comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment benefit from initial combination therapy appeared at least as great for FC II as for FC III participants. Hospitalizations for worsening PAH were not observed in FC II participants assigned to combination. The present data support an initial combination strategy for newly diagnosed patients even when symptoms are less severe. Funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline; AMBITION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01178073.

Effect of Topical Intranasal Therapy on Epistaxis Frequency in Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Epistaxis is a major factor negatively affecting quality of life in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT; also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu disease). Optimal treatment for HHT-related epistaxis is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether topical therapy with any of 3 drugs with differing mechanisms of action is effective in reducing HHT-related epistaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The North American Study of Epistaxis in HHT was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial performed at 6 HHT centers of excellence. From August 2011 through March 2014, there were 121 adult patients who met the clinical criteria for HHT and had experienced HHT-related epistaxis with an Epistaxis Severity Score of at least 3.0. Follow-up was completed in September 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received twice-daily nose sprays for 12 weeks with either bevacizumab 1% (4 mg/d), estriol 0.1% (0.4 mg/d), tranexamic acid 10% (40 mg/d), or placebo (0.9% saline). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was median weekly epistaxis frequency during weeks 5 through 12. Secondary outcomes included median duration of epistaxis during weeks 5 through 12, Epistaxis Severity Score, level of hemoglobin, level of ferritin, need for transfusion, emergency department visits, and treatment failure. RESULTS: Among the 121 patients who were randomized (mean age, 52.8 years [SD, 12.9 years]; 44% women with a median of 7.0 weekly episodes of epistaxis [interquartile range {IQR}, 3.0-14.0]), 106 patients completed the study duration for the primary outcome measure (43 were women [41%]). Drug therapy did not significantly reduce epistaxis frequency (P = .97). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median weekly number of bleeding episodes was 7.0 (IQR, 4.5-10.5) for patients in the bevacizumab group, 8.0 (IQR, 4.0-12.0) for the estriol group, 7.5 (IQR, 3.0-11.0) for the tranexamic acid group, and 8.0 (IQR, 3.0-14.0) for the placebo group. No drug treatment was significantly different from placebo for epistaxis duration. All groups had a significant improvement in Epistaxis Severity Score at weeks 12 and 24. There were no significant differences between groups for hemoglobin level, ferritin level, treatment failure, need for transfusion, or emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HHT, there were no significant between-group differences in the use of topical intranasal treatment with bevacizumab vs estriol vs tranexamic acid vs placebo and epistaxis frequency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01408030.

US commercial health plan coverage dynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies.

BACKGROUND: Health plan coverage is central to patient access to care, especially for rare, chronic diseases. For specialty drugs, coverage varies, resulting in barriers to access. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive, and fatal disease. Guidelines suggest starting or rapidly escalating to combination therapy with drugs of differing classes (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors [PDE5is], soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators [sGC stimulators], endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs], and prostacyclin pathway agents [PPAs]). OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in commercial health plan coverage for PAH treatments and how coverage has evolved. To examine the frequency of coverage updates and evidence cited in plan policies. METHODS: We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage database, which includes publicly available specialty drug coverage policies. Overall, and at the drug and treatment class level, we identified plan-imposed coverage restrictions beyond the drug's US Food and Drug Administration label, including step therapy protocols, clinical restrictions (eg, disease severity), and prescriber specialty requirements. We analyzed variation in coverage restrictiveness and how coverage has changed over time. We determined how often plans update their policies. Finally, we categorized the cited evidence into 6 different types. RESULTS: Results reflected plan coverage policies for 13 PAH drugs active between August 2017 and August 2022 and issued by 17 large US commercial health plans, representing 70% of covered lives. Coverage restrictions varied mainly by step therapy protocols and prescriber restrictions. Seven plans had step therapy protocols for most drugs, 9 for at least one drug, and 1 had none. Ten plans required specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) prescribing for at least one drug, and 7 did not. Coverage restrictions increased over time: the proportion of policies with at least 1 restriction increased from 38% to 73%, and the proportion with step therapy protocols increased from 29% to 46%, with generics as the most common step. The proportion of policies with step therapy protocols increased for every therapy class with generic availability: 18% to 59% for ERAs, 33% to 77% for PDE5is, and 33% to 43% for PPAs. The proportion of policies with prescriber requirements increased from 24% to 48%. Plans updated their policies 58% of the time annually and most often cited the 2019 CHEST clinical guidelines, followed by randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Plan use of coverage restrictions for PAH therapies increased over time and varied across both drugs and plans. Inconsistency among health plans may complicate patient access and reduce the proportion who can persist on PAH treatments.

Disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from the SPHERE registry (SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry).

BACKGROUND: Selexipag is an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension to delay disease progression and reduce the risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related hospitalization. SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry (NCT03278002) was a US-based, prospective, real-world registry of selexipag-treated patients. METHODS: Adults with pulmonary hypertension (enrolled 2016-2020) prescribed selexipag were followed for ≤18 months, with data collected at routine clinic visits. Patients were defined as newly or previously initiated if they had started selexipag ≤60 days or >60 days, respectively, before enrollment. RESULTS: The registry included 829 patients (430 newly initiated, 399 previously initiated; 759 with pulmonary arterial hypertension), of whom 55.6% were World Health Organization functional class (FC) 3/4; 57.3% were intermediate or high risk per Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0. In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 18-month discontinuation rates for adverse events were 22.0%, 32.0%, and 11.9%, and 18-month survival rates were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 94.5% in the overall, newly, and previously initiated patient populations, respectively. From baseline to month 18, most patients had stable or improved FC and stable or improved REVEAL 2.0 risk category status. Discontinuation for adverse events, hospitalization, and survival were similar regardless of patients' individually tolerated selexipag maintenance dose. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis of patients initiating selexipag, most patients had stable or improved FC and REVEAL 2.0 risk category. Similar to the GRIPHON trial, outcomes with selexipag in this real-world study were comparable across maintenance dose strata, with no new safety signals.

IMPAHCT: A randomized phase 2b/3 study of inhaled imatinib for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

AV-101 (imatinib) powder for inhalation, an investigational dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib designed to target the underlying pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension, was generally well tolerated in healthy adults in a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study. Inhaled Imatinib Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trial (IMPAHCT; NCT05036135) is a phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, and confirmatory study. IMPAHCT is designed to identify an optimal AV-101 dose (phase 2b primary endpoint: pulmonary vascular resistance) and assess the efficacy (phase 3 primary endpoint: 6-min walk distance), safety, and tolerability of AV-101 dose levels in subjects with pulmonary arterial hypertension using background therapies. The study has an operationally seamless, adaptive design allowing for continuous recruitment. It includes three parts; subjects enrolled in Part 1 (phase 2b dose-response portion) or Part 2 (phase 3 intermediate portion) will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to 10, 35, 70 mg AV-101, or placebo (twice daily), respectively. Subjects enrolled in Part 3 (phase 3 optimal dose portion) will be randomized 1:1 to the optimal dose of AV-101 and placebo (twice daily), respectively. All study parts include a screening period, a 24-week treatment period, and a 30-day safety follow-up period; the total duration is ∼32 weeks. Participation is possible in only one study part. IMPAHCT has the potential to advance therapies for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by assessing the efficacy and safety of a novel investigational drug-device combination (AV-101) using an improved study design that has the potential to save 6-12 months of development time. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05036135.

Effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and ventricular function in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Pressure overload resulting from aortic stenosis causes maladaptive ventricular and vascular remodeling that can lead to pulmonary hypertension, heart failure symptoms, and adverse outcomes. Retarding or reversing this maladaptive remodeling and its unfavorable hemodynamic consequences has the potential to improve morbidity and mortality. Preclinical models of pressure overload have shown that phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition is beneficial; however, the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients with aortic stenosis is controversial because of concerns about vasodilation and hypotension. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the safety and hemodynamic response of 20 subjects with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (mean aortic valve area, 0.7 ± 0.2 cm(2); ejection fraction, 60 ± 14%) who received a single oral dose of sildenafil (40 or 80 mg). Compared with baseline, after 60 minutes, sildenafil reduced systemic (-12%; P<0.001) and pulmonary (-29%; P=0.002) vascular resistance, mean pulmonary artery (-25%; P<0.001) and wedge (-17%; P<0.001) pressures, and increased systemic (13%; P<0.001) and pulmonary (45%; P<0.001) vascular compliance and stroke volume index (8%; P=0.01). These changes were not dose dependent. Sildenafil caused a modest decrease in mean systemic arterial pressure (-11%; P<0.001) but was well tolerated with no episodes of symptomatic hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time that a single dose of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor is safe and well tolerated in patients with severe aortic stenosis and is associated with improvements in pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics resulting in biventricular unloading. These findings support the need for longer-term studies to evaluate the role of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition as adjunctive medical therapy in patients with aortic stenosis.

Palliative care referrals in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life limiting disease with substantial symptom burden and healthcare utilization. Palliative care alleviates physical and emotional symptoms for patients with serious illness, and has been underutilized for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with PAH referred to palliative care and identify predictors of referral. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of adult patients enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry from January 2015 through June 2021, performing descriptive statistics on patient characteristics at baseline for all patients and the subset referred to palliative care. These characteristics were modeled in a backwards elimination Cox regression with time to referral to palliative care as the primary outcome. RESULTS: 92 of 1,578 patients were referred to palliative care (5.8%); 43% were referred at their last visit prior to death. Referrals were associated with increasing age per decade (hazard ratio 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.16-1.58]), lower body mass index (hazard ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.94-0.998]), supplemental oxygen use (hazard ratio 2.01 [95% confidence interval 1.28-3.16]), parenteral prostanoid use (hazard ratio 2.88 [95% confidence interval 1.84-4.51]), and worse quality of life, measured via lower physical (hazard ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99]) and mental (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% confidence interval 0.96-0.995]) scores on the 12-item Short Form Health Survey. CONCLUSION: Patients with PAH are infrequently referred to palliative care, even at centers of excellence. Referrals occur in sicker patients with lower quality of life scores, often close to the end of life.

Characteristics of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension from an innovative, comprehensive real-world patient data repository.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, life-limiting disease. PAH registries provide real-world data that complement clinical trial data and inform treatment decisions. The TRIO comprehensive, integrated patient data repository (TRIO CIPDR), is an innovative US repository capturing data on contemporary patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension and receiving US Food and Drug Administration-approved PAH therapies. This repository uniquely combines clinical data from electronic medical records with the ability to track drug-prescription and drug-dispensing characteristics, and includes 946 adult patients with PAH (data collected January 2019 to December 2020) enrolled from nine representative US specialist tertiary care centers. Potentially eligible patients were identified based on dispensing data from specialty pharmacies. Hemodynamic and clinical data, as well as dispensing information on prescribed PAH medications, were provided by tertiary centers. At enrollment, 75% of patients were female, 67% were White, median age at PAH diagnosis was 53 years (median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 years), and 37% were obese. Comorbidity profiles were as expected for a PAH population, although the proportion with atrial fibrillation (34%) was higher than expected. Overall, 38% of patients had idiopathic PAH and 30% had connective tissue disease-related PAH. Among 917 patients receiving PAH-specific therapy, 40% were on monotherapy, 43% on dual therapy, and 17% on triple therapy. Longitudinal data from this repository will allow tracking of the PAH treatment journey in relation to clinical characteristics and outcomes.

AV-101, a novel inhaled dry-powder formulation of imatinib, in healthy adult participants: a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study.

