Calculation of the minimal clinically important difference in operated patients with adult spine deformity: advantages of the ROC method and significance of prevalence in threshold selection.

PURPOSE: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is crucial to evaluate management outcomes, but different thresholds have been obtained in different works. Part of this variability is due to measurement error and influence of the database, both essential for calculating the MCID. The aim of this study was to introduce the association of the ROC method in the anchor-based MCID calculation for ODI, SRS-22r, and SF-36, to objectively set the threshold for the anchor-based MCID in an adult spine deformity (ASD) population. METHODS: Multicentric study based on a prospective database of consecutively operated ASD patients. An anchor question was used to assess patients' quality of life after surgery. Different approaches were used to calculate the MCID and then compared: SEM (Standard Error of Measurement), MDC (Minimal Detectable Change), and anchor-based MCID with ROC method. RESULTS: 516 patients were included. Those who responded with 6 and 7 to the anchor question were considered improved. The MCID ranges obtained with the ROC method exhibited the lowest variability. Prediction error rates ranged from 31% (SRS-22r) to 41% (SF-36 MCS). The MCID ranges spanned between 12 and 15 for ODI, 0.6 and 0.73 for SRS-22r, 6.62 and 7.41 for SF-36 PCS, and between 2.69 and 5.63 for SF-36 MCS. CONCLUSION: The ROC method proposes an MCID range with error rate, and can objectively determine the threshold for distinguishing improved and non-improved patients. As the MCID correlates with the utilized database and error of measurement, each study should compute its own MCID for each PROM to allow comparison among different publications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients.

INTRODUCTION: In asymptomatic subjects, variations of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and spinopelvic organization have been reported. A large range of compensation phenomena has been observed in degenerative spinal deformity in order to maintain horizontal gaze, but it remains unclear how age and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence cervical alignment. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the distribution of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in subjects with and without degenerative spinal deformity in order to precisely evaluate cervical compensation phenomena in adult spinal deformity (ASD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radiographs of 478 subjects (327 females and 151 males) were distributed into 235 asymptomatic and 243 deformed subjects. Occipito-cervical parameters were McGregor-C1, McGregor-C2, C1-C2 and occipito-C2 angles. The cervicothoracic inflection point (CTIP) was determined. Caudal cervical sagittal alignment parameters were: C2-C7 lordosis, C2-apex (superior arch), apex-CTIP (inferior arch), occipito-C3 and occipito-C4 angles, C7-slope and T1-slope. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between asymptomatic and deformed subjects were done after matching on age (40-60 years; > 60 years) and on PI (< 45°; 45-60°; > 60°). RESULTS: Among occipito-cervical parameters, there was no significant change in McGregor-C1 angle. However, McGregor-C2 angle was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr = 0.0029), with influence of age (Pr = 0.023), but PI influence. C1-C2 lordosis was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the asymptomatic group (Pr < 0.0007), without influence of age or PI noticed. C2-C7 lordosis was also higher in the ASD group (Pr < 0.025) with a role of age and PI (Pr < 0.025). Cervical lordosis in the superior arch was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr > 0.999), without influence of age or PI. In the inferior arch, the lordosis angle was not modified according to the group, but there was an influence of age (Pr < 0.0007). C7-slope and T1-slope were higher according the age group (Pr < 0.0012), without influence of the group or PI. CONCLUSION: This observational study highlights cervical sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative spinal deformity, matched on age and pelvic incidence. The inferior cervical spine seemed to be modified with a higher lordosis, increasing with age responding to the age-related thoracic kyphosis increase. In addition to that, the superior cervical spine hyperextends more in adult degenerative deformity to maintain horizontal gaze. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Influence of double rods and interbody cages on range of motion and rod stress after spinopelvic instrumentation: a finite element study.

