Susceptibility Pattern of Doxycycline in Comparison to Azithromycin, Cefuroxime and Amoxicillin against Common Isolates: A Retrospective Study Based on Diagnostic Laboratory Data.

INTRODUCTION: Doxycycline acts against a broad range of gram-positive, gramnegative and 'atypical' bacteria as well as some protozoan pathogens such as malaria. In this era of increasing multidrug-resistance, recycling of old antimicrobials should be considered and need more focus in this domain of research. We, therefore, aimed to assess the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of commonly isolated pathogens against doxycycline, azithromycin, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin from common clinical specimens by using laboratory-based diagnostic data from western India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The non-interventional retrospective study was conducted on secondary data extracted from multi-center diagnostic laboratory based in Mumbai, India. Susceptibility data of bacteria isolated from blood, urine, pus, and sputum were used in the study and culture positive samples were segregated. Antimicrobial susceptibility status of doxycycline was checked and compared with azithromycin, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin. Chi-square tests of significance were carried out to assess significant differences in susceptibility patterns. Association between variables was considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05. RESULTS: Percentage susceptibility of collective bacterial isolates was found to be highest for doxycycline in all four specimens (93.1%). Individual percentage susceptibility was observed to be highest for sputum isolates (97.5%) followed by blood (93.8%), pus (92.7%) and urine (70.0%). The activity of doxycycline was found to be 93.5% for the samples resistant to azithromycin. Doxycycline also showed good susceptibility for the isolates resistant to amoxicillin and cefuroxime which was 75.9% and 64.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Several bacterial isolates from all four sources were found to be susceptible to Doxycycline. It has an important role in the form of a better alternative of major antimicrobial agents like azithromycin, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin against gram-positive cocci. Doxycycline appeared to show better activity against isolates which were resistant to other three antimicrobials.

Correction to: Comparative Study to Evaluate Tolerability of Topical 5% Minoxidil Novel Formulation and Alcohol-Based Conventional Solutions in Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Indian Men: Randomized Double-Blind Study.

In Methods section under Study Design and Patients.

Comparative Study to Evaluate Tolerability of Topical 5% Minoxidil Novel Formulation and Alcohol-Based Conventional Solutions in Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Indian Men: Randomized Double-Blind Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with androgenetic alopecia treated with alcohol-based minoxidil topical solutions often report local irritation, dryness, and redness of the scalp. We evaluate the in-use tolerance of 5% minoxidil novel formulation topical solution-test product (TP)-compared with 5% minoxidil alcohol-based topical solutions-reference product 1 (RP1) and reference product 2 (RP2)-in Indian men with androgenetic alopecia. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind study, patients aged ≥ 18 years with androgenetic alopecia were randomized 1:1:1 to apply TP, RP1, and RP2 twice daily for 30 days. The safety endpoints included mean hydration, mean redness, and mean scaling on scalp. RESULTS: All screened patients (N = 100) were enrolled and randomized to TP (n = 33), RP1 (n = 33), or RP2 (n = 34). At day 30, the mean (SD) hydration was significantly increased in patients treated with TP [9.74 (4.98)] but significantly reduced in patients treated with RP1 [3.28 (2.67)] or RP2 [3.03 (1.57)] (p-value 0.001). The mean (SD) score for redness was significantly decreased in the TP group [0.01 (0.04)], (p-value, 0.009) at day 30 compared with baseline, while no change was observed in the RP1 [0.08 (0.13)] or RP2 [0.11 (0.17)] group. After 30 days of treatment, no significant difference was observed in the mean score of scaling in any of the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twice daily application of 5% minoxidil novel formulation for 30 days significantly improved hydration and reduced redness of the scalp. Hence, 5% minoxidil novel formulation could be a safer alternative in treating men with androgenetic alopecia who are sensitive to alcoholic formulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India; CTRI/2018/11/016431.

Viscosupplementation for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis from an Indian Perspective: An Expert Consensus Report.

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative condition and is a significant contributor toward physical disability in the aging population. The current treatment modalities for this condition focus on joint preservation with alleviation of symptoms. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) injections have emerged as the promising mainstay of nonsurgical treatment of OA, especially in patients with mild-to-moderate OA and in certain subgroups of severe OA with comorbidities or with poor response to first-line therapy. The absence of standard guidelines or recommendations for the use of IAHA in India has led to vast variations in the usage of IAHA among practitioners. Hence, this consensus-based document aims to address the issue and establish simplified and easily implemented recommendations on the use of IAHA. METHODS: A group of 78 expert orthopedic surgeons discussed in detail the evidence on appropriate criteria for diagnosis, patient selection, and follow-up evaluation for knee OA at two national meetings. In subsequently held regional meetings, key discussion points and clinical experience-based answers were translated into a questionnaire to develop the final expert consensus-based statements for the use of IAHA in patients with knee OA. RESULTS: Various consensus statements were obtained on the basis of scientific evidence obtained from PubMed, Cochrane-indexed database, and guidelines related to viscosupplementation and knee OA as well as the experts' clinical experience. This document was drafted, reviewed, validated, and modified by the expert panel until a final agreement was reached. CONCLUSION: In this pioneering attempt, the document lays down structured, expert consensus-based statements to guide and align practitioners on the appropriate use of IAHA in the Indian setting. FUNDING: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.