Plastic Surgery in the Time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has swept the world in the last several months, causing massive disruption to existing social, economic, and health care systems. As with all medical fields, plastic and reconstructive surgery has been profoundly impacted across the entire spectrum of practice from academic medical centers to solo private practice. The decision to preserve vital life-saving equipment and cancel elective procedures to protect patients and medical staff has been extremely challenging on multiple levels. Frequent and inconsistent messaging disseminated by many voices on the national stage often conflicts and serves only to exacerbate an already difficult decision-making process. METHODS: A survey of relevant COVID-19 literature is presented, and bioethical principles are utilized to generate guidelines for plastic surgeons in patient care through this pandemic. RESULTS: A cohesive framework based upon core bioethical values is presented here to assist plastic surgeons in navigating this rapidly evolving global pandemic. CONCLUSION: Plastic surgeons around the world have been affected by COVID-19 and will adapt to continue serving their patients. The lessons learned in this present pandemic will undoubtedly prove useful in future challenges to come.

Beyond the Tip of the Blade: An Investigation of Upper Extremity Machete Injuries in Honduras.

BACKGROUND: Machete injuries constitute a major cause of morbidity in Honduras. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence, initial management, surgical treatment, and follow-up patterns for machete injuries at the national public hospital in Honduras. Microsurgery in Honduras is currently in transition with limitations at multiple levels. This study aims to provide critical information to better prepare visiting surgeons and establishes a blueprint to improve microsurgical reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with machete injuries to the upper extremity (UE) who presented to the Hospital Escuela Universitario (HEU) for treatment from 2015 to 2017. Additional microsurgical data was obtained by personal communication with members of the plastic surgery department at the HEU. RESULTS: Complete data was retrieved for 100 patients who presented to the HEU with a UE machete wound. The cohort was male dominated (93%), employed as farmers (47%), and had a mean age of 32.1 years. Violence was the most common mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). The majority of UE machete injuries involved tendon (70%), nerve (28%), and an open fracture (55%). Of the 76% of patients who were scheduled for a follow-up visit, only 25% attended. Within the last calendar year, one replantation, 10 revascularizations at the wrist and forearm level, three microvascular free tissue transfers, and 175 nerve repairs were performed. CONCLUSION: Management of UE machete injuries in Honduras is challenging and requires early recognition of possible injuries to multiple anatomical systems. The majority of injuries required operative intervention. Only a small percentage of patients presented for follow up. A program to streamline care starting at injury recognition up to final follow-up is currently unavailable and needs to be developed to optimize microsurgical care.

Surgical Approaches and 30-Day Complications of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Repair Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to outline the 30-d complications of different velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) correction techniques using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric, VPI cases from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Patients were subdivided into two cohorts: (1) palatal procedures and (2) pharyngeal procedures, with the latter being subdivided into (1) pharyngeal flap and (2) sphincter pharyngoplasty. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using Pearson's chi-squared or Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and independent t-tests, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, or analysis of variance for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 767 VPI cases were identified: 191 (24.9%) treated with palatal procedures and 576 (75.1%) with pharyngeal procedures, of which 444 were pharyngeal flap and 132 were sphincter pharyngoplasty. Patients who underwent palatal procedure had longer anesthesia (152.41 min) and operating time (105.72 min), whereas patients who underwent pharyngeal procedure had longer length of stay (1.66 d). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups, nor were there significant differences in outcomes between pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty subgroups. Patients who experienced complications were younger, shorter, inpatient, and having a shorter operation time, longer anesthesia time, or longer length of stay. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of palatal procedures (62.3%), whereas pharyngeal procedures were most often performed by otolaryngologists (48.8%). CONCLUSIONS: As per national data, both palatal and pharyngeal procedures for repair can be performed with comparable 30-d complications. The chosen technique may be based on patient presentation and on the surgeon comfort level.

Revisiting the Relationship Between Hospital Case Volume and Outcomes in Abdominally Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Increased operative volume has been associated with benefits in patient outcomes for a variety of surgical procedures. In autologous abdominally based breast reconstruction, however, there are few studies assessing the association between procedure volume and patient outcomes. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the associations between abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction and patient outcomes. METHODS: The 2013-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was queried for all female patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate abdominally based breast reconstruction (deep inferior epigastric perforator or transverse rectus abdominus muscle free flaps). Outcomes included occurrence of major or surgical site in-hospital complications, hospital cost, and length of stay (LOS). High-volume (HV) hospitals were defined as the 90th percentile of annual case volume or higher (>18 cases/y). Multivariate regressions and generalized linear modeling with gamma log-link function were performed to access the outcomes associated with HV hospitals. RESULTS: Overall, 7145 patients at 473 hospitals were studied; of these, 42.4% of patients were treated at HV hospitals. There were significant differences in unadjusted major complications (2.1% vs 4.3%; P < 0.001) and unadjusted surgical site complications (3.5% vs 6.1%; P < 0.001) between HV and non-HV hospitals. After adjustments for clinical and hospital characteristics, patients treated at HV hospitals were less likely to experience a major complication (odds ratio, 0.488; 95% confidence interval, 0.353-0.675; P < 0.001) or surgical site complication (odds ratio, 0.678; 95% confidence interval, 0.519-0.887; P = 0.005). There was no difference in inpatient cost between HV and non-HV hospitals ($26,822 vs $26,295; marginal cost, $528; P = 0.102); however, HV hospitals had a shorter LOS (4.31 vs 4.40 days; marginal LOS, -0.10 days; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that perform a larger volume of immediate abdominal-based breast reconstructions after mastectomy, when compared with those that perform a lower volume of these procedures, seem to have an associated lower rate of major complications and a shorter LOS. However, these same HV centers demonstrate no decrease in costs. Further research is needed to understand how these HV centers can reduce hospital costs.