PURPOSE: To compare instrumentation configurations consisting of bilateral single or double rods and additional interbody cages (IBCs) at different levels in terms of Range of Motion (ROM) and distribution of von Mises stress in rods. METHODS: A previously validated L1-pelvis finite element model was used and instrumented with configurations consisting of single or double bilateral rods and IBCs at multiple levels. Pure moments of 7.5 N.m were applied to L1 in main directions in addition to a follower load of 280 N. Global, segmental ROM and distribution of von Mises stress in rods were studied. RESULTS: All configurations reduced segmental and global ROM from 50 to 100% compared to the intact spine. Addition of IBCs slightly increased ROM at levels adjacent to the IBC placement. The simple rod configuration presented the highest von Mises stress (457 MPa) in principal rods at L5-S1 in flexion. Doubling rods and IBC placement reduced this value and shifted the location of maximum von Mises stress to other regions. Among studied configurations, double rods with IBCs at all levels (L2-S1) showed the lowest ROM. Maximal von Mises stresses in secondary rods were lower in comparison to main rods. CONCLUSIONS: Double rods and IBCs reduced global and segmental ROM as well as von Mises stress in rods. The results suggest a possible benefit in using both strategies to minimize pseudarthrosis and instrumentation failure. However, increased ROM in adjacent levels and the shift of maximal von Mises stress to adjacent areas might cause complications elsewhere.

Comparison of four correction techniques for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: When performing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), it is of major importance to address both coronal and sagittal deformities. Although several techniques have been described, few data exist comparing them. Our objective was to compare four techniques (in situ bending (ISB), rod derotation (RD), cantilever (C) and posteromedial translation (PMT)) for the correction of spinal deformity in AIS including thoracic deformity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 562 AIS patients with thoracic deformity with at least 24-month follow-up. Radiographic analysis was performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. The main outcomes were main curve correction and thoracic kyphosis restoration (TK). RESULTS: Coronal correction rate was significantly different among the four treatment groups (ISB 64% vs C 57% vs RD 55% vs PMT 67%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that correction technique did not influence correction rate, whereas implant density, convex side compression and use of derotation connectors did. TK increase was significantly higher in the PMT group (average + 13°) than in DR (+ 3°), while ISB (-3°) and cantilever (-13°) resulted in TK decrease (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that TK increase was only influenced by the reduction technique (p < 0.001) and preoperative TK (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The four techniques had the same ability to correct spinal deformity in the coronal plane. Three factors were identified to improve correction rate: implant density, convex compression and use of derotation connectors. On the other hand, PMT was more effective in restoring TK, particularly in hypokyphotic patients.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age.

PURPOSE: The aim was to describe radiographic cervical sagittal alignment variations according to age, gender and pelvic incidence (PI) and to investigate relationships with thoracic alignment. METHODS: A total of 2599 individuals (5-93 years) without spinal deformity were studied. Cranial cervical parameters were: McGregor slope, occipita-C2 angle, McGregor-C2 lordosis and C1-C2 lordosis. Caudal cervical parameters were: C2-C7, cranial arch and caudal arch lordosis and C7- and T1-slope. A Bayesian inference compared parameter distributions. Correlations with spinopelvic and global alignment parameters were investigated. RESULTS: Among cranial cervical parameters, variations of McGregor slope were non-significant. McGregor-C2 lordosis and C1-C2 lordosis were smaller in males and increased significantly during growth, whereas the occipito-C2 angle decreased (Pr > 0.95). The occipito-C2 angle was larger and McGregor-C2 lordosis was smaller in low PI (Pr > 0.95). Among caudal cervical parameters, C2-C7 lordosis and C7- and T1-slope were larger in males and increased after 50 years (Pr > 0.95). Lordosis changes were non-significant in the cranial arch, whereas values increased in the caudal arch after 35 years (Pr > 0.95). Caudal parameter differences were non-significant between PI groups. Strong correlations existed between C2-C7, caudal arch lordosis, C7-slope, T1-slope and thoracic kyphosis. The sagittal vertical axis C2 correlated with caudal arch lordosis and T1-slope (ρ > 0.5; Pr > 0.95). CONCLUSION: Cervical alignment parameters vary according to age, gender and PI. In the cranial cervical spine, changes occur mainly during growth. In the caudal cervical spine, lordosis increases in the caudal arch, which is related to thoracic kyphosis increase with age. The caudal cervical arch acts as a compensatory segment by progressive extension, allowing horizontal gaze.

Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Metal Artifact Reduction.

Metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms are used with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during augmented reality surgical navigation for minimally invasive pedicle screw instrumentation. The aim of this study was to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability of pedicle screw placement and to compare the perception of baseline image quality (NoMAR) with optimized image quality (MAR). CBCT images of 24 patients operated on for degenerative spondylolisthesis using minimally invasive lumbar fusion were analyzed retrospectively. Images were treated using NoMAR and MAR by an engineer, thus creating 48 randomized files, which were then independently analyzed by 3 spine surgeons and 3 radiologists. The Gertzbein and Robins classification was used for screw accuracy rating, and an image quality scale rated the clarity of pedicle screw and bony landmark depiction. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. NoMAR and MAR led to similarly good intra-observer (ICC > 0.6) and excellent inter-observer (ICC > 0.8) assessment reliability of pedicle screw placement accuracy. The image quality scale showed more variability in individual image perception between spine surgeons and radiologists (ICC range 0.51−0.91). This study indicates that intraoperative screw positioning can be reliably assessed on CBCT for augmented reality surgical navigation when using optimized image quality. Subjective image quality was rated slightly superior for MAR compared to NoMAR.

Comparison of degenerative lumbar scoliosis correction and risk for mechanical failure using posterior 2-rod instrumentation versus 4-rod instrumentation and interbody fusion.

PURPOSE: Four-rod instrumentation and interbody fusion may reduce mechanical complications in degenerative scoliosis surgery compared to 2-rod instrumentation. The purpose was to compare clinical results, sagittal alignment and mechanical complications with both techniques. METHODS: Full spine radiographs were analysed in 97 patients instrumented to the pelvis: 58 2-rod constructs (2R) and 39 4-rod constructs (4R). Clinical scores (VAS, ODI, SRS-22, EQ-5D-3L) were assessed preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year and last follow-up (average 4.2 years). Radiographic measurements were: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters, segmental lordosis distribution. The incidence of non-union and PJK were investigated. RESULTS: All clinical scores improved significantly in both groups between preoperative and last follow-up. In the 2R-group, lumbar lordosis increased to 52.8° postoperatively and decreased to 47.0° at follow-up (p = 0.008). In the 4R-group, lumbar lordosis increased from 46.4 to 52.5° postoperatively and remained at 53.4° at follow-up. There were 8 (13.8%) PJK in the 2R-group versus 6 (15.4%) in the 4R-group, with a mismatch between lumbar apex and theoretic lumbar shape according to pelvic incidence. Non-union requiring revision surgery occurred on average at 26.9 months in 28 patients (48.3%) of the 2R-group. No rod fracture was diagnosed in the 4R-group. CONCLUSION: Multi-level interbody fusion combined with 4-rod instrumentation decreased risk for non-union and revision surgery compared to select interbody fusion and 2-rod instrumentation. The role of additional rods on load sharing still needs to be determined when multiple cages are used. Despite revision surgery in the 2R group, final clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options.

PURPOSE: Highlight risk factors for pseudarthrosis in long-segment spinal fusions, collect the approaches carried to address this complication. METHODS: Patients with ASD and fusion of ≥ 4 levels with minimum follow-up (FU) of ≥ 2 years were included. Full-body X-rays were done preoperatively, < 3 months and ≥ 2 years. Oswestry disability index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 and SF36 assessed pre- and postoperatively. The relationship between demographic, surgical and radiological variables with the development of pseudarthrosis was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 524 patients included, 65 patients (12.4%) developed pseudarthrosis and 53 underwent revision surgery. Notably, 88% of pseudarthrosis cases are associated with fusion length (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.292, p = 0.004), osteotomy requirement (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.85, p = 0.025), pelvic fixation (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13-0.88, p = 0.026) and combined approaches (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.09-9.91, p = 0.034). Sagittal alignment is not related to the rate of pseudarthrosis. Health related and quality of life scores were comparable at last FU between patients revised for pseudarthrosis and those that didn't require revision surgery (ODI = 28% no revision and 30% revision group). CONCLUSIONS: Pseudarthrosis is not related to malalignment, but with the surgical techniques employed for its treatment. Anterior approaches with anterior support decrease the rate by 30%, while long fusions, osteotomies and pelvic fixation increase its rate.

