RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Very few adequately powered studies exploring early thresholds for intervention in the management of post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD) in preterm infants have identified consistent neurodevelopmental advantages at 12-30 months. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of early versus conservative thresholds for intervention, primarily aimed at normalizing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, in the management of PHVD in preterm infants. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for eligible papers, and prospective randomized trials involving preterm infants were selected. The results are expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The main outcome was survival without moderate-to-severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 12-30 months. RESULTS: Ten articles representing seven randomized trials comparing early versus conservative thresholds for interventions were included. Five trials (n = 545 infants) reported no difference in the main outcome between early and conservative groups [RR 0.99 (0.71, 1.37)]. Sensitivity analysis excluding data from a medication trial did not alter the main outcome [RR 1.15 (0.95, 1.39)]. Infants in the early threshold group received significantly more interventions [RR 1.48 (1.05, 2.09)]. Deaths before discharge/during the initial study period [RR 1.04 (0.70, 1.54)] or a composite of death or shunt insertion [RR 1.04 (0.86, 1.27)] were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention for PHVD, before a clinical or ultrasound threshold is met, leads to additional clinical procedures but does not improve survival without moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 12-30 months. Caution should be exercised in interpreting these results due to significant variation between the studies. Supplementary file 3 (MP4 131172 kb).