Myotomy In Situ for Essential Blepharospasm Refractory to Botulinum Toxin.

BACKGROUND: Full myectomy is recommended for benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) refractory to botulinum toxin (BT) treatment, but long-term swelling, scar contracture, hollow appearance, and unnatural contour of the eyelids are common postoperative complications. We present myotomy in situ to minimize these adverse outcomes. METHODS: The redundant eyelid skin with its underlying muscle is resected first, and myotomy in situ is performed by completely cutting the residual orbicularis oculi muscles into multiple cubes and down to the subcutaneous layer, and then cutting the procerus and corrugator muscles down to the periosteum. Patient demographics, medical treatment history, BT injection history, blepharoptosis correction techniques, associated surgical procedures, and aesthetic outcomes were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative BT injection dosage and frequency, as well as modified disability scores, were compared using paired Student t tests. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent this technique. Their average ± SD age was 64.4 ± 8.9 years, with average postoperative follow-up occurring 17.0 ± 8.0 months. Associated diseases included blepharoptosis (88%) and apraxia of lid opening (44%). There were no postoperative hematoma, seroma, scar contracture, and depressed hollow eyelid contours. Preoperative to postoperative assessments revealed improvements in mean BT injection interval (10.4 ± 2.1 to 14.6 ± 2.9 weeks, P < 0.001), BT injection dosage (44.4 ± 13.3 to 28.1 ± 6.7 units, P < 0.001), and modified disability score (15.3 ± 3.0 to 2.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001). All patients were highly satisfied with functional and aesthetic surgical outcomes (4.5 ± 0.6 on Likert scale). CONCLUSIONS: Myotomy in situ is effective for patients with BEB who are refractory to BT treatment, with therapeutic benefits similar to that of full myectomy with the ability to maintain favorable cosmetic results. Relative high incidence of blepharoptosis and apraxia of lid opening in patients with refractory BEB was reported. Simultaneous correction of the ptosis can further optimize outcomes.

Comparative Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The abdomen is the most common donor site in autologous microvascular free flap breast reconstruction and contributes significantly to postoperative pain, resulting in increased opioid use, length of stay, and hospital costs. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated multiple clinical benefits, but these protocols are widely heterogeneous. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been reported to improve pain control and may be a key driver of the benefits seen with ERAS pathways. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting TAP blocks for abdominally based breast reconstruction were performed. Studies were extracted from 6 public databases before February 2019 and pooled in accordance with the PROSPERO registry. Total opioid use, postoperative pain, length of stay, hospital cost, and complications were analyzed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 420 studies, ultimately narrowed to 12 studies representing 1107 total patients. Total hospital length of stay (mean difference, -1.00 days; P < 0.00001; I = 81%) and opioid requirement (mean difference, -133.80 mg of oral morphine equivalent; P < 0.00001; I = 97%) were decreased for patients receiving TAP blocks. Transversus abdominis plane blocks were not associated with any significant differences in postoperative complications (P = 0.66), hospital cost (P = 0.22), and postoperative pain (P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing postoperative pain management after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction is invaluable for patient recovery. Transversus abdominis plane blocks are associated with a reduction in length of stay and opioid use, representing a safe and reasonable strategy for decreasing postoperative pain.

Severe Ocular Complications After Blepharoptosis Correction in the Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Patient: Literature Review and Case Presentation.

BACKGROUND: Blepharoptosis correction in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) patients may result in severe ocular complications owing to lagophthalmos and ophthalmoplegia. Managing the acute episode to prevent further aggravation of the keratopathy or blindness is of paramount importance. METHODS: A review of the literature for severe chemosis, keratopathy, and corneal ulceration in the patient population was performed using the PubMed database, with key words including ptosis surgery, ptosis correction, ptosis repair, and oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. A retrospective review of all patients with blepharoptosis from a single surgeon from September 2009 and May 2017 was performed, selecting those with OPMD who underwent blepharoptosis correction. RESULTS: Our literature review revealed a total of 15 articles after excluding repeated articles and selecting those meeting our inclusion criteria. A total of 232 OPMD patients underwent blepharoptosis correction. Severe ocular complications were noted in 7 patients, with treatment unspecified. For 9 years, 2 OPMD patients at our institute underwent blepharoptosis correction, with one developing severe acute keratitis, chemosis, and corneal ulceration due to lagophthalmos and ophthalmoplegia. Use of the temporary drawstring tarsorrhaphy and topical eye drop treatment for 2 weeks led to resolution of corneal ulcerations without necessitating further intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ocular complications may occur after blepharoptosis correction in OPMD patients, potentially owing to lagophthalmos and ophthalmoplegia. Temporary drawstring tarsorrhaphy is an effective option to treat these adverse outcomes.

A Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Utilization Between Plastic Surgeons and General Surgeons in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Because of lack of patient education on the importance of surgeon certification and barriers to access a plastic surgeon (PS), non-PSs are becoming more involved in providing implant-based breast reconstruction procedures. We aim to clarify differences in outcomes and resource utilization by surgical specialty for implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014. Patients undergoing immediate implant-based reconstruction or immediate/delayed tissue expander-based reconstruction were identified (Current Procedural Terminology codes 19340 and 19357, respectively). Outcomes studied were major and wound-based 30-day complications, operation time, unplanned readmission or reoperation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: We identified 9264 patients who underwent prosthesis or tissue expander-based breast reconstruction, 8362 (90.3%) by PSs and 902 (9.7%) by general surgeons (GSs). There were significant differences in major complications between specialty (1.2% PS vs 2.8% GS; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in unplanned reoperation (5.3% PS vs 4.9% GS; P = 0.592), unplanned readmissions (4.3% PS vs 3.8% GS; P = 0.555), wound dehiscence (0.7% PS vs 0.6% GS; P = 0.602), or wound-based infection rates (2.9% PS vs 2.8% GS; P = 0.866). As it pertains to resource utilization, the GS patients had a significantly longer length of stay (1.02 ± 4.41 days PS vs 1.62 ± 4.07 days GS; P < 0.001) and operative time (164.3 ± 97.6 minutes PS vs 185.4 ± 126.5 minutes; P = 0.001) than PS patients. CONCLUSIONS: This current assessment demonstrates that patients who undergo breast implant reconstruction by a GS have significantly more major complications. It is beneficial for the health care system for PSs to be the primary providers of breast reconstruction services. Measures should be taken to ensure that PSs are available and encouraged to provide this service.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Suppresses Keloid Formation Through Enhancing Apoptosis in a Nude Mouse Model.

BACKGROUND: Current understanding of steroid treatments for keloids is in regards to modulation of inflammation, proliferation, and apoptosis, with no in vivo study on the latter. Using a nude mouse model, we investigated whether triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections induce keloids regression through enhancing apoptosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six keloid specimens (1 × 1 cm) were harvested from 6 patients and separated into sets of 2 from the same patient: no treatment and intralesional TA injection (0.4 mg/mL/kg) at 8 weeks of postimplantation. One set was implanted in each of 18 randomly selected nude mice, which were separated into 3 groups based on time of keloid harvesting after treatment: group A, 2 weeks; group B, 8 weeks; and group C, 14 weeks. Each group had 1 set of specimen from each patient. Histological staining was performed with hematoxylin and eosin stain. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed for human-prolyl 4-hydroxylase (hPH4) and caspase 3 protein, along with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. RESULTS: All keloid specimens survived, with no noted overgrowth. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed dense extracellular matrix and viable fibroblasts, and hPH4 immunohistochemistry revealed strong expression, demonstrating keloid viability. Caspase 3 protein and TUNEL expressions were significantly increased in the treatment versus control groups, demonstrating that TA injections induced apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injections significantly increased apoptosis in keloids, represented by increased caspase 3 protein and TUNEL expressions, supporting that steroids suppress keloids in part owing to enhancement of apoptosis.

Referrals of Plastic Surgery Patients to Integrative Medicine Centers: A Review of Resource Utility.

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine (IM) centers are becoming more established nationwide and provide an expansive range of therapeutic services. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among plastic surgery patients, we sought to define referrals rates to IM centers by plastic surgeons to investigate (1) the role of IM in the continuous care process of plastic surgery patients and (2) whether IM centers are being effectively utilized. METHODS: Institutions with plastic surgery residency programs were identified using the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System in January 2017. Data on the presence of a named IM center, director/administrator contact information, and types of therapeutic services offered were extracted. The total number of IM services at these centers was summed and tabulated for preliminary analyses. A survey questionnaire was sent to the center to ascertain referral patterns in February 2017. RESULTS: Of 96 institutions with plastic and reconstructive surgery residency programs in North America, 49 (51%) provide IM services, and 24 (25%) have affiliated named IM centers of which we attained a survey response from 13 (54.5%). Of these centers, 10 (76.9%) evaluate more than 50 patients per week. Patient referrals to these centers were primarily from the department of medicine (73.8%) as opposed to surgery (13.1%) (P < 0.0001). An average of 0.77% of surgical referrals, or 0.077% of all referrals, arose from plastic and reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons appear to infrequently refer patients to IM centers. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among our patient population, IM centers are an underutilized adjunct in the care of our patients. Further study into specific IM services that may benefit our patients would be helpful in increasing IM utilization in our field.