Proximal junctional kyphosis is a rebalancing spinal phenomenon due to insufficient postoperative thoracic kyphosis after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

PURPOSE: Many authors tried to explain proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery by looking for risk factors. Latest publications focus on sagittal alignment. Each healthy adolescent has a specific thoracic kyphosis (TK) depending on their pelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis (LL). The objective of this work is to determine if the difference between TK at follow-up (TKFU) and the patient-specific TK (PSTK) plays a role in PJK occurrence after AIS surgery. The secondary objective was to find other risk factors. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 570 thoracic AIS who underwent a posterior thoracic fusion from nine centers. The series was separated in two groups: with and without PJK. PSTK was calculated with the formula PSTK = 2(PT + LL-PI). TK Gap was the difference between TKFU and PSTK. Logistic regression was utilized to test the impact of TK Gap and other known risk factors on PJK occurrence. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed 15 factors significantly different between the groups. In a multivariate analysis, three factors had a strong significant influence on PJK: TKFU, TK Gain and TK Gap. Four additional factors affected the rate of PJK: Posterior translation on two rods, preoperative TK, preoperative LL and number of instrumented vertebrae. CONCLUSION: PJK is related to the insufficient TK at follow-up, compared to the specific TK that every patient should have according to their pelvic parameters. PJK incidence is significantly reduced by a strong gain in TK and a thoracic selective fusion which leaves the proximal lumbar vertebrae free. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Accuracy and technical limits of percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine.

PURPOSE: The two-dimensional fluoroscopic method of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation has been clinically described as reliable method in the caudal thoracic and lumbosacral spine. Its accuracy has not been clearly reported in the cranial thoracic spine. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy according to pedicle dimensions and vertebral levels. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen human specimens were instrumented with 216 screws from T1 to S1. Pedicle isthmus widths, heights, transversal pedicles and screws were measured on computed tomography. Pedicle cortex violation ≥ 2 mm was defined as screw malposition. RESULTS: The narrowest pedicles were at T3-T5. A large variability between transversal pedicle axes and percutaneous pedicle screw was present, depending on the spinal level. Screw malposition rates were 36.1% in the cranial thoracic spine (T1-T6), 16.7% in the caudal thoracic spine (T7-T12), and 6.9% in the lumbosacral spine (L1-S1). The risk for screw malposition was significantly higher at cranial thoracic levels compared to caudal thoracic (p = 0.006) and lumbosacral (p < 0.0001) levels. Cortex violation ≥ 2 mm was constantly present if the pedicle width was < 4.8 mm. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous pedicle screw placement appears safe in the caudal thoracic and lumbosacral spine. The two-dimensional fluoroscopic method has a limited reliability above T7 because of smaller pedicle dimensions, difficulties in visualizing radiographic pedicle landmarks and kyphosis.

Influence of double rods and interbody cages on quasistatic range of motion of the spine after lumbopelvic instrumentation.

PURPOSE: This in vitro biomechanical study compares residual lumbar range of motion (ROM) and rod strain after lumbopelvic instrumentation using 2 rods, 4 rods and interbody cages. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric specimens were instrumented from L1 to sacrum, and pelvic screws were implanted. The pelvis was constrained and moments up to 7.5 Nm were applied to T12. Segmental L1-S1 ROM was analyzed by tracking radiopaque balls implanted in each vertebra using biplanar radiographs. Deformation within principal rods was measured by strain gauges. Four configurations were compared: 2 rods (2R), 4 rods (4R), 4 rods + ALIF at L4-L5 and L5-S1 (4R + ALIF), 2 rods + ALIF (2R + ALIF). RESULTS: Intact average global L1-S1 ROM was 42.9° (27.9°-66.0°) in flexion-extension (FE), 35.2° (26.8°-51.8°) in lateral bending (LB), 18.6° (6.7°-47.8°) in axial rotation (AR). In FE, average ROM was 1.9° with both 4-rod configurations versus 2.5° with 2R and 2.8° with 2R + ALIF (p < 0.05). In LB, ROM ranged between 1.2° and 1.5° without significant differences. In AR, ROM was 2.5° with both 4-rod configurations versus 2.9° with 2R (p = 0.07) and 3.1° with 2R ALIF (p = 0.01). In FE, strain decreased by 64% and 65% in principal rods at L3-L4 with 4-rod. When comparing 2-rod configurations, strain decreased by 1% in flexion and increased by 22% in extension at L3-L4 when adding an ALIF at L4-L5 and L5-S1. CONCLUSIONS: Double rods and interbody cages decrease residual ROM in FE and AT. Double rods seem efficient in limiting strain in principal rods. The use of single rods with cages at the lumbosacral junction increases strain at the first adjacent level without cage.

