RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bleeding during cardiac surgery may be refractory to standard interventions. Off-label use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity (FEIBA) has been described to treat such bleeding. However, reports of safety, particularly thromboembolic outcomes, show mixed results and reported cohorts have been small. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023 at Stanford Hospital were reviewed (n=3335). Patients who received FEIBA to treat post-cardiopulmonary bypass bleeding were matched with those who did not by propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio using nearest neighbor matching (n= 352 per group). The primary outcome was a composite outcome of thromboembolic complications including any one of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), unplanned coronary artery intervention, ischemic stroke, and acute limb ischemia, in the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included renal failure, reoperation, postoperative transfusion, ICU length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: 704 encounters were included in our propensity matched analysis. The mean dose of FEIBA administered was 7.3 ±5.5 units/kg. In propensity matched multivariate logistic regression models there was no statistically significant difference in odds ratios for thromboembolic outcomes, ICU LOS, or mortality. Patients who received >750 units of FEIBA had an increased odds ratio for acute renal failure (OR 4.14; 95% CI 1.61 to 10.36, p <0.001). In multivariate linear regression, patients receiving FEIBA were transfused more plasma and cryoprecipitate postoperatively. However, only the dose range of 501-750 units was associated with an increase in transfusion of RBCs (ß 2.73; 95% CI 0.68 to 4.78; p=0.009), and platelets (ß 1.74; 95% CI 0.85 to 2.63; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low dose FEIBA administration during cardiac surgery does not increase risk of thromboembolic events, ICU LOS, or mortality in a propensity matched cohort. Higher doses were associated with increased acute renal failure and postoperative transfusion. Further studies are required to establish the efficacy of activated factor concentrates to treat refractory bleeding during cardiac surgery.
RESUMO
Background: Anesthesiology plays a crucial role in perioperative care, critical care, and pain management, impacting patient experiences and clinical outcomes. However, our understanding of the anesthesiology research landscape is limited. Accordingly, we initiated a data-driven analysis through topic modeling to uncover research trends, enabling informed decision-making and fostering progress within the field. Methods: The easyPubMed R package was used to collect 32,300 PubMed abstracts spanning from 2000 to 2022. These abstracts were authored by 737 Anesthesiology Principal Investigators (PIs) who were recipients of National Institute of Health (NIH) funding from 2010 to 2022. Abstracts were preprocessed, vectorized, and analyzed with the state-of-the-art BERTopic algorithm to identify pillar topics and trending subtopics within anesthesiology research. Temporal trends were assessed using the Mann-Kendall test. Results: The publishing journals with most abstracts in this dataset were Anesthesia & Analgesia 1133, Anesthesiology 992, and Pain 671. Eight pillar topics were identified and categorized as basic or clinical sciences based on a hierarchical clustering analysis. Amongst the pillar topics, "Cells & Proteomics" had both the highest annual and total number of abstracts. Interestingly, there was an overall upward trend for all topics spanning the years 2000-2022. However, when focusing on the period from 2015 to 2022, topics "Cells & Proteomics" and "Pulmonology" exhibit a downward trajectory. Additionally, various subtopics were identified, with notable increasing trends in "Aneurysms", "Covid 19 Pandemic", and "Artificial intelligence & Machine Learning". Conclusion: Our work offers a comprehensive analysis of the anesthesiology research landscape by providing insights into pillar topics, and trending subtopics. These findings contribute to a better understanding of anesthesiology research and can guide future directions.