Background: Oral imatinib has been shown to be effective, but poorly tolerated, in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). To maintain efficacy while improving tolerability, AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib, was developed to deliver imatinib directly to the lungs. Methods: This phase 1, placebo-controlled, randomised single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study evaluated the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of AV-101 in healthy adults. The SAD study included five AV-101 cohorts (1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo, and a single-dose oral imatinib 400-mg cohort. The MAD study included three AV-101 cohorts (10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo; dosing occurred twice daily for 7 days. Results: 82 participants (SAD n=48, MAD n=34) were enrolled. For the SAD study, peak plasma concentrations of imatinib occurred within 3 h of dosing with lower systemic exposure compared to oral imatinib (p<0.001). For the MAD study, systemic exposure of imatinib was higher after multiple doses of AV-101 compared to a single dose, but steady-state plasma concentrations were lower for the highest AV-101 cohort (90 mg) compared to simulated steady-state oral imatinib at day 7 (p=0.0002). Across AV-101 MAD dose cohorts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cough (n=7, 27%) and headache (n=4, 15%). Conclusions: AV-101 was well tolerated in healthy adults, and targeted doses of AV-101 significantly reduced the systemic exposure of imatinib compared with oral imatinib. An ongoing phase 2b/phase 3 study (IMPAHCT; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05036135) will evaluate the safety/tolerability and clinical benefit of AV-101 for PAH.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic disease management and patient reported outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension: The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry.

To better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of patients with pulmonary hypertension, we conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating health insurance status, healthcare access, disease severity, and patient reported outcomes in this population. Using the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR), we defined and extracted a longitudinal cohort of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients from the PHAR's inception in 2015 until March 2022. We used generalized estimating equations to model the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient outcomes, adjusting for demographic confounders. We assessed whether insurance status modified these effects via covariate interactions. PAH patients were more likely to be on publicly-sponsored insurance during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prior, and did not experience statistically significant delays in access to medications, increased emergency room visits or nights in the hospital, or worsening of mental health metrics. Patients on publicly-sponsored insurance had higher healthcare utilization and worse objective measures of disease severity compared with privately insured individuals irrespective of the COVID-19 pandemic. The relatively small impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pulmonary hypertension-related outcomes was unexpected but may be due to pre-established access to high quality care at pulmonary hypertension comprehensive care centers. Irrespective of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients who were on publicly-sponsored insurance seemed to do worse, consistent with prior studies highlighting outcomes in this population. We speculate that previously established care relationships may lessen the impact of an acute event, such as a pandemic, on patients with chronic illness.

Physical Activity and Its Association with Traditional Outcome Measures in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Rationale: Limitation of physical activity is a common presenting complaint for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Physical activity is thought to be determined by cardiopulmonary function, yet there are limited data that investigate this relationship. Objectives: We aimed to study the relationship between right ventricular function and daily activity and its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PAH. Methods: Baseline data for 55 patients enrolled in PHANTOM (Pulmonary Hypertension and Anastrozole), an ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trial of anastrozole in PAH, were used. Postmenopausal women and men were eligible and underwent 6-minute walk testing and echocardiography and completed HRQoL questionnaires. Each patient wore an accelerometer for 7 days. Multivariable linear regression models were used to study the association between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and vector magnitude counts, and between daily activity and HRQoL. Principal component analysis and K-means clustering were used to identify activity-based phenotypes. K-nearest neighbors classification was applied to an independent cross-sectional cohort from the University of Pennsylvania. Results: The mean age of patients in PHANTOM was 61 years. In total, 67% were women with idiopathic PAH as the most common etiology. A 0.4-cm increase in TAPSE was associated with an increase in daily vector magnitude counts (ß: 34,000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 900-67,000; P = 0.004) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, etiology of PAH, and wear time. A 1-SD increase in vector magnitude counts was associated with higher 6-minute walk distance (ß: 56.1 m; 95% CI, 28.6-83.7; P < 0.001) and lower emPHasis-10 scores (ß: -3.3; 95% CI, 0.3-6.4; P = 0.03). Three activity phenotypes, low, medium, and high, were identified. The most active phenotype had greater 6-minute walk distances (P = 0.001) and lower emPHasis-10 scores (P = 0.009) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, World Health Organization functional class, and parenteral prostacyclin use. Phenotypes of physical activity were reproduced in the second cohort and were independently associated with 6-minute walk distance. Conclusions: Better right ventricular systolic function was associated with increased levels of activity in PAH. Increased daily activity was associated with greater 6-minute walk distance and better HRQoL. Distinct activity-based phenotypes may be helpful in risk stratification of patients with PAH or provide novel endpoints for clinical trials.

Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Era: Early Insights From the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry.

Background Current mortality data for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the United States are based on registries that enrolled patients prior to 2010. We sought to determine mortality in PAH in the modern era using the PHAR (Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry). Methods and Results We identified all adult patients with PAH enrolled in the PHAR between September 2015 and September 2020 (N=935). We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to assess mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years. Patients were stratified based on disease severity by 3 validated risk scores. In treatment-naïve patients, we compared survival based on initial treatment strategy. The median age was 56 years (44-68 years), and 76% were women. Of the 935 patients, 483 (52%) were ≤6 months from PAH diagnosis. There were 121 deaths (12.9%) during a median follow-up time of 489 days (281-812 days). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality was 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%), 16% (95% CI, 13%-19%), and 21% (95% CI, 17%-25%), respectively. When stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PAH, the mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years was 1%, 4% to 6%, and 7% to 11% for low risk; 7% to 8%, 11% to 16%, and 18% to 20% for intermediate risk; and 12% to 19%, 22% to 38%, and 28% to 55% for high risk, respectively. In treatment-naïve patients, initial combination therapy was associated with better 1-year survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.19-0.95]; P=0.037). Conclusions Mortality in the intermediate- and high-risk patients with PAH remains unacceptably high in the PHAR, suggesting the importance for early diagnosis, aggressive use of available therapies, and the need for better therapeutics.

Anticoagulation in pulmonary arterial hypertension - association with mortality, healthcare utilization, and quality of life: The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR).

BACKGROUND: Routine long-term anticoagulation in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is controversial. To date, anticoagulation has been found to be beneficial or neutral in idiopathic disease (IPAH) and neutral-to-harmful in connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH). We sought to examine the association between anticoagulation and mortality, healthcare utilization, and quality of life (QoL) in PAH. METHODS: The PHAR is a prospective registry of PAH patients referred to 58 pulmonary hypertension care centers in the United States. We compared patients who received anticoagulation during enrollment (questionnaire documented) to those who did not. Cox proportional hazard models were used for mortality, Poisson multivariate regression models for healthcare utilization, and generalized estimating equations for QOL RESULTS: Of 1175 patients included, 316 patients were treated with anticoagulation. IPAH/hereditary PAH (HPAH) comprised 46% of the cohort and CTD-PAH comprised 33%. After adjustment for demographics, clinical characteristics, site and disease severity, anticoagulation was not associated with mortality in the overall population (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.36), IPAH/HPAH (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94), or CTD-PAH (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-1.42). Anticoagulation was associated with an increased rate of emergency department visits (IRR: 1.41), hospitalizations (IRR: 1.30), and hospital days (IRR 1.33). QOL measured by emPHasis-10 score was worse in patients receiving anticoagulation (mean difference 1.74; 95% CI 0.40-3.09). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation is not associated with higher mortality, but is associated with increased healthcare utilization in the PHAR. PAH-specific QoL may be worse in patients receiving anticoagulation. The risks and benefits surrounding routine prescription of anticoagulation for PAH should be carefully considered.

Delphi consensus recommendation for optimization of pulmonary hypertension therapy focusing on switching from a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor to riociguat.

Dual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open-ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus-based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence-based guidance is unavailable.