[Biomechanical compensatory mechanisms of hips and spine : The essentials for spine and hip surgeons]. / Biomechanische Kompensationsmechanismen der Hüftgelenke und der Wirbelsäule : Das Wesentliche für Wirbelsäulen- und Hüftchirurgen.

Spinal alignment changes with age and degeneration. Different compensatory mechanisms of the spine are necessary to preserve spinal balance. The capacity of compensation of the spine decreases with age. Thus, the pelvis and the lower limbs become involved in the compensatory mechanism. Concomitant osteoarthritis of the hip could impair this capacity. The biomechanical principles of compensation are described with respect to planning reconstructive hip and spine surgery.

Combined percutaneous and open instrumentation for thoracolumbar kyphosis correction by two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: A long global thoracolumbar kyphosis is common in ankylosing spondylitis. Surgical correction of fixed sagittal malalignment by pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) might improve disability and quality of life (QoL). Two-level osteotomies represent major procedures with a risk of hemorrhage. Combined open and minimal invasive surgery has not been described and might be considered. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old female with ankylosing spondylitis was treated by golimumab and teriparatide. The treatment was stopped during pregnancy which led to vertebral compression fractures and kyphosis of 50° between T11 and L3. A PSO was planned at the kyphotic apex L2. The second PSO was planned at L4 according to the pelvic incidence of 56°, matching with a spinopelvic alignment Roussouly type 3. A derived full balance integrated method was used to calculate the amount of correction. During the first stage surgery, an open approach was performed from L1 to pelvis and combined with percutaneous cement-augmented instrumentation in already fused segments T5-T12, thus reducing perioperative morbidity. A stepwise approach including L2 PSO closure with temporary rods and L4 PSO with final instrumentation was used. Blood loss was estimated around 1100 ml. The patient was able to walk on the second day after surgery. A secondary anterior fusion with LLI cages from L2 to L5 and an ALIF at L5-S1 were performed because of high non-ossified intervertebral disks to reduce the risk for nonunion and rod fractures. At 2-year follow-up, the patient's QoL had significantly improved and full spine radiographs showed stable normalized sagittal parameters. CONCLUSION: The combined open and percutaneous approach was feasible and might be considered as an alternative option to conventional open surgery when planning major deformity correction in ankylosing spondylitis.

Osteoarthritis and spontaneous fusion of facet joints after percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study determined the rate of osteoarthritis and spontaneous facet joint fusion and analyzed risk factors related to patient characteristics, fracture type or surgical technique on pre- and postoperative CT after percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: 1050 facet joints adjacent to screws in 148 patients (15-85 years) with thoracolumbar fractures were analyzed with an average time between CTs of 12.3 months. Screw diameters, lengths and cement augmentation were recorded. Facet joint violation by screw trajectory and by insertion depth was classified in three grades. Pre- and postoperative osteoarthritis was graded as absent, minor or severe and postoperative facet joint fusion as absent, partial or complete. RESULTS: The facet violation rate was moderate in 15.4% and severe in 0.6% according to screw trajectory, and 11.0 and 0.6%, respectively, according to insertion depth. Osteoarthritis was preoperatively rated moderate in 9.6% and severe in 1.2%. A progression was evidenced in 79 facet joints (7.5%). Screw cement augmentation was the main predictive factor (p < 0.0001). Partial fusion was evidenced in 2.6% and complete fusion in 1% of facet joints. Risk factors were: BMI (p = 0.0002), age (p = 0.0013), preoperative osteoarthritis (p = 0.0005), time between 2 CTs (p = 0.0001), B-type fractures (p = 0.0005), concomitant anterior fusion (p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence or worsening of osteoarthritis was mainly observed in elderly patients with cement-augmented screws and spontaneous facet fusion in elderly patients with high BMI and preoperative osteoarthritis, or in anteriorly fused B-type injuries. Thus, percutaneous instrumentation can safely be removed after fracture consolidation in younger patients while preserving facet joints.

