Association between TMSE/MoCA and MIS/NAF in ESKD patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Both cognitive impairment and malnutrition are common in hemodialysis (HD) patients and are associated with increased hospitalization rates, infection, poor clinical outcomes, and mortality. The study investigated the association between cognitive and nutrition status among end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 115 patients with ESKD who underwent regular hemodialysis (HD). Data collection included the use of screening tools for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), specifically Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). In addition, we collected data using nutritional screening tools including Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS) and Nutrition Alert Form (NAF). Our primary outcome was to demonstrate whether there was a relationship between TMSE/MoCA and MIS/NAF scores in this population. Secondary outcomes were a prevalence of MCI and malnutrition status in ESKD patients, an association between TMSE and MoCA with other surrogate nutritional markers, and factors affecting MCI in such patients. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients undergoing HD completed our protocol. Their mean age was 63.42 (± 15.82) years, and 51.38% were male. Mean TMSE and MoCA were 23.98 (± 5.06) points and 18.3 (± 6.40) points, respectively. The prevalence of TMSE ≤ 23 and MoCA ≤ 24 were 39.45% and 83.49%, respectively. TMSE had a statistically significant negative correlation with MIS (R2 = 0.16, p < 0.001) and NAF. MoCA also negatively correlated with MIS and NAF. The age, total educational year, the status of whether having a caregiver, serum albumin, serum phosphorus level, handgrip strength, and lean mass tissue were correlated with TMSE. CONCLUSION: Nutritional parameters, including MIS score, NAF score, serum albumin, lean tissue mass, and lean tissue index, significantly correlate with TMSE and MoCA.

Maintenance intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients to minimize erythropoietin doses: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (the MAINTAIN IRON trial).

In patients on chronic hemodialysis, there is no standard protocol for maintenance iron supplementation. This study aimed to compare two fixed-dose intravenous (IV) iron protocols to reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA). We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled study on hemodialysis patients having ferritin levels between 200 and 700 ng/dl and transferrin saturation values between 20 and 40%. Patients were assigned to receive either 100 or 200 mg of IV iron each month. ESA was adjusted every month to keep Hb between 10 and 12 g/dl. ESA dose at 12 months was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, absolute iron deficiency anemia (IDA), blood transfusion, adverse events, and iron withholding rate. Of the 79 eligible patients, 40 received 100 mg of IV iron, while 39 received 200 mg. At month 12, the mean monthly ESA dose in the 100-mg IV iron group was 35,706 ± 21,637 IU, compared to 26,382 ± 14,983 IU in the 200-mg group (P = 0.03). IDA was found in twelve patients (30%) in the 100-mg group and four patients (10.5%) in the 200-mg group (P = 0.05). In each group, three patients died (P = 0.9). Hospitalization, venous access thrombosis, and infection rates were similar in both groups. The withholding rate of IV iron was higher in 200-mg group (25% vs. 64.1%), but the protocol compliance was found more in 100-mg group (50% vs. 28.2%) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, monthly 200-mg IV iron infusions significantly reduce ESA doses but have a higher withholding rate. (Funded by the Kidney Foundation of Thailand and the Research Group in Nephrology and Renal Replacement Therapy from the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University).Thai Clinical Trials Registry number, TCTR20190707001.