Patient and disease characteristics of the first 500 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from SPHERE.

BACKGROUND: Selexipag is a selective oral prostacyclin receptor agonist indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry (SPHERE) (NCT03278002) is collecting data from selexipag-treated patients in real-world clinical practice to elucidate and describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and dosing/titration regimens of patients treated with selexipag in routine clinical practice. METHODS: SPHERE is a United States (US)-based, ongoing, multicenter, prospective observational study (target N = 800). This study enrolls patients who are either newly initiated on selexipag (≤60 days before enrollment) or were previously receiving selexipag with documentation of dose titration at study enrollment. Data collection for the study occurs at routine clinic visits. In this paper, we report on the first 500 patients enrolled. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 17.8 months; 77.6% of patients completed the planned 18 months follow-up, and 22.4% discontinued early from the study. At diagnosis, 94.8% of patients had PAH (World Health Organization [WHO] Group 1), most commonly idiopathic (49.2%) and connective tissue disease associated (26.4%). Most patients (72.4%) initiated selexipag more than 60 days before enrollment. At initiation, 31.0% of patients had WHO functional class (FC) II disease, and 49.6% had WHO FC II or III disease. In addition, 55.0% of patients were receiving double therapy (most commonly an endothelin receptor antagonist plus phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor [42.3%]), whereas 30.6% were receiving monotherapy. Despite most patients already receiving PAH-specific therapy, at selexipag initiation, 67.2% (336 of 500) were at intermediate risk, and 9.6% (48 of 500) were at high risk of 1-year mortality. Risk scores remained stable in ∼55% of patients and improved in ∼20% at the end of the study. In total, 72.2% of patients had at least 1 adverse event (AE), and 37.6% reported a serious AE. The median selexipag maintenance dose was 1,200 µg twice daily (interquartile range: 800-1,600 µg twice daily). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world, US-based patients with PAH initiating selexipag typically have WHO FC II/III disease and are at intermediate risk, despite receiving PAH-specific treatment. Selexipag was prescribed as part of a combination regimen in most patients. The study identified no unexpected adverse effects.

Clinical Differences and Outcomes between Methamphetamine-associated and Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry.

Rationale: Single-center studies demonstrated that methamphetamine use is associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (Meth-APAH). We used the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry to evaluate the national distribution of Meth-APAH and to compare its impact on patient-reported and clinical outcomes relative to idiopathic PAH.Objectives: To determine if patients with Meth-APAH differ from those with idiopathic PAH in demographics, regional distribution in the United States, hemodynamics, health-related quality of life, PAH-specific treatment, and health care use.Methods: The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry is a U.S.-based prospective cohort of patients new to care at a Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center. The registry collects baseline demographics, clinical parameters, and repeated measures of health-related quality of life, World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, therapy, and health care use. Repeated measures of functional class, health-related quality of life, type of therapy, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were compared using generalized estimating equations.Results: Of 541 participants included, 118 had Meth-APAH; 83% of Meth-APAH arose in the western United States. The Meth-APAH group was younger and had a poorer socioeconomic status and lower cardiac index than the idiopathic PAH group, despite no difference in mean pulmonary artery pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance. The Meth-APAH group had a more advanced functional class in longitudinal models (0.22 points greater; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.37) and worse PAH-specific (emPHasis-10) health-related quality of life (-5.4; 95% CI, -8.1 to -2.8). There was no difference in dual combination therapy; however, participants with Meth-APAH were less likely to be initiated on triple therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.77) or parenteral therapy (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.24). Participants with Meth-APAH were more likely to seek care in the emergency department (incidence rate ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.71 to 3.11) and more likely to be hospitalized (incidence rate ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.83).Conclusions: Meth-APAH represents a unique clinical phenotype of PAH, most common in the western United States. It accounts for a notable proportion of PAH in expert centers. Assessment for methamphetamine use is necessary in patients with PAH.