Possible factors associated with sagittal malalignment recurrence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study investigates sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). The purpose was to investigate factors associated with malalignment recurrence. METHODS: Full spine radiographs were analyzed in 66 patients (average age 54.5 years, follow-up 3.8 years). Measurements were taken preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, at follow-up: SVA C2 and C7, C2-C7 lordosis, T4-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, PSO lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope. Follow-up CTs were screened for pseudarthrosis and gas in sacroiliac joints. RESULTS: PSO lordosis increased from 11.8° to 40.8° (p < 0.0001) and kept stable. Lumbar lordosis increased from 28.6° to 57.7° (p < 0.0001) and decreased to 49.7° (p = 0.0008). Pelvic tilt decreased from 29.2° to 16.5° (p < 0.0001) and increased to 22.5° (p < 0.0001). SVA C7 decreased from 105.1 to 35.5 mm (p < 0.0001) and increased to 64.8 mm (p = 0.0005). Twenty-eight patients (42%) had an SVA C7 increase of more than 70 mm in the postoperative course: recurrence group. These patients were older: 62.8 years versus 52.3 years (p = 0.0031). Loss of lordosis was 11.9° (recurrence group) versus 5.0° (non-recurrence group). Eleven patients (17%) had pseudarthrosis. Pelvic incidence increased by 9.3° (recurrence group) versus 3.8° (non-recurrence group). In 23 patients (35%), pelvic incidence increased > 10°. Gas was evidenced in sacroiliac joints in 22 patients (33%). CONCLUSION: Postoperative anterior malalignment recurrence may occur after PSO. Elderly patients were at risk of recurrence. Loss of lumbar lordosis linked to pseudarthrosis represented another factor. With malalignment recurrence, anterior trunk rotation and pelvic retroversion might additionally have augmented moments across sacroiliac joints with subsequent ligament laxity and pelvic incidence increase. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Mortality, complication, and fusion rates of patients with odontoid fracture: the impact of age and comorbidities in 204 cases.

PURPOSE: The French Society of Spine Surgery (SFCR) conducted a prospective epidemiologic multicenter study. The purpose was to investigate mortality, complication, and fusion rates in patients with odontoid fracture, depending on age, comorbidities, fracture type, and treatment. METHODS: Out of 204 patients, 60 were ≤ 70 years and 144 were > 70 years. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment types and complications (general medical, infectious, neurologic, and mechanical), and death were registered within the first year. Fractures were classified according to Anderson-D'Alonzo and Roy-Camille on the initial CT. A 1-year follow-up CT was available in 144 patients to evaluate fracture consolidation. RESULTS: Type II and oblique-posterior fractures were the most frequent patterns. The treatment was conservative in 52.5% and surgical in 47.5%. The mortality rate in patients ≤ 70 was 3.3% and 16.7% in patients > 70 years (p = 0.0002). Fracture pattern and treatment type did not influence mortality. General medical complications were significantly more frequent > 70 years (p = 0.021) and after surgical treatment (p = 0.028). Neurologic complications occurred in 0.5%, postoperative infections in 2.0%, and implant-related mechanical complications in 10.3% (associated with pseudarthrosis). Fracture fusion was observed in 93.5% of patients ≤ 70 years and in 62.5% >70 years (p < 0.0001). Pseudarthrosis was present in 31.5% of oblique-posterior fractures and in 24.3% after conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Age and comorbidities influenced mortality and medical complication rates most regardless of fracture type and treatment choice. Pseudarthrosis represented the main complication, which increased with age. Pseudarthrosis was most frequent in type II and oblique-posterior fractures after conservative treatment.

Thoracic cage volume and dimension assessment by optoelectronic molding in normal children and adolescents during growth.

PURPOSE: The thoracic spine, the chondral and osseous ribs, and the sternum together make up the thoracic cage. These elements are strictly correlated, although their growth is not synchronous. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive data set of thoracic dimensions and non-invasive volumetric assessment in a large cohort of males and females from early childhood to young adult age. METHODS: In all, 622 healthy individuals (406 girls, 216 boys) aged 6-18 years were consecutively enrolled between 2006 and 2016. All had to be healthy with no history of spinal deformity, or any lung, cardiovascular, systemic or neuromuscular disease. The optical ORTEN system for trunk surface data acquisition was used to calculate thoracic cage volume (V) and perimeter (Pe), anterior-posterior depth (AP) and transverse diameter (TD), AP/TD ratio, sternal length (St), and T1-T12 distance (Tle) in all patients. RESULTS: The overall average age was 11.1 ± 2.5 years (4-18) for girls and 11.0 ± 3.1 years (4-18) for boys. Average growth parameters were: standing height 146.2 ± 14.6 cm (103-172) for girls and 146.4 ± 20.0 cm (94-192) for boys, sitting height 75.4 ± 8.6 cm (61-91) for girls and 75.5 ± 10.3 cm (60-99) for boys, weight 37.6 ± 10.4 kg (16-65) for girls and 38.3 ± 14.3 kg (13.7-104) for boys, BMI 16.7 ± 3.7 (18.5-26) for girls and 17.0 ± 3.3 (18.7-34.3) for boys. At age 6-8 years: V was 52.5% of its final size in girls and 44.9% in boys; Pe was 80.2% its final length in girls and 76.8% in boys; St reached 68% of its final size in girls and 66.9% in boys; Tle reached 73.3% of its final length in girls and 71.2% in boys. At skeletal maturity, thoracic cage volume in boys was 19.4% greater than in girls (p < 0.05). AP/TD ratio remained < 1 in all age groups and did not differ between genders (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Growth of the thoracic cage is shown to be a gradual process that is more linear than previously reported. Only small increases in annual growth rates were observed during the pubertal growth spurt. The most important events characterizing thoracic cage development occurred during the first few years of postnatal growth. The circular cross-section of the very young child's thorax reached adult-like proportions together with its ovoid shape before age 6 years.

Posterior-only versus combined anterior/posterior fusion in Scheuermann disease: a large retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The literature shows controversies concerning surgical treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis between posterior-only fixation and combined anterior/posterior fusion. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological results and the rate of complications between these two techniques. METHODS: We performed a multicentric retrospective review of 131 patients who underwent primary fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis divided into two groups: 67 patients operated via posterior approach only and 64 operated via combined anterior/posterior approach. Classical clinical, surgical and radiological data were collected. A descriptive and statistical analysis was performed between the two groups to evaluate the influence of the surgical procedure on the rate of complications, the functional results and radiological correction. RESULTS: The average age was 23 and the average kyphosis was 77 degrees. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range 0.1-27.3). There was no difference regarding demographic data, preoperative radiographic data and length of fusion between the two groups. Functional results were good in 81% of cases. Kyphosis correction was on average 15° and the correction of the compensatory lumbar lordosis was 20°. The correction was stable at final follow-up. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of functional results, the complications rate and radiological correction. CONCLUSION: Surgery for Scheuermann's kyphosis gives good and stable functional and radiological results. Given the fact that the two surgical strategies give the same results, it appears that the anterior/posterior fusion technique to treat Scheuermann's kyphosis should be reserved for major deformations. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal decompensation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is considered as late onset complication. Several mechanisms have been suggested, but little attention has been paid to the caudal end of lumbar instrumented fusion, especially sacral iliac joint (SIJ) deterioration. METHODS: Clinical histories and radiographic sagittal parameters of two patients with SIJ luxation after PSO are presented. The biomechanical failure mechanism and risk factors are analysed. RESULTS: Two patients underwent correction of fixed anterior sagittal imbalance by PSO, followed by pseudarthrosis revision surgery. Both of them sustained persistent sacroiliac pain, progressive recurrence of anterior imbalance and progressive pelvic incidence (PI) increase around 10°. An acute bilateral SIJ luxation occurred in both patients leading to sharp increase or PI around 20°. One patient was treated by SIJ fusion and the other patient was placed on non-weight-bearing crutch ambulation for 1 year. Both patients had a high preoperative PI (95° and 78°). A theoretical match between lumbar lordosis (LL) and PI was not achieved by PSO. Osteopenia was present in both patients. Computed tomography evidenced L5-S1 pseudarthrosis and sacroiliac joint violation by pelvic or sacral ala screws. CONCLUSION: Patients with high PI might seek for further compensation at their SIJ when lacking LL after PSO. Chronic anterior imbalance might lead to progressive weakening of sacroiliac ligaments. Initial circumferential lumbosacral fusion and accurate iliac screw fixation might reduce stress on implants, risk for pseudarthrosis, implant failure and finally SIJ deterioration. Bone mineral density should further be investigated preoperatively.